Abstract
Introduction
High plasma triacylglyceride levels are known to be associated with increased risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Apolipoprotein C-III (apoC-III) is a key regulator of plasma triacylglyceride levels and is associated with hypertriglyceridemia via a number of pathways. There is consistent evidence for an association of cardiovascular events with blood apoC-III level, with support from human genetic studies of APOC3 variants. As such, apoC-III has been recognised as a potential therapeutic target for patients with severe hypertriglyceridaemia with one of the most promising apoC-III-targeting drugs, volanesorsen, having recently progressed through Phase III trials.
Objectives
To exploit a rare loss of function variant in APOC3 (rs138326449) to characterise the potential long-term treatment effects of apoC-III targeting interventions on the metabolome.
Methods
In a recall-by-genotype study, 115 plasma samples were analysed by UHPLC-MS to acquire non-targeted metabolomics data. The study included samples from 57 adolescents and 33 adults. Overall, 12 985 metabolic features were tested for an association with APOC3 genotype.
Results
144 uniquely annotated metabolites were found to be associated with rs138326449(APOC3). The highest proportion of associated metabolites belonged to the acyl-acyl glycerophospholipid and triacylglyceride metabolite classes. In addition to the anticipated (on-target) reduction of metabolites in the triacylglyceride and related classes, carriers of the rare variant exhibited previously unreported increases in levels of a number of metabolites from the acyl-alkyl glycerophospholipid and ceramide classes.
Conclusion
Overall, our results suggest that therapies targeting apoC-III may potentially achieve a broad shift in lipid profile that favours better metabolic health.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
1 Introduction
The relationship between plasma triacylglyceride (TAG) levels and cardiovascular disease (CVD) has been the focus of much research over the past four decades (Nordestgaard 2016). In that time, a series of population-based cohort studies including several meta-analyses have demonstrated that high plasma TAG levels are associated with increased risk of atherosclerotic CVD (Hokanson and Austin 1996; Sarwar et al. 2007). Alterations in dynamics of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (TRLs) (i.e. very low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) and chylomicrons), including over-production and/or delayed clearance of VLDL, can lead to high levels of TAGs (hypertriglyceridemia) (Chan et al. 2008). The role of apolipoprotein C-III (apoC-III) in regulating the metabolism of TRLs has been well characterised (Ramms and Gordts 2018). apoC-III is a glycoprotein secreted predominantly by the liver but also by the intestine and is a major component of TRLs but also, to a lesser extent, detectable in high-density lipoproteins (HDL) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) (Olkkonen et al. 2018). apoC-III is associated with hypertriglyceridemia via a number of pathways, including its action as an inhibitor of lipoprotein lipase (LPL) (the enzyme that metabolises TAGs from TRL to fatty acids and enables their clearance from the circulation) (Chan et al. 2008; Ioanna Gouni-Berthold 2017). There is consistent evidence for an association of cardiovascular events with blood apoC-III level in total plasma or in VLDL and LDL (van Capelleveen et al. 2018; Wyler von Ballmoos et al. 2015) with a suggestion that the pro-atherosclerotic properties of the protein extend beyond its role in increasing TAG levels (Ioanna Gouni-Berthold 2017), including evidence that supports a direct effect of apoC-III on vascular and inflammatory functions (Chan et al. 2008; Kanter et al. 2019; Toth 2016).
Studies in humans have reinforced the potential importance of apoC-III to lipoprotein regulation and CVD risk. The APOC3 gene sits in a gene cluster with APOA1, APOA4 and APOA5 on Chromosome 11. Initially, work was limited to the identification and characterisation of structural variants of APOC3 present in individuals or small families (reviewed in (van Dijk et al. 2004)). The functional consequences of this variation appears to include effects on lipoprotein metabolism (Liu et al. 2000; von Eckardstein et al. 1991) and insulin responsiveness (Waterworth et al. 2003). More recently, genome-wide association studies (GWAS) conducted on large numbers of individuals have found both common and rare variants in and around this set of genes to be associated with a range of lipid traits (Pollin et al. 2008; Tachmazidou et al. 2018), a population-based approach derived theoretically from MR, we can offer evidence to strengthen inference from existing observational studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Functional (or functional-linked) genetic variants within APOC3 can act as proxies for treatment, mimicking the effect of exposure to apoC-III-targeting drugs in a setting analogous to an RCT but, reflecting much longer term (lifetime) exposure. Previously, using a high throughput nuclear magnetic resonance metabolomics platform to quantify over 200 metabolic measures in more than 13,000 individuals, we identified associations between rs138326449(APOC3) and VLDL and HDL composition, other cholesterol measures, and fatty acids (Drenos et al. 2016). In the complementary study reported here, we use a recall-by-genotype study design to further probe the downstream consequences of carrying the rare allele at rs138326449(APOC3) and in doing so, model the apoC-III-targeting drug response. Using an untargeted ultra high performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS) approach to look at and beyond the lipidome to the wider metabolome (Dunn et al. 2011, 2015) we aim to both confirm the likely on-target (intended) treatment effects (i.e. lowering of circulating individual TAGs) but also explore the potential for previously unobserved (off-target) metabolic consequences (that may be linked to positive or negative health outcomes or side effects) of apoC-III targeting interventions.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Study population
The Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) is a population-based, prospective birth cohort (Boyd et al. 2013; Fraser et al. 2013). ALSPAC recruited 14,541 pregnant women who were resident in Avon, UK and had expected dates of delivery 1st April 1991 to 31st December 1992. Since then, the health and development of mothers and their children has been followed across the life-course. Further details of the cohort are available in Supplementary Methods (ESM_1) and the study website contains details of all the data that is available through a fully searchable data dictionary and variable search tool (https://www.bristol.ac.uk/alspac/researchers/our-data/). Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the ALSPAC Ethics and Law Committee and the Local Research Ethics Committees. Details of the ethics approvals relevant to the ALSPAC cohort in general can be found on the study website (https://www.bristol.ac.uk/alspac/researchers/research-ethics/) and approvals relevant to this study specifically can be found in Supplementary Methods (ESM_1). Participants have provided informed consent for use of their samples and data.
2.2 Experimental design
2.2.1 Sample collection
In this study, we used pre-existing plasma samples collected during routine follow-up clinics. During clinic appointments, blood was drawn into lithium heparin tubes which were centrifuged at 2260 g for 10 min at 4–5 °C. Heparin plasma was then aliquoted out and stored at − 80 °C. Plasma samples were frozen within 120 min of collection.
2.2.2 Sample selection
A recall-by-genotype study design was used to select a subset of stored samples for analysis. Previously, genoty** for the rs138326449 splice variant APOC3 mutation was performed for all ALSPAC participants (mothers and offspring – referred to herein as ‘young participants’) who had a suitable DNA sample using KASPAR at KBioscience (www.lgcgenomics.com) (Drenos et al. 2016). A list of carriers of the minor ‘A’ allele at rs138326449 was generated and cross-checked against a list of stored samples for these same participants. Where a sample was available for a carrier, samples from two age and sex-matched ‘controls’ (i.e. homozygotes for the major ‘G’ allele) attending the same clinic were identified for inclusion. Where additional samples (from other time points) were available for carriers, these were also selected to be analysed, giving repeated measurements for a subset of participants. In all clinics, participants who were assessed in the morning were instructed to fast overnight and those that attended after 2 pm were instructed to fast for at least six hours prior to their appointment. However, there were nine samples within the mother’s dataset which had to be considered non-fasting since the participant had reported consuming food and/or drink within six hours of blood sampling.
2.3 Ultra high performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS)
Plasma samples were extracted applying organic solvents and analysed applying two complementary UHPLC-MS assays applied to study water-soluble metabolites (HILIC assay) and lipid metabolites (C18 reversed phase assay). All samples were randomised in their sample preparation and analysis order. A single pooled QC sample was prepared from all biological samples and was applied to quantify and report data quality. Four different datasets were acquired: HILIC positive ion mode (HILIC-POS), HILIC negative ion mode (HILIC-NEG), lipids positive ion mode (LIPIDS-POS) and lipids negative ion mode (LIPIDS-NEG). Raw data processing was performed using XCMS (Smith et al. 2006). Full details of sample preparation, UHPLC-MS analysis and raw data processing can be found in Supplementary Methods (ESM_1).
An overview of quality control (QC) and data filtering procedures is shown in Fig. 1 and full details provided in Supplementary Methods (ESM_1). In brief, metabolite features with a relative standard deviation (RSD) > 30% and a percentage detection rate < 70% in pooled QC samples were deleted from the dataset.
To increase the quality of the data, filters were applied to the study samples (i.e. excluding pooled QC samples) and features within each of the four UHPLC-MS datasets. Samples with > 50% missing data and/or a total peak area (TPA) greater than three standard deviations above the mean TPA were excluded. After sample exclusion, within-class (carrier vs. control) feature missingness was calculated. Features were excluded from all subsequent analyses if they had > 30% missing data in both classes. Data was then normalised by probabilistic quotient normalisation (PQN) (Frank Dieterle et al. 2006) and rank normal transformed (Aulchenko et al. 2007) prior to statistical analysis.
2.4 Existing lipid measures
In addition to the UHPLC-MS derived metabolic measures, we had available a set of (pre-existing) basic lipid measures assessed by standard laboratory assays (high-density lipoprotein (HDL), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) and total triacylglycerides (TAG)) for a subset of the same individuals and time points. Further details of the measurement of these basic lipid measures can be found in Supplementary Methods (ESM_1). These basic lipid measures were analysed alongside the UHPLC-MS dataset for comparative purposes although the measures themselves are not directly comparable. No transformation was applied to the basic lipid measures prior to analysis.
2.5 Statistical analysis
All statistical analyses described were conducted in R v3.5 or later (R Core Team 2019).
2.5.1 Primary analysis
For the primary analysis, we only included samples that could be considered fasting (see above). We tested for an association between the metabolic features (UPLC-MS-derived and existing lipid measures) and rs138326449(APOC3) in three datasets: young participants only (n = 21 carriers/42 non-carriers with a mean age of 16 years), mothers only (n = 21 carriers/22 non-carriers, with a mean age of 49 years) and the combined dataset (young participants and mothers) (n = 42 carriers/64 non-carriers). Only samples and features that passed the above QC and filtering steps were analysed. We used either a simple linear model or a mixed linear regression model fitted by maximum likelihood (depending on the number of repeated measures) and including age and sex as fixed effects to test the association between each feature (the dependent variable) and rs138326449(APOC3) (for further details see Supplementary Methods (ESM_1)). Features with a Benjamini and Hochberg (BH)-adjusted false discovery rate (FDR) p-value (Benjamini and Hochberg 1995) of < 0.05 in at least one of the three primary analyses (combined, mothers only, young participants only) were considered to be associated with rs138326449(APOC3) genotype. For these associated features, the fold change was also calculated as the ratio between the two group means (carrier group mean/non-carrier group mean), using data before rank-transformation was applied. In order to evaluate the variance in metabolite levels explained by the fixed effects (age, sex and genotype), a simple linear model was fitted across all features (making no adjustment for repeated measures or relationships).
Missing values can occur in the data for a number of reasons both technical and biological. One of the main reasons for missing data is that the feature in question is not present in the sample or is only present at very low levels (i.e. its concentration is below the level of detection). In this situation, the linear modelling approach described above would be unable to detect associations between the predictor, rs138326449(APOC3) genotype, and presence or absence of the feature. Therefore, a Fisher’s exact test was performed to identify features for which there was a difference in the proportion of missingness between carriers and non-carriers. For this analysis we used the combined dataset (young participants and mothers) (n = 42 carriers/64 non-carriers). Features with a BH-adjusted p-value of p < 0.05 were considered to be differentially missing in carriers compared to non-carriers.
2.5.2 Sensitivity analyses
Two sensitivity analyses were performed (see Supplementary Methods (ESM_1) for more details). In the first, unlike in the primary analysis, non-fasting samples were retained in the analysis and in the second, an imputed version of the metabolite dataset was analysed.
2.6 Feature identification
We sought to structurally identify all features identified as being associated with rs138326449(APOC3) genotype in any one of either the primary or sensitivity analyses. These metabolites were identified applying accurate MS data (and MS/MS fragmentation data, where available) to a confidence level 2 as defined by the Metabolomics Standards Initiative (Sumner et al. 2007). For full details of the identification procedure, see Supplementary Methods (ESM_1). Where multiple features were annotated as the same metabolite (either within or across UHPLC-MS datasets), results for only one feature, that with the strongest association (smallest p-value) with rs138326449(APOC3) genotype, were retained. The search for duplicate metabolites was carried out within each of the three datasets (combined, mothers only, young participants only). Results are reported and figures plotted for this set of uniquely annotated features. All lipids are reported according to shorthand notation as has been reported previously (Liebisch et al. 2013).
3 Results
The dataset consisted of samples from 57 young participants (‘offspring’) (15 carriers/42 controls) and 33 mothers (11 carriers/ 22 controls), with repeat samples analysed for a subset of carriers (subject to sample availability). In total, 115 samples (51 from carriers and 64 from controls) were analysed by UHPLC-MS. Characteristics of the samples can be found in Table 1; results from a two-sample Wilcoxon rank sum test (Bauer 1972; Hollander and Wolfe 1999) suggested there was no difference in age or BMI between groups, but provided strong evidence for an effect of carrier status on HDL and TAG. There was little evidence for a difference between groups with respect to potential confounders or general indicators of health (Table S1). In total, 12,985 features derived from four UHPLC-MS runs were tested for association with genotype group (for more details see Table S2). Multiple features were detected for each metabolite because of the complexity of ion formation in the electrospray ionisation process and a metabolite can be detected in more than one assay. We estimate the number of metabolites detected to be in the range of 1000–2000 metabolites. After the exclusion of nine non-fasting samples from the mother’s sample set (all from rare variant carriers) for quality control in primary analyses, the number of samples ranged from 103 to 105 (see Fig. 1 for an overview of the data processing pipeline).
3.1 Over 300 features were identified as associated with rs138326449(APOC3)
A total of 311 (2.4%) features showed evidence of association with rs138326449(APOC3) in the primary analysis (counting unique features across the three analyses—young participants only, mothers only, and young participants and mothers combined) (Table S3). The highest number of associations was observed in the combined (mothers and young participants) analysis (287), followed by the young participants only analysis (195), with relatively few observed in the mothers only analysis (19). The majority (78.1%) of associations came from features identified in the lipids negative ion mode (LIPIDS-NEG) with relatively few associations coming from the other assays (2.6% from LIPIDS-POS, 19.0% from HILIC-POS, 0.3% from HILIC-NEG). Most features found to be associated in the mothers and/or the young participant’s datasets were also associated in the combined dataset (189 out of 213) (Fig. S1A).
The majority (236 of 287) of the associations seen in the primary analysis (of the combined dataset) replicated in both sensitivity analyses (Fig. S1B). Including non-fasting samples in the analysis resulted in fewer associations whilst using an imputed version of the data increased the number of associated features. Of the basic lipid measures, HDL and TAG were also associated with rs138326449(APOC3) in the primary analysis (in all three datasets). Using the simple linear model (including young participants and mothers) we estimated a per ‘A’ allele effect on HDL of 0.51 mmol/l (SE: 0.08, p = 6.85 × 10−09) and on total TAG of − 0.40 mmol/l (SE: 0.09, p = 2.02 × 10−05).
For the subset of all associated features (n = 311), the percentage variance in standardized individual metabolite levels explained by genotype group ranged from 0.4 to 36.7% (median: 16.2%) as compared to 36.6% in the case of HDL and 23.4% for TAG. This compares to a range of 0.0 to 36.0% (median: 2.1%) explained by age (in years) and 0.0 to 26.9% (median: 0.6%) explained by sex, across all tested features. Estimates of fold change in individual metabolite levels observed in carriers of the rare derived ‘A’ allele relative to controls for the subset of associated features ranged from 0.33 to 1.61 compared to 1.37 for HDL and 0.55 for TAG.
In addition, 53 features were found to have a different degree of missingness in carriers as compared with non-carriers (in the combined dataset). The majority came from the HILIC-POS class (71.7%) with the relatively fewer from the LIPIDS-NEG (22.6%), LIPIDS-POS (3.8%) and HILIC-NEG (1.9%) sets. The vast majority (51/53) had greater levels of missingness in the carrier group than in the non-carrier group, indicating that they occurred at detectable levels less often in the carrier group. Forty-eight of the 53 features identified were not in the list of 311 associated features from the primary (linear model-based) analyses. Therefore, a total of 359 features appear to be influenced by the presence of the rare derived ‘A’ allele at rs138326449.
3.2 Associations were seen predominantly in glycerophospholipids and triacylglycerides
Of the 311 features associated with rs138326449(APOC3) in the linear models, 213 could be identified, representing 144 unique metabolites across the three datasets (137 in the combined analysis, 92 in young participants only and 12 in mothers only) (Table S3 and Fig. S2A). Overall, the highest proportion of associated metabolites belong to the acyl-acyl glycerophospholipid (GPL) and TAG metabolite classes (Table 2 and for the full list Table S4). Box and whisker plots showing the distribution of the 213 identified metabolites in carriers versus controls based on normalised data (before rank transformation) in the combined dataset can be found in Fig. S3. 110 unique identified metabolites were found to be common across the primary analysis and the two sensitivity analyses (Fig. S2B). Of the 53 features found to be differentially missing between carriers and non-carriers, 20 were identified (Table S5).
3.3 A metabolic signature of rs138326449(APOC3) carrier status was evident
Visualisation of the 137 (identified) unique associated metabolites from the combined analysis in a heatmap with samples and metabolites clustered using Ward’s hierarchical clustering method (Murtagh and Legendre 2014; Ward 1963) as in Fig. 2, suggests broad separation of the samples into three groups—two non-carrier dominated subsets and one carrier dominated subset. Removing metabolites in the TAG class (i.e. those considered to be the primary target of apoC-III lowering therapies) in an exploratory analysis led to improved separation between carriers of the rare allele at rs138326449(APOC3) and non-carriers (Fig. S4). Within metabolite classes, the majority of associated metabolites within a class tend to move in the same direction (Fig. S5) with a small number of exceptions that in some cases may relate to molecule size, as proxied by mass to charge ratio (m/z) (for example, ceramides) (Fig. 3). Further, within the GPL classes, we observe high correlations between UHPLC-MS-derived measures and those from traditional measures of metabolic health (HDL, LDL, TG) (Fig.’s S6A and S6B).
4 Discussion
By exploiting the properties of genetic variation at the level of the population we have provided a comprehensive evaluation of the metabolic consequences of carrying the rare allele at rs138326449(APOC3) with a view to informing the therapeutic potential of apoC-III targeting drugs. This work demonstrates how a recall-by-genotype study design can be advantageous given the appropriate conditions—in this case, a relatively rare functional variant (minor allele frequency ~ 0.25% (UK)) in a gene of therapeutic relevance (i.e. a drug target) and a cohort with the necessary genetic data, stored samples and permissions in place to undertake such studies. This work complements existing literature reporting the outcomes of clinical trials of novel apoC-III targeting therapeutic agents, notably, volanesorsen.
A series of Phase I to III trials of this drug and a related drug, AKCEA-APOCIII-LRX, have shown decreases of both apoC-III production and TAG concentrations in preclinical models and healthy volunteers (Graham et al. 2013) and in patients with familial chylomicronemia syndrome (FCS) (Gaudet et al. 2014, 2017) and those with hypertriglyceridaemia (Alexander et al. 2019; Gaudet et al. 2015; Ionna Gouni-Berthold et al. 2018). Whilst conclusions from the Phase III trials were that the therapy was generally well-tolerated (indeed, volanesorsen was recently approved in Europe for treatment of FCS (Macchi et al. 2019)), there are two important limitations to these trials in terms of understanding the full effects of such an intervention. Firstly, these trials have not been able to evaluate either the efficacy or safety of targeting apoC-III in the longer term. Long term effects are of particular concern since this kind of drug has the potential to be used chronically following diagnosis with hypertriglyceridemia. Secondly, whilst results from genetic epidemiology suggest the reduction in CVD risk associated with the down-regulation of apoC-III is unlikely to be entirely due to lowering of TRLs, trials to date have measured a relatively small number of outcomes focusing on standard lipoprotein profiles and are therefore not well placed to interrogate alternative pathways. Results here go some way towards addressing this gap in knowledge. The use of samples from both adolescents and adults provide some confidence in terms of the generalisability of our findings and adds further value to this work as a comparator to results of RCTs which are generally restricted in terms of the target population and chronic effects of treatment.
We observed a clear metabolic signature associated with carrying the minor allele at rs138326449(APOC3). The list of associated metabolites was dominated by metabolites from the GPL (both acyl-acyl and acyl-alkyl) and TAG classes but also included other lipid classes (diacylglycerides, ceramides, sphingolipids). A detailed summary of our findings, including insight into their potential relevance to health and disease can be found in Table S6 in Supplementary Materials (ESM_1). Overall, our results point to a broad shift in lipid profile that appears to favour better metabolic health in those carrying the minor allele at rs138326449(APOC3). We observed not only the anticipated (on-target) reduction of many metabolites in the TAG and acyl-acyl GPL classes in carriers of the rare variant, but also previously unreported increases in levels of a number of other metabolites. Given the current data, it is not possible to evaluate the extent to which each change we see represents a direct effect of the functional change induced by the mutation (‘horizontal pleiotropy’) versus a downstream consequence of that effect (‘vertical pleiotropy’) although it is likely that both of these mechanisms contribute to the profile effects we observe.
The class with the highest proportion of metabolites showing increased concentrations was the acyl-alkyl GPL class. A number of metabolites in this class have previously been associated with positive health effects (see Table S6 for details). In addition, a small number of metabolites in the TAG class showed increased concentrations in rare variant carriers. These six TAGs were amongst the largest TAG molecules identified (as determined by molecular mass (m/z)) and had relatively high levels of fatty acid unsaturation (i.e. more fatty acid double bonds). This is interesting in the context of evidence that a distinct pattern exists within TAG subspecies such that the number of carbon atoms and double bonds appear to be relevant with respect to CVD risk (Ho et al. 2016; Rhee et al. 2011; Stegemann et al. 2014; Toledo et al. 2017). Overall, the increase in potentially favourable metabolites may go some way to explaining the previously observed discordance between the size of the cardioprotective effect of APOC3 and its impact on LDL-cholesterol levels alone (Cohen et al. 2014).
As well as the broad metabolic signature associated with carrying the minor allele at rs138326449(APOC3), there are inter-individual differences in metabolic profile. The hierarchical clustering algorithm appeared to differentiate two sub-groups within the non-carrier class, one containing individuals with much higher levels of TAGs and other potentially detrimental molecules than the carrier group and one in which only moderately higher levels were observed. The latter group was more similar to the carrier group overall and included 8 carrier samples (all mother's samples). Factors that could be contributing to the variation in metabolite levels that we see could include other genetic variants and lifestyle differences. Whilst the study was not sufficiently well-powered to enable meaningful comparisons to be made across the two age groups with respect to the associated metabolites, we see a weak correlation between p-value based ranks derived in the mother’s dataset as compared to the young participants (r = 0.24). When combined with the fact that fewer features were associated with carrier status in the mothers as compared to the young participants, one might hypothesise that the effect of the variant is attenuated or at least modified with age, via interaction with environmental variables.
The work presented here is subject to limitations. Due to the low minor allele frequency at rs138326449(APOC3), even including all available samples from carriers gave a relatively small total sample size. Therefore, confirmation of our results in other collections would be beneficial. Further limitations relate mainly to the interpretation of our findings rather than the study procedures themselves. We have discussed the possible implications of our findings in the context of apoC-III as a therapeutic target, but genetic models such as this are not a perfect proxy for pharmacologic therapy—any effects on non-apoC-III-related pathways cannot be assessed in this single-gene framework. Furthermore, due to the correlation (linkage disequilibrium) between genetic variants located close together in the genome, the effects we observe may not be entirely attributable to rs138326449(APOC3).
In conclusion, we made use of existing samples from an established biobank in a recall-by-genotype framework in order to maximise study power for a given number of samples analysed. The untargeted UHPLC-MS approach used returned results for a large number of metabolic features allowing a more comprehensive evaluation of the impact of rs138326449(APOC3) genotype on the global metabolic network of water-soluble and lipid metabolites than has previously been described. Studied in this way, genetic variation represents lifetime exposure to the effects of mutation, which in this case mirrors the action of apoC-III-targeting drugs. Our results suggest therapeutic targeting of apoC-III may result in a positive health effect both through the reduction of harmful lipids but also by increasing levels of beneficial metabolites.
Change history
23 January 2021
As a result of incorrect processing of two raw datasets presented (LIPIDS-POS and LIPIDS-NEG), some metabolite annotations reported in the original publication were incorrectly labeled. Correction of this error has resulted in the number of metabolite annotations changing from 183 to 213 and this has altered the number of metabolites reported in each lipid class. This presents a necessary technical update to the original paper, however the biological conclusions advanced in the original publication are largely unaltered. The biological interpretation of the ceramide lipid class was altered given the amended metabolite annotations. This error came to the attention of the authors after article publication.
References
Alexander, V. J., **a, S., Hurh, E., Hughes, S. G., O’Dea, L., Geary, R. S., et al. (2019). N-acetyl galactosamine-conjugated antisense drug to APOC3 mRNA, triglycerides and atherogenic lipoprotein levels. European Heart Journal, 40(33), 2785–2796. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehz209.
Aulchenko, Y. S., Ripke, S., Isaacs, A., & van Duijn, C. M. (2007). GenABEL: An R library for genome-wide association analysis. Bioinformatics, 23(10), 1294–1296. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm108.
Bauer, D. F. (1972). Constructing confidence sets using rank statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 67(339), 687–690. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1972.10481279.
Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 57(1), 289–300. https://doi.org/10.2307/2346101.
Boyd, A., Golding, J., Macleod, J., Lawlor, D. A., Fraser, A., Henderson, J., et al. (2013). Cohort Profile: The ‘Children of the 90s’—the index offspring of the avon longitudinal study of parents and children. International Journal of Epidemiology, 42(1), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dys064.
Chan, D. C., Chen, M. M., Ooi, E. M. M., & Watts, G. F. (2008). An ABC of apolipoprotein C-III: A clinically useful new cardiovascular risk factor? International Journal of Clinical Practice, 62(5), 799–809. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-1241.2007.01678.x.
Cohen, J. C., Stender, S., & Hobbs, H. H. (2014). APOC3, coronary disease, and complexities of mendelian randomization. Cell Metabolism, 20(3), 387–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmet.2014.08.007.
Corbin, L. J., Tan, V. Y., Hughes, D. A., Wade, K. H., Paul, D. S., Tansey, K. E., et al. (2018). Formalising recall by genotype as an efficient approach to detailed phenoty** and causal inference. Nature Communications, 9(1), 711. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03109-y.
Davey Smith, G., & Hemani, G. (2014). Mendelian randomization: Genetic anchors for causal inference in epidemiological studies. Human Molecular Genetics, 23(R1), R89–R98. https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddu328.
Dieterle, F., Ross, A., Schlotterbeck, G., & Senn, H. (2006). Probabilistic quotient normalization as robust method to account for dilution of complex biological mixtures. Application in 1H NMR metabonomics. Analytical Chemistry, 78(13), 4281–4290. https://doi.org/10.1021/AC051632C.
Drenos, F., Davey Smith, G., Ala-Korpela, M., Kettunen, J., Würtz, P., Soininen, P., et al. (2016). Metabolic characterization of a rare genetic variation within APOC3 and its lipoprotein lipase–independent effects clinical perspective. Circulation: Cardiovascular Genetics, 9(3), 231–239. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCGENETICS.115.001302.
Dunn, W. B., Broadhurst, D. I., Atherton, H. J., Goodacre, R., & Griffin, J. L. (2011). Systems level studies of mammalian metabolomes: The roles of mass spectrometry and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Chemical Society Reviews, 40(1), 387–426. https://doi.org/10.1039/b906712b.
Dunn, W. B., Lin, W., Broadhurst, D., Begley, P., Brown, M., Zelena, E., et al. (2015). Molecular phenoty** of a UK population: Defining the human serum metabolome. Metabolomics, 11(1), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-014-0707-1.
Fraser, A., Macdonald-Wallis, C., Tilling, K., Boyd, A., Golding, J., Davey Smith, G., et al. (2013). Cohort profile: The Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children: ALSPAC mothers cohort. International Journal of Epidemiology, 42(1), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dys066.
Gaudet, D., Alexander, V. J., Baker, B. F., Brisson, D., Tremblay, K., Singleton, W., et al. (2015). Antisense inhibition of apolipoprotein C-III in patients with hypertriglyceridemia. New England Journal of Medicine, 373(5), 438–447. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1400283.
Gaudet, D., Brisson, D., Tremblay, K., Alexander, V. J., Singleton, W., Hughes, S. G., et al. (2014). Targeting APOC3 in the familial chylomicronemia syndrome. New England Journal of Medicine, 371(23), 2200–2206. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1400284.
Gaudet, D., Digenio, A., Alexander, V., Arca, M., Jones, A., Stroes, E., et al. (2017). The approach study: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study of volanesorsen administered subcutaneously to patients with familial chylomicronemia syndrome (FCS). Atherosclerosis, 263, e10. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ATHEROSCLEROSIS.2017.06.059.
Gouni-Berthold, I. (2017). The role of antisense oligonucleotide therapy against apolipoprotein-CIII in hypertriglyceridemia. Atherosclerosis Supplements, 30, 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ATHEROSCLEROSISSUP.2017.05.003.
Gouni-Berthold, I., Alexander, V. J., Digenio, A., DuFour, R., Steinhagen-Thiessen, E., Martin, S., et al. (2018). Apolipoprotein C-III inhibition with volanesorsen in patients with hypertriglyceridemia (COMPASS): A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Atherosclerosis Supplements, 32, 25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosissup.2018.04.074.
Graham, M. J., Lee, R. G., Bell, T. A., Fu, W., Mullick, A. E., Alexander, V. J., et al. (2013). Antisense oligonucleotide inhibition of apolipoprotein C-III reduces plasma triglycerides in rodents, nonhuman primates, and humans. Circulation Research, 112(11), 1479–1490. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.111.300367.
Ho, J. E., Larson, M. G., Ghorbani, A., Cheng, S., Chen, M.-H., Keyes, M., et al. (2016). Metabolomic profiles of body mass index in the framingham heart study reveal distinct cardiometabolic phenotypes. PLoS ONE, 11(2), e0148361. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0148361.
Hokanson, J. E., & Austin, M. A. (1996). Plasma triglyceride level is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease independent of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level: A meta-analysis of population-based prospective studies. Journal of Cardiovascular Risk, 3(2), 213–219.
Hollander, M., & Wolfe, D. A. (1999). Nonparametric statistical methods. Chichester: Wiley.
Jørgensen, A. B., Frikke-Schmidt, R., Nordestgaard, B. G., & Tybjærg-Hansen, A. (2014). Loss-of-function mutations in APOC3 and risk of ischemic vascular disease. New England Journal of Medicine, 371(1), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1308027.
Kanter, J. E., Shao, B., Kramer, F., Barnhart, S., Shimizu-Albergine, M., Vaisar, T., et al. (2019). Increased apolipoprotein C3 drives cardiovascular risk in type 1 diabetes. The Journal of Clinical Investigation, 130(10), 4165–4170. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI127308.
Khetarpal, S. A., Zeng, X., Millar, J. S., Vitali, C., Somasundara, A. V. H., Zanoni, P., et al. (2017). A human APOC3 missense variant and monoclonal antibody accelerate apoC-III clearance and lower triglyceride-rich lipoprotein levels. Nature Medicine, 23(9), 1086–1094. https://doi.org/10.1038/nm.4390.
Liebisch, G., Vizcaíno, J. A., Köfeler, H., Trötzmüller, M., Griffiths, W. J., Schmitz, G., et al. (2013). Shorthand notation for lipid structures derived from mass spectrometry. Journal of Lipid Research, 54(6), 1523–1530. https://doi.org/10.1194/jlr.M033506.
Liu, H., Labeur, C., Xu, C. F., Ferrell, R., Lins, L., Brasseur, R., et al. (2000). Characterization of the lipid-binding properties and lipoprotein lipase inhibition of a novel apolipoprotein C-III variant Ala23Thr. Journal of Lipid Research, 41(11), 1760–1771.
Macchi, C., Sirtori, C. R., Corsini, A., Santos, R. D., Watts, G. F., & Ruscica, M. (2019). A new dawn for managing dyslipidemias: The era of RNA-based therapies. Pharmacological Research, 150, 104413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2019.104413.
Murtagh, F., & Legendre, P. (2014). Ward’s hierarchical agglomerative clustering method: Which algorithms implement ward’s criterion? Journal of Classification, 31, 274–295. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00357-014-9161-z.
Nordestgaard, B. G. (2016). Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: New insights from epidemiology, genetics, and biology. Circulation Research, 118(4), 547–563. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.115.306249.
Olkkonen, V. M., Sinisalo, J., & Jauhiainen, M. (2018). New medications targeting triglyceride-rich lipoproteins: Can inhibition of ANGPTL3 or apoC-III reduce the residual cardiovascular risk? Atherosclerosis, 272, 27–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ATHEROSCLEROSIS.2018.03.019.
Pollin, T. I., Damcott, C. M., Shen, H., Ott, S. H., Shelton, J., Horenstein, R. B., et al. (2008). A null mutation in human APOC3 confers a favorable plasma lipid profile and apparent cardioprotection. Science, 322(5908), 1702–1705. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1161524.
R Core Team. (2019). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria. Retrieved from https://www.r-project.org.
Ramms, B., & Gordts, P. L. S. M. (2018). Apolipoprotein C-III in triglyceride-rich lipoprotein metabolism. Current Opinion in Lipidology, 29(3), 171–179. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOL.0000000000000502.
Rhee, E. P., Cheng, S., Larson, M. G., Walford, G. A., Lewis, G. D., McCabe, E., et al. (2011). Lipid profiling identifies a triacylglycerol signature of insulin resistance and improves diabetes prediction in humans. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 121(4), 1402–1411. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI44442.
Sarwar, N., Danesh, J., Eiriksdottir, G., Sigurdsson, G., Wareham, N., Bingham, S., et al. (2007). Triglycerides and the risk of coronary heart disease: 10 158 incident cases among 262 525 participants in 29 western prospective studies. Circulation, 115(4), 450–458. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.637793.
Smith, C. A., Want, E. J., O’Maille, G., Abagyan, R., & Siuzdak, G. (2006). XCMS: Processing mass spectrometry data for metabolite profiling using nonlinear peak alignment, matching, and identification. Analytical Chemistry, 78(3), 779–787. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac051437y.
Stegemann, C., Pechlaner, R., Willeit, P., Langley, S. R., Mangino, M., Mayr, U., et al. (2014). Lipidomics profiling and risk of cardiovascular disease in the prospective population-based Bruneck study. Circulation, 129(18), 1821–1831. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.002500.
Sumner, L. W., Amberg, A., Barrett, D., Beale, M. H., Beger, R., Daykin, C. A., et al. (2007). Proposed minimum reporting standards for chemical analysis. Metabolomics, 3(3), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-007-0082-2.
Tachmazidou, I., Dedoussis, G., Southam, L., Farmaki, A.-E., Ritchie, G. R. S., **fara, D. K., et al. (2013). A rare functional cardioprotective APOC3 variant has risen in frequency in distinct population isolates. Nature Communications, 4(1), 2872. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3872.
TG, and HDL Working Group of the Exome Sequencing Project, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, Crosby, J., Peloso, G. M., Auer, P. L., Crosslin, D. R., Stitziel, N. O., et al. (2014). Loss-of-function mutations in APOC3, triglycerides, and coronary disease. New England Journal of Medicine, 371(1), 22–31. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1307095.
Timpson, N. J., Walter, K., Min, J. L., Tachmazidou, I., Malerba, G., Shin, S.-Y., et al. (2014). A rare variant in APOC3 is associated with plasma triglyceride and VLDL levels in Europeans. Nature Communications, 5, 4871. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5871.
Toledo, E., Wang, D. D., Ruiz-Canela, M., Clish, C. B., Razquin, C., Zheng, Y., et al. (2017). Plasma lipidomic profiles and cardiovascular events in a randomized intervention trial with the Mediterranean diet. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 106(4), 973–983. https://doi.org/10.3945/ajcn.116.151159.
Toth, P. P. (2016). Triglyceride-rich lipoproteins as a causal factor for cardiovascular disease. Vascular Health and Risk Management, 12, 171–183. https://doi.org/10.2147/VHRM.S104369.
van Capelleveen, J. C., Lee, S.-R., Verbeek, R., Kastelein, J. J. P., Wareham, N. J., Stroes, E. S. G., et al. (2018). Relationship of lipoprotein-associated apolipoprotein C-III with lipid variables and coronary artery disease risk: The EPIC-Norfolk prospective population study. Journal of Clinical Lipidology, 12(6), 1493–1501.e11. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JACL.2018.08.010.
van Dijk, K. W., Rensen, P. C. N., Voshol, P. J., & Havekes, L. M. (2004). The role and mode of action of apolipoproteins CIII and AV: Synergistic actors in triglyceride metabolism? Current Opinion in Lipidology, 15(3), 239–246.
von Eckardstein, A., Holz, H., Sandkamp, M., Weng, W., Funke, H., & Assmann, G. (1991). Apolipoprotein C-III(Lys58 - Glu). Identification of an apolipoprotein C-III variant in a family with hyperalphalipoproteinemia. The Journal of Clinical Investigation, 87(5), 1724–1731. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI115190.
Ward, J. H. (1963). Hierarchical grou** to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58(301), 236–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1963.10500845.
Waterworth, D. M., Talmud, P. J., Luan, J., Flavell, D. M., Byrne, C. D., Humphries, S. E., et al. (2003). Variants in the APOC3 promoter insulin responsive element modulate insulin secretion and lipids in middle-aged men. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1637(3), 200–206.
Willer, C. J., Schmidt, E. M., Sengupta, S., Peloso, G. M., Gustafsson, S., Kanoni, S., et al. (2013). Discovery and refinement of loci associated with lipid levels. Nature Genetics, 45(11), 1274–1283. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.2797.
Wyler von Ballmoos, M. C., Haring, B., & Sacks, F. M. (2015). The risk of cardiovascular events with increased apolipoprotein CIII: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Clinical Lipidology, 9(4), 498–510. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JACL.2015.05.002.
Acknowledgements
Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC): We are extremely grateful to all the families who took part in this study, the midwives for their help in recruiting them and the whole ALSPAC team, which includes interviewers, computer and laboratory technicians, clerical workers, research scientists, volunteers, managers, receptionists and nurses. The UK Medical Research Council and the Wellcome Trust [102215/2/13/2] and the University of Bristol provide core support for ALSPAC. A comprehensive list of grants funding is available on the ALSPAC website (https://www.bristol.ac.uk/alspac/external/documents/grant-acknowledgements.pdf). This publication is the work of the authors and NJT will serve as guarantor for the contents of this paper.
Funding
This work was supported by the Medical Research Council (MRC) Integrative Epidemiology Unit (IEU) [MC_UU_12013/3]. N.J.T. is a Wellcome Trust Investigator [202802/Z/16/Z to N.J.T.] and works within the University of Bristol National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre (BRC). L.J.C. and D.A.H. are supported by N.J.T.’s Wellcome Trust Investigator Grant [202802/Z/16/Z]. N.J.T., L.JC., A.G. and D.A.H. work in the MRC IEU at the University of Bristol which is supported by the MRC [MC_UU_00011] and the University of Bristol. N.J.T. is supported by the Cancer Research UK (CRUK) Integrative Cancer Epidemiology Programme [C18281/A19169]. This work was supported by Phenome Centre Birmingham [MR/M009157/1].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization: NJT, Methodology: WBD, AJC, ADS, AR, AJ, RJMW. Validation, Formal Analysis: LJC, DAH. Investigation: AG, AET, Resources: AG, WBD. Data curation: WBD, LJC. Writing - Original Draft, LJC, WBD. Writing – Review & Editing, NJT, WBD., DAH, AJC, ADS, AR, AJ, RJMW. Visualization: LJC. Supervision: NJT, WBD, RJMW. Funding Acquisition: NJT.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Corbin, L.J., Hughes, D.A., Chetwynd, A.J. et al. Metabolic characterisation of disturbances in the APOC3/triglyceride-rich lipoprotein pathway through sample-based recall by genotype. Metabolomics 16, 69 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-020-01689-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-020-01689-9