Log in

A Fuzzy-Set Approach for Addressing Uncertainties in Risk Assessment of Hydrocarbon-Contaminated Site

  • Published:
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study presented an integrated approach for evaluating environmental risks associated with hydrocarbon-contaminated sites through incorporation of a multiphase multi-component modeling system within a general risk assessment framework. The uncertainties associated with risk evaluation criteria were emphasized and effectively addressed through the development of a fuzzy-set approach. This development was based on (a) simulation of the fate of the contaminant in the subsurface to calculate contaminant concentrations in groundwater; (b) examination of the excess lifetime cancer risk (ELCR) distributions; (c) quantification of uncertainties in ELCR evaluation criteria using fuzzy membership functions; (d) categorization of the related risk levels into low, low-to-medium, medium, medium-to-high, and high, and (e) assessment of risk levels based on ELCR distribution and fuzzy evaluation criteria. The developed fuzzy risk assessment approach (FRA) was applied to a hydrocarbon-contaminated site in western Canada. Three remediation scenarios with different efficiencies (0, 60, and 90%) and planning periods (10, 20, 40, and 60 years later) were considered, and the spatial and temporal variations of risk values were examined. The temporal variation of membership values for different risk levels at locations of interest was also identified. The FRA is useful for the decision maker to gain insight into the environmental risks by considering uncertainties and to make more realistic remediation decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Batchelor, B., Valdés, J. and Araganth, V.: 1998, ‘Stochastic risk assessment of sites contaminated by hazardous wastes’, J. Environ. Eng. 124, 380–388.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, D. H., James, A. L., McKone, T. E. and Oldenburg, C. M.: 1998, ‘On uncertainty in remediation analysis: Variance propagation from subsurface transport to exposure modeling’, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safe. 62, 117–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S. J., Hwang, C. L., Beckmann, M. J. and Krelle, W.: 1992, Fuzzy Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications, Springer-Verlag, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z., Huang, G. H. and Chakma, A.: 2000, ‘Risk assessment of a petroleum-contaminated site through a multi-phase and multi-component modeling approach’, J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 26, 273–282.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Z., Huang, G. H. and Chakma, A.: 2003, ‘Hybrid fuzzy-stochastic modeling approach for assessing environmental risks at contaminated groundwater systems’, J. Environ. Eng. 129, 79–88.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, S.: 2000, ‘Development of a Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision Support System for Municiapl Solid Waste Management’, M.ASc. thesis, University of Regina, Regina, Canada.

  • Cho, H. N., Choi, H. H. and Kim, Y. B.: 2002, ‘A risk assessment methodology for incorporating uncertainties using fuzzy concepts’, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Safety. 78, 173–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duke, L. D. and Taggart, M.: 2000, ‘Uncertainty factors in screening ecological risk assessments’, Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 19, 1668–1680.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, B. B. and Slovic, P.: 1998, ‘Lay views on uncertainty in environmental health risk assessment’, J. Risk Res. 1, 261–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labieniec, P. A., Dzombak, D. A. and Siegrist, R. L.: 1997, ‘Evaluation of uncertainty in a site-specific risk assessment’, J. Environ. Eng. 123, 234–243.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, Y. J. and Hwang, C. L.: 1992, Fuzzy Mathematical Programming Methods and Applications, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, L. J. H., Chan, C. C., Chung, C. W., Ma, Y. C., Wang, G. S. and Wang, J. D.: 2002, ‘Health risk assessment on residents exposed to chlorinated hydrocarbons contaminated in groundwater of a hazardous waste site’, J. Toxicol. Environ. Health., Part A 65, 219–235.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y. W., Dahab, M. F. and Bogardi, I.: 1995, ‘Nitrate-risk assessment using fuzzy-set approach’, J. Environ. Eng. 121, 245–256.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li, J. B.: 2003, ‘Development of an Inexact Environmental Modeling System for the Management of Petroleum-Contaminated Sites’, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Regina, Regina, SK, Canada.

  • Li, J. B., Huang, G. H., Chakma, A., Zeng, G. M. and Liu, L.: 2003, ‘Integrated fuzzy-stochastic modeling of petroleum contamination in subsurface’, Energy Sources 25, 547–563.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mohamed, A. M. O. and Cote, K.: 1999, ‘Decision analysis of polluted sites – a fuzzy set approach’, Waste Manage. 19, 519–533.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • NRTEE (National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy): 1997, ‘Contaminated Site Issues in Canada: Backgrounder’, Ottawa, Canada.

  • USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency): 1989, ‘Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund, Volume I: Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part A)’, USEPA 540/1-89/002, Washington, D.C.

  • USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency): 1992, ‘Guidelines for Exposure Assessment’, USEPA 600Z-92/001, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • USEPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency): 2004, ‘Integrated Risk Information System: Benzene (CASRN 71-43-2)’, http://www.epa.gov/iris/subst/0276.htm, accessed on July 12, 2004.

  • UTA (University of Texas at Austin): 2000, ‘Technical Documentation for UTCHEM-9.0: A Three-Dimensional Chemical Flood Simulator’, Center for Petroleum and Geosystems Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, TX.

  • Wang, T. A. and McTernan, W. F.: 2002, ‘The development and application of a multilevel decision analysis model for the remediation of contaminated groundwater under uncertainty’, J. Environ. Manage. 64, 221–235.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. A.: 1965, ‘Fuzzy sets’, Inf. Control. 8, 338–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianbing Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, J., Liu, L., Huang, G. et al. A Fuzzy-Set Approach for Addressing Uncertainties in Risk Assessment of Hydrocarbon-Contaminated Site. Water Air Soil Pollut 171, 5–18 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-005-9005-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-005-9005-x

Keywords

Navigation