Log in

Quantitative measurements of prostate capsule and gland density and their correlation to prostate size: possible clinical implications in prostate cancer

  • Urology - Original Paper
  • Published:
International Urology and Nephrology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To study histo-anatomical imaging features and possible association between prostate volume, capsule thickness and glandular density within the peripheral zone (PZ) of prostates of different sizes.

Methods

Patients were selected who had undergone radical prostatectomy. Specimen selection was based on two factors: first, easy reconstruction of prostate anatomy by the histological slides; and second, based on prostate size. Specimens were chosen with small (< 35 cc) and also with large size (> 80 cc). A total of 20 patients were selected. None of these patients had undergone previous treatment. Computer-based imaging for quantitative measurements of capsule thickness and glandular density within the PZ were performed. Multiple regression analysis was performed to determine the relationship between these measured parameters and the clinical characteristics of these patients.

Results

Multiple regression analysis revealed a strong, positive association between prostate size and average capsule thickness; on the contrary, we found a negative correlation between prostate volume and average glandular density. Fibrotic thickness of the capsule was associated with gland atrophy and decreased gland density within the PZ.

Conclusions

The results suggest that BPH may be associated with the development of fibrosis and gland atrophy within the peripheral zone. As 80% of prostate cancer originates from the glandular epithelium within the peripheral zone, this observed phenomenon may explain the inverse relationship between BPH and incidence of prostate cancer well documented in the literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alcaraz A, Hammerer P, Tubaro A, Schröder FH, Castro R (2009) Is there evidence of a relationship between benign prostatic hyperplasia and prostate cancer? Findings of a literature review. Eur Urol 55(4):864–875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2008.11.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Annual Cancer Facts and Figures (2020). https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/annual-cancer-facts-and-figures/2020/cancer-facts-and-figures-2020.pdf. Accessed 24 Jan 2020.

  3. de Arachk G, Morgan R, Benoit P et al (2015) Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion targeted biopsies to diagnose clinically significant prostate cancer in enlarged compared to smaller prostates. J Urol 194(3):669–673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.03.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fine SW, Reuter VE (2012) Anatomy of the prostate revisited: implications for prostate biopsy and zonal origins of prostate cancer. Histopathology 60(1):142–152

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Strasser H, Janetschek G, Reissigl A, Bartsch G (1996) Prostate zones in three-dimensional transrectal ultrasound. Urology 47(4):485–490

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Collins T (2007) ImageJ for microscopy. Biotechniques 43(S1):S25–S30. https://doi.org/10.2144/000112517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ruifrok AC, Johnston DA (2001) Quantification of histochemical staining by color deconvolution. Anal Quant Cytol Histol 23(4):291–299

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chen ME, Troncoso P, Johnston D, Tang K, Babaian RJ (1999) Prostate cancer detection: relationship to prostate size. Urology 53(4):764–768. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-4295(98)00574-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Filson CP, Natarajan S, Margolis DJA et al (2016) Prostate cancer detection with magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion biopsy: the role of systematic and targeted biopsies. Cancer 122(6):884–892

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Lepor H (2004) Pathophysiology, epidemiology, and natural history of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Rev Urol 6(Suppl 9):S3

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Al-Khalil S, Ibilibor C, Cammack JT, de Riese W (2016) Association of prostate volume with incidence and aggressiveness of prostate cancer. Res Rep Urol 8:201

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Oh JJ, Jeong SJ, Jeong CW et al (2013) Is there any association between the severity of lower urinary tract symptoms and the risk of biopsy-detectable prostate cancer in patients with PSA level below 20 ng/ml in multi-core prostate biopsy? Prostate 73(1):42–47

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ayala AG, Ro JY, Babaian R, Troncoso P, Grignon DJ (1989) The prostatic capsule: does it exist? Its importance in the staging and treatment of prostatic carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 13(1):21–27

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Semple JE (1963) Surgical capsule of the benign enlargement of the prostate. Br Med J 1(5346):1640

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. McNeal JE, Stenberg SS (1997) Histology for pathologists. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rosenkrantz AB, Taneja SS (2014) Radiologist, be aware: ten pitfalls that confound the interpretation of multiparametric prostate MRI. Am J Roentgenol 202(1):109–120

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bostwick DG (1989) The pathology of early prostate cancer. CA Cancer J Clin 39(6):376–393. https://doi.org/10.3322/canjclin.39.6.376

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lorenzo G, Hughes TJR, Dominguez-Frojan P, Reali A, Gomez H (2019) Computer simulations suggest that prostate enlargement due to benign prostatic hyperplasia mechanically impedes prostate cancer growth. Proc Natl Acad Sci 116(4):1152–1161

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Al Kadhi O, Traka MH, Melchini A et al (2017) Increased transcriptional and metabolic capacity for lipid metabolism in the peripheral zone of the prostate may underpin its increased susceptibility to cancer. Oncotarget 8(49):84902–84916. https://doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.17926

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Vital P, Castro P, Ittmann M (2016) Oxidative stress promotes benign prostatic hyperplasia. Prostate 76(1):58–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.23100

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ali MI, Kondreddi HDP, Veeresh B (2013) Protective effect of 2-hydroxy-4-methoxy benzoic acid on testosterone induced benign prostatic hyperplasia in Wister rats. Eur J Pharmacol 698(1–3):397–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejphar.2012.10.028

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Marks LS, Mazer NA, Mostaghel E et al (2006) Effect of testosterone replacement therapy on prostate tissue in men with late-onset hypogonadism: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 296(19):2351–2361. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.296.19.2351

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Iczkowski KA, Qiu J, Qian J et al (2005) The dual 5-alpha-reductase inhibitor dutasteride induces atrophic changes and decreases relative cancer volume in human prostate. Urology 65(1):76–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2004.08.042

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Thompson IM, Goodman PJ, Tangen CM et al (2013) Long-term survival of participants in the prostate cancer prevention trial. N Engl J Med 369(7):603–610. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1215932

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. FDA Drug Safety Communication: 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs) may increase the risk of a more serious form of prostate cancer | FDA. https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-safety-and-availability/fda-drug-safety-communication-5-alpha-reductase-inhibitors-5-aris-may-increase-risk-more-serious. Accessed 24 Jan 2020.

  26. Sarkar RR, Parsons JK, Bryant AK et al (2019) Association of treatment with 5alpha-reductase inhibitors with time to diagnosis and mortality in prostate cancer. JAMA Intern Med 179(6):812–819. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.0280

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Roobol MJ, Schroder FH, Hugosson J et al (2012) Importance of prostate volume in the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) risk calculators: results from the prostate biopsy collaborative group. World J Urol 30(2):149–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-011-0804-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ankerst DP, Till C, Boeck A, Goodman PJ, Tangen CM, Thompson IM (2013) Predicting risk of prostate cancer in men receiving finasteride: effect of prostate volume, number of biopsy cores, and American Urological Association symptom score. Urology 82(5):1076–1081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2013.07.041

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Robinson S, Laniado M, Montgomery B (2017) Prostate specific antigen and acinar density: a new dimension, the “Prostatocrit”. Int Braz J Urol 43(2):230–238. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2016.0145

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Zheng S, Jiang S, Chen Z et al (2019) The roles of MRI-based prostate volume and associated zone-adjusted prostate-specific antigen concentrations in predicting prostate cancer and high-risk prostate cancer. PLoS ONE 14(11):e0218645. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0218645

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

WTR, PS, and PEW contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by PW. The first draft of the manuscript was written by PW and reviewed by WT R. Statistical analysis was performed by RK and reviewed by HAM. PS commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Werner T. de Riese.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Weaver, P.E., Smith, L.A., Sharma, P. et al. Quantitative measurements of prostate capsule and gland density and their correlation to prostate size: possible clinical implications in prostate cancer. Int Urol Nephrol 52, 1829–1837 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-020-02527-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-020-02527-6

Keywords

Navigation