Abstract
The present study was designed to verify the effectiveness of the image analysis method for body measurement in dromedary camel compared to manual measurements as a reference method. To achieve this aim, twenty-one linear body measurements were estimated on 59 adult Sahraoui dromedary camels (22 males and 37 females) with a normal clinical condition by using a measuring stick or vernier caliper (standard method). On the other hand, image analysis on profile, front, or behind photographs was processed using Axiovision Software. Overall mean comparison, relative error, variance, Pearson’s correlation coefficient, and coefficient of variance showed that the image analysis method was accurate in relation to the manual measurement. Furthermore, image analysis results indicated relevant accuracy (bias correction factor, Cb ≈1) and precision (Pearson ρ ≈1) which were significantly correlated with the results of the reference method (Lin’s concordance correlation coefficients rccc ≈ 1). According to Bland–Altman upper and lower limits of agreement, the concordance was estimated between 93.22 and 98.3%. Passing-Bablok regression showed a good relationship between the results of the two methods displaying no significant systematic and proportional bias. The image analysis method for linear body measurements in dromedary camel showed results that are in agreement with the manual measuring method. Therefore, the image analysis could be considered a valid tool for camel conformation trait studies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Affuso, O., Pradhan, L., Zhang, C., Gao, S., Wiener, H.W., Gower, B., Heymsfield, S.B and Allison, D.B., 2018. A method for measuring human body composition using digital images. PLoS One, ;13(11), e0206430.
Al-Atiyat, R.M., Suliman, G., AlSuhaibani, E., El-Waziry, A., Al-Owaimer, A. and Basmaeil, S., 2016. The differentiation of camel breeds based on meat measurements using discriminant analysis. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 48(5), 871–878.
Alawneh, J.I., Stevenson, M.A., Williamson, N.B., Lopez-Villalobos, N., Otley, T., 2011. Automatic recording of daily walkover liveweight of dairy cattle at pasture in the first 100 days in milk, Journal of Dairy Science, 94(9), 4431-4440.
Alhajeri, B.A., Alhaddad, H., Alaqeely, R., Alaskar, H., Dashti, Z. and Maraqa, T., 2021. Camel breed morphometrics: current methods and possibilities, Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03721426.2021.1889347
Ayadi, M., Aljumaah, R.S., Samara, E.M., Faye, B. and Caja, G., 2016. A proposal of linear assessment scheme for the udder of dairy camels (Camelus dromedarius). Tropical Animal Health and Production, 48(5), 927–933.
Barnhart, H.X., Lokhnygina, Y., Kosinski, A.S. and Haber, M 2007. Comparison of concordance correlation coefficient and coefficient of individual agreement in assessing agreement. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics, 17(4), 721-38.
Bell, M.J., Mareike, M., Marion, S. and Robert, P., 2018. Comparison of Methods for Monitoring the Body Condition of Dairy Cows. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 2, 80.
Bewley, J.M., Peacock, A.M., Lewis, O., Boyce, R.E., Roberts, D.J., Coffey, M.P., Kenyon, S.J. and Schutz, M.M., 2008. Potential for estimation of body condition scores in dairy cattle from digital images. Journal of Dairy Science, 91 (9), 3439–3453.
Bilić-Zulle, L., 2011. Comparison of methods: Passing and Bablok regression. Biochemia Medica. 21, 49-52.
Bland, J.M. and Altman, D.G., 1986. Statistical method for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet, i:307–310.
Bland, J.M. and Altman, D.G., 1999. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 8(2), 135–160.
Çağlı, A. and Yılmaz, M., 2021. Determination of some body measurements of camels with three-dimensional modeling method (3D). Tropical Animal Health and Production, 53, 554.
Fischer, A., Luginbuhl, T., Delattre, L., Delouard, J. M. and Faverdin, P., 2015. Rear shape in 3 dimensions summarized by principal component analysis is a good predictor of body condition score in Holstein dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 98 (7), 4465 - 4476.
Freitag, G.P., de Lima, L.G.F., Jacomini, J.A., Kozicki, L.E. and Ribeiro, L.B., 2021. An Accurate Image Analysis Method for Estimating Body Measurements in Horses. Journal of Equine Veterinary Science, 101, 103418.
Gherissi, D.E., Afri-Bouzebda, F., Bouzebda, Z. and Lamraoui, R. 2014. Morphometric variations and endocrine changes of the one-humped male camel in relation to reproductive activity. Ruminant Science, 3(1), 9-18
Gherissi, D.E., Afri-Bouzebda, F., Bouzebda, Z., 2018. Seasonal changes in the testicular morphology and interstitial tissue histomorphometry of Sahraoui camel under Algerian extreme arid conditions. Biological Rhythm Research, 49 (2), 1744-4179.
Gherissi, D.E., Boukhili, M. and Gherissi, A., 2020. Genital histomorphometrical evaluation and survey on reproductive traits of male camel (Camelus dromedarius) in relation to the pubertal age under extreme arid conditions. Asian Journal of Agriculture and Biology 8(4): 436-446
Iglesias, C., Navas, F. J., Ciani, E., Arbulu, A. A., González, A., Marín, C. and Mérida, S.N., 2020. Zoometric characterization and body condition score in Canarian camel breed. Archivos de zootecnia, 69(265), 102–107.
Kamili, A., Bengoumi, M. and Faye B., 2006. Assessment of body condition and body composition in camel by barymetric measurements. Journal of Camel Practice and Research,13(1), 67-72.
Kang, X., Zhang, X.D. and Liu, G., 2020. Accurate detection of lameness in dairy cattle with computer vision: A new and individualized detection strategy based on the analysis of the supporting phase. Journal of Dairy Science, 103(11), 10628-10638.
Kashiha, M.A., Green, A.R., Sales, T.G, Bahr, C., Berckmans, D. and Gates, R.S., 2014. Performance of an image analysis processing system for hen tracking in an environmental preference chamber. Poultry Science, 93(10), 2439-2448.
Kogure, G.S., Silva, R.C., Ribeiro, V.B., Mendes, M.C., Menezes-Reis, R., Ferriani, R.A., Furtado, C.L.M. and Reis, R.M.D. 2020. Concordance in prediction body fat percentage of Brazilian women in reproductive age between different methods of evaluation of skinfolds thickness. The Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 64 (3), 257-268.
Kojima, T., Oishi, K., Aoki, N., Matsubara, Y., Uete, T, Fukushima, Y., Inoue, G., Sato, S., Shiraishi, T., Hirooka, H. and Masuda T., 2022. Estimation of beef cow body condition score: a machine learning approach using three-dimensional image data and a simple approach with heart girth measurements. Livestock Science, 256, 104816.
Kuzuhara, Y., Kawamura, K., Yoshitoshi, R., Tamaki, T., Sugai, S., Ikegami, M., Kurokawa, Y., Obitsu, T., Okita, M., Sugino, T., Yasuda, T., 2015. A preliminarily study for predicting body weight and milk properties in lactating Holstein cows using a three-dimensional camera system. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 111, 186-193.
Lahav, Y., Goldstein, N. and Gepner, Y. Comparison of body composition assessment across body mass index categories by two multifrequency bioelectrical impedance analysis devices and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in clinical settings. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 75, 1275–1282
Laven, L.J., Wang, L., Regnerus, C. and Laven, R.A. 2015. Measuring Claw Conformation in Cattle: Assessing the Agreement between Manual and Digital Measurement. Animals, 5, 687-701.
Le Cozler, Y., Allain, C., Faverdin, P., Delattre, L. and Delouard, J.M. 2018. L’imagerie 3d, un outil pour estimer les caractéristiques corporelles des animaux. D’après C. Allain, A. Caillot, L. Depuille, P. Faverdin, J M Delouard, et al. 2018. : Utilisation d’un dispositif d’imagerie en 3D pour modéliser la forme complète de bovins laitiers et mesurer de nouveaux phénotypes morphologiques. 24. Rencontres autour des recherches sur les ruminants (3R), 2018, NA, France.
Le Cozler Y., Allain, C., Caillot, A., Delouard, J.M., Delattre, L., Luginbuhl, T. and Faverdin, P., 2019. High-precision scanning system for complete 3D cow body shape imaging and analysis of morphological traits. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 157, 447-453.
Lin, L., 1989. A concordance correlation coefficient to evaluate reproducibility. Biometrics, 45:255–268.
Linnet, K., 1993. Evaluation of regression procedures for methods comparison studies. Clinical Chemistry, 39, 424-32.
McAlinden, C., Khadka, J. and Pseudovs, K., 2011. Statistical methods for conducting agreement (comparison of clinical tests) and precision (repeatability or reproducibility) studies in optometry and ophthalmology. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 31, 330–338.
Meghelli, I., Kaouadji, Z., Yilmaz, O., Cemal, I., Karaca, O. and Gaouar, S.B.S., 2020. Morphometric characterization and estimating body weight of two Algerian camel breeds using morphometric measurements. Tropical animal health and production, 52 (5), 2505-2512
Negretti, P., Bianconi, G., Bartocci, S., Terramoccia, S. and Verna, M., 2008. Determination of live weight and body condition score in lactating Mediterranean buffalo by Visual Image Analysis. Livestock Science, 113, 1–7.
Passing, H. and Bablok, W., 1983. A new biometrical procedure for testing the equality of measurements from two different analytical methods. Application of linear regression procedures for method comparison studies in Clinical Chemistry, Part I. Journal of Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Biochemistry, 21,709–720.
Ruchay, A., Kober, V., Dorofeev, K., Kolpakov, V. and Miroshnikov, S., 2020. Accurate body measurement of live cattle using three depth cameras and non-rigid 3-D shape recover., Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 179, 105821.
Schofield, C.P., Marchant, J.A., White, R.P., Brandl, N. and Wilson, M., 1999. Monitoring Pig Growth using a prototype imaging system. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 72, 205-210.
Sénèque, E., Lesimple, C., Morisset, S. and Hausberger, M., 2019. Could posture reflect welfare state? A study using geometric morphometrics in riding school horses. PLoS One, 14(2),e0211852.
Shorten, P.R., 2021. Computer vision and weigh scale-based prediction of milk yield and udder traits for individual cows. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 188, 106364.
Song, X., Schuttea, J.J.W., Van der Tolb, P.P.J., Van Halsemab, F.E.D. and Groot Koerkampa P.W.G., 2014. Body measurements of dairy calf using a 3-D camera in an automatic feeding system. Proceedings International Conference of Agricultural Engineering, Zurich, 06–10.07.2014 – www.eurageng.eu. Ref: C0467
Udovičić, M., Baždarić, K., Bilić-Zulle, L. and Petrovečki, M., 2007. What we need to know when calculating the coefficient of correlation? Biochemia Medica, 17, 10-15.
Viazzi, S., Bahr, C., Schlageter-Tello, A., Van Hertem, T., Romanini, C.E.B., Pluk, A., Halachmi, I., Lokhorst, C. and Berckmans, D., 2013. Analysis of individual classification of lameness using automatic measurement of back posture in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science, 96(1), 257–266.
Yahaya, A., Olopade, J.O., Kwari, H.D. and Wiam, I. M., 2012. Osteometry of the skull of one-humped camels. Part I: Immature animals. Italian Journal of Anatomy and Embryology, 117 (1), 23–33.
Zhang A.L.N., Wu, B.P., Jiang, C.X.H., Xuan, D.C.Z., Ma, E.Y.H and Zhang, F.Y.A. 2018a. Development and validation of a visual image analysis for monitoring the body size of sheep, Journal of Applied Animal Research, 46(1), 1004-1015
Zhang, A.L., Wu, B.P., Wuyun, T.C., Jiang, X.D., Xuan, E.C. and Ma, F.Y. 2018b. Algorithm of sheep body dimension measurement and its applications based on image analysis. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture,153, 33-45
Zhang, J., Zhuang, Y., Ji, H. and Teng, G., 2021. Pig Weight and Body Size Estimation Using a Multiple Output Regression Convolutional Neural Network: A Fast and Fully Automatic Method. Sensors, 21, 3218.
Zhao, K.X. and He, D.J., 2015. Target detection method for moving cows based on background subtraction. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 8(1), 42-49.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the camel owners for making the animals available for the study and the participants for their support in taking animal measurements.
Funding
This research was supported by PRFU Scientific Research Project: Anatomo-physiological particularities and means to improve the Algerian dromedary, project code: D01N01UN410120190005.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
G.D.E. conceived and designed the study and performed the experiments; G.D.E. and L.R analyzed the data and G.D.E., L.R., C.F., and G.S.B.S. wrote and corrected the paper. All authors read and approved the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics declarations
The camels were studied according to the ethical principles of animal experimentation and international guidelines for animal welfare (Terrestrial Animal Health Code 2018, Sect. 7. Art 7.5.1) and national executive decree No. 95–363 of November 11, 1995 (Algeria).
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gherissi, D.E., Lamraoui, R., Chacha, F. et al. Accuracy of image analysis for linear zoometric measurements in dromedary camels. Trop Anim Health Prod 54, 232 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-022-03242-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-022-03242-3