Log in

Performance evaluation of Kuroiler and Sasso chicken breeds reared under farmer management conditions in highland and lowland areas of Mvomero district, Eastern Tanzania

  • Regular Articles
  • Published:
Tropical Animal Health and Production Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

One thousand one hundred and fifty-two dual-purpose improved chickens (576 Kuroiler and 576 Sasso) of mixed sexes were reared in two diverse agro-ecological zones, i.e., highland and lowland in Mvomero district, Eastern Tanzania, to determine the effects of agro-ecological zones on growth performance, egg production, and survivability under farmer management conditions. Two villages per zone were purposively selected, and from each village, 16 farmers were included in the study; a particular farmer received 18 birds of mixed sexes of the same breed. Data on body weight, egg production trait, and mortality were taken at different ages from week 6 up to 52. General Linear Models fitting breed, agro-ecological zone, and interactions between breed and zone were used to analyze the data. Results show that breed had no significant effects on body weight and body weight gain. However, the effects of the agro-ecological zone and interaction between breed and zone on body weight and body weight gain were significant at the 16th and 20th week of age. The highland zone had heavier chickens than the lowland. While Sasso performed better than Kuroiler chickens in the highland zone, the opposite was observed in the lowland. Significant breed × agro-ecology interactions were observed only for age at first egg whereby Sasso matured earlier than Kuroiler in the highland zone but much later than Kuroiler in the lowland. Birds raised in the highland zone survived better than those chickens in the lowland during both growing and laying periods. Thus, knowledge of breed performance in relation to agro-ecological differences is critical when distributing improved chicken breeds to farmers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

References

  • Alem T (2014). Production and reproduction performance of rural poultry in lowland and midland agro-ecological zones of Central Tigray, Northern Ethiopia. African Journal of Agricultural Research 9(49):3531-3539. https://academicjournals.org/article/article1417520139_Alem.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Assefa, S., Melesse, A. and Banerjee, S. 2019. Egg Production and Egg Quality Traits of Local and Exotic Chicken Breeds Reared in Two Agroecologies under Traditional Management System. Research Journal of Food and Nutrition 3 (1): 11-17. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331684037

    Google Scholar 

  • Bekele, F., Gjøen, H.M., Kathle, J., Ådnøy, T. and Abebe, G. 2009. Genotype X environment interaction in two breeds of chickens kept under two management systems in Southern Ethiopia. Tropical Animal Health and Production 41:1101–1114. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/23665839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Da Silva, M., Desta, S. and Stapleton, J. (2017) Development of the chicken sector in the Tanzanian Livestock Master Plan. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/132697821.pdf

  • Eik, L.O., Kifaro, G.C., Kiango, S.M., Nordhagen, Ø. M. Safari, J. and Mtenga, L.A. 2008. Productivity of goats and their contribution to household food security in high potential areas of East Africa: A case of Mgeta, Tanzania. African Journal of Food Agriculture Nutrition and Development 8(3).

  • Fleming, D. S., Koltes, J. E., Markey, A. D., Schmidt, C. J., Ashwell, C. M., Rothschild, M. F., Persia, M.E., Reecy, J.M. and Lamont, S.J. 2016. Genomic analysis of Ugandan and Rwandan chicken ecotypes using a 600 k genoty** array. BMC Genomics 17: 407. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/303555278

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Getiso, A., Jimma, A., Asrat, M., Kebede, H.G., Zeleke, B. and Birhanu, T. 2017. Management practices and productive performances of Sasso chickens breed under village production system in SNNPR, Ethiopia. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare 7 (7): 120 – 135.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goromela, E. H., Kwakkel, R. P., Verstegen, M. W. A. and Katule, A. 2006. Strategies to optimize the use of scavengeable feed resource base by smallholder poultry farmers. African Journal of Agricultural Research 1: 91-100. http://www.academicjournals.org/AJAR

    Google Scholar 

  • Habte, M., Ameha, N. and Demeke S. 2013. Production performance of local and exotic breeds of chicken at rural household level in Nole Kabba Woreda, Western Wollega, Ethiopia. African Journal of Agricultural Research 8(11):1014- 1021.

    Google Scholar 

  • Islam, R., Deka, C. K., Rahman, M., Deka, B.C., Hussain, M. and Paul, A. 2017. Comparative performances of Kuroiler, Rainbow Rooster and Indigenous birds under backyard system of rearing in Dhubri district of Assam. Journal of Rural and Agricultural Research 17 (1): 40 - 43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kejela, Y. 2020. Production Performance of Chicken under Farmers’ Management and Their Roles at Urban Household Economy in Southern Ethiopia. Agricultural Sciences 11: 178-190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidie, H.A. 2019. Characterization of chicken production system and on-farm evaluation of introduced exotic chicken breeds in Gondar Zuria and Kalu districts of Amhara region, Ethiopia. MSc Thesis. Haramaya University, Haramaya, Ethiopia.

  • Lozano-Jaramillo, M., Alemu, S.W., Dessie, T., Komen, H. and Bastiaansen, J.W. M. 2019. Using phenotypic distribution models to predict livestock performance. Scientific Reports 9: 15371.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mbaga, H.R., Msanya, B.M. and Mrema, J.P. 2017. Pedological Characterization of Typical Soil of Dakawa Irrigation Scheme, Mvomero District, Morogoro Region, Tanzania. International Journal of Current Research in Biosciences and Plant Biology 4(6): 77-86. https://doi.org/10.20546/ijcrbp.2017.406.009

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MLFD 2015. Ministry of Livestock and Fisheries Development. Tanzania livestock modernization initiative. Dar es Salaam, Tanzania: Ministry of Livestock and Fisheries Development. https://livestocklivelihoodsandhealth.org/wpcontent/uploads/2015/07/Tanzania_Livestock_Modernization_Initiative_July_2015.pdf

  • Mulugeta, S., Goshu, G. and Esatu, W. 2020. Growth performance of DZ-white and Improved Horro chicken breeds under different agro-ecological zones of Ethiopia. Journal of Livestock Science 11: 45-53. https://cgspace.cgiar.org/rest/rest/bitstreams/187395/retrieve

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mwalusanya, N.A., Katule, A.M., Mutayoba, S.K. and Mtambo, M.M.A. 2002. Productivity of local chickens under village management conditions. Tropical Animal Health and Production 34: 405-416. https://springer.longhoe.net/article/10.1023/A:1020048327158

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • North, M. O. 1984. Breeder Management. In Commercial Chicken Production Manual. The Avi. Publishing Company. Inc. Westport, Connecticut. 240-243, 298-321 pp.

  • Olwande, P.O., Ogara, W.O., Okuthe, S.O., Muchemi, G., Okoth, E., Odindo, M.O. and Adhiambo, R.F. 2010. Assessing the productivity of indigenous chickens in an extensive management system in southern Nyanza, Kenya. Tropical Animal Health and Production 42: 283–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Permin, A. 2008. Good practices in small scale poultry production: A manual for trainers and producers in East Africa. A Consultancy Report to FAO, FAO ECTAD Regional Unit Eastern Africa, Nairobi, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.

  • Pius, L. O. and Mbaga, S. H. 2018. Variations in village chicken management packages in two agro-ecological zones of Tanzania. International Journal of Livestock Production 9(3): 42-49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roysfarm 2018. Kuroiler Chicken Breed Information. https://www.roysfarm.com/kuroiler-chicken

  • Rumisha, S.F., Shayo, E.H. and Mboera L.E.G. 2019. Spatio-temporal prevalence of malaria and anaemia in relation to agro-ecosystems in Mvomero district, Tanzania. Malaria Journal 18: 228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanka, Y. D., Mbaga, S. H., Mutayoba, S.K., Katule, A.M. and Goromela, S.H. 2020. Evaluation of growth performance of Sasso and Kuroiler chickens fed three diets at varying levels of supplementation under semi-intensive system of production in Tanzania. Tropical Animal Health and Production.

  • SAS 2009. Statistical Analytical System. User Guide for Personal Computers, Statistical Programme. Windows Version 9.2, SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC, USA.

  • SASSO 2014. Coloured chicken genetics. http://www.sasso.fr/coloured-chicken-genetics-for-organic-red-label-farmer-chickens.html

  • Sazzad, M. H. 1992. Comparative study on egg production and feed efficiency of different breeds of poultry under intensive and rural conditions in Bangladesh. Livestock Research for Rural Development 4(3): 65-69. http://www.fao.org/ag/aga/agap/frg/lrrd/lrrd4/3/bangla1.htm.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, J. 2011. A new breed: Highly productive chickens help raise Ugandans from poverty researcher at the Center for Infectious Diseases and Vaccinology at ASU’s Bio-design Institute. https://asunews.asu.edu/node/21034

  • Sharma, J., **e, J., Boggess, M., Galukande, E., Semambo, D. and Sharma S. 2015. Higher weight gain by Kuroiler chickens than indigenous chickens raised under scavenging conditions by rural households in Uganda. Livestock Research for Rural Development 27: 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonola, V.S. 2015. Evaluation of performance of Norwegian dairy goats in Mgeta Morogoro. MSc Thesis. Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania.

  • Zaman, M.A., Sørensen, P. and Howlider, M.A.R., 2004. Egg production performance of a breed and three crossbreeds under semi-scavenging system of management. Livestock Research for Rural Development 16(8). http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd16/8/zama16060.htm

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors express their appreciation to the Department of Animal, Aquaculture and Range Sciences of Sokione University of Agriculture for providing necessary facilities during the brooding period. They are further grateful to the Mvomero District Council, in particular the Livestock and Fisheries Office and households for their cooperation during the course of data collection.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Funding

This research was carried out under the financial support of the African Chicken Genetic Gains (ACGG) project in Tanzania sponsored by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (Grant Agreement OPP1112198).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All listed authors have made substantial contributions to the research design, or the acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data, and drafting the manuscript or revising it critically. All authors have approved the submitted version.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. S. Guni.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

National and institutional procedures for the care and use of animals were followed. The study was approved by International Livestock Research Institute Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (ILRI IACUC) with reference number: IACUC-RC2016.26.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Guni, F.S., Mbaga, S.H., Katule, A.M. et al. Performance evaluation of Kuroiler and Sasso chicken breeds reared under farmer management conditions in highland and lowland areas of Mvomero district, Eastern Tanzania. Trop Anim Health Prod 53, 245 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-021-02693-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-021-02693-4

Keywords

Navigation