Log in

Gynoecium pubescence in soybean: a prevalent false-positive during in vitro androgenesis

  • Research Note
  • Published:
Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture (PCTOC) Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Doubled haploidy serves as an effective tool for enhancing genetic gain in plant breeding programs. Androgenesis, an extensively-employed form of doubled haploidy, involves totipotent induction within the immature microgametophyte followed by agamous embryogenesis and chromosome doubling. Protocol development for in vitro androgenesis is reliant upon the application of species- (and oftentimes genotype-) specific induction stimuli as well as phenotypic markers that reflect cellular reprogramming. In cell cultures, however, the latter is impeded readily by pseudo-embryogenic structures of somatic origin. In this study, gynoecium-derived trichomes of soybean were intentionally incorporated into isolated microspore cultures. Trichome morphology was then compared to early-dividing zygotic and apozygotic plant embryos previously reported, as were nuclei orientation and cross wall composition. Lastly, autofluorescence intensity was measured for trichomes and various microspore phenotypes, the results of which implied that autofluorescence post-light exposure may be a useful parameter for culture purification and/or quality control. The findings herein demonstrate that trichomes serve a pseudo-embryogenic role during in vitro androgenesis in soybean and necessitate extra caution when identifying sporophytic tissues in species with floral pubescence.

Key message

This manuscript draws morphological parallels between eudicot embryos and gynoecial trichomes, and may be used as a reference/cautionary guide for the identification of pseudo-embryos in vitro.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Abbreviations

CW:

Calcofluor white M2R

DAPI:

4′6-Diamidino-2-phenylindole

MCT:

Multicellular secretory Trichome

IMC:

Isolated microspore culture

PBS:

Phosphate-buffered saline

References

  • Arteaga N, Savic M, Méndez-Vigo B, Fuster-Pons A, Torres-Pérez R, Oliveros JC, Picó FX, Alonso-Blanco C (2021) MYB transcription factors drive evolutionary innovations in Arabidopsis fruit Trichome patterning. Plant Cell. https://doi.org/10.1093/plcell/koaa041

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bal U, Shariatpanahi ME, Castro AJ, Emery D, Clement C, Dehestani-Ardakani M, Touraev A (2012) Pseudo-embryogenic structures in anther and isolated microspore cultures in vitro: a cautionary guide. Czech J Gen Plant Breed 48:51–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beilstein MA, Al-Shehbaz IA, Kellogg EA (2006) Brassicaceae phylogeny and trichome evolution. Am J Bot 93:607–619

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cardoso MB, Bodanese-Zanettini MH, Mundstock EC, Kaltchuk-Santos E (2007) Evaluation of gelling agents on anther culture: response of two soybean cultivars. Braz Arch Biol Technol 50:933–939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coumans M, Zhong D (1995) Doubled haploid sunflower (Helianthus annuus) plant production by androgenesis: fact or artifact? Part 2. In vitro isolated microspore culture. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 41:203–209

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deslauriers C, Powell AD, Fuchs K, Pauls KP (1991) Flow cytometric characterization and sorting of cultured Brassica napus microspores. Biochim Biophys Acta (BBA) Mol Cell Res 1091:165–172

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fahn A (2000) Structure and function of secretory cells. Adv Bot Res 31:37–75

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrie AMR, Caswell KL (2011) Isolated microspore culture techniques and recent progress for haploid and doubled haploid plant production. Plant Cell Tiss Org Cult 104:301–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garda M, Hale B, Rao N, Lowe M, Bright M, Goodling S, Phillips GC (2020) Soybean androgenesis I: identification of pyramidal stressors in anther cultures that sustain cell divisions and embryo formation from isolated microspore cultures. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 56:415–429

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hale B, Phipps C, Rao N, Wijeratne A, Phillips GC (2020) Differential expression profiling reveals stress-induced cell fate divergence in soybean microspores. Plants 9:1510

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hale B, Phipps C, Rao N, Kelley C, Phillips GC (2021) Soybean androgenesis II: non-gametophytic morphologies in isolated microspore culture. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-020-10144-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hauser MT (2014) Molecular basis of natural variation and environmental control of trichome patterning. Front Plant Sci 5:320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healy RA, Horner HT, Bailey TB, Palmer RG (2005) A microscopic study of trichomes on gynoecia of normal and tetraploid Clark cultivars of Glycine max and seven near-isogenic lines. Int J Plant Sci 166:415–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healy RA, Palmer RG, Horner HT (2009) Multicellular secretory trichome development on soybean and related Glycine gynoecia. Int J Plant Sci 170:444–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horner HT, Healy RA, Cervantes-Martinez T, Palmer RG (2003) Floral nectary fine structure and development in Glycine max L. (Fabaceae). Int J Plant Sci 164:675–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joosen R, Cordewener J, Supena EDJ, Vorst O, Lammers M, Maliepaard C, Boutilier K (2007) Combined transcriptome and proteome analysis identifies pathways and markers associated with the establishment of rapeseed microspore-derived embryo development. Plant Physiol 144:155–172

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pechan PM, Keller WA, Mandy F, Bergeron M (1988) Selection of Brassica napus L. embryogenic microspores by flow sorting. Plant Cell Rep 7:396–398

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Found. Stat, Comp

  • Schulze D, Pauls KP (1998) Flow cytometric characterization of embryogenic and gametophytic development in Brassica napus microspore cultures. Plant Cell Physiol 39:226–234

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seguí-Simarro JM, Nuez F (2007) Embryogenesis induction, callogenesis, and plant regeneration by in vitro culture of tomato isolated microspores and whole anthers. J Exp Bot 58:1119–1132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma S, Sangwan NS, Sangwan RS (2003) Developmental process of essential oil glandular trichome collapsing in menthol mint. Curr Sci 84:544–550

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soriano M, Li H, Boutilier K (2013) Microspore embryogenesis: establishment of embryo identity and pattern in culture. Plant Reprod 26:181–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang X, Liu Y, He Y, Ma L, Sun MX (2013) Exine dehiscing induces rape microspore polarity, which results in different daughter cell fate and fixes the apical-basal axis of the embryo. J Exp Bot 64:215–228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Werker E (2000) Trichome diversity and development. Adv Bot Res 31:1–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu M, Zhao J (2012) The cytological changes of tobacco zygote and proembryo cells induced by beta-glucosyl Yariv reagent suggest the involvement of arabinogalactan proteins in cell division and cell plate formation. BMC Plant Biol 12:126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded through support from USDA-NIFA Non-Land Grant Colleges of Agriculture Capacity Building award number 2018-70001-28762, Arkansas Soybean Promotion Board, University of Arkansas System Division of Agriculture, Corteva Agriscience Open Innovation, and Corteva Agriscience Internship Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brett Hale.

Additional information

Communicated by Sergio J. Ochatt.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hale, B., Lor, P., Chellamma, S. et al. Gynoecium pubescence in soybean: a prevalent false-positive during in vitro androgenesis. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 146, 417–421 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-021-02071-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-021-02071-w

Keywords

Navigation