References
Sutton SS, Magagnoli J, Cummings TH, Dettling T, Lovelace B, Christoph MJ et al (2023) Real-world clinical outcomes among US veterans with oral factor xa inhibitor–related major bleeding treated with andexanet alfa or 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate. J Thromb Thrombolysis 56(1):137–146
Wang SV, Schneeweiss S, Franklin JM, Desai RJ, Feldman W, Garry EM et al (2023) Emulation of Randomized clinical trials with nonrandomized database analyses: results of 32 clinical trials. JAMA 329(16):1376–1385
Hemkens LG, Contopoulos-Ioannidis DG, Ioannidis JPA (2016) Agreement of treatment effects for mortality from routinely collected data and subsequent randomized trials: Meta-epidemiological survey. BMJ (Online). ;352
Dahabreh IJ, Sheldrick RC, Paulus JK, Chung M, Varvarigou V, Jafri H et al (2012) Do observational studies using propensity score methods agree with randomized trials? A systematic comparison of studies on acute coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J 33:1893–1901
Ren J, Cislo P, Cappelleri JC, Hlavacek P, DiBonaventura M (2023) Comparing g-computation, propensity score-based weighting, and targeted maximum likelihood estimation for analyzing externally controlled trials with both measured and unmeasured confounders: a simulation study. BMC Med Res Methodol. 23(1)
Cohen AT, Lewis M, Connor A, Connolly SJ, Yue P, Curnutte J et al (2022) Thirty-day mortality with andexanet alfa compared with prothrombin complex concentrate therapy for life‐threatening direct oral anticoagulant‐related bleeding. J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open 3(2):1–10
Costa OS, Connolly SJ, Sharma M, Beyer-Westendorf J, Christoph MJ, Lovelace B et al (2022) Andexanfa versus four-factor prothrombin complex concentrate for the reversal of apixaban- or rivaroxaban-associated intracranial hemorrhage: a propensity score-overlap weighted analysis. Crit Care. 26(1)
Keinath JJ, Lekura J, Hauser CD, Bajwa MK, Bloome ME, Kalus JS et al (2023) Deterioration free discharge comparison of andexanet-alfa and prothrombin complex concentrates (PCC) for reversal of factor xa inhibitor associated bleeds. J Thromb Thrombolysis.
Acknowledgements
The NIHR Biomedical Research Centre (NIHR203326) and the British Heart Foundation Accelerator (BHF) (AA/18/2/34218) have supported the Institute of Cardiovascular Sciences where this research is based. The opinions expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not represent any of the listed organisations. RJB is supported through a BHF Dedicated Scholarship.
Funding
Dr. Richard John Buka MBChB (Hons). British Heart Foundation, http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000274.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
No ethical approval was required or sought.
Financial disclosures
RJB has received honoraria from Bayer, Sobi, and Sanofi, and Takeda.
DJS has received honoraria from Pfizer-BMS and Bayer.
PLRN has received research grants from Novartis, Principia, Sanofi, and Rigel Pharmaceuticals and has received had honoraria from Bayer, Grifols and Takeda.
RJB and PLRN have received an externally-sponsored research grant from AstraZeneca to audit the use of reversal agents for direct oral anticoagulant-associated bleeding across the UK.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Buka, R.J., Sutton, D.J. & Nicolson, P.L. Enoxaparin is not an oral factor Xa inhibitor. Response to Sutton et al. real-world clinical outcomes among US veterans with oral factor Xa inhibitor–related major bleeding treated with andexanet alfa or 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate. J Thromb Thrombolysis 57, 739–741 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-024-02948-5
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11239-024-02948-5