Log in

Wind farm layout optimization using adaptive equilibrium optimizer

  • Published:
The Journal of Supercomputing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The layout optimization of wind turbines seeks to improve wind power conversion efficiency by minimizing the wake effect in wind farm. However, the existing optimization methods cannot provide a layout with high output power due to their inability to weaken the energy losses caused by the wake effect between turbines. In this paper, an equilibrium optimizer with local perturbation and adaptive escape strategies, termed adaptive equilibrium optimizer (AEO), is proposed to tackle the wind farm layout optimization problem (WFLOP). To be specific, the worst turbines in the layout are re-located to better locations to reduce wind losses by enhancing the exploitation capacity of AEO with a local perturbation strategy. Then, an adaptive escape strategy supports the particles to get out of the local optimum and to search toward more promising areas, which facilitates the adjustment of the layout to reduce the wake effect. Besides, an adaptive repair operator adaptively reconfigures infeasible layouts to augment the proportion of feasible solutions in the population; thus, AEO can sufficiently explore the layout space to optimize the output power of wind farms. Twelve prohibited area constraints, three turbine scales, and three wind farm sizes are utilized to evaluate the performance of AEO in two cases with various wind speeds and directions. The experimental results demonstrate that the AEO performs excellently in terms of efficiency, robustness, and generalization for the layout optimization of turbines with different constraints, scales, and wind farm sizes in comparison with the state-of-the-art metaheuristics and other methods reported in the literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cao L, Ge M, Gao X, Du B, Li B, Huang Z, Liu Y (2022) Wind farm layout optimization to minimize the wake induced turbulence effect on wind turbines. Appl Energy 323:119599

    Google Scholar 

  2. Moreno SR, Pierezan J, dos Santos Coelho L, Mariani VC (2021) Multi-objective lightning search algorithm applied to wind farm layout optimization. Energy 216:119214

    Google Scholar 

  3. Eroğlu Y, Seçkiner SU (2012) Design of wind farm layout using ant colony algorithm. Renewable Energy 44:53–62

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wilson D, Rodrigues S, Segura C, Loshchilov I, Hutter F, Buenfil GL et al (2018) Evolutionary computation for wind farm layout optimization. Renewable Energy 126:681–691

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pan JS, Tian AQ, Snášel V, Kong L, Chu SC (2022) Maximum power point tracking and parameter estimation for multiple-photovoltaic arrays based on enhanced pigeon-inspired optimization with Taguchi method. Energy 251:123863

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pan JS, Tian AQ, Chu SC, Li JB (2021) Improved binary pigeon-inspired optimization and its application for feature selection. Appl Intell 51(12):8661–8679

    Google Scholar 

  7. Tian AQ, Liu FF, Lv HX (2024) Snow geese algorithm: a novel migration-inspired meta-heuristic algorithm for constrained engineering optimization problems. Appl Math Model 126:327–347

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mosetti GPCDB, Poloni C, Diviacco B (1994) Optimization of wind turbine positioning in large windfarms by means of a genetic algorithm. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn 51(1):105–116

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jensen NO (1983) A note on wind generator interaction (Vol. 2411). Roskilde, Denmark: Risø National Laboratory

  10. Grady SA, Hussaini MY, Abdullah MM (2005) Placement of wind turbines using genetic algorithms. Renewable Energy 30(2):259–270

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chen Y, Li H, ** K, Song Q (2013) Wind farm layout optimization using genetic algorithm with different hub height wind turbines. Energy Convers Manage 70:56–65

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gao X, Yang H, Lu L (2016) Optimization of wind turbine layout position in a wind farm using a newly-developed two-dimensional wake model. Appl Energy 174:192–200

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ju X, Liu F (2019) Wind farm layout optimization using self-informed genetic algorithm with information guided exploitation. Appl Energy 248:429–445

    Google Scholar 

  14. Abdelsalam AM, El-Shorbagy MA (2018) Optimization of wind turbines siting in a wind farm using genetic algorithm based local search. Renewable Energy 123:748–755

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ju X, Liu F, Wang L, Lee WJ (2019) Wind farm layout optimization based on support vector regression guided genetic algorithm with consideration of participation among landowners. Energy Convers Manage 196:1267–1281

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bansal JC, Farswan P (2017) Wind farm layout using biogeography based optimization. Renewable Energy 107:386–402

    Google Scholar 

  17. Pookpunt S, Ongsakul W (2013) Optimal placement of wind turbines within wind farm using binary particle swarm optimization with time-varying acceleration coefficients. Renewable Energy 55:266–276

    Google Scholar 

  18. Long H, Li P, Gu W (2020) A data-driven evolutionary algorithm for wind farm layout optimization. Energy 208:118310

    Google Scholar 

  19. Patel J, Savsani V, Patel V, Patel R (2017) Layout optimization of a wind farm to maximize the power output using enhanced teaching learning based optimization technique. J Clean Prod 158:81–94

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bai F, Ju X, Wang S, Zhou W, Liu F (2022) Wind farm layout optimization using adaptive evolutionary algorithm with Monte Carlo Tree Search reinforcement learning. Energy Convers Manage 252:115047

    Google Scholar 

  21. Lei Z, Gao S, Wang Y, Yu Y, Guo L (2022) An adaptive replacement strategy-incorporated particle swarm optimizer for wind farm layout optimization. Energy Convers Manage 269:116174

    Google Scholar 

  22. Koc I (2022) A comprehensive analysis of grid-based wind turbine layout using an efficient binary invasive weed optimization algorithm with levy flight. Expert Syst Appl 198:116835

    Google Scholar 

  23. Beşkirli M, Koç İ, Haklı H, Kodaz H (2018) A new optimization algorithm for solving wind turbine placement problem: Binary artificial algae algorithm. Renewable Energy 121:301–308

    Google Scholar 

  24. Chen Y, Li H, He B, Wang P, ** K (2015) Multi-objective genetic algorithm based innovative wind farm layout optimization method. Energy Convers Manage 105:1318–1327

    Google Scholar 

  25. Song D, Liu J, Yang J, Su M, Wang Y, Yang X, Joo YH (2020) Optimal design of wind turbines on high-altitude sites based on improved Yin-Yang pair optimization. Energy 193:116794

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tao S, Xu Q, Feijóo A, Zheng G, Zhou J (2020) Wind farm layout optimization with a three-dimensional Gaussian wake model. Renewable Energy 159:553–569

    Google Scholar 

  27. Faramarzi A, Heidarinejad M, Stephens B, Mirjalili S (2020) Equilibrium optimizer: a novel optimization algorithm. Knowl-Based Syst 191:105190

    Google Scholar 

  28. Abdel-Basset M, Chang V, Mohamed R (2021) A novel equilibrium optimization algorithm for multi-thresholding image segmentation problems. Neural Comput Appl 33(17):10685–10718

    Google Scholar 

  29. Shaheen AM, Elsayed AM, El-Sehiemy RA, Abdelaziz AY (2021) Equilibrium optimization algorithm for network reconfiguration and distributed generation allocation in power systems. Appl Soft Comput 98:106867

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wang J, Yang B, Li D, Zeng C, Chen Y, Guo Z, Yu T (2021) Photovoltaic cell parameter estimation based on improved equilibrium optimizer algorithm. Energy Convers Manag 236:114051

    Google Scholar 

  31. Ahmed S, Ghosh KK, Mirjalili S, Sarkar R (2021) AIEOU: Automata-based improved equilibrium optimizer with U-shaped transfer function for feature selection. Knowl-Based Syst 228:107283

    Google Scholar 

  32. Abdel-Basset M, Mohamed R, Mirjalili S (2021) A binary equilibrium optimization algorithm for 0–1 knapsack problems. Comput Ind Eng 151:106946

    Google Scholar 

  33. Houssein EH, Çelik E, Mahdy MA, Ghoniem RM (2022) Self-adaptive Equilibrium Optimizer for solving global, combinatorial, engineering, and Multi-Objective problems. Expert Syst Appl 195:116552

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sun Y, Pan JS, Hu P, Chu SC (2022) Enhanced equilibrium optimizer algorithm applied in job shop scheduling problem. J Intell Manuf 34(4):1639–1665

    Google Scholar 

  35. Du Pont BL, Cagan J (2012) An extended pattern search approach to wind farm layout optimization

  36. Naik MK, Panda R, Abraham A (2021) An entropy minimization based multilevel colour thresholding technique for analysis of breast thermograms using equilibrium slime mould algorithm. Appl Soft Comput 113:107955

    Google Scholar 

  37. Li C, Li J, Chen H, Heidari AA (2021) Memetic Harris Hawks optimization: developments and perspectives on project scheduling and QoS-aware web service composition. Expert Syst Appl 171:114529

    Google Scholar 

  38. Gao S, Wang K, Tao S, ** T, Dai H, Cheng J (2021) A state-of-the-art differential evolution algorithm for parameter estimation of solar photovoltaic models. Energy Convers Manage 230:113784

    Google Scholar 

  39. Azizi M, Talatahari S, Gandomi AH (2022) Fire Hawk optimizer: a novel metaheuristic algorithm. Artif Intell Rev 56(1):287–363

    Google Scholar 

  40. Mirjalili S (2016) SCA: a sine cosine algorithm for solving optimization problems. Knowl-Based Syst 96:120–133

    Google Scholar 

  41. Dhiman G, Kumar V (2019) Seagull optimization algorithm: Theory and its applications for large-scale industrial engineering problems. Knowl-Based Syst 165:169–196

    Google Scholar 

  42. Mirjalili S, Lewis A (2016) The whale optimization algorithm. Adv Eng Softw 95:51–67

    Google Scholar 

  43. GE1.5sle. General electric ge 1.5sle - 1,50 mw - wind turbine, last visit Oct, 24 2022. URL: https://en.wind-turbine-models.com/turbines/655-ge-general-electricge-1.5sle

  44. Zimmerman DW, Zumbo BD (1993) Relative power of the Wilcoxon test, the Friedman test, and repeated-measures ANOVA on ranks. J Exp Educ 62(1):75–86

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 61802328, 61972333, and 61771415.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

KZ was involved in methodology, formal analysis, investigation and writing—original draft preparation; FX participated in formal analysis, investigation and writing—review and editing; XG contributed to writing—review and editing and worked in supervision.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Fen ** Gao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No potential conflict of interest has been stated by the authors.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhong, K., **ao, F. & Gao, X. Wind farm layout optimization using adaptive equilibrium optimizer. J Supercomput 80, 15245–15291 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-024-05986-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11227-024-05986-1

Keywords

Navigation