Abstract
Alternatives to legacy munitions and explosives, materials that feature increased stability against external stimuli without compromising their energetic yields are currently being developed. The environmental interactions of such energetic materials need to be addressed, especially as their use becomes more widespread. In order to explore such compounds with environmental influences in mind, we assess the electronic structure and properties of these insensitive munitions (IMs) compounds in modeled hard water using both theory and experiment. To model the IMs in hard water, we have used density functional theory with the M06-2X functional and the 6-311 + G(d,p) basis set with explicit water molecules to capture features like hydrogen bonding, implicit solvent to incorporate bulk water effects, and select ions that would be present in natural water. We ensured the nature of the potential energy surfaces of optimized geometries through vibrational frequency calculations under the harmonic approximation. Several electronic properties, such as oxidation and reduction potentials and electron affinity and ionization potential, for each system are presented. Additionally, cyclic voltammetry experiments were performed, and obtained results were compared with quantum chemical predictions. The experimental reduction potentials are found to be in good agreement with the predicted results. Overall, the reduction potentials predicted by density functional theory for the IM-ion-water complexes are shifted compared with the corresponding isolated munition such that reduction or oxidation would be more facile in the presence of water and ions.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11224-019-01466-y/MediaObjects/11224_2019_1466_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11224-019-01466-y/MediaObjects/11224_2019_1466_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11224-019-01466-y/MediaObjects/11224_2019_1466_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11224-019-01466-y/MediaObjects/11224_2019_1466_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11224-019-01466-y/MediaObjects/11224_2019_1466_Fig5_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11224-019-01466-y/MediaObjects/11224_2019_1466_Fig6_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Richard RM, Ball DW (2008) . J Mol Struct Theochem 851:284–293
Hu T-P, Ren F-D, Ren J (2009) . J Mol Struct Theochem 909:13–18
Qiu L, Gong X, Zheng J, Ziao H (2009) . J Hazard Mater 166:931–938
Taylor S, Park E, Bullion K, Dontsova K (2015) . Chemosphere 119:342–348
Boddu VM, Abburi K, Maloney SW, Damavarapu R (2008) . J Chem Eng Data 53:1120–1125
Sviatenko LK, Gorb L, Hill FC, Leszczynska D, Leszczynski J (2016) . J Comput Chem 37:1206–1213
Batz ML, Garland PM, Reiter RC, Sanborn MDS, Stevenson CD (1997) . J Org Chem 62:2045–2049
Du S, Wang Y, Che L-Z, Shi W-J, Ren F-D, Li Y-X, Wang J-L, Cao D-L (2012) . J Mol Model 18:2105–2115
Sviatenko L, Isayev O, Gorb L, Hill F, Leszczynski J (2011) . J Comput Chem 32:2195–2203
Phillips KL, Sandler SI, Chiu PC (2011) . J Comput Chem 32:226–239
Sviatenko LK, Isayev O, Gorb L, Hill FC, Leszczynska D, Leszczynski J (2015) . J Comput Chem 36:1029–1035
Sviatenko LK, Gorb L, Hill FC, Leszczynski J (2013) . J Comput Chem 34:1094–1100
Jenness GR, Sieter J, Shukla MK (2017) . Phys Chem Chem Phys 20:18850–18861
Dang LX, Rice JE, Caldwell J, Knollman PA (1991) . J Am Chem Soc 113:2481–2486
Stuart SJ, Berne B (1996) . J Phys Chem 100:11934–11943
Carignano M, Karlström G, Linse P (1997) . J Phys Chem B 101:1142–1147
Burda JV, Šponer J, Leszczynski J, Hobza P (1997) . J Phys Chem B 101:9670–9677
Šponer J., Burda JV, Sabat M, Leszczynski J, Hobza P (1998) . J Phys Chem A 102:5951–5957
Ayala R, Martinez JM, Pappalardo RR, Sanches M (2000) . E. J Chem Phys A 104:2799–2807
Lee HM, Tarakeshwar P, Park J, Kolaski MR, Yoon YJ, Yi H-B, Kim Y, Kim KS (2004) . J Phys Chem A 108:2949–2958
Dauster I, Suhm MA, Buck U, Zeuch T (2007) . Phys Chem Chem Phys 10:83–95
Merchant S, Purushottam DD, Dean KR, Asthagiri D (2011) . J Chem Phys 135:054505–1–054505–8
Gonzalez JD, Florez E, Romero J, Reyes A, Restrep A (2013) . J Mol Model 19:1763–1777
Rempe SB, Pratt LR (2001) . Fluid Phase Equilib 183-184:121–132
Zhao Y, Truhlar DG (2008) . Theor Chem Account 120:215–241
McLean A, Chandler G (1980) . J Chem Phys 72:5639
Krishnan R, Binkley J, Seeger R, Pople J (1980) . J Chem Phys 72:650
Blaudeau J-P, McGrath MP, Curtiss LA, Radom L (1997) . J Chem Phys 107:5016
Cossi M, Rega N, Scalmani G, Barone V (2003) . J Comput Chem 24:669–681
Frisch MJ, Trucks GW, Schlegel HB, Scuseria GE, Robb MA, Cheeseman JR, Scalmani G, Barone V, Petersson GA, Nakatsuji H, Li X, Caricato M, Marenich AV, Bloino J, Janesko BG, Gomperts R, Mennucci B, Hratchian HP, Ortiz JV, Izmaylov AF, Sonnenberg JL, Williams-Young D, Ding F, Lipparini F, Egidi F, Goings J, Peng B, Petrone A, Henderson T, Ranasinghe D, Zakrzewski VG, Gao J, Rega N, Zheng G, Liang W, Hada M, Ehara M, Toyota K, Fukuda R, Hasegawa J, Ishida M, Nakajima T, Honda Y, Kitao O, Nakai H, Vreven T, Throssell K, Montgomery JA Jr, Peralta JE, Ogliaro F, Bearpark MJ, Heyd JJ, Brothers EN, Kudin KN, Staroverov VN, Keith TA, Kobayashi R, Normand J, Raghavachari K, Rendell AP, Burant JC, Iyengar SS, Tomasi J, Cossi M, Millam JM, Klene M, Adamo C, Cammi R, Ochterski JW, Martin RL, Morokuma K, Farkas O, Foresman JB, Fox DJ (2016) Gaussian 16 revision a.03. Gaussian, Inc., Wallingford
Boys S, Bernardi F (1970) . Mol Phys 19:553–566
Lewis A, Bumpus JA, Truhlar DG, Cramer CJ (2004) . J Chem Educ 81:596–604
Truhlar DG, Cramer CJ, Lewis A, Bumpus JA (2007) . J Chem Educ 84:934
Marenich AV, Ho J, Coote ML, Cramer CJ, Truhlar DG (2014) . Phys Chem Chem Phys 16:15068–15106
Sviatenko LK, Gorb L, Hill FC, Leszczynska D, Leszczynski J (2015) . J Phys Chem A 119:8139–8145
Mongay C, Cerda V (1974) . Ann Chim 64:409–412
Acknowledgments
The use of trade, product, or firm names in this report is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the US Government. The tests described and the resulting data presented herein, unless otherwise noted, were obtained from research conducted under the Environmental Quality Technology Program of the US Army Corps of Engineers and the Environmental Security Technology Certification Program of the Department of Defense by the USAERDC. Permission was granted by the Chief of Engineers to publish this information. The findings of this report are not to be construed as an official Department of the Army position unless so designated by other authorized documents.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
McAlexander, H.R., Giles, S.A., Crouch, R.A. et al. An integrated quantum chemical and experimental approach for exploring the structures and properties of insensitive munitions interacting with ions in bulk water. Struct Chem 31, 975–982 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-019-01466-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-019-01466-y