Log in

3D-QSAR (CoMFA, CoMSIA, HQSAR and topomer CoMFA), MD simulations and molecular docking studies on purinylpyridine derivatives as B-Raf inhibitors for the treatment of melanoma cancer

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Structural Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As per the World Health Organization (WHO), cancer is the second most leading cause of death after cardiovascular diseases in worldwide with around 9.88 million total new cases and 1.08 million were observed due to skin cancer in 2018. Amongst two types of skin cancer, progression of melanoma cancer is increasing day by day due to the environmental changes than non-melanoma cancer. Most of B-Raf mutation, specifically B-RafV600E, is responsible for the progression of the melanoma cancer. Here, various 3D-QSAR techniques like comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA), comparative molecular similarity indices analysis (CoMSIA), molecular hologram QSAR (HQSAR) and topomer CoMFA were used to design novel B-Raf inhibitors by using 28 synthetic B-Raf inhibitors. Except for topomer CoMFA model, remaining models were generated by three different alignment methods in which distil-based alignment method was found best and gave prominent statistical values. After performing N-fold statistical validation, in CoMFA, q2, r2 and r2pred values were found to be 0.638, 0.969 and 0.848, respectively. Similarly, q2, r2 and r2pred values were found to be 0.796, 0.978 and 0.891 in CoMSIA (SHD) and 0.761, 0.973 and 0.852 in CoMSIA (SH) by N-fold statistical validation. In HQSAR analysis, statistical values were found for q2 as 0.984, r2 as 0.999 and r2pred as 0.634 with 97 as best hologram length (BHL). The results of topomer CoMFA showed the q2 value of 0.663 and the r2 value of 0.967. Important features of purinylpyridine were identified by contour map analysis of all 3D-QSAR techniques, which could be useful to design the novel molecules as B-Raf inhibitors for the treatment of melanoma cancer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

Raf:

Rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma

RAS:

Retrovirus-associated DNA sequences

MAPK:

Mitogen-activated protein kinase

RTK:

Receptor tyrosine kinase

ERK:

Extracellular regulated kinase

3D-QSAR:

Three-dimensional quantitative structural activity relationship

CoMFA:

Comparative molecular field analysis

CoMSIA:

Comparative molecular similarity indices analysis

HQSAR:

Molecular hologram QSAR

MD/MS:

Molecular docking and molecular simulation

References

  1. http://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/cancer (Accessed on 5th October 2018)

  2. List of rare diseases and synonyms (2018) https://www.orpha.net/orphacom/cahiers/docs/GB/List_of_rare_diseases_in_alphabetical_order.pdf. Accessed 5 Oct 2018

  3. Liu L, Xu J, Yang J, Feng C, Miao Y (2017). Bioorg Med Chem Lett 27:4952

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Neidle S (2013) Cancer drug design and discovery, 2nd edn. Acedamic Press, London

  5. Rahman MA, Salajegheh A, Smith RA, Lam AKY (2013). Exp Mol Pathol 95:336

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Verma J, Khedkar VM, Coutinho EC (2010). Curr Top Med Chem 10:95

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang S, Lin Z, Pu Y, Zhang Y, Zhang L, Zuo Z (2017). Comput Biol Chem 67:38

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Yu S, Yuan J, Shi J, Ruan X, Zhang T, Wang Y et al (2015). Chemom Intell Lab Syst 146:34

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Yang W, Chen Y, Zhou X, Gu Y, Qian W, Zhang F et al (2015). Eur J Med Chem 89:581

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sybyl X (2011) Molecular modelling software. Tripos Certara, V.1.2, St. Louis

    Google Scholar 

  11. Borisa A, Bhatt H (2015). Eur J Pharm Sci 79:1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang W, Tian Y, Wan Y, Gu S, Ju X, Luo X, Liu G (2018). Struct Chem 30:385–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Elham G, Mohammad H (2018). J Chin Chem Soc 65:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jianbo T, Pei Z, **ang S, Wang W (2017). J Chemom 31:2934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wold S, Ruhe A, Wold H, Dunn III WJ (1984). J Sci Stat Comput 5:735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zambre V, Murumkar P, Giridhar R, Yadav M (2010). J. Mol. Graph. Model 29:229

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Tanga H, Yanga L, Li J, Chen J (2016). J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng 68:64–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Clark M, Cramer RD., (1993), Quant. Struct. Relationships 12:137.

  19. Patel P, Bhatt H (2016). Bioorg Med Chem Lett 28:2328

    Google Scholar 

  20. Golbraikh A, Tropsha A (2002). J Mol Graph Model 20:269

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Markus Böhm, Jörg Stürzebecher and, Gerhard Klebe (1999),. J Med Chem42:458.

  22. Mohammed AA, Janarthanan T, Naga ST (2017). Struct Chem 28:1187–1200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Chaube U, Bhatt H (2017). Mol Divers 21:741

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Chaube U, Chhatbar D, Bhatt H (2016). Bioorg Med Chem Lett 26:864

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Ballu S, Itteboina R, Sivan SK, Manga V (2017). Struct Chem 29:593–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to Nirma University, Ahmedabad, India, for providing the needful facilities to carry out research work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hardik Bhatt.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 241 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chavda, J., Bhatt, H. 3D-QSAR (CoMFA, CoMSIA, HQSAR and topomer CoMFA), MD simulations and molecular docking studies on purinylpyridine derivatives as B-Raf inhibitors for the treatment of melanoma cancer. Struct Chem 30, 2093–2107 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-019-01334-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11224-019-01334-9

Keywords

Navigation