Log in

Phenomenological Model of Scattered Fracture for Anisotropic Materials

  • Published:
Strength of Materials Aims and scope

Calculation methods for assessing the strength and durability of critical structural elements for various purposes generally assume the isotropy hypothesis of structural materials. At the same time, their technological and operational anisotropy significantly affects the bearing capacity of the entire product. Introducing damageability parameters into the system of governing equations makes it possible to increase the reliability of stress-strain state calculations and assess the durability of structural bearing elements. The use of anisotropic structural materials requires specification of the damageability tensor. The laws governing the influence of anisotropy of mechanical characteristics of metal materials on the kinetics of damage accumulation (scattered fractures) have been established. The results of experimental studies and kinetic damageability diagrams for anisotropic metallic structural materials are presented. A generalized damage accumulation model with consideration of anisotropy parameters has been developed. It allows determining the components of the damageability tensor based on the results of a single basic experiment to measure the degradation of the elastic modulus of a material. The dependence of the limit values of scattered fracture on anisotropy coefficients is shown.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. L. M. Kachanov, Fundamentals of Fracture Mechanics [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1974).

  2. Yu. N. Rabotnov, Introduction to Fracture Mechanics [in Russian], Nauka, Moscow (1987).

  3. J. Lemaitre and R. Desmorat, Engineering Damage Mechanics, Springer, Paris (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  4. A. O. Lebedev, M. I. Bobyr, and V. P. Lamashevskyi, Mechanics of Materials [in Ukrainian], National Technical University of Ukraine “KPI”, Kyiv ( 2006).

  5. D. Krajcinovic, Damage Mechanics, Amsterdam (1996).

  6. N. I. Bobyr’ and V. V. Koval’, “Damage contribution to the assessment of the stress-strain state of structure elements,” Strength Mater, 49, 361–368 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11223-017-9876-2

  7. B. Erice and F. Gálvez, “A coupled elastoplastic-damage constitutive model with Lode Angle dependent failure criterion,” Int J Solid Struct, 51, No. 1, 93–110 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.09.015

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. M. G. Chausov, P. O. Maruschak, V. Hutsaylyuk, et al., “Effect of complex combined loading mode on the fracture toughness of titanium alloys,” Vacuum, 147, 51–57 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vacuum.2017.10.010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. V. T. Troshchenko and L. A. Khamaza, “Strain–life curves of steels and methods for determining the curve parameters. Part 1. Conventional methods,” Strength Mater, 42, No. 6, 647–659 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11223-010-9253-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. N. Bonora, “Identification and measurement of ductile damage parameters,” J Strain Anal Eng, 34, No. 6, 463–478 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1243/0309324991513894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Q. M. Li, “Strain energy density failure criterion,” Int J Solid Struct, 38, Nos. 38–39, 6997–7013 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-7683(01)00005-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. V. P. Golub, “Nonlinear continuum damage mechanics and its application to the problems of creep and fatigue,” Prikl. Mekh., No. 3, 34–66 (2000).

  13. A. Darlet and R. Desmorat, “Stress triaxiality and lode angle along surfaces of elastoplastic structures,” Int J Solid Struct, 67–68, 71–83 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.03.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. R. Kiran and K. Khandelwal, “A triaxiality and lode parameter dependent ductile fracture criterion,” Eng Fract Mech, 128, 121–138 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfracmech.2014.07.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. J. Betten, “Damage tensors in continuum mechanics,” J Mécanique Théorique Appliquée, No. 1, 13–32 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  16. C. Y. Tang, W. Shen, L. H. Peng, and T. C. Lee, “Characterization of isotropic damage using double scalar variables,” Int J Damage Mech, 11, No. 1, 3–25 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1106/105678902023194

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. C. L. Chow and J. Wang, “An anisotropic theory of continuum damage for ductile fracture,” Eng Fract Mech, 27, No. 5, 547–558 (1987).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. H. Badreddine, K. Saanouni, and T. D. Nguyen, “Damage anisotropy and its effect on the plastic anisotropy evolution under finite strains,” Int J Solid Struct, 63, 11–31 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2015.02.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. J. W. Ju, “On energy-based coupled elastoplastic damage theories: Constitutive modeling and computational aspects,” Int J Solid Struct, 25, No. 7, 803–833 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(89)90015-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. N. R. Hansen and H. L. Schreyer, “A thermodynamically consistent framework for theories of elastoplasticity coupled with damage,” Int J Solid Struct, 31, No. 3, 359–389 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-7683(94)90112-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. M. Bobyr, O. Khalimon, and O. Bondarets, “Phenomenological damage models of anisotropic structural materials,” J Mech Eng NTUU KPI, No. 67, 5–13 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  22. J. Lemaitre, R. Desmorat, and M. Sauzay, “Anisotropic damage law of evolution,” Eur J Mech A-Solid, 19, No. 2, 187–208 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/s0997-7538(00) 00161-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. C. Luo, Y. Mou, and R. P. Han, “A large anisotropic damage theory based on an incremental complementary energy equivalence model,” Int J Fracture, 70, No. 1, 19–34(1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00018133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. F. Sidoroff, “Description of anisotropic damage application to elasticity,” in: IUTAM Colloquium on Physical Nonlinearities in Structural Analysis, Springer, Berlin (1981), pp. 237–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-81582-9_35

  25. M. Bobyr, O. Khalimon, and O. Bondarets, “Modeling of scattered damage accumulation kinetics under combined stress,” Strength Mater, 44, No. 1, 20–26 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11223-012-9344-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to O. A. Bondarets.

Additional information

Translated from Problemy Mitsnosti, No. 5, pp. 86 – 95, September – October, 2023.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bobyr, M.I., Bondarets, O.A. Phenomenological Model of Scattered Fracture for Anisotropic Materials. Strength Mater 55, 945–953 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11223-023-00585-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11223-023-00585-6

Keywords

Navigation