SpringerLink
Log in

Spatial Distribution of Social Inequality in the Metropolitan District of Quito, Ecuador

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Social Indicators Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Exploring the spatial variation of regional social inequality allows the design of public policies; therefore, this study analyzes this phenomenon in the Metropolitan District of Quito, Ecuador (MDQ). To achieve this goal, an index was constructed to measure social inequality for each of the census sectors in the MDQ, using the Kernel nonlinear principal component analysis (KPCA) method. Two scenarios were considered while applying this method in order to select the one that best explained the social conditions of the census sectors according to the index. The first scenario used the method with no geographic weighting, and the second scenario involved the spatial component of the KPCA method. For the latter, appraisals of the properties in each census sector were considered. The results showed that by involving the spatial component in the method, the index reflects the MDQ reality better, and therefore, it could be seen that social inequality is highly spatially heterogeneous in the MDQ.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alzate, C., & Suykens, J. A. (2006). A weighted kernel-PCA formulation with out-of-sample extensions for spectral clustering methods. In 2006 IEEE international joint conference on neural network proceedings (pp. 138–144). IEEE.

  • Amara, M., & Ayadi, M. (2013). The local geographies of welfare in Tunisia: Does neighbourhood matter? International Journal of Social Welfare, 22(1), 90–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aslam, A., & Corrado, L. (2012). The geography of well-being. Journal of Economic Geography, 12(3), 627–649.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, T., Chamberlin, J., & Rhinehart, I. (2005). An investigation of the spatial determinants of the local prevalence of poverty in rural Malawi. Food Policy, 30(5–6), 532–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Böttcher, A., & Wenzel, D. (2008). The Frobenius norm and the commutator. Linear Algebra and Its Applications, 429(8–9), 1864–1885.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bromley, R. (1978). Introduction-the urban informal sector: Why is it worth discussing? World Development, 6(9–10), 1033–1039.

    Google Scholar 

  • Builes, N. M. S. (2016). Educación y paz: de la inclusión al reconocimiento de la diversidad. Vulnerabilidad y desplazamiento en la escuela. Complejidad, Conflictos Y Paces, 97.

  • Burchardt, H. J. (2012). Why is Latin America so unequal? Attempts at explanation from an unusual perspective. New Society, 239, 137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera-Barona, P. (2017). Influence of urban multi-criteria deprivation and spatial accessibility to healthcare on self-reported health. Urban Science, 1(2), 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera-Barona, P., Murphy, T., Kienberger, S., & Blaschke, T. (2015). A multi-criteria spatial deprivation index to support health inequality analyses. International Journal of Health Geographics, 14(1), 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera-Barona, P., Wei, C., & Hagenlocher, M. (2016). Multiscale evaluation of an urban deprivation index: Implications for quality of life and healthcare accessibility planning. Applied Geography, 70, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callens, M. (2017). Long-term trends in life satisfaction, 1973–2012: Flanders in Europe. Social Indicators Research, 130(1), 107–127. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-1134-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council of the Metropolitan District of Quito, Municipal Ordinance No. 152 (2011).

  • De Leeuw, J., & Mair, P. (2009). Gifi methods for optimal scaling in R: The package homals. Journal of Statistical Software, 31(4), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debnath, L., & Mikusinski, P. (2005). Introduction to Hilbert spaces with applications. Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demšar, U., Harris, P., Brunsdon, C., Fotheringham, A. S., & McLoone, S. (2013). Principal component analysis on spatial data: An overview. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 103(1), 106–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • ECLAC, N. (2010). Time for equality: Gaps to be closed, roads to be opened. Thirty-third Period of sessions of ECLAC.

  • ECLAC, N. (2016). The matrix of social inequality in Latin America.

  • Egüez Armas, V. D. L. M., & Pérez Huachamboza, M. M. (2017). Multivariate characterization of the socioeconomic level for the urban area of Ecuador, LIFE-ECV conditions survey, Ronda 2014 (Bachelor’s thesis, Quito: UCE).

  • Eiras-Franco, C., Flores, M., Bolón-Canedo, V., Zaragoza, S., Fernández-Casal, R., Naya, S., & Tarrío-Saavedra, J. (2019). Case study of anomaly detection and quality control of energy efficiency and hygrothermal comfort in buildings. In 8th International Conference on Data Science, Technology and Applications (pp. 145–151). Prague, Czech Republic: DATA; 26–28 July 2019.

  • Elbers, C., Lanjouw, J. O., & Lanjouw, P. (2003a). Micro-level estimation of poverty and inequality. Econometrica, 71(1), 355–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gifi, A. (1990). Nonlinear multivariate analysis. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guttman, L. (1941). The quantification of a class of attributes: A theory and method of scale construction. In The Prediction of personal adjustment P. Horst (Ed.). Soc. Sci. Res. Council. Bull, 48: 321–245.

  • Iwata, B. A., & Dozier, C. L. (2008). Clinical application of functional analysis methodology. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 1(1), 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jayasinghe, M., & Smith, C. (2021). Poverty implications of household headship and food consumption economies of scales: A case study from Sri Lanka. Social Indicators Research, 155(1), 157–185.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. A., & Wichern, D. W. (2014). Applied multivariate statistical analysis (Vol. 4). Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klugman, J., Rodríguez, F., Kovacevic, M., Kennedy, A., Jespersen, E., & Orme, W. (2011). Human development report 2011. Sustainability and equity: A better future for all. Madrid: United Nations Development Program (UNDP): Ediciones Mundi-Prensa p. 42.

  • Lee, J. M., Yoo, C., Choi, S. W., Vanrolleghem, P. A., & Lee, I. B. (2004). Nonlinear process monitoring using kernel principal component analysis. Chemical Engineering Science, 59(1), 223–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linting, M., Meulman, J. J., Groenen, P. J., & van der Koojj, A. J. (2007). Nonlinear principal components analysis: Introduction and application. Psychological Methods, 12(3), 336–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, S. A. (2008). The salience of neighbourhoods: Lessons from early sociology? American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 34(3), 257–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturo, F., Balzanella, A., & Di Battista, T. (2019). Building statistical indicators of equitable and sustainable well-being in a functional framework. Social Indicators Research, 146(3), 449–471.

    Google Scholar 

  • Max-Neef, M. A., Elizalde, A., & Hopenhayn, M. (2006). Development on a human scale: Concepts, applications and some reflections (Vol. 66). Icaria editorial.

  • Mika, S., Rätsch, G., Weston, J., Schölkopf, B., Smola, A. J., & Müller, K. R. (1999). Invariant feature extraction and classification in kernel spaces. In NIPS (pp. 526–532).

  • Mill, J. S., Bentham, J., & Troyer, J. (2003). The classical utilitarians: Bentham and Mill. Hackett Publishing.

  • Morales, M. C., & Gutiérrez, F. J. M. (2009). Development theories and regional inequalities: A bibliographic review. Análisis Económico, 24(55), 365–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moscoso, S. S. (2017). Evolution of income inequality in Ecuador, period 2007–2015. Volume 13

  • Murillo, F. H. S., Chica Olmo, J., & Soto Builes, N. M. (2019). Spatial variability analysis of quality of life and its determinants: A case study of Medellín Colombia. Social Indicators Research, 144(3), 1233–1256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nam, J. (2021). Does economic inequality constrain intergenerational economic mobility? The association between income inequality during childhood and intergenerational income persistence in the United States. Social Indicators Research, 154(2), 469–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Statistics and Censuses. INEC, 2105. I. Survey Results Compendium. Living Conditions ECV, Sixth Round 2015.

  • Naveed, T. A., Gordon, D., Ullah, S., & Zhang, M. (2021). The construction of an asset index at household level and measurement of economic disparities in Punjab (Pakistan) by using MICS-micro data. Social Indicators Research, 155(1), 73–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naya, S., Tarrío-Saavedra, J., Zaragoza, S., Sánchez, M. A. F., & Oviedo, M. (2015). Statistical quality control with functional data. An application to energy efficiency. In Proceedings of the 60th ISI world statistics congress, 26–31 July 2015 (pp. 3425–3432).

  • Naya, S., Tarrío-Saavedra, J., López-Beceiro, J., Francisco-Fernández, M., Flores, M., & Artiaga, R. (2014). Statistical functional approach for interlaboratory studies with thermal data. Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry, 118(2), 1229–1243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2012). Create capacities: Proposal for human development. Iwata.

  • Nussbaum, M. (2000). Women and human development: The capabilities approach. New. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2004). Hiding from humanity. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2006). Frontiers of justice. Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M., & Sen, A. (Eds.). (1993). Quality of life. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2013). OECD guidelines for measuring subjective well-being. Measurement of Subjective Well-Being, (139–178). https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264191655-7-en.

  • OECD (2014). GDP as a measure of well-being: The agenda beyond GDP. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264214637-16-en.

  • ONU (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York, USA: United Nations.

  • Peralta, E., & Tasquer, R. M. (2003). Quito: Cultural heritage of humanity. MRE Ecuador.

  • Pérez, F. J. (2015). Political economy and land appraisal methods. Equity and Development, 1(24), 53–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pun-Cheng, L. S. (2016). Distance decay. International encyclopedia of geography: People, the earth, environment and technology: People, the earth. Environmental Technology, 1–5.

  • R Core Team (2020). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-proje, http://ct.org/.

  • Rawls, J. (1995). Political liberalism. UNAM.

  • Rawls, J. (2002). Justice as fairness. Barcelona, Mexico: Paidós.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romdhani, S., Gong, S., & Psarrou, A. (1999). A Multi-View Nonlinear Active Shape Model Using Kernel PCA. In BMVC (Vol. 10, pp. 483–492).

  • Samaniego Ponce, P. (2013). Evolución de la pobreza y la desigualdad en Quito.

  • Schölkopf, B., Smola, A., & Müller, K. R. (1998). Nonlinear component analysis as a kernel eigenvalue problem. Neural Computation, 10(5), 1299–1319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segura, R. (2014). Socio-spatial inequalities in Latin American cities: Two problems, a paradox and a proposal.

  • Sen, A. (1993). Capability and well-being. In M. C. Nussbaum.

  • Sen, A. K. (1980). Equality of what? Tanner lectures on human values. University of Utah Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2000). Development as freedom. Anchor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2002). Rationality and freedom. Cambridge. Belknap Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2003). El nivel de vida. Editorial Complutense.

  • Sen, A. K. (2004). Capabilities, lists, and public reason: Continuing the conversation. Feminist Economics, 10(3), 77–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2006). What do we want from a theory of justice? J Philos, 103(5), 215–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. (2012). Valores y justicia. Revista de Metodología Económica 19(2), 101–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sepúlveda-Murillo, F. H., Soto-Builes, N. M., Checa-Olivas, M., & Chica-Olmo, J. (2020). Map** spatial variability of the quality of life in the city of Medellin-Colombia. Studies of Applied Economics 38(1)

  • Strager, M. P., & Rosenberger, R. S. (2006). Incorporating stakeholder preferences for land conservation: Weights and measures in spatial MCA. Ecological Economics, 57(4), 627–639.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suykens, J. A., Signoretto, M., & Argyriou, A. (Eds.). (2014). Regularization, optimization, kernels, and support vector machines. Florida: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tobler, W. R. (1979). Estimation of attractivities from interactions. Environment and Planning A, 11(2), 121–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tokman, V. (1987). The imperative to act. The informal sector today. Nueva Sociedad, 90, 93–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, C., Barona, P. C., & Blaschke, T. (2015). Where is the poverty area? quantifying the neighborhood effect in a deprivation index estimation: A case study in Quito Ecuador. Gi_forum, 2015, 625–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, C., Cabrera Barona, P., & Blaschke, T. (2017). A new look at public services inequality: The consistency of neighborhood context and citizens’ perception across multiple scales. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 6(7), 200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei, C., Cabrera-Barona, P., & Blaschke, T. (2016). Local geographic variation of public services inequality: Does the neighborhood scale matter? International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 13(10), 981.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zolotova, I. N. (2017). Analysis of inequality in the distribution of real estate wealth in the Metropolitan District of Quito. Analítika: Revista De Análisis Estadístico., 13, 135–170.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Facultad de Ciencias, Escuela Politécnica Nacional, 17012759, Quito (Pichincha), Ecuador

    Jared Abigail Valencia-Salvador & Miguel Alfonso Flores-Sánchez

  2. Faculty of Basic Sciences, University of Medellin, 050026, Medellin, Colombia

    Fabio Humberto Sepúlveda-Murillo

  3. Faculty of Social and Human Sciences, University of Medellin, 050026, Medellin, Colombia

    Norely Margarita Soto Builes

Authors
  1. Jared Abigail Valencia-Salvador
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Fabio Humberto Sepúlveda-Murillo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Miguel Alfonso Flores-Sánchez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Norely Margarita Soto Builes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fabio Humberto Sepúlveda-Murillo.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Valencia-Salvador, J.A., Sepúlveda-Murillo, F.H., Flores-Sánchez, M.A. et al. Spatial Distribution of Social Inequality in the Metropolitan District of Quito, Ecuador. Soc Indic Res 163, 753–769 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-022-02916-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-022-02916-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation