Abstract
Diversity of editorial boards of academic journals has recently become one of the most frequently discussed topics in scientific communication. Diversity of editorial board is considered to be an important element affecting the journal, the field and the region in terms of the number and diversity of publications. In parallel with this increasing awareness in the academic circles, many studies on diversity in the literature at both the field and journal levels have been carried out. In this study, the editorial boards of academic journals in the field of Library and Information Sciences were analyzed in terms of accommodating geographical representation, and the effect of such diversity, if any, on the number of publications was investigated. The data set consisted of the journals in the mentioned field in the SCImago web page Journal Rankings. The analyzes were carried out based on 6126 persons registered to 212 journals, including chief editors. The findings of the study showed that 75.11% of all members of editorial boards were from North American and European countries. While Asian countries (Central and South Asia, and East and Southeast Asia) were represented by 13.16% in journals in the field of Library and Information Sciences. A linear correlation was found between the regions where the chief editors of the journals were registered and the assignments of the editorial boards. Moreover, a linear correlation was found between the editors of journals (chief editors and other editors assigned to boards) and the scientific outputs (citable documents, citations, and h-index) in terms of regional relationship. The consistency of the results with those of other studies in the literature clearly demonstrates a need for more transparent processes in academic publishing. A policy to ensure a fair and diverse representation in boards of journals features numerous multifaceted positive effects.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
SCImago has indexed the country information of the sources according to the publisher's location information (Scopus, n.d., p. 19). Nevertheless, this information is not always clear, especially in cases where most or all of the publisher's functions are carried out thousands of miles from the corporate offices.
References
Albuquerque, A., Oliveira, T., Dos Santos Junior, M., & Albuquerque, S. (2020). Structural limits to the de-westernization of the communication field: The editorial board in clarivate’s JCR system. Communication, Culture and Critique, 13(2), 185–203. https://doi.org/10.1093/ccc/tcaa015
Araújo, R., & Shideler, G. (2019). Cultural and geographical representation in the editorial boards of aquatic science journals. Science Editor, 42, 120–123.
Araújo, R. J., Shideler, G. S., & Reamer, M. B. (2021). Chief editors in aquatic science and communication are more likely to oversee editorial boards from their own regions. Learned Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1393
Baccini, A., & Barabesi, L. (2009). Interlocking Editorship: A network analysis of the links between economic journals. Scientometrics, 82, 365–389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0053-7
Baccini, A., & Barabesi, L. (2011). Seats at the table: The network of the editorial boards in information and library science. Journal of Informetrics, 5, 382–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2011.01.012
Beath, C., Chan, Y., Davison, R. M., Dennis, A., & Recker, J. (2021). Editorial board diversity at the basket of eight journals: A report to the college of senior scholars. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 48, 236–247. https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.04830
Besancenot, D., Kim, H., & Faria, J. R. (2012). Search and research: The influence of editorial boards on journals’ quality. Theory and Decision, 73(4), 687–702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11238-012-9314-7
Boldt, J., & Maleck, W. (2000). Composition of the editorial/advisory boards of major English-language anesthesia/critical care journals. Acta Anaesthiologica Scandinavica, 44, 175–179. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-6576.2000.440208.x
Bonnevie, E. (2003). A multifaceted portrait of a library and information science journal: The case of the journal of information science. Journal of Information Science, 29, 11–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/016555150302900102
Braun, T., & Dióspatonyi, I. (2005a). The journal gatekeepers of major publishing houses of core science journals. Scientometrics, 64(2), 113–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0243-x
Braun, T., & Diospatonyi, I. (2005b). The counting of core journal gatekeepers as science indicators really counts: The scientific scope of action and strength of nations. Scientometrics, 62(3), 297–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-005-0023-7
Braun, T., & Diospatonyi, I. (2006). Gatekee** in the international journal literature of chemistry. Information Processing & Management, 42, 1652–1656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2006.03.014
Cabanac, G. (2012). Sha** the landscape of research in information systems from the perspective of editorial boards: A scientometric study of 77 leading journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, Association for Information Science & Technology, 63(5), 977–996. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22609
Campos-Arceiz, A., Primack, R. B., Miller-Rushing, A. J., & Maron, M. (2018). Striking underrepresentation of biodiversity-rich regions among editors of conservation journals. Biological Conservation, 220, 330–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2017.07.028
Council of Science Editors (2019). CSE 2019 Annual Meeting. https://www.councilscienceeditors.org/events/previous-annual-meetings/cse-2019-annual-meeting/
Cronin, B. (2009). A seat at the table. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(12), 2387–12387. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21213
Cummings, S., & Hoebink, P. (2016). Representation of academics from develo** countries as authors and editorial board members in scientific journals: Does this matter to the field of development studies? The European Journal of Development Research, 29(2), 369–383. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-016-0002-2
Delta Think. News & views: Open Access market sizing update 2021. Retrieved (October 19, 2021) From https://deltathink.com/news-views-open-access-market-sizing-update-2021/
Demeter, M. (2020). Power relations in global knowledge production. A cultural/critical approach. Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 15(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/17447143.2019.1657124
Dhanani, A., & Jones, M. J. (2017). Editorial boards of accounting journals: Gender diversity and internationalisation. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 30(5), 1008–1040. https://doi.org/10.1108/AAAJ-08-2014-1785
Dyachenko, E. L. (2014). Internationalization of academic journals: Is there still a gap between social and natural Science? Scientometrics, 101, 241–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1357-9
García-Carpintero, E., Granadino, B., & Plaza, L. M. (2010). The representation of nationalities on the editorial boards of international journals and the promotion of the scientific output of the same countries. Scientometrics, 84(3), 799–811. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0199-3
Goyanes, M. (2020). Editorial boards in communication Science journals: Plurality or standardization? International Communication Gazette., 82(4), 342–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748048518825322
Goyanes, M., & Demeter, M. (2020). How the geographic diversity of editorial boards affects what is published in JCR-ranked communication journals. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 97(4), 1123–1148. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699020904169
Harzing, A., & Metz, I. (2011). Gender and geographic diversity in the editorial board of the journal of ınternational business studies. AIB Insights, 11(3), 3–7.
Harzing, A. W., & Metz, I. (2012). Explaining geographic diversity of editorial boards: The role of conference participation and English-language skills. European Journal of International Management, 6(6), 697–715. https://doi.org/10.1504/EJIM.2012.050423
Harzing, A. W., & Metz, I. (2013). Practicing what we preach. Management International Review, 53, 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-011-0124-x
Huang, M. H., Shaw, W. C., & Lin, C. S. (2019). One category, two communities: subfield differences in “ınformation science and library science” in journal citation reports. Scientometrics, 119(2), 1059–1079. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03074-3
Jarvelin, K., & Vakkari, P. (1990). Content-analysis of research articles in library and information science. Library & Information Science Research, 12(4), 395–421.
Küçük, M. E., Al, U., & Olcay, N. E. (2008). Türkiye’de bilimsel elektronik dergiler. Türk Kütüphanciliği, 22(3), 308–319.
Kuebbing, S. E., McCary, M. A., Lieurance, D., et al. (2022). A self-study of editorial board diversity at biological invasions. Biological Invasions, 24, 321–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-021-02664-8
Lariviere, V., Sugimoto, C. R., & Cronin, B. (2012). A bibliometric chronicling of library and information science’s first hundred years. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63, 997–1016. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.22645
Lauf, E. (2005). National diversity of major international journals in the field of communication. Journal of Communication, 55(1), 139–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb02663.x
Meo, S. A., & Usmani, A. M. (2014). Impact of R&D expenditures on research publications, patents and high-tech exports among European countries. European Review for Medical and Pharmacological Sciences, 18(1), 1–9.
Michael, A. Ask the Chefs: How can we increase the diversity in scholarly communications [Blog]. Retrieved November 16, 2017 from https://scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2017/11/16/diversity-scholarly-communications/
Mindt, M. R., Hilsabeck, R. C., Olsen, J. P., Savin, M. J., Crook, C. L., & Suchy, Y. (2018). Advancing science through diversity and ınclusion in the editorial process: A case study. Science Editor, 41(3), 93–96.
Newhouse, L. J., & Brandeau, M. L. (2021). Who are the gatekeepers? An examination of diversity in Informs journal editorial boards. Service Science. https://doi.org/10.1287/serv.2021.0274
Oh, D.-G., Kim, E., Yeo, J., Yang, K., & Lee, J. (2019). A comparison of editorial board members of non-Western journals and core LIS journals. International Conference on Library and Information Science, July 2019, Taipei, Taiwan, 383–394.
Okagbue, H. I., Atayero, A. A., Adamu, M. O., Bishop, S. A., Oguntunde, P. E., & Opanuga, A. A. (2018). Exploration of editorial board composition, Citescore and percentiles of Hindawi journals indexed in Scopus. Data in Brief, 19, 743–752. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2018.05.066
Ozbilgin, M. (2004). “International” human resource management: Academic parochialism in editorial boards of the “top” 22 journals on international human resource management. Personnel Review, 33(2), 205–221. https://doi.org/10.1108/00434804105180559
Palser, E. R., Lazerwitz, M., & Fotopoulou, A. (2021). Gender and geographical disparity in editorial boards of journals in psychology and neuroscience. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.15.431321
Porter, C. (2021). Diversifying editorial boards. COPE. https://publicationethics.org/news/diversifying-editorial-boards
Sart, G. (2020). Ar-Ge harcamalarının bilimsel makale sayısına etkisi: G7 ülkeleri Örneği. Bilim-Teknoloji-Yenilik Ekosistemi Dergisi, 1(1), 35–45.
Schlögl, C., & Petschnig, W. (2005). Library and information science journals: An editor survey. Library Collections, Acquisitions, and Technical Services, 29(1), 4–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649055.2005.10766030
Scopus 2022 Content coverage. Retrieved November 26, 2022 from https://www.elsevier.com/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/69451/Scopus_ContentCoverage_Guide_WEB.pdf
Søreide, K., Ringdal, K. G., & Lossius, H. M. (2010). Submission policy, peer-review and editorial board members: Interesting conflicts and conflicts of interest. Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation, & Emergency Medicine, 18, 56. https://doi.org/10.1186/1757-7241-18-56
The World Bank. (2022). Retrieved November 26, 2022. from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/GB.XPD.RSDV.GD.ZS?view=chart
Trepte, S., & Loths, L. (2020). National and gender diversity in communication: A content analysis of six journals between 2006 and 2016. Annals of the International Communication Association, 44(4), 289–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/23808985.2020.1804434
Tsay, M. (2011). A bibliometric analysis and comparison on three information science journals: JASIST, IPM, JOD, 1998–2008. Scientometrics, 89, 591–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0460-4
Uzun, A. (2004). Assessing internationality of scholarly journals through foreign authorship patterns: The case of major journals in information science, and scientometrics. Scientometrics, 61, 457–465.
Walters, W. H. (2015). Do editorial board members in library and information science publish disproportionately in the journals for which they serve as board members? Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 46(4), 343–354. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.46.4.03
Walters, W. H. (2016). The research contributions of editorial board members in library and information science. Journal of Scholarly Publishing, 47(2), 121–146. https://doi.org/10.3138/jsp.47.2.121
Willett, P. (2013). The characteristics of journal editorial boards in library and ınformation science. International Journal of Knowledge Content Development and Technology, 3, 5–17.
**e, Y., Wu, Q., Zhang, P., & Li, X. (2020). Information Science and Library Science (IS-LS) journal subject categorisation and comparison based on editorship information. Journal of Informetrics, 14(4), 101069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2020.101069
Yip, S. W., & Rashid, M. A. (2021). Editorial diversity in medical education journals. The Clinical Teacher, 18, 523–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.13386
Youk, S., & Park, H. S. (2019). Where and what do they publish? Editors’ and editorial board members’ affiliated institutions and the citation counts of their endogenous publications in the field of communication. Scientometrics, 120, 1237–1260. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-019-03169-x
Zsindely, S., Schubert, A., & Braun, T. (1982). Editorial gatekee** patterns in international science journals. A new science indicator. Scientometrics, 4(1), 57–68.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interests
The authors did not receive support from any organization for the submitted work.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Akça, S., Şenyurt, Ö. Geographical representation of editorial boards: a review in the field of library and information sciences. Scientometrics 128, 1409–1427 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04614-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-022-04614-0