Log in

Error estimation for non-linear singularly perturbed reaction–diffusion parabolic problems via element-free Galerkin method

  • Published:
Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current study aims to develop an error analysis for non-linear parabolic singularly perturbed reaction–diffusion problems using element-free Galerkin method. A robust numerical methodology is introduced based on combining the implicit Crank–Nicolson scheme for temporal derivatives and the element-free Galerkin (EFG) method for spatial derivatives. The moving least-squares (MLS) approximation has been employed to generate the shape functions. Essential boundary conditions have been enforced by the incorporation of the Lagrange multiplier method. Due to the presence of steep boundary layers in the solution of the considered problem, a piecewise-uniform layer-adapted Shishkin’s technique has been used to generate nodal points at the transition point. The stability and error analysis of the present method on a discrete \(L^{2}-\)norm is analyzed in an innovative theoretical framework. The \(\epsilon\)-uniform convergency of the fully-discrete EFG method is shown to be \(\mathcal {O}(\tau ^{2}+d_{s}^{m})\), where \(\tau\) and \(d_{s}^{m}\) are the time step size and size of the influence domain, respectively. The Lagrange multiplier method has been incorporated to deal with the implementation of essential boundary conditions. Lastly, a few numerical experiments are performed to validate the theoretical results and verify the computational consistency and robustness of the proposed scheme. The \(L_{\infty }\) errors and the convergence rate have been presented.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data sets supporting the results presented in the study have been generated using the MATLAB code. No external data files are used in the present work.

References

  1. Bansal K, Rai P, Sharma KK (2017) Numerical treatment for the class of time dependent singularly perturbed parabolic problems with general shift arguments. Differ Equ Dyn Syst 25(2):327–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bullo TA, Duressa GF, Degla GA (2021) Robust finite difference method for singularly perturbed two-parameter parabolic convection–diffusion problems. Int J Comput Methods 18(02):2050034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chandru M, Das P, Ramos H (2018) Numerical treatment of two-parameter singularly perturbed parabolic convection diffusion problems with non-smooth data. Math Methods Appl Sci 41(14):5359–5387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chandru M, Prabha T, Das P, Shanthi V (2019) A numerical method for solving boundary and interior layers dominated parabolic problems with discontinuous convection coefficient and source terms. Differ Equ Dyn Syst 27(1):91–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheng O, Jia-qi M (2005) The nonlinear singularly perturbed problems for predator–prey reaction diffusion equations. J Biomath 20(2):135–141

    Google Scholar 

  6. Das P (2015) Comparison of a priori and a posteriori meshes for singularly perturbed nonlinear parameterized problems. J Comput Appl Math 290:16–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Das P (2018) A higher order difference method for singularly perturbed parabolic partial differential equations. J Differ Equ Appl 24(3):452–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Das P, Natesan S (2014) Optimal error estimate using mesh equidistribution technique for singularly perturbed system of reaction–diffusion boundary-value problems. Appl Math Comput 249:265–277

    Google Scholar 

  9. Das P, Rana S, Ramos H (2022) On the approximate solutions of a class of fractional order nonlinear volterra integro-differential initial value problems and boundary value problems of first kind and their convergence analysis. J Comput Appl Math 404:113116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kadalbajoo M, Sharma K (2005) Numerical treatment of boundary value problems for second order singularly perturbed delay differential equations. Comput Appl Math 24:151–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaur J, Sangwan V (2021) Exponentially fitted element-free Galerkin approach for nonlinear singularly perturbed problems. J Math 2021:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kumar D (2018) An implicit scheme for singularly perturbed parabolic problem with retarded terms arising in computational neuroscience. Numer Methods Partial Differ Equ 34(6):1933–1952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kumar D, Kadalbajoo MK (2011) A parameter-uniform numerical method for time-dependent singularly perturbed differential–difference equations. Appl Math Model 35(6):2805–2819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kumar BR, Kumar S (2015) Convergence of three-step Taylor galerkin finite element scheme based monotone schwarz iterative method for singularly perturbed differential–difference equation. Numer Funct Anal Optim 36(8):1029–1045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kumar S, Kumar BR (2017) A finite element domain decomposition approximation for a semilinear parabolic singularly perturbed differential equation. Int J Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul 18(1):41–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kumar S, Kumar BR, Boonkkamp JTT (2019) Complete flux scheme for elliptic singularly perturbed differential–difference equations. Math Comput Simul 165:255–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kumar K, Podila PC, Das P, Ramos H (2021) A graded mesh refinement approach for boundary layer originated singularly perturbed time-delayed parabolic convection diffusion problems. Math Methods Appl Sci 44(16):12332–12350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lancaster P, Salkauskas K (1981) Surfaces generated by moving least squares methods. Math Comput 37(155):141–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Miller JJ, Oriordan E, Shishkin GI (1996) Fitted numerical methods for singular perturbation problems: error estimates in the maximum norm for linear problems in one and two dimensions. World scientific, Singapore

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Murray JD (2002) Mathematical biology: I. An introduction. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Parthiban S, Valarmathi S, Franklin V (2015) A numerical method to solve singularly perturbed linear parabolic second order delay differential equation of reaction-diffusion type. Malaya J Matematik 18:412–20

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rana S, Das P (2020) Theoretical prospects of the solutions of fractional order weakly singular volterra integro differential equations and their approximations with convergence analysis

  23. Rashidinia J, Barati A, Nabati M (2014) Application of sinc-Galerkin method to singularly perturbed parabolic convection–diffusion problems. Numer Algorith 66(3):643–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Roos H-G, Stynes M, Tobiska L (2008) Robust numerical methods for singularly perturbed differential equations: convection-diffusion-reaction and flow problems, vol 24. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  25. Roos H-G, Stynes M, Tobiska L (2008) Robust numerical methods for singularly perturbed differential equations: convection–diffusion-reaction and flow problems, vol 24. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sangwan V, Kumar BVR (2012) Finite element analysis for mass-lumped three-step Taylor Galerkin method for time dependent singularly perturbed problems with exponentially fitted splines. Numer Funct Anal Optim 33(6):638–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Shakti D, Mohapatra J, Das P, Vigo-Aguiar J (2022) A moving mesh refinement based optimal accurate uniformly convergent computational method for a parabolic system of boundary layer originated reaction-diffusion problems with arbitrary small diffusion terms. J Comput Appl Math 404:113167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sun F, Wang J, Cheng Y, Huang A (2015) Error estimates for the interpolating moving least-squares method in n-dimensional space. Appl Numer Math 98:79–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tefera DM, Tirunehi AA, Derese GA (2024) Absolutely stable fitted mesh scheme for singularly perturbed parabolic convection diffusion equations. In: Lente G (ed) Reaction kinetics, mechanisms and catalysis. Springer, Cham, pp 1–22

    Google Scholar 

  30. Thalhammer M (2004) On the convergence behaviour of variable stepsize multistep methods for singularly perturbed problems. BIT Numer Math 44(2):343–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Tian H (2003) Asymptotic expansion for the solution of singularly perturbed delay differential equations. J Math Anal Appl 281(2):678–696

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tiruneh AA, Derese GA, Tefera DM (2022) A nonstandard fitted operator method for singularly perturbed parabolic reaction-diffusion problems with a large time delay. Int J Math Math Sci 2022:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Wu J (1996) Theory and applications of partial functional differential equations, vol 119. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vivek Sangwan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest in this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kaur, J., Sangwan, V. & Kumar, R. Error estimation for non-linear singularly perturbed reaction–diffusion parabolic problems via element-free Galerkin method. Reac Kinet Mech Cat 137, 1255–1281 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11144-024-02630-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11144-024-02630-0

Keywords

Navigation