Log in

A generalizable framework for enhanced natural climate solutions

  • Opinion Paper
  • Published:
Plant and Soil Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The natural removal of carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere through land conservation, restoration, and management is receiving increasing attention as a scalable approach for climate change mitigation. However, different land-use sectors compete for resources and incentives within and across geopolitical regions, resulting in divergent goals and inefficient prioritization of CO2 removal efforts. Thus, a unifying framework is needed to accelerate basic research and coordinated interventions to accelerate climate change mitigation.

Scope

We propose a generalizable framework for Enhanced Natural Climate Solutions (NCS +), which we define as activities that can be coordinated to increase carbon drawdown and permanence on land while improving livelihoods and the provision of natural resources in vulnerable communities and ecosystems. The framework builds on interdisciplinary scientific convergence, including critical socioecological interactions, to inform both top-down policy incentives and bottom-up adoption by industries and managers. To achieve this goal, we suggest a multi-tiered approach for the prioritization of projects at local to regional scales that would simultaneously accelerate scientific discovery and broad implementation of CO2 removal projects.

Conclusions

Our vision leverages input from hundreds of researchers and land managers, including social and environmental scientists as well as representatives from tribal governments, state, and federal agencies in the Pacific Northwest of the USA, as a model system. Five guiding principles orient the framework which would be applicable in any region. As evidence of feasibility, we provide a synthesis of interdisciplinary studies that illustrate how coordinated action, with explicit consideration of system-specific technical and socioecological limitations, can lead to scalable projects with multiple co-benefits. Using theory as a linchpin for innovation, we propose that NCS + could better align climate change mitigation, adaptation, and justice goals at multiple scales.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the National Science Foundation Convergence Accelerator Program (Landscape Carbon Sequestration for Atmospheric Recovery. Grant #1939511) and all participating scientists, practitioners, policy scholars, state and tribal representatives whose pilot ideas helped inspire this piece. As organizers of the first NCS+ conference we would like to thank all contributors listed below:

Convergence Accelerator Contributors (2019)

Alex Philp

University of Montana

Alyden Donnelly

NORI Carbon Removal Marketplace

Andrew Gray

PNW Research Station, US Forest Service

Caroline Fish

University of Oregon

Christine Shirley

Dep. of Land Conservation & Development

Dana Chadwick

Stanford University

Daniel Dietz

McKenzie River Trust

David Diaz

EcoTrust

Don Motanic

Intertribal Timber Council

Gary Morishima

Quinault Management Center

Grant Scheve

AGRA Marketing

Heidi Huber-Stearns

University of Oregon

Henry Luan

University of Oregon

Jen-Moore Kucera

American Farmland Trust

John Bolte

Oregon State University

Joseph Sexton

Terra Pulse

Karl Morgenstern

Eugene Water & Electric Board

Kory Russel

University of Oregon

Lauren Hallett

University of Oregon

Lee Rahr

Sustainable Northwest

Lisamarie Windham-Myers

USGS, CA

Mason Earles

University of California, Davis

Matthew Polizzotto

University of Oregon

Melissa Lucash

Portland State University

Pamela Conrad

CMG Landscape Architecture

Stephen Lawn

AGRA Biochar Tech Implementation

Steve Perakis

USGS, OR

William Horwath

University of California, Davis

Yekang Ko

University of Oregon

Michele Smith

JD Environmental and Natural Resources University of Oregon

Barbara Bomfim

Postdoctoral Fellow Soil–Plant-Atmosphere Research Lab University of Oregon

Robert Mellinger

JD candidate Environmental and Natural Resources University of Oregon

Jamie Wright

PhD candidate Environmental Sciences Studies & Policy University of Oregon

Schyler Reis

PhD candidate Environmental Sciences Studies & Policy University of Oregon

Adriana Uscanga

PhD candidate Geography University of Oregon

Callie Barret

JD candidate Environmental and Natural Resources University of Oregon

Zachary Griffith

JD candidate Environmental and Natural Resources University of Oregon

Deanna Lynn

MS candidate Landscape Architecture University of Oregon

Markus Koeneke

MS candidate Earth Sciences University of Oregon

Apple Goeckner

Environmental and Natural Resources Program Manager University of Oregon

Sustainable Regional Systems Research Network Contributors (2021)

Jake Searcy

UO

Michael Coughlan

UO

Lauren Hallett

UO

John Arroyo

UO

Peg Boulay

UO

Bryan Rebar

UO

Heidi Huber-Stearns

UO

Brendan Bohannan

UO

Shawn Bourque

Karuk Tribe

Michelle Totman

Tulalip Tribes

Darin Jarnaghan

Coquille Tribe

John Bolte

OSU

Kate Lajtha

OSU

Christopher Still

OSU

Chad Hanson

OSU

Jennifer Moore

American Farmer Trust

Kristin Trippe

USDA ARS

Joshua Fu

U Tennessee

Forrest Hoffman

U Tennessee

Craig Cornu

Institute For Applied Eco.

Laura Brophy

Institute For Applied Eco.

Amy Borde

PNNL

Christopher Janousek

OSU

Dennis Baldocchi

UC Berkeley

Patty Oikawa

CA State U

Lisamarie Windham-Myers

USGS

Steve Deverel

Hydorfocus

Heida Diefenderfer

UW/PNNL

Dana Chadwick

U Texas

Julia Jones

OSU

Joseph Sexton

Terrapulsc

Varsha Vijay

Terrapulsc

Min Feng

TerrapuIse

Panshi Wang

TerrapuIse

Doug Toomey

UO

Lauren Ponisio

UO

Ryan Light

UO

Nicolas Morar

UO

Wanda Crannell

OSU

Ricardo Mata Gonzalez

OSU

Sam Angima

OSU

Jessica Halofsky

NW Climate Hub

Daniel Dietz

McKenzie River Trust

Jared Weybright

McKenzieWatershed Counc.

Stefanie Simpson

The Nature Conservancy

Katie MacKendrick

LongTomWatershed Counc.

Bree Yednock

SSNER

Ernie Niemi

Natural Resource Econ

Steven Lawn

S Vall. Consult.

Kyler Sherry

Climate Trust

Elizabeth Verhoeven

OSU Exten. Serv.

Eric Richardson

NAACP

Ben Bond-Lamberty

UW/PNNL

Jeff Diez

UO

Micheal Nelson

HJ Andrews

Mark Schulze

HJ Andrews

Toby Maxwell

Boise State U

Barbara Bomfim

LBL

Jianwei Zhang

USFS

Alex Philip

U Montana

Steven Perakis

USGS

Sharon Stanton

PNW Res. Stn.

Mark Johnston

Coquille Tribe

David Bell

USFS

Cassie Bordelon

WA DNR

Michael Peterson

CA Dept Insurance

Karl Morgenstern

Eugene Water & Electric Brd

Gregory Jones

Evenstad Center for Wine Ed.

Tamy Livner

NW Natural

Scott Settelmyer

TerraCarbon

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lucas C. R. Silva.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Hans Lambers.

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Silva, L.C.R., Wood, M.C., Johnson, B.R. et al. A generalizable framework for enhanced natural climate solutions. Plant Soil 479, 3–24 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-022-05472-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-022-05472-8

Keywords

Navigation