Abstract
Key message
Coexpression network revealing genes with Co-variation Expression pattern (CE) and those with Top rank of Expression fold change (TE) played different roles in responding to new environment of Miscanthus lutarioriparius.
Abstract
Variation in gene expression level, the product of genetic and/or environmental perturbation, determines the robustness-to-plasticity spectrum of a phenotype in plants. Understanding how expression variation of plant population response to a new field is crucial to domesticate energy crops. Weighted Gene Coexpression Network Analysis (WGCNA) was used to explore the patterns of expression variation based on 72 Miscanthus lutarioriparius transcriptomes from two contrasting environments, one near the native habitat and the other in one harsh domesticating region. The 932 genes with Co-variation Expression pattern (CE) and other 932 genes with Top rank of Expression fold change (TE) were identified and the former were strongly associated with the water use efficiency (r ≥ 0.55, P ≤ 10−7). Functional enrichment of CE genes were related to three organelles, which well matched the annotation of twelve motifs identified from their conserved noncoding sequence; while TE genes were mostly related to biotic and/or abiotic stress. The expression robustness of CE genes with high genetic diversity kept relatively stable between environments while the harsh environment reduced the expression robustness of TE genes with low genetic diversity. The expression plasticity of CE genes was increased less than that of TE genes. These results suggested that expression variation of CE genes and TE genes could account for the robustness and plasticity of acclimation ability of Miscanthus, respectively. The patterns of expression variation revealed by transcriptomic network would shed new light on breeding and domestication of energy crops.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11103-018-0754-5/MediaObjects/11103_2018_754_Fig1_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11103-018-0754-5/MediaObjects/11103_2018_754_Fig2_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11103-018-0754-5/MediaObjects/11103_2018_754_Fig3_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11103-018-0754-5/MediaObjects/11103_2018_754_Fig4_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11103-018-0754-5/MediaObjects/11103_2018_754_Fig5_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11103-018-0754-5/MediaObjects/11103_2018_754_Fig6_HTML.gif)
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- WGCNA:
-
Weighted gene coexpression network analysis
- CE:
-
Co-variation expression pattern
- TE:
-
Top rank of expression fold change
- JH:
-
Jiangxia in Hubei Province
- QG:
-
Qingyang in Gansu Province
- WUE:
-
Water use efficiency
- A:
-
CO2 assimilation rate
- E:
-
Transpiration rate
- FPKM:
-
Expected number of fragments per kilobase of transcript sequence per millions base pairs sequenced
- ANOVA:
-
Analysis of variance
- TO:
-
Topological overlap
- ME:
-
Module eigengene
- GO:
-
Gene ontology
- KEGG:
-
Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes
- SNPs:
-
Single-nucleotide polymorphism
- dS :
-
The synonymous substitution rates
- dN :
-
Non-synonymous substitution rates
- E p :
-
Average expression level
- E d :
-
Expression diversity
- π:
-
Genetic diversity
- NC:
-
Non-differential change
References
Alipanahi B, Frey BJ (2013) Network cleanup. Nat Biotechnol 31:714–715. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2657
Aoki K, Ogata Y, Shibata D (2007) Approaches for extracting practical information from gene co-expression networks in plant biology. Plant Cell Physiol 48:381–390. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcm013
Barling A et al (2013) A detailed gene expression study of the Miscanthus genus reveals changes in the transcriptome associated with the rejuvenation of spring rhizomes. BMC Genom 14:864. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-864
Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J, Bealer K, Madden TL (2009) BLAST plus: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinform 10:421
Campos ACA, Kruijer W, Alexander R, Akkers RC, Danku J, Salt DE, Aarts MG (2017) Natural variation in Arabidopsis thaliana reveals shoot ionome, biomass, and gene expression changes as biomarkers for zinc deficiency tolerance. J Exp Bot 68:3643–3656. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erx191
Carpita NC, McCann MC (2008) Maize and sorghum: genetic resources for bioenergy grasses. Trends Plant Sci 13:415–420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2008.06.002
Chen SL, Renvoize SA (2006) Miscanthus, vol 22. Flora of China. Science Press & Missouri Botanical Garden Press, Bei**g & St Louis
Chen WJ et al (2005) Contribution of transcriptional regulation to natural variations in Arabidopsis. Genome Biol 6:R32. https://doi.org/10.1186/gb-2005-6-4-r32
Conesa A, Götz S, García-Gómez JM, Terol J, Talón M, Robles M (2005) Blast2GO: a universal tool for annotation, visualization analysis in functional genomics research. Bioinformatics 21:3674–3676. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bti610
DeBiasse MB, Kelly MW (2016) Plastic and evolved responses to global change: What can we learn from comparative transcriptomics? J Hered 107:71–81. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esv073
Denver DR, Morris K, Streelman JT, Kim SK, Lynch M, Thomas WK (2005) The transcriptional consequences of mutation and natural selection in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat Genet 37:544–548. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1554
Des Marais DL, McKay JK, Richards JH, Sen S, Wayne T, Juenger TE (2012) Physiological genomics of response to soil drying in diverse Arabidopsis accessions. Plant Cell 24:893–914. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.112.096180
Des Marais DL, Hernandez KM, Juenger TE (2013) Genotype-by-environment interaction and plasticity: exploring genomic responses of plants to the abiotic environment. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 44:5–29. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-110512-135806
Downs GS et al (2013) A developmental transcriptional network for maize defines coexpression modules. Plant Physiol 161:1830–1843. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.112.213231
Du J, Li X, Li T, Yu D, Han B (2017) Genome-wide transcriptome profiling provides overwintering mechanism of Agropyron mongolicum. BMC Plant Biol 17:138. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-017-1086-3
Fan Y et al (2015) Transcriptome-wide characterization of candidate genes for improving the water use efficiency of energy crops grown on semiarid land. J Exp Bot 66:6415–6429. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erv353
Feng G et al (2017) Comprehensive transcriptome analysis reveals distinct regulatory programs during vernalization and floral bud development of orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.). BMC Plant Biol 17:216. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-017-1170-8
Ficklin SP, Feltus FA (2011) Gene coexpression network alignment and conservation of gene modules between two grass species: maize and rice. Plant Physiol 156:1244–1256. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.111.173047
Ficklin SP, Luo F, Feltus FA (2010) The association of multiple interacting genes with specific phenotypes in rice using gene coexpression networks. Plant Physiol 154:13–24. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.110.159459
Fristedt R, Scharff LB, Clarke CA, Wang Q, Lin C, Merchant SS, Bock R (2014) RBF1, a plant homolog of the bacterial ribosome-binding factor RbfA, acts in processing of the chloroplast 16S ribosomal RNA. Plant Physiol 164:201–215. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.113.228338
Fu J et al (2009) System-wide molecular evidence for phenotypic buffering in Arabidopsis. Nat Genet 41:166–167. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng.308
Giussani LM, Cota-Sánchez JH, Zuloaga FO, Kellogg EA (2001) A molecular phylogeny of the grass subfamily Panicoideae (Poaceae) shows multiple origins of C4 photosynthesis. Am J Bot 88:1993–2012
Głowacka K, Adhikari S, Peng J, Gifford J, Juvik JA, Long SP, Sacks EJ (2014) Variation in chilling tolerance for photosynthesis and leaf extension growth among genotypes related to the C4 grass Miscanthus × giganteus. J Exp Bot 65:5267–5278. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/eru287
Gobbi A, Jurman G (2015) A null model for pearson coexpression networks. PLoS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128115
Heaton E, Dohleman F, Long S (2008) Meeting US biofuel goals with less land: the potential of Miscanthus. Glob Chang Biol 14:2000–2014. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2486.2008.01662.x
House MA, Griswold CK, Lukens LN (2014) Evidence for selection on gene expression in cultivated rice (Oryza sativa). Mol Biol Evol 31:1514–1525. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msu110
Iancu OD, Kawane S, Bottomly D, Searles R, Hitzemann R, McWeeney S (2012) Utilizing RNA-Seq data for de novo coexpression network inference. Bioinformatics 28:1592–1597. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts245
Inman-Bamber NG, Bonnett GD, Smith DM, Thorburn PJ (2005) Sugarcane physiology: integrating from cell to crop to advance sugarcane production. Field Crops Res 92:115–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2005.01.011
Jordan IK, Katz LS, Denver DR, Streelman JT (2008) Natural selection governs local, but not global, evolutionary gene coexpression networks in Caenorhabditis elegans. BMC Syst Biol 2:96. https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-2-96
Killcoyne S, Carter GW, Smith J, Boyle J (2009) Cytoscape: a community-based framework for network modeling. Methods Mol Biol 563:219–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-60761-175-2_12
Kim C, Lee T-H, Guo H, Chung SJ, Paterson AH, Kim D-S, Lee G-J (2014) Sequencing of transcriptomes from two Miscanthus species reveals functional specificity in rhizomes, and clarifies evolutionary relationships. BMC Plant Biol 14:134. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2229-14-134
Kusunoki K, Nakano Y, Tanaka K, Sakata Y, Koyama H, Kobayashi Y (2017) Transcriptomic variation among six Arabidopsis thaliana accessions identified several novel genes controlling aluminium tolerance: transcriptomic variation for aluminium tolerance. Plant Cell Environ 40:249–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12866
Lachowiec J, Queitsch C, Kliebenstein DJ (2016) Molecular mechanisms governing differential robustness of development and environmental responses in plants. Ann Bot 117:795–809. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mcv151
Langfelder P, Horvath S (2007) Eigengene networks for studying the relationships between co-expression modules. BMC Syst Biol 1:54. https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-0509-1-54
Langfelder P, Horvath S (2008) WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinform 9:559. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-9-559
Langfelder P, Horvath S (2012) Fast R functions for robust correlations and hierarchical clustering. J Stat Softw 46:i11
Li A, Horvath S (2007) Network neighborhood analysis with the multi-node topological overlap measure. Bioinformatics 23:222–231. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btl581
Liu W, Sang T (2013) Potential productivity of the Miscanthus energy crop in the Loess Plateau of China under climate change. Environ Res Lett 8:4003. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/4/044003
Liu W, Yan J, Li J, Sang T (2012) Yield potential of Miscanthus energy crops in the Loess Plateau of China. Global Change Biol Bioenergy 4:545–554. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01157.x
Liu W, Jia M, Song Z, Yan J, Li J, Tao S (2014) Long-term water balance and sustainable production of Miscanthus energy crops in the Loess Plateau of China. Biomass Bioenergy 62:47–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.01.018
Lu X et al (2013) AaORA, a trichome-specific AP2/ERF transcription factor of Artemisia annua, is a positive regulator in the artemisinin biosynthetic pathway and in disease resistance to Botrytis cinerea. New Phytol 198:1191–1202. https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.12207
Ma C, **n M, Feldmann KA, Wang X (2014) Machine learning–based differential network analysis: a study of stress-responsive transcriptomes in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 26:520–537. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.113.121913
Mi J, Liu W, Yang W, Yan J, Li J, Sang T (2014) Carbon sequestration by Miscanthus energy crops plantations in a broad range semi-arid marginal land in China. Sci Total Environ 496:373–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.07.047
Mitra K, Carvunis A-R, Ramesh SK, Ideker T (2013) Integrative approaches for finding modular structure in biological networks. Nat Rev Genet 14:719–732. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3552
Munkvold JD, Laudencia-Chingcuanco D, Sorrells ME (2013) Systems genetics of environmental response in the mature wheat embryo. Genetics 194:265–277. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.113.150052
Oldham MC, Konopka G, Iwamoto K, Langfelder P, Kato T, Horvath S, Geschwind DH (2008) Functional organization of the transcriptome in human brain. Nat Neurosci 11:1271–1282. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2207
Richards CL, Rosas U, Banta J, Bhambhra N, Purugganan MD (2012) Genome-wide patterns of Arabidopsis gene expression in nature. PLoS Genet 8:e1002662. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002662
Sang T (2011) Toward the domestication of lignocellulosic energy crops: learning from food crop domestication. J Integr Plant Biol 53:96–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7909.2010.01006.x
Sang T, Zhu W (2011) China’s bioenergy potential. Global Change Biol Bioenergy 3:79–90. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-1707.2010.01064.x
Sato Y et al (2013) RiceFREND: a platform for retrieving coexpressed gene networks in rice. Nucleic Acids Res 41:D1214–D1221. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gks1122
Sham PC, Purcell SM (2014) Statistical power and significance testing in large-scale genetic studies. Nat Rev Genet 15:335–346. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg3706
Shen X, Pettersson M, Rönnegård L, Carlborg Ö (2012) Inheritance beyond plain heritability: variance-controlling genes in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS Genet 8:e1002839. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1002839
Somerville C, Koornneef M (2002) A fortunate choice: the history of Arabidopsis as a model plant. Nat Rev Genet 3:883–889. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg927
Song Z et al (2017) Transcriptomic characterization of candidate genes responsive to salt tolerance of Miscanthus energy crops. Glob Change Biol Bioenergy 9:1222–1237. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12413
Swanson-Wagner R et al (2012) Resha** of the maize transcriptome by domestication. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:11878–11883. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1201961109
Swindell WR, Huebner M, Weber AP (2007) Plastic and adaptive gene expression patterns associated with temperature stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Heredity 99:143–150. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.hdy.6800975
Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S (2011) Mega5: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28:2731–2739. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msr121
Tonsor SJ, Scott C, Boumaza I, Liss TR, Brodsky JL, Vierling E (2008) Heat shock protein 101 effects in A. thaliana: genetic variation, fitness and pleiotropy in controlled temperature conditions. Mol Ecol 17:1614–1626. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.03690.x
Turco G, Schnable JC, Pedersen B, Freeling M (2013) Automated conserved non-coding sequence (CNS) discovery reveals differences in gene content and promoter evolution among grasses. Front Plant Sci 4:170. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00170
Vijayan V, Saraph V, Milenković T (2015) MAGNA++: maximizing accuracy in global network alignment via both node and edge conservation. Bioinformatics 31:2409–2411. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btv161
Voelckel C, Gruenheit N, Lockhart P (2017) Evolutionary transcriptomics and proteomics: insight into plant adaptation. Trends Plant Sci 22:462–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2017.03.001
Wang J, Lan P, Gao H, Zheng L, Li W, Schmidt W (2013) Expression changes of ribosomal proteins in phosphate- and iron-deficient Arabidopsis roots predict stress-specific alterations in ribosome composition. BMC Genom 14:783. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-14-783
**ng S et al (2016) The coordination of gene expression within photosynthesis pathway for acclimation of C4 energy crop Miscanthus lutarioriparius. Front Plant Sci 7:109. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00109
Xu X et al (2013) Parallel comparison of Illumina RNA-Seq and Affymetrix microarray platforms on transcriptomic profiles generated from 5-aza-deoxy-cytidine treated HT-29 colon cancer cells and simulated datasets. BMC Bioinform 14:S1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-14-S9-S1
Xu Q et al (2015) Population transcriptomics reveals a potentially positive role of expression diversity in adaptation. J Integr Plant Biol 57:284–299. https://doi.org/10.1111/jipb.12287
Xu Q et al (2016) Population transcriptomics uncovers the regulation of gene expression variation in adaptation to changing environment. Sci Rep 6:25536. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep25536
Xu Q et al (2017) Systematic comparison of lncRNAs with protein coding mRNAs in population expression and their response to environmental change. BMC Plant Biol 17:42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12870-017-0984-8
Yampolsky LY, Glazko GV, Fry JD (2012) Evolution of gene expression and expression plasticity in long-term experimental populations of Drosophila melanogaster maintained under constant and variable ethanol stress. Mol Ecol 21:4287–4299. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2012.05697.x
Yan J et al (2012) Variability and adaptability of Miscanthus species evaluated for energy crop domestication. Global Change Biol Bioenergy 4:49–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01108.x
Yan J et al (2015a) High photosynthetic rate and water use efficiency of Miscanthus lutarioriparius characterize an energy crop in the semiarid temperate region. Global Change Biol Bioenergy 7:207–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12118
Yan J, Zhu M, Liu W, Xu Q, Zhu C, Li J, Sang T (2015b) Genetic variation and bidirectional gene flow in the riparian plant Miscanthus lutarioriparius, across its endemic range: implications for adaptive potential. Glob Change Biol Bioenergy 8:764–776. https://doi.org/10.1111/gcbb.12278
Yan J et al (2017) Population transcriptomic characterization of the genetic and expression variation of a candidate progenitor of Miscanthus energy crops. Mol Ecol 26:5911–5922. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.14338
Yang Z (2007) PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol Biol Evol 24:1586–1591. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msm088
Yip AM, Horvath S (2007) Gene network interconnectedness and the generalized topological overlap measure. BMC Bioinform 8:22. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-8-22
Zhang N, Belsterling B, Raszewski J, Tonsor SJ (2015) Natural populations of Arabidopsis thaliana differ in seedling responses to high-temperature stress. AoB Plants 7:plv101. https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plv101
Zhu CY et al (2017) Haplotypes phased from population transcriptomes detecting selection in the initial adaptation of Miscanthus lutarioriparius to stressful environments. Plant Genome. https://doi.org/10.3835/plantgenome2016.11.0119
Acknowledgements
This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2016YFC0500905), the grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31000147; 31400284), the Project for Autonomous Deployment of the Wuhan Botanical Garden (55Y755271G02) and the Science and Technology Service Network Initiative of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (KFJ-EW-STS-061).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
TS conceived and designed the experiments. SX, ZS, JY, CL and LK performed the experiments. SX, ZS and WL performed data analysis. SX, CT, JY and TS wrote the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
**ng, S., Tao, C., Song, Z. et al. Coexpression network revealing the plasticity and robustness of population transcriptome during the initial stage of domesticating energy crop Miscanthus lutarioriparius. Plant Mol Biol 97, 489–506 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-018-0754-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11103-018-0754-5