Log in

Cefmetazole as an Alternative to Carbapenems Against Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli Infections Based on In Vitro and In Vivo Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics Experiments

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Cefmetazole (CMZ) has received attention as a pharmaceutical intervention for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli (ESBL-EC) infections. This study aimed to investigate the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics (PK/PD) characteristics of CMZ against ESBL-EC.

Methods

The susceptibility and time-killing activity of CMZ against clinically isolated ESBL-EC (EC9 and EC19) were determined in vitro. The optimal PK/PD index and its target value were calculated based on the results of a PK study in healthy mice and PD study in neutropenic murine thigh infection model mice.

Results

The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of CMZ against EC9 and EC19 were 2.0 and 1.0 µg/mL, respectively. Time–kill studies showed that colony-forming units decreased in a time-dependent manner at CMZ concentrations in the range of 4–64 × MIC. In in vivo PK/PD studies, the antibacterial effect of CMZ showed the better correlation with the time that the free drug concentration remaining above the MIC (fT>MIC), with the target values for a static effect and 1 log10 kill reduction calculated as 57.6% and 69.6%, respectively.

Conclusion

CMZ possesses time-dependent bactericidal activities against ESBL-EC and is required to achieve “fT>MIC” ≥ 69.6% for the treatment of ESBL-EC infections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.

Abbreviations

CFU:

Colony-forming units

CIV:

Continuous intravenous infusion

CLSI:

Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute

CMZ:

Cefmetazole

ESBL:

Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase

ESBL-EC:

Extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli

fAUC24/MIC:

Ratio of the area under the free drug concentration–time curve for a 24 h period to the minimum inhibitory concentration

fCmax/MIC:

Ratio of the maximum free drug concentration to the minimum inhibitory concentration

fT>MIC:

Time that the free drug concentration remaining above the minimum inhibitory concentration

HPLC:

High-performance liquid chromatography

MIC:

Minimum inhibitory concentration

PK/PD:

Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics

References

  1. Septimus EJ. Antimicrobial resistance an antimicrobial/diagnostic stewardship and infection prevention approach. Med Clin North Am. 2018;102(5):819–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pitout JDD. Infections with extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae changing epidemiology and drug treatment choices. Drugs. 2010;70(3):313–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Willyard C. The drug-resistant bacteria that pose the greatest health threats. Nature. 2017;543(7643):15.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ambler RP. The structure of β-lactamases. Philos Trans R Soc London. 1980;289(1036):321–31.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bush K, Jacoby GA. Updated functional classification of-lactamases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54(3):969–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rodríguez-Baño J, Gutiérrez-Gutiérrez B, Machuca I, Pascual A. Treatment of infections caused by extended-spectrum-beta-lactamase-, AmpC-, and carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2018;31(2):1–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Paterson DL, Bonomo RA. Extended-spectrum-lactamases: a clinical update. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2005;18(4):657–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. van Duin D, Doi Y. The global epidemiology of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Virulence. 2017;8(4):460–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. World Health Organization. Guidelines for the prevention and control of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa in health care facilities. 2017. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/259462. Accessed 23 Jul 2021.

  10. Jones RN. Review of the in-vitro spectrum and characteristics of cefmetazole (CS-1170). J Antimicrob Chemother. 1989;23(Suppl D):1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jacoby GA, Carreras I. Activities of β-Lactam Antibiotics against Escherichia coli Strains Producing Extended-Spectrum β-Lactamases. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990;34(5):858–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Yang Q, Zhang H, Cheng J, Xu Z, Xu Y, Cao B, et al. In vitro activity of flomoxef and comparators against Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae and Proteus mirabilis producing extended-spectrum β-lactamases in China. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2015;45(5):485–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Matsumura Y, Yamamoto M, Nagao M, Tanaka M, Takakura S, Ichiyama S. In vitro activities and detection performances of cefmetazole and flomoxef for extended-spectrum β-lactamase and plasmid-mediated AmpC β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2016;84(4):322–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Matsumura Y, Yamamoto M, Nagao M, Komori T, Fujita N, Hayashi A, et al. Multicenter retrospective study of cefmetazole and flomoxef for treatment of extended-spectrum-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli bacteremia. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2015;59(9):5107–13.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ambrose PG, Bhavnani SM, Rubino CM, Louie A, Gumbo T, Forrest A, et al. Pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics of antimicrobial therapy: It’s not just for mice anymore. Clin Infect Dis. 2007;44(1):79–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Craig WA. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters: rationale for antibacterial dosing of mice and men. Clin Infect Dis. 1998;26(1):1–10.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Tashiro S, Hayashi M, Takemura W, Igarashi Y, Liu X, Mizukami Y, et al. Pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics evaluation of flomoxef against extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli in vitro and in vivo in a murine thigh infection model. Pharm Res. 2021;38(1):27–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Methods for dilution antimicrobial susceptibility tests for bacteria that grow aerobically; approved standard 10th edition. CLSI document M07–A10. Wayne: CLSI; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing: 30th edition. CLSI supplement M100. Wayne: CLSI; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. Methods for determining bactericidal activity of antimicrobial agents; approved guideline. CLSI document M26-A. Wayne: CLSI; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Halstenson CE, Guay DRP, Opsahl JA, Hirata CAI, Olanoff LS, Novak E, et al. Disposition of cefmetazole in healthy volunteers and patients with impaired renal function. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1990;34(4):519–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rossolini GM, D’Andrea MM, Mugnaioli C. The spread of CTX-M-type extended-spectrum β-lactamases. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2008;14(Suppl 1):33–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. McEntee L, Johnson A, Farrington N, Unsworth J, Dane A, Jain A, et al. Pharmacodynamics of tebipenem: new options for oral treatment of multidrug-resistant gram-negative infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2019;63(8):e00603-e619.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Lepak AJ, Zhao M, Vanscoy B, Taylor DS, Ellis-Grosse E, Ambrose PG, et al. In Vivo Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of ZTI-01 (Fosfomycin for Injection) in the Neutropenic Murine Thigh Infection Model against Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2017;61(6):476–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Craig WA. The postantibiotic effect. Clin Microbiol Newsl. 1991;13(16):121–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Bevan ER, Jones AM, Hawkey PM. Global epidemiology of CTX-M β-lactamases: temporal and geographical shifts in genotype. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017;72(8):2145–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Osawa K, Shigemura K, Shimizu R, Kato A, Kusuki M, Jikimoto T, et al. Molecular characteristics of extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli in a university teaching hospital. Microb Drug Resist. 2015;21(2):130–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Abdul-Aziz MH, Sulaiman H, Mat-Nor MB, Rai V, Wong KK, Hasan MS, et al. Beta-lactam infusion in severe sepsis (BLISS): a prospective, two-centre, open-labelled randomised controlled trial of continuous versus intermittent beta-lactam infusion in critically ill patients with severe sepsis. Intensive Care Med. 2016;42(10):1535–45.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Akahane M, Enoki Y, Saiki R, Hayashi Y, Hiraoka K, Honma K, et al. Stability of antimicrobial agents in an elastomeric infusion pump used for outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy. Int J Infect Dis. 2021;103:464–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Fukuchi T, Iwata K, Kobayashi S, Nakamura T, Ohji G. Cefmetazole for bacteremia caused by ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae comparing with carbapenems. BMC Infect Dis. 2016;16(1):427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kuwana T, Yamaguchi J, Kinoshita K, Hori S, Ihara S, Taniguchi T. Case report successful de-escalation antibiotic therapy using cephamycins for sepsis caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae bacteremia: A sequential 25-case series. Open Med. 2020;15(1):782–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND DISCLOSURES

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI (Grant Number JP18K06795). Sho Tashiro wishes to thank the Nagai Memorial Research Scholarship from the Pharmaceutical Society of Japan. We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing. All authors meet the ICMJE authorship criteria. The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Wataru Takemura, Sho Tashiro, Yuta Yokoyama, Kazuaki Matsumoto contributed to the study conception and design. Data collection were performed by Wataru Takemura, Sho Tashiro, Marina Hayashi, Yuki Igarashi, **aoxi Liu, Yuki Mizukami, Nana Kojima, Takumi Morita. Analysis and interpretation of data were performed by Wataru Takemura, Sho Tashiro, Yuki Enoki, Kazuaki Taguchi, Yuta Yokoyama, Tomonori Nakamura, Kazuaki Matsumoto. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Wataru Takemura and Sho Tashiro and was revised critically by Kazuaki Taguchi and Kazuaki Matsumoto. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kazuaki Taguchi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Takemura, W., Tashiro, S., Hayashi, M. et al. Cefmetazole as an Alternative to Carbapenems Against Extended-Spectrum Beta-Lactamase-Producing Escherichia coli Infections Based on In Vitro and In Vivo Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics Experiments. Pharm Res 38, 1839–1846 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-021-03140-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-021-03140-7

KEY WORDS

Navigation