Log in

Phenolic Contents, Enzyme Inhibitory Activities, and Protective Effect of Aqueous Extract of Rosa Pisiformis Fruits

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Chemistry Journal Aims and scope

The present study was designed to assess the phytochemical contents as well as the in vitro biological activities fruit of Rosa pisiformis and possible in vivo cardioprotective and hepatoprotective properties of the aqueous extract of R. pisiformis fruit on trace elements (cadmium, selenium, nickel, zinc, iron, copper, cobalt, chromium, manganese, lead), minerals (sodium, calcium, potassium, magnesium), glutathione and malondialdehyde in heart and liver tissue samples, serum vitamin (retinol, cholecalciferol, phylloquinone, α-tocopherol), total sialic acid, and lipid-bound sialic acid in a rat model of isoproterenol-induced oxidative damage. In the study, 40 Wistar albino rats were divided into four groups of ten each: control, isoproterenol 100 mg/kg bodyweight; isoproterenol 100 mg/kg bodyweight; then R. pisiformis 300 mg/kg bodyweight, and R. pisiformis 300 mg/kg bodyweight. Rats were given isoproterenol twice at an interval of 24 h for two days (on days 28 and 29) subcutaneously. The experimental period was maintained at 30 days. According to analysis results, caffeic acid and p-coumaric acid were found to be the high contents of the fruit extracts at 6.01 ± 0.0006 and 3.93 ± 0.007 mg/100 g dry weight. It showed that R. pisiformis (300 mg/kg bodyweight) aqueous extract had a potent action on oxidative damage. The R. pisiformis (300 mg/kg bodyweight) treatment significantly alleviated toward normalcy on the zinc, manganese, cobalt, magnesium, and sodium values in the heart, and zinc and magnesium values in liver tissue samples. These positive effects may be related to the action of p-coumaric acid and caffeic acid present in the R. pisiformis 300 mg/kg and it has hypolipidemic and antioxidant properties that could protect from myocardial damage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. B. J. Lee, Y. F. Tseng, C. H. Yen, et al., J. Nutr., 12(1),142 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. H. Li, S. Horke, U. Förstermann, Trends Pharmacol. Sci., 34(6), 313 – 319 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. A. J. Almzaiel, J. Contemp. Med. Sci., 1(2),18 – 22 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. S. Yang, M. K. Jensen, E. B. Rimm, et al., Am. J. Epidemiol., 180(9), 901 – 908 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. S. Goyal, M. K. Siddiqui, K. M. Siddiqui, et al., Exp. Toxicol. Pathol., 62(1), 61 – 74 (2010).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. P. Nisha, P. A. Nazar, P.A. Jayamurthy, Food Chem. Toxicol., 47(10), 2640 – 2644 (2009).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. N. Balasundram, K. Sundram, S. Samman, Food Chem., 99(1), 191 – 203 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. M. P. Kähkönen, A. I. Hopia, H. J. Vuorela, et al., J. Agric. Food Chem., 47, 3954 – 3962 (1999).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. S. H. Lam, J. M. Chen, C. J. Kang, et al., Phytochem., 69(5), 1173 – 1178 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. H. Ali, P-J. Houghton, A. Soumyanath, J. Ethnopharmacol., 107(3), 449 – 455 (2006).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Y-M. Lee, Y. S. Kim, Y. Lee, et al., Phytother. Res., 26(5), 778 – 782 (2012).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. E. **a, G. Rao, H. Van Remmen, et al., J. Nutr., 125(2), 195 – 201 (1995).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. R. Rizzi, A. Caroli, P. Bolla, et al., J. Dairy Res., 55(3), 345 – 353 (1988).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. S. K. Jain, R. McVie, J. Duett, et al., Diabetes, 38(12), 1539 – 1543 (1989).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. O. Ulmer Verlag Lowry, N. Rosebrough, A. Farr, et al., J. Biol. Chem., 193(1), 265 – 275 (1951).

  16. Q. Su, K. G. Rowley, N. D. Balazs, J. Chromatogr. B. Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci., 781(1 – 2), 393 – 418 (2002).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. D. Siluk, R. V. Oliveira, M. Esther-Rodriguez-Rosas, et al., J. Pharm. Biomed. Anal., 44(4), 1001 – 1007 (2007).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. G. A. Sydow, Biomed. Biochim. Acta, 44(11-12), 1721 – 1723 (1985).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. N. Katopodis, Y. Hirshaut, N. L. Geller, et al., Cancer Res., 42(12), 5270 – 5275 (1982).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. X. B. Wang, Y. D. Han, S. Zhang, et al., J. Cell. Mol. Med., 20(12), 2362 – 2373 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. A. Jyoti Roy, P. P. Stanely Mainzen, Eur. J. Pharmacol., 699(1 – 3), 33 – 39 (2013).

  22. K. H. Lim, D. Ko, J. H. Kim, J. Ginseng Res., 37(3), 273 – 282 (2013).

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. K. Suchal, S. Malik, N. Gamad, et al., Phytomedicine, 23(12), 1401 – 1408 (2016).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. A. I. Othman, M. M. Elkomy, M. A. El-Missiry, et al., Eur. J. Pharmacol., 794, 27 – 36 (2017).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. S. A. Hussain, M. A. Kareem, S. N. Rasool, et al., Biol. Trace Elem. Res., 181(1), 112 – 121 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. V. Khan, S. Sharma, U. Bhandari, et al., Life Sci., 194, 205 – 212 (2018).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. V. S. Panda, S. R. Naik, Exp. Toxicol. Pathol., 60(4 – 5), 397 – 404 (2008).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. A. Nakamura, Y. Monma, S. Kajitani, et al., Heart Vessels, 31(9), 1446 – 1455 (2016).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Y. Q. Yan, X. C. Liu, W. B. **g, et al., Biol. Trace Elem. Res., 151(3), 344 – 349 (2013).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. D. Kolte, K. Vijayaraghavan, S. Khera, et al., Cardiol. Rev., 22(4), 182 – 192 (2014).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. C. Benstoem, A. Goetzenich, S. Kraemer, et al., Nutrients, 7(5), 3094 – 3118 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. V. Kloubert, L. Rink, Food. Funct., 6(10), 3195 – 3204 (2015).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. M. M Kannan, S. D Quine, Eur. J. Pharmacol., 659(1), 45 – 52 (2011).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Suat Ekin.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ekin, S., Akkoyun, M.B., Kiziltas, H. et al. Phenolic Contents, Enzyme Inhibitory Activities, and Protective Effect of Aqueous Extract of Rosa Pisiformis Fruits. Pharm Chem J 57, 1799–1806 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11094-024-03081-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11094-024-03081-6

Keywords

Navigation