Log in

Spectrophotometric Quantification of Total Phenol, Flavonoid and Alkaloid Content and In-Vitro Investigation of Antioxidant and Cytotoxic Potential of Hippeastrum equestre Bulbs

  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Chemistry Journal Aims and scope

Methanol and dichloromethane extracts of Hippeastrum equestre plant bulbs have been evaluated for antioxidant activity (using DPPH and ABTS radical scavenging assay) and cytotoxic potential (using the brine shrimp lethality assay and MTT assay), where MTT assay was performed against human cervical cancer (HeLa) and human prostate cancer (PC3) cell lines. The extracts were prepared by simple maceration of plant material. Both extracts were also investigated for the qualitative and quantitative composition of phytochemical constituents. Qualitative phytochemical screening of plant extracts revealed the presence of flavonoids, alkaloids, carbohydrates, tannins, phenols, saponins, terpenoids, proteins and amino acids. Total alkaloid content in methanol and dichloromethane extracts were highest (125.17 ± 0.02 and 114.48 ± 0.01 mg atropine eq./g extract, respectively) as compared to total flavonoid and phenol contents (61.17 ± 0.027, 43.09 ± 0.05 mg rutin eq./g extract and 40.37 ± 0.022, 27.74 ± 0.02 mg gallic acid eq. /g extract, respectively). The plant extracts showed significant % inhibition of DPPH radical as well as ABTS radical activity and the results were comparable with that of standard. Results of the brine shrimp lethality assay indicated that at a dose of 1000 μg/mL, both methanol and dichloromethane extracts showed high percentage mortality (100% and 86.6%, respectively). The MTT assay showed that at 30 mg/mL dichloromethane and methanol extracts of the plant bulbs exhibited cytotoxic activity against PC3 and HeLa cell lines (69.97, 79.66% and 80, 89%) with IC50 values of 20.29, 16.70 and 13.78, 12.96 μg/mL respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. V. Balamurugan, V. Balakrishnan, J. P. Robinson, and M. Ramakrishnan, Bangladesh J. Pharmacol., 9(4), 604 – 609 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. M. A. Jordan, Curr. Med. Chem. Anticancer Agents, 2(1), 1 – 17 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. A. Aberoumand, Int. J. Food Nutr. Eng., 2(3), 16 – 20 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. J. Joselin, T. S. Brintha, A. R. Florence, et al., Asian Pac. J. Trop. Dis., 2(1), 260 – 264 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Z. **, Nat. Prod. Rep., 30(6), 849–868 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. C. W. Fennell and J. van Staden, Ethnopharmacology, 78(1), 15 – 26 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Z. **, Nat. Prod. Rep., 24(4), 886 – 905 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. E. E. Elgorashi and J. van Staden, Ethnopharmacology, 90(1), 27 – 32 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. J. P. Andrade, R. B. Giordani, L. Torras-Claveria, et al., Phytochem. Rev., 15, 1 – 14 (2016).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. G. L. Ellman, K. D. Courtney, V. Andres, and R. M. Featherstone, Biochem. Pharmacol., 7, 88 – 95 (1961).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. A. F. da Silva, J. P.de Andrade, Bevilaqua, et al., Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav., 85(1), 148 – 154 (2006).

  12. B. Sener, I. Orhan and J. Satayavivad, Phytother. Res., 17(10), 1220 – 1223 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. S. Yui, M. Mikami, M. Kitahara, and M. Yamazaki, Immunopharmacology, 40(2), 151 – 162 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. F. N. Ekwueme, O. F. C Nwodo, P. E. Joshua, et al., Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. Appl. Sci., 4(5), 1176 – 1188 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. J. Nidal, H. Fatima and A. AliAnas, J. Mater. Environ. Sci., 6(6), 1771 – 1778 (2015).

    Google Scholar 

  16. T. A. Owolarafe, S. O. Dosunmu, M. T. Yakubu, et al., Asian J. Pharmacol. Toxicol., 02(03), 11 – 15 (2014).

  17. N. Sharief, A. Srinivasulu, V. Uma Maheshwara Rao, Indian J. Appl. Res., 4(5), 1 – 3 (2014).

  18. F. Shamsa, H. Monsef, R. Ghamooshi and M. Verdian-rizi. Thai J. Pharm. Sci., 32, 17 – 20 (2008).

  19. R. Re, N. Pellegrini, A. Proteggente, et al., Free Radical Biol. Med., 26, 1231 – 1237 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. B. N. Meyer, N. R. Ferrigni, J. E. Putnam, et al., Planta Med., 45(5), 31 – 34 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. F. Lilybeth, Olowaand M. Nuñeza, Int. Res. J. Biological Sci., 2(11), 74 – 77 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  22. M. Afzal, M. Uzair and B. Chaudhry, Bangladesh J. Pharmacol., 10, 97 – 99 (2015).

  23. J. van Meerloo, G. J. Kaspers and J. Cloos, Methods Mol. Biol., 731, 237 – 245 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. M.Wang, J. Li, M. Rangarajan, et al., J. Agric. Food Chem., 46, 4869 – 4873 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. B. N. Meyer, N. R. Ferrigni, J. E. Putnam, et al., Plant Med., 45(5), 31 – 34 (1982).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. L. H. Yao, Y. M. Jiang, J. Shi, et al., Plant Foods Hum Nutr., 59(3), 113 – 122 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. S. Lamponi, Plants, 10(6), 1225 – 1228 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. G. Raquel, P. Letícia, H Amélia, et al., Química Nova., 31(8), 2042 – 2046 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  29. M. T. Chua, Y. T. Tung and S. T. Chang, Bioresource Technol., 99(6), 1918 – 1925 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Y. J. Hwang, E. J. Lee, H. R. Kim, et al., Complement. Altern. Med., 13(1) 310 – 319 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. D. M. Radomska-Leoeniewska, A. Hevelke, P. Skopiñski, et al., Pharmacol. Rep., 68(2), 462–471 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. A. W. Boots, G. R. Haenenand, A. Bast, Eur. J. Pharmacol., 58(2), 325–337 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. K. R. Carvalho, A. B. Silva, M. M. Torres, et al., J. Braz. Chem. Soc., 26(10), 1976 – 1980 (2015).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. K. Habartová, L. Cahlíková, M. Øezáèová, et al., Nat. Prod. Commun., 11(10), 1587 – 1594 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

  35. R. Havelek, D. Muthná, P. Tomšík, et al., Chem. Biol., 275, 121 – 132 (2017).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. I. Doskoèil, A. Hošt’álková, M. Šafratová, et al., Phytochem. Lett., 13, 394 – 398 (2015)

  37. J. M. Kong, N. K. Goh, L. S. Chia, et al., Acta Pharmacol. Sin., 24, 7 – 21 (2003).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. L. H. Yao, Y. M. Jiang, J. Shi, et al., Plant Foods Hum. Nutr., 59, 113 – 122 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. K. Habartová, L. M. Cahlíkov, M. Øezáèová, et al., Nat. Prod. Commun., 11(10), 1587 – 1594 (2016).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Atif Shahzad.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shahzad, A., Afzal, S. & Ahmad, I. Spectrophotometric Quantification of Total Phenol, Flavonoid and Alkaloid Content and In-Vitro Investigation of Antioxidant and Cytotoxic Potential of Hippeastrum equestre Bulbs. Pharm Chem J 56, 1263–1271 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11094-022-02784-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11094-022-02784-y

Keywords

Navigation