Log in

Corona Electric Discharge as a Source of Chemically Active Species

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Plasma Chemistry and Plasma Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The yields of oxidation of substances in aqueous solutions under the action of a corona electric discharge were studied. The possibilities of reducing the energy consumption for the oxidation of organic compounds by hydroxyl radicals by initiating and maintaining chain reactions are considered. Hydroxyl radicals were generated in a corona electric discharge on a point solid electrode located above the surface of an aqueous solution. Under the experimental conditions, an ozone-hydroxyl mixture is formed, in which the lifetime of hydroxyl radicals increases to 0.2 s. The conditions for the development of a chain reaction were analysed. Experiments were carried out for aqueous solutions of phenol with COD values from 710 to 2900 mg O/L, oxalic acid with a COD of 2000 mg O/L and 0.1 M solution KI for treated liquid volumes from 2.5 to 35 L. Oxalic acid was used as a detector of hydroxyl radicals, KI solution – detector OH + O3. At a low concentration of dissolved organic substances (COD ~ 700 mgO/L), initiation of a chain reaction is impossible. It is shown that there are conditions, when take place the inhibition of chain oxidative reactions of phenol. The reasons for inhibition are a decrease in the pH of the medium, the transformation of primary radicals into inactive secondary ones, and the occurrence of reverse reactions. The yield of hydroxyl radicals is ~ 0.2 (100 eV)−1, while the oxidation yield reaches ~ 7.5 (100 eV)−1 and increases with an increase in the volume of the treated liquid.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hickling A (1971) Electrochemical processes in glow discharge at the gas-solution interface. In: O’M Bockris J, Conway BE (eds) Modern aspects of electrochemistry. Butterworths, London

    Google Scholar 

  2. Denaro AR (1976) A model for glow discharge electrolysis. Electrochim Acta 20:669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sen Gupta SK, Singh R, Srivastava AK (1975) Chemical effects of anodic contact glow discharge electrolysis in aqueous formic acid solutions: formation of oxalic acid. Indian J Chem 34A:459

    Google Scholar 

  4. Raizer YP (1991) Gas discharge physics. In: Allen JE (Eds), Springer, Berlin

  5. Veldhuizen EM, Rutgers WR (2001) Corona discharges: fundamentals and diagnostics. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242454280

  6. Hoeben WFLM, Van Veldhuizen EM, Rutgers WR, Kroesen GMW (1999) Gas phase corona discharges for oxidation of phenol in an aqueous solution. J Phys D: Appl Phys 32:L133

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Joshi AA, Locke BR, Arce P, Finney WC (1995) Formation of hydroxyl radicals, hydrogen peroxide and aqueous electrons by pulsed streamer corona discharge in aqueous solution. J Hazzard Mat 41:3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Malik MA, Ghaffar A, Malik SA (2001) Water purification by electrical discharges. Plasma Sources Sci Technol 10:82

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Muhammad AM, Ubaid-ur-Rehman AG, Kurshid A (2002) Synergistic effect of pulsed corona discharges and ozonation on decolorization of methylene blue in water. Plasma Sources Sci Technol 11:236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Preis S, Panorel IC, Kornev I, HatakkaKalias HJ (2013) Pulsed corona discharge: the role of ozone and hydroxyl radical in aqueous pollutants oxidation. Water Sci Technol 68(7):1536. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2013.399

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Glaze WH, Kang J-W, Chapin DH (1987) The chemistry of water treatment processes involving ozone, hydrogen peroxide and ultraviolet radiation. Ozone Sci Eng 9:335. https://doi.org/10.1080/01919518708552148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Oturan MA, Aaron JJ (2014) Advanced oxidation processes in water/wastewater treatment: principles and applications. A review. Crit Rev Env Sci Technol. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2013.829765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Antonopouloua M, Evgenidoub E, Lambropouloub D, Konstantinoua I (2014) A review on advanced oxidation processes for the removal of taste and odor compounds from aqueous media. Water Res 53:215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.01.028

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Tijani JO, Fatoba OO, Madzivire G, Petrik LF (2014) A review of combined advanced oxidation technologies for the removal of organic pollutants from water. Water Air Soil Pollut 225:2102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-014-2102-y

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Vagi MC, Petsas AS (2017) Advanced oxidation processes for the removal of pesticides from wastewater: recent review and trends. 15th International conference on environmental science and technology. CEST. 01225.

  16. Mishra NS, Reddy R, Kuila A, Rani A, Mukherjee P, Nawaz A, Piciah S (2017) A review on advanced oxidation processes for effective water treatment. Curr World Environ 12(3):470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Miklos DB, Remyb C, Jekel M, Linden KG, Drewes JE, Hubner U (2018) Evaluation of advanced oxidation processes for water and wastewater treatment–A critical review. Water Res 139:118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.03.042

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Verna M, Haritash AK (2020) Review of advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) for treatment of pharmaceutical wastewater. Adv Environ Res 9(1):1

    Google Scholar 

  19. Miichi T, Kanzawa R (2018) Advanced oxidation process using dc corona discharge over water. Electr Commun Japan 101(5):65. https://doi.org/10.1002/ecj.12064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Alaton IA, Balcioglu IA, Bahnemann DW (2002) Advanced oxidation of a reactive dyebath effluent: comparison of O3, H2O2/UV-C and TiO2/UV-A processes. Water Res 36:1143

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Andreozzi R, Caprio V, Marotta R, Vogna D (2003) Paracetamol oxidation from aqueous solutions by means of ozonatiom and H2O2/UV system. Water Res 37:993

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Gutten U (2003) Ozonation of drinking water: part 1 oxidation kinetics and product formation. Water Res 37:1443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Oxidation technologies for water and wastewater treatment (1997). selected proceedings of the international conference on oxidation technologies for water and wastewater treatment. Clausthal-Zellerfeld, Germany, 12–15 may 1996. Editors Vogelpohl A, Geissen S-U. Elsevier Science Ltd, Oxford. Water Science & Technology. 35(4):1–361.

  24. Piskarev IM (1999) Choice of conditions of an electrical discharge for generating chemically active particles for the decomposition of impurities in water. Tech Phys 44(1):53

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Vanraes P, Nikiforov AY, Leys C (2016) Electrical discharge in water treatment technology for micropollutant decomposition. Plasma Sci Technol-Progr Phy State Chem React. https://doi.org/10.5772/61830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Piskarev IM (2020) The role of ozone in chemical processes in electric discharge plasma. High Energy Chem 54(3):205. https://doi.org/10.1134/S001814392003011X

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Piskarev IM (2000) A model of reactions in a corona discharge in the O2(g)-H2o system. Russ J Phys Chem 74(3):464

    Google Scholar 

  28. Woods RJ, Pikaev AK (1993) Applied radiation chemistry: radiation processing. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  29. Bruggeman PJ, Kushner MJ, Locke BR, Gardeniers JGE (2016) Plasma–liquid interactions: a review and roadmap. Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 25, 053002. http://iopscience.iop.org/0963-0252/25/5/053002.

  30. Piskarev IM, Ivanova IP (2021) Comparison of chemistry induced by direct and indirect plasma treatment of water to the efect of UV radiation. Plasma Chem Plasma Process 41(1):447–475

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Titov VA, Khlyustova AV, Naumov IK, Sirotkin SA, Agafonov AV (2020) Formation rate and energy yield of hydroxyl radicals in water under the action of gas-discharge plasma. Plasma Phys Rep 46(4):472–475

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Piskarev IM (2001) Reaction in air and nitrogen in the plasma of a corona discharge between the surface of water and an electrode. Russ J Phys Chem 75(11):1832–1836

    Google Scholar 

  33. Aristova NA, Piskarev IM (2002) Characteristic features of reactions initiated by a flash corona discharge. Tech Phys 47(10):1246–1249

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Handbook of Chemistry and Physics. Haynes William M. Editor-in-Chief. CRC Press. 97 Editions. 2016 – 2017 Years.

  35. Standatrd methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 19th Edition, 1995. Edited by Andrew D. Eaton, Lenore S. Clesceri, Arnold E. Greenberg. P. 5–12. Open reflux method. COD.

  36. Staehelin J, Hoigne J (1982) Decomposition of ozone in water: rate of initiation by hydroxide ions and hydrogen peroxide. Environ Sci Technol 16:676

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Hoigne J (1998) Chemistry of aqueous ozone and transformation of pollutants by ozone and advanced oxidation processes. In: Hrubec J (ed) The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry, vol. 5, part C, Quality and Treatment of Drinking Water, Part II,. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  38. Garoma T, Gurol MD (2005) Modeling aqueous ozone/uv process using oxalic acid as probe chemical. Environ Sci Technol 39:7964

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Igor M. Piskarev.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Piskarev, I.M. Corona Electric Discharge as a Source of Chemically Active Species. Plasma Chem Plasma Process 41, 1415–1434 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11090-021-10180-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11090-021-10180-9

Keywords

Navigation