Log in

Remote sensing image classification using modified random forest with empirical loss function through crowd-sourced data

  • Published:
Multimedia Tools and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Environmental changes are captured as satellite images and stored in datasets for monitoring a particular location. These remote sensing images can be employed in predicting valuable data for both urban planning and in land-use management. Moreover, infrastructure planning, management of natural resources are also assessed using these images. Many traditional classification approaches have been utilized in classifying images. However, it resulted with processing of limited images and acquired minimum accuracy rate. In order to overcome the challenges in existing systems, the present research takes effort in utilizing three datasets such as SAT-4, SAT-6 and RSI-CB for proposed classification. Using such crowd sourced data, images are annotated clearly through vector information. Such images are taken for three stage implementation in proposed work for effective classification of satellite images. Large scale distribution data contains six categories and 35 sub-classes with 40,000 images of size 128 × 128 pixels. Initially, pre-processing performs checking of missing values and feature scaling to avoid incorrect predictions. The second stage is the feature extraction process performed by VGG19 and ResNet 50 architecture which provides best features. Individually extracted features from both models are concatenated and sent as input to the third stage of classification. Modified RF (Random Forest) with empirical loss function is used for classification which classifies images with majority voting process on tree based structure. Loss values are computed to determine the efficacy of the model. In addition to that, classification process is also executed by DT (Decision Tree) and K-NN (K-Nearest Neighbour) to exhibit the classification efficiency of proposed model. Performance evaluation on three datasets along with comparative analysis with other classification methods in terms of precision, accuracy, f1-score and recall are performed for determining the effectiveness of present research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Algorithm 1
Algorithm 2
Algorithm 3
Algorithm 4
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The author do not have permission to share data.

References

  1. Alam MM, Gazuruddin M, Ahmed N, Motaleb A, Rana M, Shishir RR, … Rahman RM (2021) Classification of deep-SAT images under label noise. Appl Artif Intell 35(14):1196–1218

  2. Arndt J, Lunga D (2021) Large-scale classification of urban structural units from remote sensing imagery. IEEE J Sel Top Appl Earth Obs Remote Sens 14:2634–2648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ayhan B, Kwan C (2020) Tree, shrub, and grass classification using only RGB images. Remote Sens 12(8):1333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Boulila W, Sellami M, Driss M, Al-Sarem M, Safaei M, Ghaleb FA (2021) RS-DCNN: A novel distributed convolutional-neural-networks based-approach for big remote-sensing image classification. Comput Electron Agric 182:106014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen X, Zhu G, Liu M (2022) Remote sensing image scene classification with self-supervised learning based on partially unlabeled datasets. Remote Sens 14(22):5838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen Z, Wang Y, Han W, Feng R, Chen J (2019) An improved pretraining strategy-based scene classification with deep learning. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 17(5):844–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Deur M, Gašparović M, Balenović I (2020) Tree species classification in mixed deciduous forests using very high spatial resolution satellite imagery and machine learning methods. Remote Sensing 12(23):3926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Devi NB, Kavida AC, Murugan R (2022) Feature extraction and object detection using fast-convolutional neural network for remote sensing satellite image. J Indian Soci Remote Sens 50(6):961–973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fırat H, Asker ME, Bayındır Mİ, Hanbay D (2023) Hybrid 3D/2D complete inception module and convolutional neural network for hyperspectral remote sensing image classification. Neural Process Lett 55(2):1087–1130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gajendran N (2020) A novel pixel-based supervised hybrid approach for prediction of land cover from satellite imagery. Indian J Sci Technol 13(17):1786–1794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Gamshadzaei MH, Rahimzadegan M (2021) Particle swarm optimization based water index (PSOWI) for map** the water extents from satellite images. Geocarto Int 36(20):2264–2278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kuldeep PK, Garg RD (2021) Texture‐based riverine feature extraction and flood map** using satellite images. Advances in Remote Sensing for Natural Resource Monitoring, pp 405–430

  13. Gargees RS, Scott GJ (2019) Deep feature clustering for remote sensing imagery land cover analysis. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 17(8):1386–1390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gargees RS, Scott GJ (2021) Large-scale, multiple level-of-detail change detection from remote sensing imagery using deep visual feature clustering. Remote Sens 13(9):1661

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Holloway J, Helmstedt KJ, Mengersen K, Schmidt M (2019) A decision tree approach for spatially interpolating missing land cover data and classifying satellite images. Remote Sensing 11(15):1796

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kareem RSA, Raman**eyulu AG, Rajan R, Setiawan R, Sharma DK, Gupta MK, … Sengan S (2021) Multilabel land cover aerial image classification using convolutional neural networks. Arab J Geosci 14:1–18

  17. Kato S, Miyamoto H, Amici S, Oda A, Matsushita H, Nakamura R (2021) Automated classification of heat sources detected using SWIR remote sensing. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 103:102491

    Google Scholar 

  18. Koteswaramma N (2019) A neural network based classification of multi spectral satellite images for change detection application. Int J Dev Technol Sci 1(1):40–45

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lee S-H, Han K-J, Lee K, Lee K-J, Oh K-Y, Lee M-J (2020) Classification of landscape affected by deforestation using high-resolution remote sensing data and deep-learning techniques. Remote Sens 12(20):3372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Liyanage K, Whitaker BM (2020) Satellite image classification using LC-KSVD sparse coding. In: 2020 Intermountain Engineering, Technology and Computing (IETC). IEEE, pp 1–6

  21. Lv C, Lu Y, Lu M, Feng X, Fan H, Xu C, Xu L (2022) A classification feature optimization method for remote sensing imagery based on fisher score and mRMR. Appl Sci 12(17):8845

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ma C, Sha D, Mu X (2021) Unsupervised adversarial domain adaptation with error-correcting boundaries and feature adaption metric for remote-sensing scene classification. Remote Sens 13(7):1270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Meher SK (2019) Semisupervised self-learning granular neural networks for remote sensing image classification. Appl Soft Comput 83:105655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Peng C, Li Y, Jiao L, Shang R (2020) Efficient convolutional neural architecture search for remote sensing image scene classification. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 59(7):6092–6105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Razaque A, Ben Haj Frej M, Almi’ani M, Alotaibi M, Alotaibi B (2021) Improved support vector machine enabled radial basis function and linear variants for remote sensing image classification. Sensors 21(13):4431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Roy SK, Deria A, Hong D, Rasti B, Plaza A, Chanussot J (2023) Multimodal fusion transformer for remote sensing image classification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.1109/TGRS.2023.3286826

  27. Saboori M, Homayouni S, Shah-Hosseini R, Zhang Y (2022) Optimum feature and classifier selection for accurate urban land use/cover map** from very high resolution satellite imagery. Remote Sens 14(9):2097

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Scott GJ, Hagan KC, Marcum RA, Hurt JA, Anderson DT, Davis CH (2018) Enhanced fusion of deep neural networks for classification of benchmark high-resolution image data sets. IEEE Geosci Remote Sens Lett 15(9):1451–1455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Scott GJ, Hurt JA, Marcum RA, Anderson DT, Davis CH (2018) Aggregating deep convolutional neural network scans of broad-area high-resolution remote sensing imagery. In: IGARSS 2018-2018 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. IEEE, pp 665–668

  30. Singh S (2021) Land use land cover classifıcation using deep learning classifiers for remote sensed images. ICICNIS 2020. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3769768 or https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3769768

  31. Subraja N, Venkatasekhar D (2021) A framework for satellite imaginary using deep Sat-4 and deep Sat-6 datasets. Turkish Online Journal of Qualitative Inquiry 12(3):111–120

    Google Scholar 

  32. Thiagarajan K, Manapakkam Anandan M, Stateczny A, Bidare Divakarachari P, Kivudujogappa Lingappa H (2021) Satellite image classification using a hierarchical ensemble learning and correlation coefficient-based gravitational search algorithm. Remote Sens 13(21):4351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tuyen DN, Tuan TM, Son LH, Ngan TT, Giang NL, Thong PH, … Kanavos A (2021) A novel approach combining particle swarm optimization and deep learning for flash flood detection from satellite images. Mathematics 9(22):2846

  34. Uma Maheswari K, Rajesh S (2020) A novel QIM-DCT based fusion approach for classification of remote sensing images via PSO and SVM models. Soft Comput 24(20):15561–15576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Unnikrishnan A, Sowmya V, Soman K (2019) Deep learning architectures for land cover classification using red and near-infrared satellite images. Multimed Tools Appl 78:18379–18394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Wang J, Li W, Wang Y, Tao R, Du Q (2023) Representation-enhanced status replay network for multisource remote-sensing image classification. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2023.3286422

  37. Wang X, Xu H, Yuan L, Dai W, Wen X (2022) A remote-sensing scene-image classification method based on deep multiple-instance learning with a residual dense attention ConvNet. Remote Sens 14(20):5095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Wu X, Zhang Z, Zhang W, Yi Y, Zhang C, Xu Q (2021) A convolutional neural network based on grou** structure for scene classification. Remote Sens 13(13):2457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. **a M, Tian N, Zhang Y, Xu Y, Zhang X (2020) Dilated multi-scale cascade forest for satellite image classification. Int J Remote Sens 41(20):7779–7800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhang X, Wang Y, Zhang N, Xu D, Chen B (2019) Research on scene classification method of high-resolution remote sensing images based on RFPNet. Appl Sci 9(10):2028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhang Z, Liu S, Zhang Y, Chen W (2021) RS-DARTS: A convolutional neural architecture search for remote sensing image scene classification. Remote Sens 14(1):141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Zhong Y, Fei F, Liu Y, Zhao B, Jiao H, Zhang L (2017) SatCNN: Satellite image dataset classification using agile convolutional neural networks. Remote Sens Lett 8(2):136–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Pazhanikumar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author reports that there is no conflict of Interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pazhanikumar, K., KuzhalVoiMozhi, S.N. Remote sensing image classification using modified random forest with empirical loss function through crowd-sourced data. Multimed Tools Appl 83, 53899–53921 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-17556-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-023-17556-3

Keywords

Navigation