Log in

Fuzzy Semantic Classification of Multi-Domain E-Learning Concept

  • Published:
Mobile Networks and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Scholarly articles are a great source of knowledge. Learning from them like E-learning requires automatic approaches to build concept-maps, learning paths, etc., as these sources are monotonically increasing and are big too. These sources have multi-domain, variety, huge volumes, which are, in fact, Big Data’s characteristics. Thus data from different domains have to be handled together, especially in the E-learning systems. This paper presents a new approach for concept extraction and semantically clustering and classification of these e-learning concepts using fuzzy membership values. Scholarly articles from different domains are taken for our experimental work, and we tested on BBC datasets with 100 documents and 650 documents. Since the number of domains is known, and all concepts are stored, we have done both clustering and classification for testing our fuzzy-based semantic system. We have used logistics regression, Support Vector Machine (SVM) with Linear kernel, Polynomial kernel, Radial Basis Function (RBF) Kernel, Sigmoid kernel to obtain maximum accuracy up to 94% to 96% for all data sets. In clustering, using K-Means, we got precision up to 93%. The system can be used to generate adaptive learning paths, concept map extraction; Big-Data based E-Learning portals.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wu X, Zhu X, Wu G-Q, Ding W (2013) Data mining with big data. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 26(1):97–107

    Google Scholar 

  2. Elia G, Polimeno G, Solazzo G, Passiante G (2020) A multi-dimension framework for value creation through big data. Ind Mark Manag 90:617–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Khan S, Liu X, Shakil KA, Alam M (2017) A survey on scholarly data: From big data perspective. Inf Process Manag 53(4):923–944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Liu Y, Peng J, Kang J, Iliyasu AM, Niyato D, Abd El-Latif AA (2020) A secure federated learning framework for 5g networks. IEEE Wirel Commun 27(4):24–31

  5. Deerwester S, Dumais ST, Furnas GW, Landauer TK, Harshman R (1990) Indexing by latent semantic analysis. J Am Soc Inf Sci 41(6):391–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Furnas GW, Deerwester S, Dumais ST, Landauer TK, Harshman RA, Streeter LA, Lochbaum KE (1988) Information retrieval using a singular value decomposition model of latent semantic structure. In: proceedings of the 11th annual international ACM SIGIR conference on research and development in information retrieval, pages 465-480. ACM

  7. Baziz M, Boughanem M, Aussenac-Gilles N, Chrisment C (2005) Semantic cores for representing documents in ir. In: Proceedings of the 2005 ACM symposium on applied computing, pages 1011–1017. ACM

  8. Kohomban US, Lee WS (2005) Learning semantic classes for word sense disambiguation. In: proceedings of the 43rd annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 34-41. Association for Computational Linguistics

  9. Patwardhan S, Banerjee S, Pedersen T (2003) Using measures of semantic relatedness for word sense disambiguation. In international conference on intelligent text processing and computational linguistics, pages 241-257. Springer

  10. Ponzetto SP, Strube M (2007) Knowledge derived from wikipedia for computing semantic relatedness. J Artif Intell Res 30:181–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Newman D, Lau JH, Grieser K, Baldwin T (2010) Automatic evaluation of topic coherence. In: Human Language Technologies: The 2010 Annual conference of the north American chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 100–108. Association for Computational Linguistics

  12. Stevenson M, Greenwood MA (2005) A semantic approach to ie pattern induction. In: proceedings of the 43rd annual meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, pages 379-386. Association for Computational Linguistics

  13. Budan IA, Graeme H (2006) Evaluating wordnet-based measures of semantic distance. Comput Linguist 32(1):13–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pietro H. Guzzi, Marco Mina, Concettina Guerra, and Mario Cannataro. Semantic similarity analysis of protein data: assessment with biological features and issues. Brief Bioinform 13(5):569–585, 2011

  15. Janowicz K, Raubal M, Kuhn W (2011) The semantics of similarity in geographic information retrieval. J Spat Inf Sci 2011(2):29–57

    Google Scholar 

  16. Budanitsky A, Hirst G (2001) Semantic distance in wordnet: an experimental, application-oriented evaluation of five measures. In: Workshop on WordNet and other lexical resources, volume 2, pages 2–2

  17. Kaur I, Hornof AJ (2005) A comparison of lsa, wordnet and pmi-ir for predicting user click behavior. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pages 51–60

  18. Gracia J, Mena E (2008) Web-based measure of semantic relatedness. In: International conference on web information systems engineering, pages 136-150. Springer

  19. Wubben S (2008) Using free link structure to calculate semantic relatedness. ILK research group technical report series, (08-01)

  20. Navigli R, Lapata M (2007) Graph connectivity measures for unsupervised word sense disambiguation. In: IJCAI, pages 1683-1688

  21. Alghamdi A, Hammad M, Ugail H, Abdel-Raheem A, Muhammad K, Khalifa HS, Abd El-Latif AA (2020) Detection of myocardial infarction based on novel deep transfer learning methods for urban healthcare in smart cities. Multimedia tools and applications, pages 1-22

  22. Liu S, Wang S, Liu X, Lin C-T, Lv Z (2020) Fuzzy detection aided real-time and robust visual tracking under complex environments. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst

  23. Liu S, Liu X, Wang S, Muhammad K. Fuzzy-aided solution for out-of-view challenge in visual tracking under iot-assisted complex environment. Neural Comput & Applic 1–11

  24. Alghamdi AS, Polat K, Alghoson A, Alshdadi AA, Abd El-Latif AA (2020) A novel blood pressure estimation method based on the classification of oscillometric waveforms using machine learning methods. Appl Acoust 164:107279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lau RYK, Song D, Li Y, Cheung TCH, Hao J-X (2008) Toward a fuzzy domain ontology extraction method for adaptive e-learning. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 21(6):800–813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Cilibrasi RL, Vitanyi PMB (2007) The google similarity distance. IEEE Trans Knowl Data Eng 19(3):370–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee C-H, Lee G-G, Leu Y (2009) Application of automatically constructed concept map of learning to conceptual diagnosis of e-learning. Expert Syst Appl 36(2):1675–1684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sengul S, Senay SC (2014) Assessment of concept maps generated by undergraduate students about the function concept. Procedia-Soc Behav Sci 116:729–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sadoddin R, Driollet O (2016) Mining and visualizing associations of concepts on a large-scale unstructured data. In: 2016 IEEE second international conference on big data computing service and applications (BigDataService), pages 216–224. IEEE

  30. Ahmed R, Ahmad N (2012) Knowledge representation by concept mining & fuzzy relation from unstructured data. Published in international journal of research review in engineering science and technology (ISSN 2278-6643) Volume-1 Issue-2

  31. Ahmed R, Ahmad T (2019) Fuzzy concept map generation from academic data sources. In: Applications of artificial intelligence techniques in engineering, pages 415-424. Springer

  32. Sangaiah AK, Samuel OW, Li X, Abdel-Basset M, Wang H (2018) Towards an efficient risk assessment in software projects-fuzzy reinforcement paradigm. Comput Electr Eng 71:833–846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Prakoso DW, Abdi A, Amrit C. Short text similarity measurement methods: a review. Soft Comput 1–25

  34. Haritha K, Judy MV (2021) Fuzzy cognitive map-based genetic algorithm for community detection. In: Progress in advanced computing and intelligent engineering, pages 412-426. Springer

  35. Ahmad T, Ahmad R, Masud S, Nilofer F (2016) Framework to extract context vectors from unstructured data using big data analytics. In: 2016 Ninth international conference on contemporary computing (IC3), pages 1–6. IEEE

  36. Sedik A, Iliyasu AM, El-Rahiem A, Abdel Samea ME, Abdel-Raheem A, Hammad M, Peng J, El-Samie A, Fathi E, Abd El-Latif AA et al (2020) Deploying machine and deep learning models for efficient data-augmented detection of covid-19 infections. Viruses 12(7):769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Bai X, Zhang T, Wang C, Abd El-Latif AA, Niu X (2013) A fully automatic player detection method based on one-class svm. IEICE Trans Inf Syst 96(2):387–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We deeply acknowledge Taif University for Supporting this study through Taif University Researchers Supporting Project number (TURSP-2020/115), Taif University, Taif, Saudi Arabia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rafeeq Ahmed.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahmed, R., Ahmad, T., Almutairi, F.M. et al. Fuzzy Semantic Classification of Multi-Domain E-Learning Concept. Mobile Netw Appl 26, 2206–2215 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-021-01776-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11036-021-01776-8

Keywords

Navigation