SpringerLink
Log in

An investigation into the public acceptance in China of carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology

  • Original article
  • Published:
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is one of the main technologies that can achieve fossil energy emission reduction, so the realization of the dual-carbon goal may require the promotion of CCS technology. For any country in the world, public support is one of the prerequisites for the commercial development of CCS technology. In order to identify the current acceptance of CCS technology in China, this paper conducts a questionnaire survey on the Internet from September to December 2021, recovering 302 valid questionnaires, as well as statistical analysis and hypothesis verification. We utilize the structural equation to quantify the impact of public awareness, benefit perception, risk perception, public trust, climate change awareness, and environmental awareness on CCS acceptance. We found the following facts: (i) In terms of cognition, 58% of the respondents have heard of CCS, and 10% know it better. (ii) As for acceptance, the total number of respondents who basically agreed, agreed and strongly agreed was 53%. (iii) Climate change awareness, public awareness, public trust, and interest perception have a significant positive impact on the degree of acceptance. Risk perception has a significant negative impact on acceptance. Public trust can adjust the relationship between interest and risk perception and acceptance. Public awareness affects the acceptance of CCS with interest and risk perception as intermediary variable. (iv) Lack of risk disclosure and research on CCS projects may lead to blind acceptance by the public. Given this, this study proposes that the government and researchers should strengthen their exploration of the benefits and risks of CCS to identify its advantages and disadvantages as a relatively new emission reduction technology, so as to provide support to the achievement of China’s carbon neutrality goal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to the size and complexity of the questionnaires, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Alzahrani SM, Alwafi AM, Alshehri SM (2023) A framework of examining the factors affecting public acceptance of nuclear power plant: case study in Saudi Arabia. Nucl Eng Technol 55(3):908–918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arning K, Offermann-van Heek J, Linzenich A, Kaetelhoen A, Sternberg A, Bardow A, Ziefle M (2019) Same or different? Insights on public perception and acceptance of carbon capture and storage or utilization in Germany. Energy Policy 125:235–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth P, Boughen N, Mayhew M, Millar F (2010) From research to action: Now we have to move on CCS communication. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 4:426–433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachu S (2008) CO2 storage in geological media: role, means, status and barriers to deployment. Prog Energy Combust Sci 34:254–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bäckstrand K, Meadowcroft J, Oppenheimer M (2011) The politics and policy of carbon capture and storage: framing an emergent technology. Glob Environ Chang 21:275–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baer P (2003) An issue of scenarios: carbon sequestration as investment and the distribution of risk. Clim Chang 59:283–291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batabyal A, Nordhaus W, Boyer J (2001) Warming the world: economic models of global warming. J Range Manag 54:312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Birkle I, Klink-Lehmann J, Hartmann M (2022) Different and alike: level and determinants of public acceptance of fattening pig, beef cattle and broiler farming in Germany. Meat Sci 193:108946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen F (2011) Carbon capture and storage as a corporate technology strategy challenge. Energy Policy 39:2256–2264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd A (2015) Examining community perceptions of energy systems development: the role of communication and sense of place. Environ Commun 11:1–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd AD (2017) Examining community perceptions of energy systems development: the role of communication and sense of place. Environ Commun 11:184–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BP (2020) Statistical Review of World Energy 2020, vol 2022. BP, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Broecks K, Jack C, Ter Mors E, Boomsma C, Shackley S (2021) How do people perceive carbon capture and storage for industrial processes? Examining factors underlying public opinion in the Netherlands and the United Kingdom. Energy Res Soc Sci 81:102236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budinis S, Krevor S, Dowell NM, Brandon N, Hawkes A (2018) An assessment of CCS costs, barriers and potential. Energy Strat Rev 22:61–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z-A, Li Q, Liu L-C, Zhang X, Kuang L, Jia L, Liu G (2015) A large national survey of public perceptions of CCS technology in China. Appl Energy 158:366–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Huang B, Lin C-T (2019) Environmental awareness and environmental Kuznets curve. Econ Model 77:2–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung J-B, Kim E-S (2018) Public perception of energy transition in Korea: nuclear power, climate change, and party preference. Energy Policy 116:137–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curry TE (2004) Public awareness of carbon capture and storage: a survey of attitudes toward climate change mitigation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • de Best-Waldhober M, Daamen D, Ramirez AR, Faaij A, Hendriks C, de Visser E (2009) Informed public opinions on CCS in comparison to other mitigation options. Energy Procedia 1:4795–4802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desbarats J, Upham P, McLachlan C, Riesch H, Reiner D, Brunsting S, Best-Waldhober D, Duetschke E, Oltra C, Sala R (2010a) Review of the public participation practices for CCS and non-CCS projects in Europe. Institute for European Environmental Policy, London (UK)

    Google Scholar 

  • Desbarats J, Upham P, McLachlan C, Riesch H, Reiner D, Brunsting S, Best-Waldhober D, Duetschke E, Oltra C, Sala R (2010b) Review of the public participation practices for CCS and non-CCS projects in Europe. Revue De Chirurgie Orthopédique Et Réparatrice De Lapparl Moteur 21:763–767

    Google Scholar 

  • Eggleston HS, Buendia L, Miwa K, Ngara T, Tanabe K (2006) Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories. National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, Japan

    Google Scholar 

  • Fan J-L, Xu M, Li F, Yang L, Zhang X (2018) Carbon capture and storage (CCS) retrofit potential of coal-fired power plants in China: the technology lock-in and cost optimization perspective. Appl Energy 229:326–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flynn R, Bellaby P (2007) Risk and the public acceptance of new technologies 978-1-349-35486-3

  • Fan J-L, Wei S, Yang L, Wang H, Zhong P, Zhang X (2019) Comparison of the LCOE between coal-fired power plants with CCS and main low-carbon generation technologies: Evidence from China. Energy 176:143–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gjernes E, Helgesen LI, Maree Y (2013) Health and environmental impact of amine based post combustion CO2 capture. Energy Procedia 37:735–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haug JK, Stigson P (2016) Local acceptance and communication as crucial elements for realizing CCS in the Nordic region. Energy Procedia 86:315–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoegh-Guldberg O, Bruno JF (2010) The impact of climate change on the world’s marine ecosystems. Science 328:1523–1528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holloway S, van der Straaten R (1995) The Joule II project the underground disposal of carbon dioxide. Energy Convers Manag 36:519–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huijts NMA, Molin EJE, Steg L (2012) Psychological factors influencing sustainable energy technology acceptance: a review-based comprehensive framework. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16:525–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Energy Agency (2010) Energy technology perspectives. International Energy Agency, Paris

  • IEA (2020) Global Energy Review 2020, IEA, Paris. https://www.iea.org/reports/global-energy-review-2020, License: CC BY 4.0

  • IPCC (2005) B. M., Ogunlade Davidson, Heleen de Coninck, Manuela Loos and Leo Meyer (Eds.). Cambridge University Press, UK. pp 431. Available from Cambridge University Press, The Edinburgh Building Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge CB2 2RU England

  • IPCC (2021), P. A. Arias, N. Bellouin, E. Coppola, R. G. Jones, G. Krinner, J. Marotzke, et al. In: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, edited by V. Masson-Delmotte, P. Zhai, A. Pirani, S. L. Connors, C. Péan, S. Berger, et al. Cambridge University Press.

  • Jacobson MZ (2019) The health and climate impacts of carbon capture and direct air capture. Energy Environ Sci 12:3567–3574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang K, Ashworth P, Zhang S, Liang X, Sun Y, Angus DJR, Reviews SE (2019) China’s carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) policy: a critical review. Renew Sust Energ Rev 109601

  • Jones CR, Olfe-Kräutlein B, Naims H, Armstrong K (2017) The social acceptance of carbon dioxide utilisation: a review and research agenda. Front Energy Res 2017:11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karimi F, Toikka A (2018) General public reactions to carbon capture and storage: does culture matter? Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 70:193–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasperson RE, Ram BJ (2013) The public acceptance of new energy technologies. Daedalus 142:90–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaye J (2002) Biomedical communications: purposes, audiences, and strategies. Journal Mass Commun Q 79:747–748

    Google Scholar 

  • Kern F, Gaede J, Meadowcroft J, Watson J (2016) The political economy of carbon capture and storage: an analysis of two demonstration projects. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 102:250–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraeusel J, Möst D (2012) Carbon Capture and Storage on its way to large-scale deployment: social acceptance and willingness to pay in Germany. Energy Policy 49:642–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee TM, Markowitz EM, Howe PD, Ko C-Y, Leiserowitz AA (2015) Predictors of public climate change awareness and risk perception around the world. Nat Clim Chang 5:1014–1020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei Y (2021) China’s annual report on carbon dioxide capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) (2021) issued a proposal to carry out large-scale CCUS demonstration and industrial cluster construction. Environ Resour Econ 40–42

  • Li K, Shen S, Fan J-L, Xu M, Zhang X (2022) The role of carbon capture, utilization and storage in realizing China’s carbon neutrality: a source-sink matching analysis for existing coal-fired power plants. Resour Conserv Recycl 178:106070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang D, Wu W (2009) Barriers and incentives of CCS deployment in China: results from semi-structured interviews. Energy Policy 37:2421–2432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu B, Xu Y, Yang Y, Lu S (2021) How public cognition influences public acceptance of CCUS in China: based on the ABC (affect, behavior, and cognition) model of attitudes. Energy Policy 156:112390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lv G, Li Q, Wang S, Li X (2015) Key techniques of reservoir engineering and injection–production process for CO2 flooding in China’s SINOPEC Shengli Oilfield. J CO2 Util 11:31–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magazzino C, Mele M, Morelli G, Schneider N (2021) The nexus between information technology and environmental pollution: application of a new machine learning algorithm to OECD countries. Util Policy 72:101256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mardoyan A, Braun P (2015) Analysis of Czech subsidies for solid biofuels. Int J Green Energy 12(4):405–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markusson N, Kern F, Watson J (2011) Assessing CCS viability-A socio-technical framework. Energy Procedia 4:5744–5751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maroušek J, Gavurová B (2022) Recovering phosphorous from biogas fermentation residues indicates promising economic results. Chemosphere 291:133008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin H, Littlefield AA, Menefee M, Kinzer A, Hull T, Sovacool BK, Bazilian MD, Kim J, Griffiths S (2023) Carbon capture utilization and storage in review: sociotechnical implications for a carbon reliant world. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 177:113215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mele M, Magazzino C (2020) A machine learning analysis of the relationship among iron and steel industries, air pollution, and economic growth in China. J Clean Prod 277:123293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metz B, Davidson O, De Coninck HC, Loos M, Meyer L (2005) IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Midden CJH, Huijts NMA (2009) The role of trust in the affective evaluation of novel risks: the case of CO2 storage. Risk Anal 29:743–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon W-K, Kahlor LA, Olson HC (2020) Understanding public support for carbon capture and storage policy: the roles of social capital, stakeholder perceptions, and perceived risk/benefit of technology. Energy Policy 139:111312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nie L (2015) Research on global CCS technology commercialization path. Coal Industry Press, Bei**g

    Google Scholar 

  • Ono K, Kato E, Tsunemi K (2022) Construction of a structural equation model to identify public acceptance factors for hydrogen refueling stations under the provision of risk and safety information. Int J Hydrogen Energy 47:31974–31984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pelto MS (2008) Impact of climate change on north cascade alpine glaciers, and alpine runoff. Northwest Sci 82(1):65–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pianta S, Rinscheid A, Weber EU (2021) Carbon Capture and Storage in the United States: perceptions, preferences, and lessons for policy. Energy Policy 151:112149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenzweig C, Parry ML (1994) Potential impact of climate change on world food supply. Nature 367(6459):133–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumann D, Simon A (2008) Public acceptance of CO2 capture and storage (CCS): simulating the impact of communication. In: Contribution to ZUMA (Zentrum für Umfragen, Methoden und Analysen, Centre for surveys, methods and analyses) Advanced Simulation Workshop, pp 8–11

  • Seigo SLO, Arvai J, Dohle S, Siegrist M (2014) Predictors of risk and benefit perception of carbon capture and storage (CCS) in regions with different stages of deployment. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 25:23–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen Shuo FJ, Chen Q, Zhang X (2021) Documents on carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) technology Metrological analysis. Themal Power Gener 50(01):47–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegrist M (2000) The influence of trust and perceptions of risks and benefits on the acceptance of gene technology. Risk Anal 20:195–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siirila ER, Navarre-Sitchler AK, Maxwell RM, McCray JE (2012) A quantitative methodology to assess the risks to human health from CO2 leakage into groundwater. Adv Water Resour 36:146–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens JC (2006) Growing interest in carbon capture and storage (CCS) for climate change mitigation. Sustain: Sci Pract Policy 2:4–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Terwel BW, Daamen DDL (2012) Initial public reactions to carbon capture and storage (CCS): differentiating general and local views. Clim Policy 12:288–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terwel BW, Harinck F, Ellemers N, Daamen DDL (2011) Going beyond the properties of CO2 capture and storage (CCS) technology: How trust in stakeholders affects public acceptance of CCS. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 5:181–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The Administrative Centre for China's Agenda 21, M.o.S.a.T (2021) China Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage (CCUS) Technology Assessment Report

  • Tokushige K, Akimoto K, Tomoda T (2007a) Public acceptance and risk-benefit perception of CO2 geological storage for global warming mitigation in Japan. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Chang 12:1237–1251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tokushige K, Akimoto K, Tomoda T (2007b) Public perceptions on the acceptance of geological storage of carbon dioxide and information influencing the acceptance. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 1:101–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Udemba EN, Magazzino C, Bekun FV (2020) Modeling the nexus between pollutant emission, energy consumption, foreign direct investment, and economic growth: new insights from China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:17831–17842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wade S, Greenberg S (2011) Social site characterization: from concept to application. In: A review of relevant social science literature and a toolkit for social site characterization. AJW Inc, Washington, DC

  • Wallquist L, Seigo SLO, Visschers VHM, Siegrist M (2012) Public acceptance of CCS system elements: a conjoint measurement. Int J Greenhouse Gas Control 6:77–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallquist L, Visschers VHM, Siegrist M (2011) Antecedents of risk and benefit perception of CCS. Energy Procedia 4:6288–6291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang N, Akimoto K, Nemet GF (2021) What went wrong? Learning from three decades of carbon capture, utilization and sequestration (CCUS) pilot and demonstration projects. Energy Policy 158:112546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson J, Kern F, Markusson N (2014) Resolving or managing uncertainties for carbon capture and storage: lessons from historical analogues. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 81:192–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitmarsh L, Xenias D, Jones CR (2019) Framing effects on public support for carbon capture and storage. Palgrave Communications 5(1):17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang L, Zhang X, McAlinden KJ (2016) The effect of trust on people’s acceptance of CCS (carbon capture and storage) technologies: Evidence from a survey in the People’s Republic of China. Energy 96:69–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeqiraj D (2022) Enhanced oil recovery (EOR) project scheduling with multiobjective of maximum net present value and minimum makesapn. Results Eng 13:100339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang L, Wang J, You J (2015) Consumer environmental awareness and channel coordination with two substitutable products. Eur J Oper Res 241:63–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of Huo Yingdong Education Foundation (Grant no. 171072), Open Fund of State Key Laboratory of Coal Resources and Safe Mining (China University of Mining and Technology) (Grant nos. SKLCRSM21KFA05, SKLCRSM22KFA09), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant nos. 2022JCCXNY02, 2021XJGL01).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Center for Sustainable Development and Energy Policy Research (SDEP), School of Energy and Mining Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Bei**g, 100083, China

    **g**g **e & Yujiao **an

  2. School of Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Bei**g, 100083, China

    Yujiao **an

  3. State Key Laboratory of Coal Resources and Safe Mining (China University of Mining and Technology), Bei**g, 100083, China

    Yujiao **an

  4. The Administrative Centre for China’s Agenda 21 (ACCA21), Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST), Bei**g, 100038, China

    Guowei Jia

Authors
  1. **g**g **e
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yujiao **an
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Guowei Jia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yujiao **an.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

**e, J., **an, Y. & Jia, G. An investigation into the public acceptance in China of carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 28, 27 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-023-10065-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-023-10065-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation