Abstract
Objectives
To describe understanding of the irreversible nature of permanent contraception and knowledge and attitudes about long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) among individuals seeking and not seeking permanent contraception.
Methods
We performed a cross-sectional survey among patients with Medicaid insurance attending an obstetrics and gynecology clinic in [location]. The survey consisted of 20 true/false and Likert questions assessing knowledge and perceptions about permanent contraception and LARC. Sixty-seven participants were needed to detect a small-to-medium Cohen’s effect size f2 = 0.20, with 95% power and alpha = 0.05.
Results
Ninety potential participants were contacted and 67 were recruited. Forty-three participants desired permanent contraception and 24 did not. Approximately half of all participants were not aware that permanent contraception is irreversible. Participants who desired permanent contraception had lower LARC knowledge scores (62% correct versus 70%, p = 0.042) and more negative perceptions about LARC (54% versus 38%, p = 0.048). Fewer participants desiring permanent contraception identified LARC efficacy as equal to permanent contraception (32% versus 83%, p < 0.01), and fewer would consider using LARC (intrauterine device: 23% versus 58%, p < 0.01; implant: 16% versus 46%, p < 0.01). These differences persisted in multivariable models adjusting for age, gravidity, and parity.
Conclusions for Practice
Individuals who desire permanent contraception may not be aware of its permanence, or of equally effective alternatives. They were also found to have more negative perceptions of LARC in our sample. Additional research is needed to understand factors underlying these differences. Counseling practices should be tailored to ensure accurate knowledge about permanent contraception and LARC for all people seeking to avoid pregnancy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ACOG Committee on Ethics. (2017). Committee Opinion No. 695: Sterilization of women: Ethical issues and considerations. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 129(4), 109–116.
ACOG Committee on Gynecologic Practice. (2019). ACOG Committee Opinion No. 774: Opportunistic sal**ectomy as a strategy for epithelial ovarian cancer prevention. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 133(4), 279–284.
Allyn, D. P., Leton, D. A., Westcott, N. A., & Hale, R. W. (1986). Presterilization counseling and women’s regret about having been sterilized. Journal of Reproductive Medicine, 31(11), 1027–1032.
Bell, C. (1994). DSM-IV: Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. JAMA, 272(10), 828–829.
Beshar, I., So, J., Chelvakumar, M., Cahill, E. P., Shaw, K. A., & Shaw, J. G. (2021). Socioeconomic differences persist in use of permanent vs long-acting reversible contraception: An analysis of the National Survey of Family Growth, 2006 to 2010 vs 2015 to 2017. Contraception, 103(4), 246–254.
Birgisson, N. E., Zhao, Q., Secura, G. M., Madden, T., & Peipert, J. F. (2015). Preventing unintended pregnancy: The contraceptive CHOICE project in review. Journal of Women’s Health, 24(5), 349–353.
Block-Abraham, D., Arora, K. S., Tate, D., & Gee, R. E. (2015). Medicaid consent to sterilization forms: Historical, practical, ethical, and advocacy considerations. Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology, 58(2), 409–417.
Borrero, S., Abebe, K., Dehlendorf, C., Schwarz, E. B., Creinin, M. D., Nikolajski, C., & Ibrahim, S. (2011). Racial variation in tubal sterilization rates: Role of patient-level factors. Fertility and Sterility, 95(1), 17–22.
Borrero, S., Nikolajski, C., Rodriguez, K. L., Creinin, M. D., Arnold, R. M., & Ibrahim, S. A. (2008). “Everything I know I learned from my mother … or not": Perspectives of African-American and white women on decisions about tubal sterilization. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 24(3), 312–319.
Borrero, S., Schwarz, E. B., Reeves, M. F., Bost, J. E., Creinin, M. D., & Ibrahim, S. A. (2007). Race, insurance status, and tubal sterilization. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 109(1), 94–100.
Brandi, K., & Fuentes, L. (2020). The history of tiered-effectiveness contraceptive counseling and the importance of patient-centered family planning care. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 222(4), S873–S877.
Buchner, A., Erdfelder, E., Faul, F., & Lang, A. (2020). G*Power: Statistical power analyses for Windows and Mac. Retrieved from https://www.psychologie.hhu.de/arbeitsgruppen/allgemeine-psychologie-und-arbeitspsychologie/gpower.html
Dehlendorf, C., Fitzpatrick, J., Steinauer, J., Swiader, L., Grumbach, K., Hall, C., & Kuppermann, M. (2017). Development and field testing of a decision support tool to facilitate shared decision making in contraceptive counseling. Patient Education and Counseling, 100(7), 1374–1381.
Dickerson, C. (2020, September 16). Inquiry ordered into claims immigrants had unwanted gynecology procedures. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com
Eig, J. (2014). The birth of the pill: How four crusaders reinvented sex and launched a revolution. Norton & Company.
Greenphire. (2020). Clincard. Greenphire. https://greenphire.com/participant-payments/
Gurney, E. P., McAllister, A., Lang, B., Schreiber, C. A., & Sonalkar, S. (2020). Ultrasound assessment of postplacental copper intrauterine devices position 6 months after placement during cesarean delivery. Contraception: X, 2, 100040. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conx.2020.100040
Hall, K. S., Ela, E., Zochowski, M. K., Caldwell, A., Moniz, M., McAndrew, L., Steel, M., Challa, S., Dalton, V. K., & Ernst, S. (2016). “I don’t know enough to feel comfortable using them:” Women’s knowledge of and perceived barriers to long acting reversible contraceptives on a college campus. Contraception, 93(6), 556–564.
Hardy, E., Bahamondes, L., Osis, J. M., Costa, R. G., & Faundes, A. (1996). Risk factors for tubal sterilization regret, detectable before surgery. Contraception, 54(3), 159–162.
Harris, P. A., Taylor, R., Minor, B. L., Elliott, V., Fernandez, M., O’Neal, L., McLeod, L., Delacqua, G., Delacqua, F., Kirby, J., & Duda, S. N. (2019). The REDCap consortium: Building an international community of software platform partners. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 95, 103208.
Hoopes, A. J., Ahrens, K. R., Gilmore, K., Cady, J., Haaland, W. L., Oelschlager, A. A., & Prager, S. (2016). Knowledge and acceptability of long-acting reversible contraception among adolescent women receiving school-based primary care services. Journal of Primary Care & Community Health, 7(3), 165–170.
Madden, T., Mullersman, J. L., Omvig, K. J., Secura, G. M., & Peipert, J. F. (2013). Structured contraceptive counseling provided by the Contraceptive CHOICE Project. Contraception, 88(2), 243–249.
Roberts, D. E. (1997). Killing the black body: Race, reproduction, and the meaning of liberty. Pantheon Books.
Sadatmahalleh, S. J., Ziaei, S., Kazemnejad, A., & Mohamadi, E. (2018). Evaluation of influencing factors on tubal sterilization regret: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Fertility & Sterility, 12(3), 200–206.
SAS Institute Inc. (2014). SAS/ACCESS® 9.4 Interface to ADABAS: Reference. SAS Institute Inc.
Shih, G., Dubé, K., & Dehlendorf, C. (2013). “We never thought of a vasectomy”: A qualitative study of men and women’s counseling around sterilization. Contraception, 88(3), 376–381.
Shreffler, K. M., McQuillan, J., Greil, A. L., & Johnson, D. R. (2015). Surgical sterilization, regret, and race: Contemporary patterns. Social Science Research, 50, 31–45.
United Nations. (1994). Report of the International Conference on Population and Development. Paper published at the International Conference on Population and Development.
United States Census Bureau. (2017). American Community Survey, five year estimates, 2013–17, Table S1701 (Poverty Status in the Past 12 Months). United States Census Bureau. https://data.census.gov/cedsci/
Whitaker, A. K., Quinn, M. T., Munroe, E., Martins, S. L., Mistretta, S. Q., & Gilliam, M. L. (2016). A motivational interviewing-based counseling intervention to increase postabortion uptake of contraception: A pilot randomized controlled trial. Patient Education and Counseling, 99, 1663–1669.
Yee, L. M., & Simon, M. A. (2011). Perceptions of coercion, discrimination and other negative experiences in postpartum contraceptive counseling for low-income minority women. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 22(4), 1387–1400.
Zeal, C., Higgins, J. A., & Newton, S. R. (2018). Patient-perceived autonomy and long-acting reversible contraceptive use: A qualitative assessment in a Midwestern, University Community. BioResearch Open Access, 7(1), 25–32.
Zite, N. B., Philipson, S. J., & Wallace, L. S. (2007). Consent to sterilization section of the Medicaid-Title XIX form: Is it understandable? Contraception, 75(4), 256–260.
Zite, N. B., & Wallace, L. S. (2011). Use of a low-literacy informed consent form to improve women’s understanding of tubal sterilization: A randomized controlled trial. Obstetrics and Gynecology, 117(5), 1160–1166.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to recognize the following individuals for their contributions to this work: MA, (B.S., M.S., Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine), for data collection. SH, (B.S., Philadelphia College of Osteopathic Medicine), for data collection. XX, (Ph.D., Department of Epidemiology & Population Health, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY), for data analysis and interpretation.
Funding
This work was supported by the Albert Einstein Society Seed Grant for Healthcare Disparities Research, an institutional grant supporting resident research. The Albert Einstein Society had no role in the study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, the writing of the report, or decision to publish the results.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Andrea Leung, Andrew Loh, Sara Pentlicky, and Elizabeth P. Gurney contributed to the design and implementation of the research, to the analysis of the results, and to the writing of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Dr. Elizabeth Gurney is a Nexplanon trainer for Merck. Dr. Sara Pentlicky is a Nexplanon trainer for Merck and IUD trainer for Bayer. None of the other authors reports a conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Leung, A., Loh, A., Pentlicky, S. et al. Knowledge and Attitudes About Sterilization and Long-Acting Reversible Contraception. Matern Child Health J 25, 1336–1344 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-021-03172-w
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-021-03172-w