SpringerLink
Log in

Living with wildlife: a review of advances in social-ecological analysis across landscapes

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Landscape Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 23 November 2023

This article has been updated

Abstract

Context

An exciting research frontier is the intersection of wildlife ecology and social science. Associated research is embracing a spatial approach to integrating ecological and social data to investigate the complex relationships between wildlife and humans across landscapes. However, there is a lack of coherence on the status, current methodology, and potential future directions of this body of research to advance landscape analyses.

Objectives

We provided a review of the current state of the science of social-ecological research and modeling of human-wildlife interactions across space, with a goal of compiling state-of-the-art approaches, methods, major findings, limitations, and future directions.

Methods

We performed a systematic literature review of peer-reviewed journal articles published from January 2000 to August 2023. We synthesized methods, lessons learned, and key themes in the literature.

Results

Synthesized findings pointed to the importance of spatial context in sha** wildlife and human attributes and their interactions, and the demonstrated value of adding social science data to contest past practices of oversimplifying the complex drivers of human-wildlife interactions. Challenges and limitations included spatial scale mismatches, the limits of assigning causality, misaligned terminology, and need for more in-depth and diverse social science data collection methods and frameworks.

Conclusions

These studies highlighted the potential for social-ecological analyses to inform management through identification of key levers, scenario modeling, and avoidance of “panacea traps.” Our results also chart a path forward that calls for more extensive data integration, investigation of feedbacks, and multi-scale approaches to more deeply understand human-wildlife relationships across landscapes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

Change history

References

  • Allen MC, Lockwood JL, Burger J (2021) Finding clarity in ecological outcomes using empirical integrated social–ecological systems: A case study of agriculture-dependent grassland birds. J Appl Ecol 58:528–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almuna R, Cruz JM, Vargas FH, Ibarra JT (2020) Landscapes of coexistence: generating predictive risk models to mitigate human-raptor conflicts in forest socio-ecosystems. Biol Conserv 251:108795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • An L, Linderman M, Qi J et al (2005) Exploring complexity in a human–environment system: an agent-based spatial model for multidisciplinary and multiscale integration. Ann Am Assoc Geog 95:54–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • An L, He G, Liang Z, Liu J (2006) Impacts of demographic and socioeconomic factors on spatio-temporal dynamics of panda habitat. Biodivers Conserv 15:2343–2363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • An L, Mak J, Yang S et al (2020) Cascading impacts of payments for ecosystem services in complex human-environment systems. JASSS- J Artif Soc S 23:5

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson J (1985) Ideology in geography: An introduction. Antipode 17:28–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrade R, Bateman HL, Larson KL et al (2022) To the rescue—Evaluating the social-ecological patterns for bird intakes. Urban Ecosyst 25:179–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arbieu U, Grünewald C, Schleuning M, Böhning-Gaese K (2017) The importance of vegetation density for tourists’ wildlife viewing experience and satisfaction in African savannah ecosystems. PLoS ONE 12:e0185793

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Arbieu U, Albrecht J, Mehring M et al (2020) The positive experience of encountering wolves in the wild. Conserv Sci Pract 2:e184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baruch-Mordo S, Breck SW, Wilson KR, Broderick J (2009) A tool box half full: how social science can help solve human–wildlife conflict. Hum Dimens Wildl 14:219–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bateman HL, Brown JA, Larson KL et al (2021) Unwanted residential wildlife: Evaluating social-ecological patterns for snake removals. Glob Ecol Conserv 27:e01601

    Google Scholar 

  • Behr DM, Ozgul A, Cozzi G (2017) Combining human acceptance and habitat suitability in a unified socio-ecological suitability model: a case study of the wolf in Switzerland. J Appl Ecol 54:1919–1929

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belaire JA, Whelan CJ, Minor ES (2014) Having our yards and sharing them too: the collective effects of yards on native bird species in an urban landscape. Ecol Appl 24:2132–2143

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Belaire JA, Westphal LM, Minor ES (2016) Different social drivers, including perceptions of urban wildlife, explain the ecological resources in residential landscapes. Landsc Ecol 31:401–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell SL, Westley M, Lovell R, Wheeler BW (2018) Everyday green space and experienced well-being: the significance of wildlife encounters. Landsc Res 43:8–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bettigole CA, Donovan TM, Manning R et al (2014) Acceptability of residential development in a regional landscape: potential effects on wildlife occupancy patterns. Biol Conserv 169:401–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhatia S, Redpath SM, Suryawanshi K, Mishra C (2020) Beyond conflict: exploring the spectrum of human–wildlife interactions and their underlying mechanisms. Oryx 54:621–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloomfield LSP, McIntosh TL, Lambin EF (2020) Habitat fragmentation, livelihood behaviors, and contact between people and nonhuman primates in Africa. Landsc Ecol 35:985–1000

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boesch L, Mundry R, Kühl HS, Berger R (2017) Wild mammals as economic goods and implications for their conservation. Ecol Soc 22:36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bontrager A, Kretser H, Leong K, Connelly N (2017) Conservation opportunity and risk map** for carnivores using landowner survey data from the greater Yellowstone ecosystem. Prof Geogr 69:225–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boonstra WJ, de Boer FW (2014) The historical dynamics of social–ecological traps. Ambio 43:260–274

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bowman JL, Leopold BD, Vilella FJ, Gill DA (2004) A spatially explicit model, derived from demographic variables, to predict attitudes toward black bear restoration. J Wildl Manage 68:223–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown G, McAlpine C, Rhodes J et al (2019) Integration of social spatial data to assess conservation opportunities and priorities. Biol Conserv 236:452–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchholtz EK, Redmore L, Fitzgerald LA et al (2019) Temporal partitioning and overlap** use of a shared natural resource by people and elephants. Front Ecol Evol 7:117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter NH, Riley SJ, Shortridge A et al (2014a) Spatial assessment of attitudes toward tigers in Nepal. Ambio 43:125–137

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carter NH, Viña A, Hull V et al (2014b) Coupled human and natural systems approach to wildlife research and conservation. Ecol Soc 19:43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter NH, López-Bao JV, Bruskotter JT et al (2017) A conceptual framework for understanding illegal killing of large carnivores. Ambio 46:251–264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carter N, Williamson MA, Gilbert S et al (2020a) Integrated spatial analysis for human–wildlife coexistence in the American West. Environ Res Lett 15:021001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter NH, Baeza A, Magliocca NR (2020b) Emergent conservation outcomes of shared risk perception in human-wildlife systems. Conserv Biol 34:903–914

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman S, Watson JEM, Salazar A et al (2017) The impact of urbanization and climate change on urban temperatures: a systematic review. Landsc Ecol 32:1921–1935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cleary M, Joshi O, Fairbanks WS (2021) Map** and modeling the components of human tolerance for black bears in eastern Oklahoma. J Environ Manage 288:112378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clemm von Hohenberg B, Hager A (2022) Wolf attacks predict far-right voting. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 119:e2202224119

  • Collaboration for Environmental Evidence (2013) Guidelines for systematic review and evidence synthesis in environmental management, Version 4.2. Bangor University, UK

  • Decker DJ, Brown TL, Siemer WF (2001) Human dimensions of wildlife management in North America. Wildlife Society

  • Ditmer MA, Niemiec RM, Wittemyer G, Crooks KR (2022a) Socio-ecological drivers of public conservation voting: Restoring gray wolves to Colorado, USA. Ecol Appl 32:e2532

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ditmer MA, Wittemyer G, Breck SW, Crooks KR (2022b) Defining ecological and socially suitable habitat for the reintroduction of an apex predator. Glob Ecol Conserv 38:e02192

    Google Scholar 

  • Dressel S, Ericsson G, Sandström C (2018) Map** social-ecological systems to understand the challenges underlying wildlife management. Environ Sci Policy 84:105–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn AR, Morzillo AT, Keener-Eck Larson LS, Christoffel RA Spatial analysis of attitudes toward timber rattlesnakes (Crotalus horridus) where encounters occur within an exurban landscape. In press. Soc Nat Resour

  • Eriksson M, Sandström C, Ericsson G (2015) Direct experience and attitude change towards bears and wolves. Wildlife Biol 21:131–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farr JJ, Pruden MJ, Glover R, et al (2022) A ten-year community reporting database reveals rising coyote boldness and associated human concern in Edmonton, Canada. bioRxiv 2010–2022

  • Fidino M, Lehrer EW, Kay CAM et al (2022) Integrated species distribution models reveal spatiotemporal patterns of human–wildlife conflict. Ecol Appl 32:e2647

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fink C, Toivonen T, Correia RA, Di Minin E (2021) Map** the online songbird trade in Indonesia. Appl Geogr 134:102505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frank B, Glikman JA, Marchini S (2019) Human–wildlife interactions: turning conflict into coexistence. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Gálvez N, Guillera-Arroita G, St. John FAV et al (2018) A spatially integrated framework for assessing socioecological drivers of carnivore decline. J Appl Ecol 55:1393–1405

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gangaas KE, Kaltenborn BP, Andreassen HP (2013) Geo-spatial aspects of acceptance of illegal hunting of large carnivores in Scandinavia. PLoS ONE 8:e68849

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gaynor KM, Hojnowski CE, Carter NH, Brashares JS (2018) The influence of human disturbance on wildlife nocturnality. Science 360:1232–1235

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ghoddousi A, Buchholtz EK, Dietsch AM et al (2021) Anthropogenic resistance: accounting for human behavior in wildlife connectivity planning. One Earth 4:39–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser M, Krause G, Ratter BMW, Welp M (2012) Human-nature interactions in the Anthropocene: potentials of social-ecological systems analysis. Routledge, New York, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Glover HK, Weston MA, Maguire GS et al (2011) Towards ecologically meaningful and socially acceptable buffers: response distances of shorebirds in Victoria, Australia, to human disturbance. Landsc Urban Plan 103:326–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goddard MA, Dougill AJ, Benton TG (2013) Why garden for wildlife? Social and ecological drivers, motivations and barriers for biodiversity management in residential landscapes. Ecol Econ 86:258–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris NC, Gámez S, Gadsden GI, Malhotra R (2022) Textured species range maps enhance interdisciplinary science capacity across scales. Front Ecol Environ 20:319–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassell JM, Bettridge JM, Ward MJ et al (2021) Socio-ecological drivers of vertebrate biodiversity and human-animal interfaces across an urban landscape. Glob Chang Biol 27:781–792

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • He G, Chen X, Beaer S et al (2009) Spatial and temporal patterns of fuelwood collection in Wolong Nature Reserve: implications for panda conservation. Landsc Urban Plan 92:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henson L, Balkenhol N, Gustas R et al (2021) Convergent geographic patterns between grizzly bear population genetic structure and Indigenous language groups in coastal British Columbia. Canada Ecol Soc 26:7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hohbein RR, Nibbelink NP, Cooper RJ (2021) Non-governmental organizations improve the social-ecological fit of institutions conserving the Andean bear in Colombia. Ecol Soc 26:13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homewood K, Lambin EF, Coast E et al (2001) Long-term changes in Serengeti-Mara wildebeest and land cover: pastoralism, population, or policies? Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:12544–12549

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hull V, Tuanmu M-N, Liu J (2015) Synthesis of Human-Nature Feedbacks Ecol Soc 20:17

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson HE, Lewis DL, Lischka SA, Breck SW (2018) Assessing ecological and social outcomes of a bear-proofing experiment. J Wildl Manage 82:1102–1114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Junker J, Boesch C, Mundry R et al (2015) Education and access to fish but not economic development predict chimpanzee and mammal occurrence in West Africa. Biol Conserv 182:27–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalnicky EA, Brunson MW, Beard KH (2014) A social–ecological systems approach to non-native species: habituation and its effect on management of coqui frogs in Hawaii. Biol Conserv 180:187–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keener-Eck LS, Morzillo AT, Christoffel RA (2020) Resident attitudes toward timber rattlesnakes (Crotalus horridus). Soc Nat Resour 33:1073–1091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knopff AA, Knopff KH, St Clair CC (2016) Tolerance for cougars diminished by high perception of risk. Ecol Soc 21:33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kretser HE, Curtis PD, Knuth BA (2009) Landscape, social, and spatial influences on perceptions of human–black bear interactions in the Adirondack Park, NY. Hum Dimens Wildl 14:393–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubo T, Shoji Y (2014) Spatial tradeoffs between residents’ preferences for brown bear conservation and the mitigation of human-bear conflicts. Biol Conserv 176:126–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson KL, Fleeger M, Lerman SB et al (2021) Who is abuzz about bees? Explaining residents’ attitudes in Phoenix, Arizona. Urban Ecosyst 24:35–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laurance WF, Vasconcelos HL, Lovejoy TE (2000) Forest loss and fragmentation in the Amazon: implications for wildlife conservation. Oryx 34:39–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lélé S, Norgaard RB (2005) Practicing interdisciplinarity. Bioscience 55:967–975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lischka SA, Teel TL, Johnson HE et al (2018) A conceptual model for the integration of social and ecological information to understand human-wildlife interactions. Biol Conserv 225:80–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Cubbage FW, Pulliam HR (1994) Ecological and economic effects of forest landscape structure and rotation length: simulation studies using ECOLECON. Ecol Econ 10:249–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd P, Martin TE, Redmond RL et al (2005) Linking demographic effects of habitat fragmentation across landscapes to continental source–sink dynamics. Ecol Appl 15:1504–1514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lute ML, Serenari C, Drake MD et al (2020) Modeling urban socio-ecological drivers of human–carnivore coexistence. J Urban Ecol 6:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie CA, Ahabyona P (2012) Elephants in the garden: financial and social costs of crop raiding. Ecol Econ 75:72–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magle SB, Fidino M, Sander HA et al (2021) Wealth and urbanization shape medium and large terrestrial mammal communities. Glob Chang Biol 27:5446–5459

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mahajan P, Chaudhary R, Kazi A, Khandal D (2022) Spatial determinants of livestock depredation and human attitude toward wolves in Kailadevi Wildlife Sanctuary, Rajasthan. Front Ecol Evol, India, p 10

    Google Scholar 

  • Malawska A, Top** CJ (2018) Applying a biocomplexity approach to modelling farmer decision-making and land use impacts on wildlife. J Appl Ecol 55:1445–1455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manfredo MJ, Teel TL, Gavin MC, Fulton D (2014) Considerations in representing human individuals in social-ecological models. Understanding society and natural resources. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 137–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer P, Grêt-Regamey A, Ciucci P et al (2023) Map** human-and bear-centered perspectives on coexistence using a participatory Bayesian framework. J Nat Conserv 73:126387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCann NP, Walberg EM, Forester JD et al (2021) Integrating socioecological suitability with human-wildlife conflict risk: case study for translocation of a large ungulate. J Appl Ecol 69:298

    Google Scholar 

  • Miranda EBP, Peres CA, Downs CT (2022) Landowner perceptions of livestock predation: implications for persecution of an Amazonian apex predator. Anim Conserv 25:110–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadi A, Almasieh K, Wan HY et al (2021) Integrating spatial analysis and questionnaire survey to better understand human-onager conflict in Southern Iran. Sci Rep 11:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morzillo AT, Schwartz MD (2011) Landscape characteristics affect animal control by urban residents. Ecosphere 2:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morzillo AT, Mertig AG, Garner N, Liu J (2007) Spatial distribution of attitudes toward proposed management strategies for a wildlife recovery. Hum Dimens Wildl 12:15–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morzillo AT, de Beurs KM, Martin-Mikle CJ (2014) A conceptual framework to evaluate human-wildlife interactions within coupled human and natural systems. Ecol Soc 19:44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz L, Hausner V, Brown G et al (2019) Identifying spatial overlap in the values of locals, domestic-and international tourists to protected areas. Tour Manag 71:259–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray MH, Byers KA, Buckley J et al (2021) “I don’t feel safe sitting in my own yard”: Chicago resident experiences with urban rats during a COVID-19 stay-at-home order. BMC Public Health 21:1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mustățea M, Pătru-Stupariu I (2021) Using landscape change analysis and stakeholder perspective to identify driving forces of human–wildlife interactions. Land 10:146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagendra H, Rocchini D, Ghate R (2010) Beyond parks as monoliths: Spatially differentiating park-people relationships in the Tadoba Andhari Tiger Reserve in India. Biol Conserv 143:2900–2908

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nijman V, Nekaris KAI (2010) Effects of deforestation on attitudes and levels of tolerance towards commensal primates (Cercopithecidae) in Sri Lanka. Int J Pest Manag 56:153–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris D, Michalski F (2013) Socio-economic and spatial determinants of anthropogenic predation on Yellow-spotted River Turtle, Podocnemis unifilis (Testudines: Pelomedusidae), nests in the Brazilian Amazon: implications for sustainable conservation and management. Zoologia 30:482–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paige SB, Bleecker J, Mayer J, Goldberg T (2017) Spatial overlap between people and non-human primates in a fragmented landscape. EcoHealth 14:88–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pătru-Stupariu I, Nita A, Mustăţea M et al (2020) Using social network methodological approach to better understand human–wildlife interactions. Land Use Policy 99:105009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piédallu B, Quenette P-Y, Mounet C et al (2016) Spatial variation in public attitudes towards brown bears in the French Pyrenees. Biol Conserv 197:90–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puri M, Marx AJ, Possingham HP et al (2022) An integrated approach to prioritize restoration for carnivore conservation in shared landscapes. Biol Conserv 273:109697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rastandeh A, Jarchow M, Carnes M (2021) Incorporating social values and wildlife habitats for biodiversity conservation modeling in landscapes of the Great Plains. Landsc Ecol 36:1137–1160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sage AHH, Hillis V, Graves RAA et al (2022) Paths of coexistence: spatially predicting acceptance of grizzly bears along key movement corridors. Biol Conserv 266:109468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santangeli A, Girardello M, Buechley ER et al (2019) Navigating spaces for implementing raptor research and conservation under varying levels of violence and governance in the Global South. Biol Conserv 239:108212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semmens DJ, Diffendorfer JE, Bagstad KJ et al (2018) Quantifying ecosystem service flows at multiple scales across the range of a long-distance migratory species. Ecosyst Serv 31:255–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shumway N, Seabrook L, McAlpine C, Ward P (2014) A mismatch of community attitudes and actions: A study of koalas. Landsc Urban Plan 126:42–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith OM, Taylor JM, Echeverri A et al (2021) Big wheel keep on turnin’: linking grower attitudes, farm management, and delivery of avian ecosystem services. Biol Conserv 254:108970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soulsbury CD, White PCL (2015) Human–wildlife interactions in urban areas: a review of conflicts, benefits and opportunities. Wildl Res 42:541–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Start D, Barbour MA, Bonner C (2020) Urbanization reshapes a food web. J Anim Ecol 89:808–816

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steen-Adams MM, Langston N, Adams MDO, Mladenoff DJ (2015) Historical framework to explain long-term coupled human and natural system feedbacks: application to a multiple-ownership forest landscape in the northern Great Lakes region, USA. Ecol Soc 20:28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg RM, Morzillo AT, Riley SPD, Clark SG (2015) People, predators and place: rodenticide impacts in a wildland-urban interface. Rural Soc 24:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Struebig MJ, Linkie M, Deere NJ et al (2018) Addressing human-tiger conflict using socio-ecological information on tolerance and risk. Nat Commun 9:1–9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Swartz TM, Coon JJ, Mattes JR, Miller JR (2019) Identifying opportunities to conserve farm ponds on private lands: integration of social, ecological, and historical data. Land 8:127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teixeira L, Tisovec-Dufner KC, de Marin G, L, et al (2021) Linking human and ecological components to understand human–wildlife conflicts across landscapes and species. Conserv Biol 35:285–296

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thant ZM, May R, Roskaft E (2022) Human-elephant coexistence challenges in Myanmar: An analysis of fatal elephant attacks on humans and elephant mortality. J Nat Conserv 69:126260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres PC, Morsello C, Parry L, Pardini R (2021) Forest cover and social relations are more important than economic factors in driving hunting and bushmeat consumption in post-frontier Amazonia. Biol Conserv 253:108823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel SM, Vasudev D, Ogutu JO et al (2023) Identifying sustainable coexistence potential by integrating willingness-to-coexist with habitat suitability assessments. Biol Conserv 279:109935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White J, Kemmelmeier M, Bassett S, Smith J (2018) Human perceptions of an avian predator in an urban ecosystem: close proximity to nests increases fondness among local residents. Urban Ecosyst 21:271–280

    Google Scholar 

  • **e J, Hill HR, Winterstein SR et al (1999) White-tailed deer management options model (DeerMOM): design, quantification, and application. Ecol Modell 124:121–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang H, Lupi F, Zhang J et al (2018) Feedback of telecoupling: the case of a payments for ecosystem services program. Ecol Soc 23:45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang HB, Ligmann-Zielinska A, Dou Y et al (2022) Complex effects of telecouplings on forest dynamics: an agent-based modeling approach. Earth Interact 26:15–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yarmey N (2019) Human Dimensions of Black Bear (Ursus americanus) Management in Connecticut

  • Zuluaga S, Vargas FH, Grande JM (2021) Integrating socio-ecological information to address human–top predator conflicts: The case of an endangered eagle in the eastern Andes of Colombia. Perspect Ecol Conserv 19:98–107

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation at the University of Florida for funding to support this work.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Wildlife Ecology and Conservation, University of Florida, 110 Newins-Ziegler Hall, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA

    Vanessa Hull, **aoxing Bian, Diane J. Episcopio-Sturgeon & Viviana Rojas-Bonzi

  2. School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Florida, 2035 McCarty Hall D, PO Box 116455, Gainesville, FL, 32611, USA

    **aoxing Bian & Diane J. Episcopio-Sturgeon

  3. High Meadows Environmental Institute, Princeton University, M31 Guyot Hall, Princeton, NJ, 08544–1003, USA

    Christian J. Rivera

  4. Instituto de Investigación Biológica del Paraguay (IIBP), 1607 Del Escudo, Asuncion, 1425, Paraguay

    Viviana Rojas-Bonzi

  5. Department of Natural Resources & the Environment, University of Connecticut, 1376 Storrs Road, Unit 4087, Storrs, CT, 06269-4087, USA

    Anita T. Morzillo

Authors
  1. Vanessa Hull
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. **aoxing Bian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Diane J. Episcopio-Sturgeon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Christian J. Rivera
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Viviana Rojas-Bonzi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Anita T. Morzillo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed to the analysis and writing of this manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vanessa Hull.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

The original online version of this article was revised: In the original publication of the article, the reference citation was incorrectly published, now it has been corrected here.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 191 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hull, V., Bian, X., Episcopio-Sturgeon, D.J. et al. Living with wildlife: a review of advances in social-ecological analysis across landscapes. Landsc Ecol 38, 4385–4402 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-023-01778-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-023-01778-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation