Log in

High uranium dose from the groundwater in a granitic terrain in the eastern part of Karnataka, India

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Very high uranium concentrations of ⁓3000 μgL−1 or more have been found in groundwater held in the granitic aquifers of four villages in eastern Karnataka, India. The highest uranium concentration was 8649 μgL−1 (calculated 218.7 BqL−1) and a maximum radon activity of 101.4 BqL−1. The ingestion doses of uranium for males and females of all age groups are very much higher compared to the corresponding dose calculated for World Health Organization and Atomic Energy Regulatory Board recommended concentrations of 30 and 60 μgL−1for drinking water. It is therefore recommended that alternative sources for drinking water need to be made to meet United Nations Sustainable Development Goals 3 and 6 to ensure good health from safe drinking water.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The authors have no financial or proprietary interests in any material discussed in this article.

References

  1. World Health Organization (1963) International standards for drinking-water

  2. Indian Standard Specification for Drinking Water (1983) IS: 10500

  3. World Health Organization (2011) Guidelines for drinking-water quality. WHO Chron 38(4):1–178

    Google Scholar 

  4. World Health Organization (2012) Uranium in drinking water. Background document for development of WHO guidelines for drinking-water quality. WHO, Geneva, pp 1–21

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sahoo SK, Jha VN, Patra AC, Jha SK, Kulkarni MS (2020) Scientific background and methodology adopted on derivation of regulatory limit for uranium in drinking water–a global perspective. Environ Adv 2:100020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. AERB (2004) Limits on uranium in drinking water, atomic energy regulatory board of India, Mumbai, AERB/VC/16/2004/80/373

  7. Virk HS (1997) Uranium and radon surveys in western Himalaya. Curr Sci 73(6):536–538

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Central Ground Water Board (CGWB) report (2020) Uranium occurrence in shallow aquifers in India. http://cgwb.gov.in/WQ/URANIUM_REPORT_2019-20.pdf

  9. Sahoo SK, Jha SK, Jha VN, Patra AC, Kulkarni MS (2021) Survey of uranium in drinking water sources in India: interim observations. Curr Sci 120(9):1482–1490

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Coyte RM, Jain RC, Srivastava SK, Sharma KC, Khalil A, Ma L, Vengosh A (2018) Large-scale uranium contamination of groundwater resources in India. Environ Sci Technol Lett 5(6):341–347

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Srinivasan R, Pandit SA, Karunakara N, Deepak Salim K, Sudeep Kumara M, Kumar R, Khatei G, Ramkumar KD (2021) High uranium concentration in groundwater used for drinking in parts of eastern Karnataka. India Curr Sci 121(11):1459

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Markich SJ (2002) Uranium speciation and bioavailability in aquatic systems: an overview. Sci World J 2:707–729. https://doi.org/10.1100/tsw.2002.130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kimura T, Serrano GJ, Nakayama S, Takahashi K, Takeishi H (1992) Speciation of uranium in aqueous solutions and in precipitates by photoacoustic spectroscopy. Radiochim Acta 58(1):173–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Deshmukh P, Sar SK, **dal MK, Ray T (2023) Magnetite based green bio composite for uranium exclusion from aqueous solution. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 332:297–310

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Haynes WM (Ed) (2014) Section 4–properties of the elements and inorganic compounds, CRC Handbook of chemistry and physics (95th edn). CRC Press, Boca Raton.https://doi.org/10.1201/b17118

  16. Degu Belete G, Alemu Anteneh Y (2021) General overview of radon studies in health hazard perspectives. J Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6659795

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) (2013) Toxicological profile for uranium. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Atlanta

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sanjon EP, Maier A, Hinrichs A, Kraft G, Drossel B, Fournier C (2019) A combined experimental and theoretical study of radon solubility in fat and water. Sci Rep 9(1):10768. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-47236-y

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Chikkballapur district profile (2023) https://chikkaballapur.nic.in/en/demography/. Access on 5th April 2023

  20. Kolar district profile (2023) https://kolar.nic.in/en/demography/. Access on 5th April 2023

  21. Ramakrishnan M, Vaidyanadhan R (2008) Geology of India. Geological Society of India Publications, vol 1, p 557

  22. Moyen JF, Martin H, Jayananda M, Auvray B (2003) Late archean granites: a typology based on Dharwar craton (India). Precabrian Res 127:103–123

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Krogstad EJ, Hanson GN, Rajamani V (1991) U-Pb ages of zircon and sphene for two gneiss terranes adjacent to the Kolar Schist Belt, South India: evidence for separate crustal evolution histories. J Geol 99(6):801–815

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Nandy J, Dey S, Heilimo E (2019) Neoarchaean magmatism through arc and lithosphere melting: evidence from eastern Dharwar Craton. Geol J 54(5):3148–3166. https://doi.org/10.1002/gj.3498

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Sarma SD, Parashuramulu V, Santosh M, Nagaraju E, Ramesh Babu N (2020) Pb–Pb baddeleyite ages of mafic dyke swarms from the Dharwar Craton: implications for Paleoproterozoic LIPs and diamond potential of mantle keel. Geosci Front 11(6):2127–2139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2020.05.014

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Goswami S, Maurya VK, Tiwari RP, Swain S, Verma MB (2019) Structural analysis of T. Sundupalle greenstone belt and surrounding granitoids, Andhra Pradesh, India. Arab J Geosci 12:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-019-4793-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kumar P. Senthil (2001) Radioelemental distribution in the Dharwar craton, south India: Implications for the evolution of the upper continental crust and heat generation in the craton (Ph. D. thesis, Osmania Univ., Hyderabad, India, p 218)

  28. International Atomic Energy Agency (2010) Analytical methodology for the determination of radium isotopes in environmental samples. IAEA

  29. Karunakara N, Yashodhara I, Sudeep Kumara K, Tripathi RM, Sanjeev MN, Sonal K, Chougaonkar MP (2014) Assessment of ambient gamma dose rate around a prospective uranium mining area of South India–a comparative study of dose by direct methods and by soil radioactivity. J Results Phys 4:20–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Al-Azmi D, Sudeep Kumara MP, Mohan NK (2019) Gamma dose rates in the high background radiation area of Mangalore region, Results. Radiat Prot Dosim 184(3–4):290–293

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Mohan MP, D’souza RS, Nayak SR, Kamath SS, Shetty T, Kumara KS, Karunakara N (2018) A study of temporal variations of 7Be and 210Pb concentrations and their correlations with rainfall and other parameters in the South West Coast of India. J Environ Radioact 192:194–207

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mohan MP, D’Souza RS, Nayak SR, Kamath SS, Shetty T, Kumara KS, Karunakara N (2019) Influence of rainfall on atmospheric deposition fluxes of 7Be and 210Pb in Mangaluru (Mangalore) at the Southwest Coast of India. Atmos Environ 202:281–295

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Yashodhara I, Karunakara N, SudeepKumar K, Murthy R, Tripathi RM (2011) Radiation levels and radionuclide distributions in soils of the gogi region, a proposed uranium mining region in north Karnataka. Radiat Prot Environ 34(4):267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Yashodhara I, Sudeep Kumara K, Tripathi RM, Karunakara N (2012) Activity concentrations of 226Ra and 238U in water samples and estimation of radiation dose around the proposed uranium mining region in Gogi. In: 19th national symposium on radiation physics (NSRP-19), pp 525–528

  35. Raghavayya M, Iyengar MAR, Markose PM (1980) Estimation of Radium-226 by emanometry. Bull Radiat Prot 3:11–14

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. IAEA Safety Standards (2011) Radiation protection and safety of radiation sources: international basic safety standards, p 471

  37. UNSCEAR (United Nation Scientific Committee on the effect of Atomic Radiations) (2000) Ionizing radiation. Sources and biological effects report to the general assembly with scientific annexes. New York, United Nations, p 659

  38. Reserve Bank of India (RBI) (2020) https://rbi.org.in/Scripts/PublicationsView.aspx?id=20000

  39. Radiation Risk in Perspective (2019) Position statement of the heath physics society. https://hps.org/documents/radiationrisk.pdf

  40. UNSCEAR (United Nation Scientific Committee on the effect of Atomic Radiations) (2016) Sources, effects and risks of ionizing radiation. New York, United Nations p 512. https://www.unscear.org/docs/publications/2016/UNSCEAR_2016_Report-CORR.pdf

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are indebted to Prof. S. K. Satheesh for his support and encouragement. The authors are thankful to Mrs. Kavitha Devi Ramkumar for her help in the preparation of illustrations.

Funding

The authors have no relevant financial or nonfinancial interests to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Manoj Kumar **dal or S. A. Pandit.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Ethical approval

All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or nonfinancial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

**dal, M.K., Pandit, S.A., Karunakara, N. et al. High uranium dose from the groundwater in a granitic terrain in the eastern part of Karnataka, India. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 333, 2905–2913 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-023-09053-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-023-09053-6

Keywords

Navigation