Log in

A simple spectrofluorimetric method to estimate uranium: application to nuclear reprocessing solution

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A simple spectrofluorimetric method is reported for the estimation of uranium (U) in nitric acid using 0.4 M H2SO4 as an enhancing reagent. The intensity of fluorescence peak of U at 512 nm with excitation at 414 nm shows linearity over 150–6000 µg/mL. Standard addition method is applied to arrive at the estimates of U in simulated dissolver and high active liquid waste solution of nuclear reprocessing plant. The estimate value of U for the sample with high content of other ions is found to be more accurate than the value measured by Davies-Gray method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Colletti LM, Cop** R, Garduno K, Lujan EJW, Mauser AK, Mechler-Hickson A, May I, Reilly SD, Rios D, Rowley J, Schroeder AB (2017) The application of visible absorption spectroscopy to the analysis of uranium in aqueous solutions. Talanta 175:390-405

  2. Nicholas AS, Gary SC, Kenneth RC (2013) Fluorescence and absorbance spectroscopy of the uranyl ion in nitric acid for process monitoring applications. J Radio Nucl Chem 295:1553–1560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Haruo F, Tetsuya M, Kazumichi S, Shotaro H, Yukio W (1986) Fluorometry of UO22+ ion in nitric acid solutions. J Nucl Sci Tech 23:1069–1074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Senol S (2013) Comparison method for uranium determination in ore sample by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES). Appl Spect 67:731–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jixin Q, Yihong X (2018) Direct measurement of uranium in seawater by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. Talanta 183:18–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang L, Wang C-Z, Tang H-B, Wang L, Liu Y-S, Zhao Y-L, Chai Z-F, Shi W-Q (2015) Rapid determination of uranium in water samples by adsorptive cathodic strip** voltammetry using a tin-bismuth alloy electrode. Electrochim Acta 174:925–932

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hiroshi Y, Yukie I, Tsugufumi M, Kota I, Yasuhiro S (2018) Evaluation of total-reflection X-ray fluorescence measurements for the prospective determination of uranium in the decommissioning of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant reactor. Spectrochim Acta Part B 148:183–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Davies W, Gray W (1964) A rapid and specific titrimetric method for the precise determination of uranium using iron(II) sulphate as reductant. Talanta 11:1203–1211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Mathew KJ, Bürger S, Vogt S, Mason P, Morales-Arteaga ME, Narayanan UI (2009) Uranium assay determination using davies and gray titration: an overview and implementation of GUM for uncertainty evaluation. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 282:939–94

  10. Costa M, Klein CB (2006) Toxicity and carcinogenicity of chromium compounds in humans. Crit Rev Toxicol 36:155–163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Moulin C, Decambox P, Trecani L (1996) Direct and fast uranium determination in zirconium by time-resolved laser induced fluorescence spectrometry. Anal Chim Acta 321:121–126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Maji S, Kumar S, Sankaran K (2014) Fluorimetric estimation of U(VI) in the presence of a large excess of Th(IV). J Radioanal Nucl Chem 302:1277–1281

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Maji S, Sundararajan K, Hemamalini G, Viswanathan KS (2001) Fluorimetric estimation of uranium: applications in nuclear technology. IGC report, IGCAR, Kalpakkam, 228

  14. Tetsuya M, Haruo F, Kazumichi S (1988) Effects of coexisting ions upon UO22+ fluorescence in fuel Reprocessing solutions. J Nucl Sci Tech 25:868–874

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Maji S, Viswanathan KS (2011) Enhancement of uranyl fluorescence using trimesic acid: ligand sensitization and co-fluorescence. J Lumi 131:1848–1852

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Scapolan S, Ansoborlo E, Moulin C, Madic C (1998) Investigations by time-resolved laser-induced fluorescence and capillary electrophoresis of the uranyl–phosphate species: application to blood serum. J Alloys Comp 271–273:106–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mathur JN, Murali MS, Balarama Krishna MV, Iyer RH, Chitnis RR, Wattal PK, Bauri AK, Banerji A (1996) Recovery of neptunium from highly radioactive waste solutions of purex origin using CMPO. J Radio Nucl Chem Lett 213:419–429

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Chinnusamy A, Velavendan P, Ganesh S, Pandey NK, Mudali UK, Natarajan R (2014) Analysis of uranium in dissolver solution of fast reactor carbide fuel reprocessing. J Radio Nucl Chem 300:115–119

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors would like to thank Mrs. R. Gangadevi, Fuel Chemistry Division, MC&MFCG, IGCAR for analysis of uranium samples by DG method.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Maji.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interests

The authors declare there are no conflict of interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maji, S., Kumar, S. & Sundararajan, K. A simple spectrofluorimetric method to estimate uranium: application to nuclear reprocessing solution. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 329, 1061–1066 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-021-07829-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-021-07829-2

Keywords

Navigation