Abstract
Using videos as tools for reflection has a strong grounding in the research literature. Traditionally, these videos provide representations of K-12 students interacting with one another and their teacher during small or whole group instruction and come from teachers’ own or their peers’ classrooms. More recently, online simulated classrooms have been used as practice spaces to support teachers in learning how to engage in core teaching practices, such as facilitating discussions. The purpose of this study was to explore the potential usefulness of video records generated from online simulations as a tool for self-reflection. To do so, we examined the nature of in-service elementary teachers’ self-reflections from video records of them facilitating argumentation-focused discussions with five student avatars in an online simulated classroom. Findings suggest that most teachers’ reflections on their discussion practice tended to be positive in nature. In addition, findings suggest that most in-service teachers used multiple pieces of evidence to justify their overall quality assessment of their discussion on five key dimensions of argumentation-focused discussions. The types of evidence they used were aligned with how a scoring rubric defined these dimensions but varied in nature across the participants. Finally, findings show that study participants tend to draw upon both what they and students say and do during these discussions as evidence to support their overall assertions about how well they attended to specific discussion dimensions. Implications for using videos from online teaching simulations as tools for reflection are discussed.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10956-023-10085-6/MediaObjects/10956_2023_10085_Fig1_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10956-023-10085-6/MediaObjects/10956_2023_10085_Fig2_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10956-023-10085-6/MediaObjects/10956_2023_10085_Fig3_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10956-023-10085-6/MediaObjects/10956_2023_10085_Fig4_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10956-023-10085-6/MediaObjects/10956_2023_10085_Fig5_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10956-023-10085-6/MediaObjects/10956_2023_10085_Fig6_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10956-023-10085-6/MediaObjects/10956_2023_10085_Fig7_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The datasets generated during and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Banilower, E. R., Smith, P. S., Malzahn, K. A., Plumley, C. L., Gordon, E. M., & Hayes, M. L. (2018). Report of the 2018 NSSME+. Horizon Research Inc. http://www.horizon-research.com/report-of-the-2018-nssme
Barnhart, T., & van Es, E. (2015). Studying teacher noticing: Examining the relationship among pre-service science teachers’ ability to attend, analyze and respond to student thinking. Teaching and Teacher Education, 45, 83–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.09.005
Benedict, A., Holdheide, L., Brownell, M., & Foley, A. M. (2016). Learning to teach: Practice-based preparation in teacher education. Special Issues Brief. Center on Great Teachers and Leaders.
Benedict-Chambers, A., Fick, S. J., & Arias, A. M. (2020). Preservice teachers’ noticing of instances for revision during rehearsals: A comparison across three university contexts. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 31(4), 435–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2020.1715554
Berland, L. K., & Reiser, B. J. (2009). Making sense of argumentation and explanation. Science Education, 93(1), 26–55.
Bogar, Y. (2019). Synthesis study on argumentation in science education. International Education Studies, 12(9), 1–14.
Borko, H., Jacobs, J., Eiteljorg, E., & Pittman, M. E. (2008). Video as a tool for fostering productive discussions in mathematics professional development. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 417–436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.012
Calandra, B., Brantley-Dias, L., Lee, J. K., & Fox, D. L. (2009). Using video editing to cultivate novice teachers’ practice. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(1), 73–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2009.10782542
Chan, K. K. H., Xu, L., Cooper, R., Berry, A., & van Driel, J. H. (2020). Teacher noticing in science education: Do you see what I see? Studies in Science Education, 57, 1–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057267.2020.1755803
Cherrington, S., & Loveridge, J. (2014). Using video to promote early childhood teachers’ thinking and reflection. Teaching and Teacher Education, 41, 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.03.004
Davis, E. A., Kloser, M., Wells, A., Windschitl, M., Carlson, J., & Marino, J. (2017). Teaching the practice of leading sense-making discussion in science: Science teacher educators using rehearsals. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 28(3), 275–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2017.1302729
Forzani, F. M. (2014). Understanding “core practices” and “practice-based” teacher education: Learning from the past. Journal of Teacher Education, 65(4), 357–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487114533800
Gaudin, C., & Chaliès, S. (2015). Video viewing in teacher education and professional development: A literature review. Educational Research Review, 16, 41–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.06.001
Gelfuso, A. (2016). A framework for facilitating video-mediated reflection: Supporting preservice teachers as they create ‘warranted assertabilities’ about literacy teaching and learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 58, 68–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.04.003
Grossman, P. L., Compton, C., Igra, D., Ronfeldt, M., Shahan, E., & Williamson, P. (2009). Teaching practice: A cross-professional perspective. Teachers College Record, 111(9), 2055–2100. https://www.tcrecord.org/Content.asp?ContentId=15018
Hawkins, S., & Park Rogers, M. (2016). Tools for reflection: Video-based reflection within a preservice community of practice. Journal of Science Teacher Education: THe Official Journal of the Association for Science Teacher Education, 27(4), 415–437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-016-9468-1
Kang, H., & van Es, E. A. (2019). Articulating design principles for productive use of video in preservice education. Journal of Teacher Education, 70(3), 237–250. http://proxy-tu.researchport.umd.edu/login?ins=tu&url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edsgbc&AN=edsgcl.586115633&site=eds-live&scope=site
Kloser, M. (2014). Identifying a core set of science teaching practices: A Delphi expert panel approach. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(9), 1185–1218.
Lottero-Perdue, P., Haines, S., Baranowski, A., & Kenny, P. (2020). Designing a model shoreline. Science and Children, 57(7), 40–45.
Lottero-Perdue, P. S., Mikeska, J., & Orlandi, E. (2020a). Development and teacher perceptions of an avatar-based performance task for elementary teachers to practice post-testing argumentation discussions in engineering design. Proceedings of the 2020 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access. American Association for Engineering Education. https://strategy.asee.org/development-and-teacher-perceptions-of-an-avatar-based-performance-task-for-elementary-teachers-to-practice-post-testing-argumentation-discussions-in-engineering-design
Lottero-Perdue, P., Mikeska, J., & Orlandi, E. (2020b, June 22-25). Practicing post-testing engineering argumentation discussions with elementary student avatars [Paper Presentation]. Montreal, Canada: Annual Meeting of the American Society for Engineering Education. https://peer.asee.org/34444
Lottero-Perdue, P. S., Mikeska, J. N., & Nester, M. S. (2022). Using preservice teachers’ transcript coding of simulated argumentation discussions to characterize aspects of their noticing about argument construction and critique. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 22(1), 105–139. https://citejournal.org/volume-22/issue-1-22/science/using-preservice-teachers-transcript-coding-of-simulated-argumentation-discussions-to-characterize-aspects-of-their-noticing-about-argument-construction-and-critique
Major, L., & Watson, S. (2018). Using video to support in-service teacher professional development: The state of the field, limitations and possibilities. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 27(1), 49–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2017.1361469
Marco-Bujosa, L., Gonzalez-Howard, M., McNeill, K., & Loper, S. (2017). Designing and using multimedia modules for teacher educators: Supporting teacher learning of scientific argumentation. Innovations in Science Teacher Education, 2(4), 1–16.
Marsh, B., & Mitchell, N. (2014). The role of video in teacher professional development. Teacher Development, 18(3), 403–417. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2014.938106
Masters, H. (2020). Using teaching rehearsals to prepare preservice teachers for explanation-driven science instruction. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 31(4), 414–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2020.1712047
McCoy, S., & Lynam, A. M. (2021). Video-based self-reflection among pre-service teachers in Ireland: A qualitative study. Education and Information Technologies, 26(1), 921–944. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020-10299-w
McDonald, M., Kazemi, E., & Kavanagh, S. S. (2013). Core practices and pedagogies of teacher education: A call for a common language and collective activity. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(5), 378–386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487113493807
McNeill, K. L., & Pimentel, D. S. (2010). Scientific discourse in three urban classrooms: The role of the teacher in engaging high school students in argumentation. Science Education, 94(2), 203–229.
McNeill, K. L., Katsh-Singer, R., González-Howard, M., & Loper, S. (2016). Factors impacting teachers’ argumentation instruction in their science classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 38(12), 2026–2046.
Mikeska, J. N., & Howell, H. (2020). Simulations as practice-based spaces to support elementary science teachers in learning how to facilitate argumentation-focused science discussions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(9), 1356–1399. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21659
Mikeska, J. N., Howell, H., & Straub, C. (2019). Using performance tasks within simulated environments to assess teachers’ ability to engage in coordinated, accumulated, and dynamic (CAD) competencies. International Journal of Testing, 19(2), 128–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2018.1551223
Mikeska, J. N., Shekell, C., Dix, J., & Lottero-Perdue, P. S. (2022). “Unnatural how natural it was”: Using a performance task and simulated classroom for preservice secondary teachers to practice engaging student avatars in scientific argumentation. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 30(3), 341–376.
Mikeska, J. N., Howell, H., & Kinsey, D. (2023). Do simulated teaching experiences impact elementary preservice teachers’ ability to facilitate argumentation-focused discussions in mathematics and science? Journal of Teacher Education, 74(5), 422–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/00224871221142842
Mikeska, J. N., Steinberg, J., Lottero-Perdue, P. S., Cisterna, D., Kinsey, D., & Howell, H. (2023). Using simulated classrooms to examine elementary teachers’ perceptions about, attention to, and use of formative feedback to improve their ability to facilitate science discussions. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education. https://citejournal.org/volume-23/issue-1-23/science/using-simulated-classrooms-to-examine-elementary-teachers-perceptions-about-attention-to-and-use-of-formative-feedback-to-improve-their-ability-to-facilitate-science-discussions/
National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grade K-8. The National Academies Press.
Osborne, J., Simon, S., Christodoulou, A., Howell-Richardson, C., & Richardson, K. (2013). Learning to argue: A study of four schools and their attempt to develop the use of argumentation as a common instructional practice and its impact on students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(3), 315–347. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21073
Osmanoglu, A. (2016). Prospective teachers’ teaching experience: Teacher learning through the use of video. Educational Research, 58(1), 39–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131881.2015.1117321
Peercy, M. M., & Troyan, F. J. (2017). Making transparent the challenges of develo** a practice-based pedagogy of teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 61, 26–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.10.005
Rosaen, C. L., Lundeberg, M., Cooper, M., Fritzen, A., & Terpstra, M. (2008). Noticing noticing: How does investigation of video records change how teachers reflect on their experiences? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(4), 347–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108322128
Schreier, M. (2014). Qualitative content analysis. In U. Flick (Ed.), The SAGE Handbook of qualitative data analysis (pp. 170–183). SAGE Publications Ltd.
Seidel, T., Stürmer, K., Blomberg, G., Kobarg, M., & Schwindt, K. (2011). Teacher learning from analysis of videotaped classroom situations: Does it make a difference whether teachers observe their own teaching or that of others? Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 259–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.009
Tripp, T. R., & Rich, P. J. (2012). The influence of video analysis on the process of teacher change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(5), 728–739. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.01.011
Tunney, J. W., & van Es, E. A. (2016). Using video for teacher-educator professional development. The New Educator, 12(1), 105–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/1547688X.2015.1113348
van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2002). Learning to notice: Scaffolding new teachers’ interpretations of classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 10(4), 571–596. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/9171/
van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2008). Mathematics teachers’ “learning to notice” in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 244–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.11.005
van Es, E. A., Tunney, J., Goldsmith, L. T., & Seago, N. (2014). A framework for the facilitation of teachers’ analysis of video. Journal of Teacher Education, 35(4), 340–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487114534266
Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., Braaten, M., & Stroupe, D. (2012). Proposing a core set of instructional practices and tools for teachers of science. Science Education, 96, 878–903.
**ao, B., & Tobin, J. (2018). The use of video as a tool for reflection with preservice teachers. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 39(4), 328–345. https://doi.org/10.1080/10901027.2018.1516705
Funding
This study was funded by Towson University’s School of Emerging Technologies and ETS’s internal allocation funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at the second author’s institution and all participants provided their written consent to participate.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Disclaimer
Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s).
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Mikeska, J.N., Lottero-Perdue, P.S. & Kinsey, D. Using Videos as a Tool for Self-Reflection: The Nature of In-Service Elementary Teachers’ Reflections on Their Ability to Facilitate Argumentation-Focused Discussions in a Simulated Classroom. J Sci Educ Technol 33, 316–332 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10085-6
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-023-10085-6