Log in

Construction and validation of a simulated ground motion dataset for Turkey

  • Research
  • Published:
Journal of Seismology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A dataset of simulated ground motions is created for seven recorded and previously validated, along with three hypothetical earthquakes in Turkey. This dataset has potential uses in engineering practice and research by both seismological and engineering communities. The simulated ground motion dataset with extensive information on the simulations and ground motion intensity parameters for each simulated motion is presented in an open-access online repository. A two-level randomization scheme is proposed to account for the uncertainties in input parameters and source-to-site geometries. An investigation of the magnitude-distance ranges in the simulated dataset, as well as the distribution of ground motion intensity measures, showed that the created dataset fills the gaps observed in recorded ground motion datasets. Pulse-like motions in the dataset are identified, and the relationship between pulse periods and earthquake magnitude is shown to agree with other relationships in the literature which are derived from recorded ground motions. The effects of source-to-site geometry and uncertainties in the following four input parameters are investigated: magnitude (\(Mw)\), stress drop, (\(\Delta \tau\)), time-averaged shear-wave velocity in the upper 30 m (\({V}_{S30}\)), and high-frequency attenuation parameter (\({\kappa }_{0}\)). The dataset is validated by investigating the variability and inter-period correlation of normalized residual spectral acceleration values (\(\epsilon )\), calculated using a ground motion model (GMM). The variability of \(\epsilon\) is found to be consistent with the variability of GMMs. However, inter-period correlations of \(\epsilon\) are shown to be larger than predictions of empirical models based on recorded earthquakes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

Figure 1 is prepared with The Generic Map** Tools (GMT) Version 6.3.0. The rest of the figures are plotted with the Python package matplotlib (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.592536).

Funding

This study has been performed with partial funds from a project funded by the Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency of Turkey (AFAD) with the grant number UDAP-C-21-59.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Abdullah Altindal performed the analyses and wrote the main manuscript text. Aysegul Askan supervised the analyses and edited the manuscript text.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aysegul Askan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Research data

The created dataset can be found at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7007918. A Python library is created within the scope of this work to automate running EXSIM12 simulations, which is publicly available at https://github.com/abdullahaltindal/pyexsim12 (last accessed April 2023). EXSIM12 code can be found at http://www.seismotoolbox.ca (last accessed April 2023).

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 2820 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Altindal, A., Askan, A. Construction and validation of a simulated ground motion dataset for Turkey. J Seismol 27, 1047–1065 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-023-10179-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10950-023-10179-z

Keywords

Navigation