SpringerLink
Log in

Ultrasound evaluation of the radial artery for arterial catheterization in healthy anesthetized patients

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the anatomy of the radial artery using ultrasound in anesthetized patients, and to correlate its anatomical data with patients’ characteristics. The success rate of radial artery cannulation using ultrasound was also evaluated to analyze the relationship between the anatomical data and the success rate. Study 1 One hundred ninety-five patients scheduled for general anesthesia were enrolled. Ultrasound measurements were obtained when the vital signs were stable after anesthesia induction. The wrist joint of patients were extended to 30°. The diameter and depth of the radial artery, and the angle between the radial artery and skin surface were measured using ultrasound. Anatomical data were correlated with patients’ characteristics. Study 2 Arterial cannulation was performed in 125 patients using long-axis in-plane technique to evaluate the success rate using ultrasound. Study 1 The diameter of the radial artery was mean value of 2.2 ± 0.4 mm and larger than 0.9 mm in all patients. It had significant correlation with body surface area (BSA) (Pearson correlation 0.292, P < 0.001). The incidence of abnormal angle between the radial artery and skin surface was significantly higher in elderly patients (≥65 years) than young patients (P = 0.017). Study 2 The first attempt success rate of arterial catheterization using ultrasound was 92.5 % using long-axis in-plane technique, regardless of patient’s characteristics. For small sized adult patients, a 22G angio-catheter should be used during radial artery cannulation, because the radial artery diameter significantly correlated with BSA in healthy anesthetized patients. In addition, ultrasound-guided catheterization is recommended in elderly patients because the incidence of abnormal angle between the radial artery and skin surface was high.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sandhu NS, Patel B. Use of ultrasonography as a rescue technique for failed radial artery cannulation. J Clin Anesth. 2006;18:138–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Levin PD, Sheinin O, Gozal Y. Use of ultrasound guidance in the insertion of radial artery catheters. Crit Care Med. 2003;31:481–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hansen MA, Juhl-Olsen P, Thorn S, Frederiksen CA, Sloth E. Ultrasonography-guided radial artery catheterization is superior compared with the traditional palpation technique: a prospective, randomized, blinded, crossover study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2014;58:446–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shiloh AL, Savel RH, Paulin LM, Eisen LA. Ultrasound-guided catheterization of the radial artery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Chest. 2011;139:524–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ishii S, Shime N, Shibasaki M, Sawa T. Ultrasound-guided radial artery catheterization in infants and small children. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2013;14:471–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Jani B, Rajkumar C. Ageing and vascular ageing. Postgrad Med J. 2006;82:357–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Mizukoshi K, Shibasaki M, Amaya F, Hirayama T, Shimizu F, Hosokawa K, et al. Ultrasound evidence of the optimal wrist position for radial artery cannulation. Can J Anaesth. 2009;56:427–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ludman PF, Stephens NG, Harcombe A, et al. Radial versus femoral approach for diagnostic coronary angiography in stable angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol. 1997;79:1239–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Benit E, Missault L, Eeman T, et al. Brachial, radial, or femoral approach for elective Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation: a randomizedcomparison. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1997;41:124–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Yoo BS, Yoon J, Ko JY, et al. Anatomical consideration of the radial artery for transradial coronary procedures: arterial diameter, branching anomaly and vessel tortuosity. Int J Cardiol. 2005;101:421–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kotowycz MA, Johnston KW, Ivanov J, et al. Predictors of radial artery size in patients undergoing cardiac catheterization: insights from the Good Radial Artery Size Prediction (GRASP) study. Can J Cardiol. 2014;30:211–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yokoyama N, Takeshita S, Ochiai M, et al. Anatomic variations of the radial artery in patients undergoing transradial coronary intervention. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2000;49:357–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Berk D, Gurkan Y, Kus A, Ulugol H, Solak M, Toker K. Ultrasound-guided radial arterial cannulation: long axis/in-plane versus short axis/out-of-plane approaches? J Clin Monit Comput. 2013;27:319–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shiver S, Blaivas M, Lyon M. A prospective comparison of ultrasound-guided and blindly placed radial arterial catheters. Acad Emerg Med. 2006;3:1275–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zochios VA, Wilkinson J, Dasgupta K. The role of ultrasound as an adjunct to arterial catheterization in critically ill surgical and intensive care unit patients. J Vasc Access. 2014;15:1–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors have no competing interests to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, 1198 Guwol-dong, Namdong-gu, Incheon, 405-760, South Korea

    Dongchul Lee, Hong Soon Kim, Kyung Cheon Lee, Su ** Lee & Hyun Jeong Kwak

  2. Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Anesthesiology and Pain Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea

    Ji Young Kim

Authors
  1. Dongchul Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ji Young Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hong Soon Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Kyung Cheon Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Su ** Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hyun Jeong Kwak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyun Jeong Kwak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lee, D., Kim, J.Y., Kim, H.S. et al. Ultrasound evaluation of the radial artery for arterial catheterization in healthy anesthetized patients. J Clin Monit Comput 30, 215–219 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-015-9704-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-015-9704-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation