SpringerLink
Log in

Resistance of Hong Kong waters to nutrient enrichment: assessment of the role of physical processes in reducing eutrophication

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Oceanography Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hong Kong waters receive high nutrient loading from year-round sewage effluent and Pearl River discharge during the summer wet season. We assessed the role of physical processes in reducing eutrophication by calculating a eutrophication reduction index for four different hydrographical areas and four seasons. We used outdoor incubation experiments to assess the response of phytoplankton when physical (mixing and dilution) processes and mesozooplankton grazing were reduced. The primary regulator of phytoplankton growth in low nutrient eastern waters (reference site) shifted from nutrients in the wet season to increased vertical mixing in the dry season. In the highly flushed western waters and Victoria Harbour, the majority (>86 %) of the eutrophication impacts were reduced by strong hydrodynamic mixing (turbulence, vertical mixing, and flushing effects) all year. In southern waters, eutrophication effects were severe (chlorophyll a of up to ~73 μg L−1) and was regulated by the ambient phosphate (PO4) concentration (~0.1 μM) during summer. In contrast, 62–96 % of the potential eutrophication impacts were reduced by physical processes during other seasons. Bioassays also revealed that the yield of chlorophyll from dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) that was taken up by phytoplankton [1.1–3.3 g Chl (mol N)−1] was not significantly different in both N- and P-limited cases. In contrast, the uptake ratios of DIN:PO4 (26:1–105:1) and Chl:P ratios [42–150 g Chl (mol P)−1] in the P-limited cases were significantly (p < 0.05, t test) higher than the N-limited cases [~16DIN:1P and 22–48 g Chl (mol P)−1]. The C:Chl ratios ranged from 32 to 87 g g−1. These potential ranges in ratios need to be considered in future nutrient models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andersen T, Schartau AKL, Paasche E (1991) Quantifying external and internal nitrogen and phosphorus pools as well as nitrogen and phosphorus supplied through remineralization, in coastal marine plankton by means of a dilution technique. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 69:67–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersen JH, Schlüter L, Ærtebjerg G (2006) Coastal eutrophication: recent developments in definitions and implications for monitoring strategies. J Plankton Res 28:621–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behrenfeld MJ, Boss E, Siegel DA, Shea DM (2005) Carbon based ocean productivity and phytoplankton physiology from space. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 19:GB1006. doi:10.1029/2004GB002299

  • Chen MR, Liu H (2011) Experimental simulation of trophic interactions among omnivorous copepods, heterotrophic dinoflagellates and diatoms. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 403:65–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen B, Liu H, Landry MR, Chen M, Sun J, Shek L, Chen X, Harrison PJ (2009) Estuarine nutrient loading affects phytoplankton growth and microzooplankton grazing at two contrasting sites in Hong Kong coastal waters. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 379:77–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho BC, Azam F (1990) Biogeochemical significance of bacterial biomass in the ocean’s eutrophic zone. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 63:253–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cloern JE (1991) Annual variations in river flow and primary production in the South San Francisco Bay Estuary. In: Elliot M, Ducrotoy JP (eds) Estuaries and coasts: spatial and temporal intercomparisons. ECSA 19 symposium, Olsen & Olsen, pp 91–96

  • Cloern JE (2001) Our evolving conceptual model of the coastal eutrophication problem. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 210:223–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards V, Icely J, Newton A, Webster R (2005) The yield of chlorophyll from nitrogen: a comparison between the shallow Ria Formosa lagoon and the deep oceanic conditions at Sagres along the southern coast of Portugal. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 62:391–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elrifi IR, Turpin DH (1985) Steady-state luxury consumption and the concept of optimum nutrient ratios—a study with phosphate and nitrate limited Selenastrum minutum (Chlorophyta). J Phycol 21:592–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher TR, Harding LW Jr, Stanley DW, Ward LG (1988) Phytoplankton, nutrients, and turbidity in the Chesapeake, Delaware, and Hudson estuaries. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 27:61–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fofonoff NP, Millard RC Jr (1983) Algorithms for computation of fundamental properties of seawater. UNESCO Technical Papers in Marine Science 44. UNESCO/SCPPOR/ICES/IAPSO Joint Panel on Oceanographic Tables and Standards and SCOR Working Group 51

  • Gowen R, Tett P, Jones J (1992) Predicting marine eutrophication: the yield of chlorophyll from nitrogen in Scottish coastal waters. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 85:153–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grasshoff KM, Ehrhardt M, Kremling K (1983) Methods of seawater analysis. Chemie, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison PJ, Thompson PA, Calderwood GS (1990) Effects of nutrient and light limitation on the biochemical composition of phytoplankton. J Appl Phycol 2:45–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison PJ, Yin KD, Lee JHW, Gan JP, Liu HB (2008) Physical–biological coupling in the Pearl River Estuary. Cont Shelf Res 28:1405–1415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ho YT (2007) Dynamics of nutrients and phytoplankton biomass and production in Hong Kong waters. PhD thesis, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Hong Kong

  • Ho AYT, Xu J, Yin K, Jiang YL, Yuan XC, He L, Anderson DM, Lee JHW, Harrison PJ (2010) Phytoplankton biomass and production in subtropical Hong Kong waters: influence of the Pearl River outflow. Estuar Coasts 33:170–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knap A, Michaels A, Close A, Ducklow H, Dickson A (1996) Protocols for the joint global ocean flux study (JGOFS) core measurements. JGOFS Report No 19, vi + 170. Reprint of the IOC Manuals and Guides No 29 UNESCO 1994

  • Le Pape O, Del Amo Y, Ménesguen A, Aminot A, Quequiner B, Treguer P (1996) Resistance of a coastal ecosystem to increasing eutrophic conditions: the Bay of Brest (France), a semi-enclosed zone of Western Europe. Cont Shelf Res 16:1885–1907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee JHW, Harrison PJ, Kuang C, Yin K (2006) Eutrophication dynamics in Hong Kong coastal waters: physical and biological interactions. In: Wolanski E (ed) The environment in Asia Pacific harbour. Springer, The Netherlands, pp 187–206

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Leonardos N, Geider RJ (2004) Responses of elemental and biochemical composition of Chaetoceros muelleri to growth under varying light and nitrate:phosphate supply ratios and their influence on critical N:P. Limnol Oceanogr 49:2105–2114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malone TC, Crocker LH, Pike SE, Wendler BW (1988) Influences of river flow on the dynamics of phytoplankton production in a partially stratified estuary. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 48:235–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monbet Y (1992) Control of phytoplankton biomass in estuaries: a comparative analysis of microtidal and macrotidal estuaries. Estuaries 15:563–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nixon SW, Pilson MEQ (1983) Nitrogen in estuarine and coastal ecosystems. In: Carpenter EJ, Capone DG (eds) Nitrogen in marine environment. Academic, New York, pp 565–648

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabalais NN, Nixon SW (2002) Preface: nutrient over enrichment of the coastal zone. Estuaries 25:639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ragueneau O, Quéguiner B, Tréguer P (1996) Contrast in biological responses to tidally-induced vertical mixing for two macrotidal ecosystems of Western Europe. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 42:645–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redfield AC, Ketchum BH, Richards FA (1963) The influence of organisms on the composition of sea-water. In: Hill MN (ed) The sea, vol 2. Interscience, New York, pp 26–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Riemann B, Simonsen P, Stensgaard L (1989) The carbon and chlorophyll content of phytoplankton from various nutrient regimes. J Plankton Res 11:1037–1045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose JM, Caron DA (2007) Does low temperature constrain the growth rates of heterotrophic protists? Evidence and implication for algal biomass in cold waters. Limnol Oceanogr 52:886–895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith VH, Tilman GD, Nekola JC (1999) Eutrophication: impacts of excess nutrient input on freshwater marine and terrestrial ecosystems. Environ Pollut 100:179–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strickland JDH, Parsons TR (1968) Determination of reactive nitrate. In: A practical handbook of seawater analysis. Fish Res Board Can Bull 167:71–75

  • Tada K, Morishita M, Hamada K, Montani S, Yamada M (2001) Standing stock and production rate of phytoplankton and a red tide outbreak in a heavily eutrophic embayment, Dokai Bay, Japan. Mar Pollut Bull 42:1177–1186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan Y, Huang L, Chen Q, Huang X (2004) Seasonal variation in zooplankton composition and grazing impact on phytoplankton standing stock in the Pearl River Estuary, China. Cont Shelf Res 24:1949–1968

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Therriault JC, Levasseur M (1985) Control of phytoplankton production in the lower St Lawrence Estuary: light and freshwater runoff. Nat Can 112:77–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend DW, Thomas M (2002) Springtime nutrient and phytoplankton dynamics on Georges Bank. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 228:57–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Mooy BAS, Fredricks HF, Pedler BE, Dyhrman ST, Karl DM, Koblížek M, Lomas MW, Mincer TJ, Moore LR, Moutin T, Rappé MS, Webb EA (2009) Phytoplankton in the ocean use non-phosphorus lipids in response to phosphorus scarcity. Nature 458:69–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visser AW, Kamp-Nielsen L (1996) The use of models in eutrophication studies. In: Jørgensen BB, Richardson K (eds) Eutrophication in coastal marine ecosystems. American Geophysical Union, Washington DC, pp 221–242

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wienke SM, Cloern JE (1987) The phytoplankton component of seston in San Francisco Bay. Neth J Sea Res 21:25–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu J, Ho AYT, Yin K, Yuan X, Anderson DM, Lee JHW, Harrison PJ (2008a) Temporal and spatial variations in nutrient stoichiometry and regulation of phytoplankton biomass in Hong Kong waters: influence of the Pearl River outflow and sewage input. Mar Pollut Bull 57:335–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu J, Yin K, He L, Yuan X, Ho AYT, Harrison PJ (2008b) Phosphorus limitation in the northern Southern China Sea during late summer: influence of the Pearl River. Deep Sea Res I 55:1330–1342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu J, Ho AYT, Yin K, Lee JHW, Anderson DM, Harrison PJ (2009) Nutrient limitation in Hong Kong waters inferred from comparison of nutrient ratios bioassays and 33P turnover times. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 388:81–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu J, Lee JHW, Yin K, Liu H, Harrison PJ (2011) Environmental response to sewage treatment strategies; Hong Kong’s experience in long term water quality monitoring. Mar Pollut Bull 62:2275–2287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin K (2002) Monsoonal influence on seasonal variations in nutrients and phytoplankton biomass in coastal waters of Hong Kong in the vicinity of the Pearl River estuary. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 245:111–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao H (1990) Evolution of the Pearl River estuary. Ocean Press, Bei**g (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Financial support for this research was provided by the University Grants Council of Hong Kong AoE project (AoE/P-04/04-4-II). We thank the Hong Kong Government EPD for the use their water quality monitoring data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Environment, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, People’s Republic of China

    Jie Xu, Yuelu Jiang, **angcheng Yuan, Alvin Y. T. Ho & Paul J. Harrison

  2. Australian Rivers Institute, Griffith University, Nathan Campus, Brisbane, QLD, 4111, Australia

    Kedong Yin

  3. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Clear Water Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, People’s Republic of China

    Joseph H. W. Lee

  4. Biology Department, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution, Woods Hole, MA, 02543, USA

    Donald M. Anderson

Authors
  1. Jie Xu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kedong Yin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Joseph H. W. Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Donald M. Anderson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yuelu Jiang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. **angcheng Yuan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Alvin Y. T. Ho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Paul J. Harrison
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jie Xu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xu, J., Yin, K., Lee, J.H.W. et al. Resistance of Hong Kong waters to nutrient enrichment: assessment of the role of physical processes in reducing eutrophication. J Oceanogr 68, 545–560 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10872-012-0118-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10872-012-0118-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation