Abstract
This paper presents an investigation of ultrathin Cu (In1−xGax) Se2 solar cell which was calibrated from the fabricated cell using Silvaco-TCAD tools. Carrier transport mechanism and conduction band alignment at the CdS/CIGS interface shows a large influence on PV parameters. The influence of the absorber trap density on the electrical characteristics of the single junction cell was investigated under AM 1.5G one-sun (100 mW/cm2) illumination. Further simulations quantify significant improvements in cell efficiency while using a thin Al2O3 material as a rear passivation layer. In addition, the impact of the backside pitch size, opening width, absorber layer do**, and thickness on cell performance is investigated to enhance the cell efficiency. To evaluate our work, the electrical characteristics of the optimized cell were compared to the fabricated cells.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10854-021-06661-4/MediaObjects/10854_2021_6661_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10854-021-06661-4/MediaObjects/10854_2021_6661_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10854-021-06661-4/MediaObjects/10854_2021_6661_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10854-021-06661-4/MediaObjects/10854_2021_6661_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10854-021-06661-4/MediaObjects/10854_2021_6661_Fig5_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10854-021-06661-4/MediaObjects/10854_2021_6661_Fig6_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10854-021-06661-4/MediaObjects/10854_2021_6661_Fig7_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10854-021-06661-4/MediaObjects/10854_2021_6661_Fig8_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10854-021-06661-4/MediaObjects/10854_2021_6661_Fig9_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10854-021-06661-4/MediaObjects/10854_2021_6661_Fig10_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10854-021-06661-4/MediaObjects/10854_2021_6661_Fig11_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10854-021-06661-4/MediaObjects/10854_2021_6661_Fig12_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10854-021-06661-4/MediaObjects/10854_2021_6661_Fig13_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10854-021-06661-4/MediaObjects/10854_2021_6661_Fig14_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10854-021-06661-4/MediaObjects/10854_2021_6661_Fig15_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10854-021-06661-4/MediaObjects/10854_2021_6661_Fig16_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10854-021-06661-4/MediaObjects/10854_2021_6661_Fig17_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10854-021-06661-4/MediaObjects/10854_2021_6661_Fig18_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10854-021-06661-4/MediaObjects/10854_2021_6661_Fig19_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10854-021-06661-4/MediaObjects/10854_2021_6661_Fig20_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10854-021-06661-4/MediaObjects/10854_2021_6661_Fig21_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Solar Frontier hits 23.35% efficiency with thin-film cell, Renewablesnow.Com (2019). http://www.news/solar-frontier-hits-2335-efficiency-with-thin-film-cell-639947/. Accessed 7 Feb 2019
M. Powalla, S. Paetel, E. Ahlswede, R. Wuerz, C.D. Wessendorf, T. Magorian-Friedlmeier, Thin-film solar cells exceeding 22% solar cell efficiency: an overview on CdTe- Cu(In, Ga)Se2- and perovskite-based materials. Appl. Phys. Rev. 5, 041602 (2018)
N. Boukortt, S. Patanè, Y.M. Abdulraheem, Numerical investigation of CIGS thin-film solar cells. Sol. Energy 204, 440–447 (2020)
N. Boukortt, S. Patanè, M. Adouane, R. AlHammadi, Numerical optimization of ultrathin CIGS solar cells with rear surface passivation. Sol. Energy 220, 590–597 (2021)
H.U. Sverdrup, K.V. Ragnarsdottir, D. Koca, An assessment of metal supply sustainability as an input to policy: security of supply extraction rates, stocks-in-use, recycling, and risk of scarcity. J. Clean. Prod. 140, 359–372 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.06.085
British Geological Survey, Risk list (2015). http://www.bgs.ac.uk/mineralsuk/statistics/riskList.html
T.M. Friedlmeier et al., Improved photocurrent in Cu(In, Ga)Se2 solar cells: from 20.8% to 21.7% efficiency with CdS buffer and 21.0% Cd-free. IEEE J. Photovolt. 5(5), 1487–1491 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOTOV.2015.2458039
S. Schleussner, U. Zimmermann, T. Wätjen, K. Leifer, M. Edoff, Effect of gallium grading in Cu(In, Ga)Se2 solar-cell absorbers produced by multi-stage co-evaporation. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 95, 721–726 (2011)
M. Edoff, S. Schleussner, E. Wallin, O. Lundberg, Technological and economical aspects on the influence of reduced Cu(In, Ga)Se2 thickness and Ga grading for co-evaporated Cu(In, Ga)Se2 modules. Thin Solid Films 519, 7530–7533 (2011)
W.-C. Chen, L. Stolt, M. Edoff, Ga/(Ga + In) grading effects on ultra-thin (UT) CIGS solar cell, in IEEE 40th Photovoltaic Specialist Conference (2019)
R. Kotipalli et al., Influence of Ga/(Ga + In) grading on deep-defect states of Cu(In, Ga)Se2 solar cells. Phys. Status Solidi RRL 9, 157–160 (2015)
J. Krc, G. Cernivec, A. Campa et al., Optical and electrical modeling of Cu(In, Ga)Se2 solar cells. Opt. Quant. Electron. 38, 1115–1123 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11082-006-9049-1
J. Lontchi, M. Zhukova, M. Kovacic et al., Optimization of back contact grid size in Al2O3-rear-passivated ultrathin CIGS PV cells by 2-D simulations. IEEE J. Photovolt. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOTOV.2020.3012631
J. Krc et al., Optical modeling and simulation of thin-film of Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cell, in International Conference on Numerical Simulation of Semiconductor Optoelectronic Devices (2006), pp. 33–34
J. Krc, M. Sever, A. Campa, Z. Lokar, B. Lipovsek, M. Topic, Optical confinement in chalcopyrite based solar cells. Thin Solid Films 633, 193–201 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsf.2016.08.056
N. Boukortt, S. Patanè, Single junction-based thin-film CIGS solar cells optimization with efficiencies approaching 24.5%. Optik 218, 165240 (2020)
Silvaco International Ltd, ATLAS User’s Manual Device Simulation Software (Silvaco International Ltd., Santa Clara, 2016)
O. Lundberg, M. Bodegård, J. Malmström, L. Stolt, Influence of the Cu(In, Ga)Se2 thickness and Ga grading on solar cell performance. Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 11, 77–88 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.462
Refractiveindex, info, RefractiveIndex.INFO (2019). https://refractiveindex.info/?shelf=main&book=Al2O3&page=Malitson-o. Accessed 24 Jan 2019
M. Kovacic, J. Krc, B. Lipovsek, W.C. Chen, M. Edoff, P.J. Bolt, J. van Deelen, M. Zhukova, J. Lontchi, D. Flandre, P. Salomé, M. Topic, Light management design in ultra-thin chalcopyrite photovoltaic devices by employing optical modelling. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 200, 109933 (2019)
R. Kotipalli et al., Investigating the electronic properties of Al2 O3 /Cu(In, Ga)Se2 interface. AIP Adv. 5, 107101 (2015)
R. Kotipalli et al., Passivation effects of atomic-layer-deposited alu- minum oxide. EPJ Photovolt. 4, 45107 (2013)
N. Boukortt, S. Patanè, Single junction-based thin-film CIGS solar cells optimization with efficiencies approaching 24.5 %. Optik 218, 165240 (2020)
N. Boukortt, Numerical optimization of 0.5-μm-thick Cu (In1-xGax) Se2 solar cell. Optik 200, 163409 (2019)
J. Goffard, C. Colin, F. Mollica, A. Cattoni, C. Sauvan, P. Lalanne, J.-F. Guillemoles, N. Naghavi, S. Colli, Light trap** in ultrathin CIGS solar cells with nanostructured back mirrors. IEEE J. Photovolt. 7, 1433–1441 (2017)
J. Joel, Characterization of Al2O3 as CIGS surface passivation layer in high-efficiency CIGS solar cells. In PhD thesis, Uppsala Universitet, Sweden (2014).
Acknowledgements
This research work is partially supported by Semiconductor Laboratory (GE01/08), Kuwait University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Boukortt, N.E.I., AlAmri, A.M., Bouhjar, F. et al. Investigation and optimization of ultrathin Cu(In,Ga)Se2 solar cells by using silvaco-TCAD tools. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron 32, 21525–21538 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-021-06661-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-021-06661-4