Log in

A Pilot Study Implementing Co** Power in Italian Community Hospitals: Effect of Therapist Attachment Style on Outcomes in Children

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Child and Family Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study presented the initial report of a project regarding the implementation of the Co** Power Program in Italian community hospitals, and the program’s ability to reduce externalizing behavioral problems in children with a Disruptive Behavior Disorder diagnosis. Usually, interventions for children are implemented by a number of therapists with different personal characteristics, which therefore influence the implementation quality of an intervention. That said, the present study aimed to establish whether the insecure attachment styles of therapists predict unfavorable outcomes for children treated with the Co** Power Program. The sample included 80 children with a Disruptive Behavior Disorder diagnosis and 16 therapists. The results showed that the change in children’s aggressive behavioral problems was significantly related to the levels of the therapist’s preoccupation with relationships. Higher levels of change in aggression (where a higher value means that the aggression at the end of the treatment is higher than aggression at the baseline evaluation) are associated with higher levels of therapist’s preoccupied attachment style (anxious attachment style). This study provided some preliminary evidence that therapists need to be sensitive to their own attachment experiences when delivering therapy for children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achenbach, T. M., & Rescorla, L. A. (2001). Manual for the ASEBA school-age forms and profiles. Burlington, NJ: University of Vermont, Research Center for Children, Youth, and Families. ISBN 0-938565-73-7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, T., Ogles, B. M., Patterson, C. L., Lambert, M. J., & Vermeersch, D. A. (2009). Therapist effects: Facilitative interpersonal skills as a predictor of therapist success. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 65, 755–768.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Battagliese, G., Caccetta, M., Luppino, O. I., Baglioni, C., Cardi, V., Mancini, F., & Buonanno, C. (2015). Cognitive-behavioral therapy for externalizing disorders: A meta-analysis of treatment effectiveness. Behavior Research Therapy, 75, 60–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohart, A. C., Elliott, R., Greenberg, L. S., & Watson, J. C. (2002). Empathy. In J. C. Norcross (Ed.), Psychotherapy relationships that work. Therapist contributions and responsiveness to clients (pp. 89–108). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

  • Bowlby, J. (1988). A secure base. London: Tavistock Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruck, E., Winston, A., Aderholt, S., & Muran, J. C. (2006). Predictive validity of patient and therapist attachment and introject styles. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 60, 393–406.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bucci, S., Seymour-Hyde, S., Harris, A., & Berry, K. (2015). Client and therapist attachment styles and working alliance. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 23, 155–165.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, N. L. (1996). Working models of attachment: Implications for explanation, emotion, and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 810–832.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crittenden, P. M., & Landini, A. (2011). Assessing adult attachment: A dinamic maturational approach to discourses analysis. New York, NY: Norton Professional Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Degnan, A., Seymour-Hyde, A., Harris, A., & Berry, K. (2014). The role of therapist attachment in alliance and outcome: A systematic literature review. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, 23, 47–65.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, M. J., & Monroe, J. M. (2011). The relationship between adult attachment style and therapeutic alliance in individual psychotherapy: A meta-analytic review. Psychotherapy, 48, 237–248.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dinger, U., Strack, M., Sachsse, T., & Schauenburg, H. (2009). Therapists’ attachment, patients’ interpersonal problems and alliance development over time in inpatient psychotherapy. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 46, 227–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dozier, M., Cue, K., & Barnett, L. (1994). Clinicians as caregivers. Role of attachment organization in treatment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 62, 793–800.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Eyberg, S. M., Nelson, M. M., & Boggs, S. R. (2008). Evidence-based psychosocial treatment for children and adolescence with disruptive behaviour. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 37, 215–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feeney, J. A., Noller, P., & Hanrahan, M. (1994). Assessing adult attachment. In M. B. Sperling, & W. H. Berman (Eds.), Attachment in adults: Clinical and developmental perspectives (pp. 128–152). New York, NY: Guilford Press.

  • Frigerio, A., Vanzin, L., Pastore, V., Nobile, M., Giorda, R., & Marino, C., et al. (2006). The Italian preadolescent mental health project (PrISMA): Rationale and methods. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research, 15, 22–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. R. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511–524.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Karantzas, G. C., Feeney, J. A., & Wilkinson, R. (2010). Is less more? Confirmatory factor analysis of the attachment style questionnaires. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27, 749–780.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, J., Birmaher, B., Brent, D., Rao, U., Flynn, C., & Moreci, P., et al. (1997). Schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia for school-age children present and lifetime version (K-SADS- PL): Initial reliability and validity data. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 36, 980–988.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kolko, D. J., Dorn, L. D., Bukstein, O. G., Pardini, D. A., Holden, E. A., & Hart, J. A. (2009). Community vs. clinic-based modular treatment of children with early-onset ODD or CD: A clinical trial with three-year follow-up. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37, 591–609.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Levis, C. C., & Simons, A. D. (2011). A pilot study disseminating cognitive behavioral therapy for depression: Therapist factors and perceptions of barriers to implementation. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 38, 324–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lippe, A., von der Monsen, J. T., Rønnestad, M. H., & Eilertsen, D. E. (2008). Treatment failure in psychotherapy: The pull of hostility. Psychotherapy Research, 18, 420–432.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lochman, J. E., & Wells, K. C. (2002). Contextual social-cognitive mediators and child outcome: A test of the theoretical model in the co** power program. Development and Psychopathology, 14, 945–967.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lochman, J. E., & Wells, K. C. (2003). Effectiveness study of co** power and classroom intervention with aggressive children: Outcomes at a one-year follow-up. Behavior Therapy, 34, 493–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lochman, J. E., & Wells, K. C. (2004). The co** power program for preadolescent aggressive boys and their parents: Outcome effects at the one-year follow-up. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 571–578.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lochman, J. E., Boxmeyer, C. L., Powell, N. P., Roth, D., & Windle, M. (2006). Masked intervention effects: Analytic methods for addressing low dosage of intervention. New Directions for Evaluation, 110, 19–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lochman, J. E., Boxmeyer, C., Powell, N., Qu, L., Wells, K., & Windle, M. (2009a). Dissemination of the co** power program: Importance of intensity of counselor training. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77, 397–409.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lochman, J. E., Lenhart, L. A., & Wells, K. C. (2012a). Co** Power. Programma per il controllo di rabbia e aggressivita‘ in bambini e adolescenti. A cura di P. Muratori, L. Polidori, L. Ruglioni, A. Manfredi, A. Milone (Eds.), Edizione italiana. Trento: Erickson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lochman, J. E., Powell, N., Boxmeyer, C., Andrade, B., Stromeyer, S., & Jimenez-Camargo, L. A. (2012b). Adaptations to the co** power program’s structure, delivery settings, and clinician training. Psychotherapy, 49, 135–142.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lochman, J. E., Powell, N., Boxmeyer, C., Qu, L., Wells, K., & Windle, M. (2009b). Implementation of a school-based prevention program: Effects of counselor and school characteristics. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 40, 476–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Main, M., & Goldwyn, R. (1984). Adult attachment scoring and classification system. California: University of California. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masi, G., Milone, A., Manfredi, A., Brovedani, P., Pisano, S., & Muratori, P. (2016). Combined pharmacotherapy-multimodal psychotherapy in children with disruptive behavior disorders. Psychiatry Research, 238, 8–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, B., Pilkonis, P. A., Proietti, J. M., Heape, C. L., & Egan, M. (2001). Attachment styles and personality disorders as predictors of symptom course. Journal of Personality Disorders, 5, 371–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muratori, P., Bertacchi, I., Giuli, C., Lombardi, L., Bonetti, S., & Nocentini, A., et al. (2015). First adaptation of co** power program as a classroom-based prevention intervention on aggressive behaviors among elementary school children. Prevention Science, 16, 432–439.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muratori, P., Milone, A., Manfredi, A., Polidori, L., Ruglioni, L., Lambruschi, F., et al. (2017). Evaluation of improvement in externalizing behaviors and callous-unemotional traits in children with disruptive behavior disorder: A 1-year follow up clinic-based study. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 44, 452–462.

  • Muratori, P., Milone, A., Nocentini, A., Manfredi, A., Polidori, L., Ruglioni, L., Lambruschi, F., Masi, G., & Lochman, J. (2014). Maternal depression and parenting practices predict treatment outcome in italian children with disruptive behavior disorders. Journal of Child and FamilyStudies, 24, 2805–2816.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muratori, P., Polidori, L., Lambruschi, F., Lenzi, F., Manfredi, A., & Ruglioni, L., et al. (2013). Un modello di trattamento in setting di gruppo per i disturbi da comportamento dirompente in età‘ evolutiva: Il Pisa Co** Power Program. Psicologia Clinica dello Sviluppo, 17, 411–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Mplus user’s guide. 6th edn. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odgers, C. L., Moffit, T. E., Broadbent, J. M., Dickson, N., Hancox, R. J., & Harrington, H., et al. (2008). Female and male antisocial trajectories: From childhood origins to adult outcomes. Development and Psychopathology, 20, 673–716.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ozer, E. J. (2006). Contextual effects in school-based violence prevention programs: A conceptual framework and empirical review. Journal of Primary Prevention, 27, 315–340.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Safran, J. D., Muran, J. C., & Eubanks-Carter, C. (2011). Repairing alliance ruptures. Psychotherapy, 48, 80–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schauenburg, H., Buchheim, A., Beckh, K., Nolte, T., Brenk- Franz, K., & Leichsenring, F., et al. (2010). The influence of psychodynamically oriented therapists’ attachment representations on outcome and alliance in inpatient psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research, 20, 193–202.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenwald, S. K., & Hoagwood, K. (2001). Effectiveness, transportability, and dissemination of interventions: What matters when? Psychiatric Services, 52, 1190–1197.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schoenwald, S. K., Chapman, J. E., Sheidow, A. J., & Carter, R. E. (2011). Long-term youth criminal outcomes in MST transport: The impact of therapist adherence and organizational climate and structure. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 38, 91–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shadish, W. R., & Ragsdale, K. (1996). Random versus nonrandom assignment in controlled experiments: Do you get the same answer? Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 1290–1305.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer, D., Gould, M. S., Brasic, J., Ambrosini, P., Fisher, P., Bird, H., & Aluwahia, S. (1983). A children’s global assessment scale (CGAS). Archives of General Psychiatry, 40, 1228–1231.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. E. M., Msetfi, R. M., & Golding, L. (2010). Client self-rated adult attachment patterns and the therapeutic alliance: A systematic review. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 326–337.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, H., Jacobs, N. J., Ferguson, K. S., Allen, J. G., & Fonagy, P. (1998). What do adult attachment scales measure? Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 62, 33–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, H., & Remsing, L. (2007). Practice parameter for the assessment and treatment of children and adolescents with oppositional defiant disorder. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 46, 126–141.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tracey, T. J. G., Wampold, B. E., Lichtenberg, J. W., & Goodyear, R. K. (2014). Expertise in psychotherapy: An elusive goal? American Psychologist, 69, 218–229.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Wiel, N. M., Matthys, W., Cohen- Kettenis, P. T., Maassen, G. H., Lochman, J. E., & Van Engeland, H. (2007). The effectiveness of an experimental treatment when compared to care as usual depends on the type of care as usual. Behavioral Modification, 31, 298–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wampold, B. E., & Imel, Z. E. (2015). The great psychotherapy debate: The evidence for what makes psychotherapy work. 2nd edn. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, C. A., DeRubeis, R. J., & Barber, J. P. (2010). Therapist adherence/competence and treatment outcome: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting Clinical Psychology, 78, 200–211.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • West, S. G., Duan, N., Pequegnat, W., Gaist, P., Des Jarias, D. C., & Holtgrave, D., et al. (2008). Alternatives to randomized control trial. American Journal of Public Health, 98, 1359–1366.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Westra, H., Aviram, A., Connors, L., Kertes, A., & Ahmed, M. (2012). Therapist emotional reactions and client resistance in cognitive behavioral therapy. Psychotherapy, 49, 163–172.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman, H., & Tishby, O. (2014). Client attachment, attachment to the therapist and client–therapist attachment match: How do they relate to change in psychodynamic psychotherapy? Psychotherapy Research, 24, 392–406.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author Contributions

P.M. designed, executed the study, and wrote the paper. L.P. collaborated with the design of the study and wrote the paper. S.C. collected data. VD: collected data. M.M. collected data. A.M. collaborated with the design of the study. A.N. analyzed the data and wrote part of the results. D.S. collected data. D.V. collected data. F.L. collaborated with the design of the study. J.L. collaborated in the writing and editing of the final manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pietro Muratori.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Muratori, P., Polidori, L., Chiodo, S. et al. A Pilot Study Implementing Co** Power in Italian Community Hospitals: Effect of Therapist Attachment Style on Outcomes in Children. J Child Fam Stud 26, 3093–3101 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-017-0820-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10826-017-0820-7

Keywords

Navigation