Abstract
Purpose
Women carriers of FMR1 premutation are at increased risk of early ovarian dysfunction and even premature ovarian insufficiency. The aim of this study was to examine a possible association between FMR1 permutation and numeric sex chromosome variations.
Methods
A retrospective case-control study conducted in the reproductive center of a university-affiliated medical center. The primary outcome measure was the rate of sex chromosomal numerical aberrations, as demonstrated by haplotype analyses, in FMR1 premutation carriers compared to X-linked preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic/single gene defect (PGT-M) cycles for other indications that do not affect the ovarian follicles and oocytes.
Results
A total of 2790 embryos with a final genetic analysis from 577 IVF PGT-M cycles were included in the final analysis. Mean age was similar between the groups, however, FMR1 carriers required more gonadotropins, and more women were poor responders with three or less oocytes collected. The ratio of embryos carrying a numeric sex chromosome variation was similar: 8.3% (138/1668) of embryos in the FMR1 group compared to 7.1% (80/1122) in the controls. A subgroup analysis based on age and response to stimulation has not demonstrated a significant difference either.
Conclusions
Although carriers of FMR1 premutation exhibit signs of reduced ovarian response, it does not seem to affect the rate of numeric sex chromosomal variation compared to women undergoing PGT-M for other indications. This suggests that the mechanism for chromosomal number aberrations in women at advanced maternal age are different to those FMR1 premutation carriers with poor ovarian reserve.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Tassone F, Iong KP, Tong TH, Lo J, Gane LW, Berry-Kravis E, et al. FMR1 CGG allele size and prevalence ascertained through newborn screening in the United States. Genome Med. 2012;4(12):100. https://doi.org/10.1186/gm401.
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee opinion No. 691: carrier screening for genetic conditions. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129(3):e41–55. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000001952.
Pieretti M, Zhang FP, Fu YH, Warren ST, Oostra BA, Caskey CT, et al. Absence of expression of the FMR-1 gene in fragile X syndrome. Cell. 1991;66(4):817–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-8674(91)90125-i.
Tassone F, Hagerman RJ, Taylor AK, Mills JB, Harris SW, Gane LW, et al. Clinical involvement and protein expression in individuals with the FMR1 premutation. Am J Med Genet. 2000;91(2):144–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1096-8628(20000313)91:2.
Elizur SE, Lebovitz O, Derech-Haim S, Dratviman-Storobinsky O, Feldman B, Dor J, et al. Elevated levels of FMR1 mRNA in granulosa cells are associated with low ovarian reserve in FMR1 premutation carriers. PLoS One. 2014;9(8):e105121. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105121.
Wittenberger MD, Hagerman RJ, Sherman SL, McConkie-Rosell A, Welt CK, Rebar RW, et al. The FMR1 premutation and reproduction. Fertil Steril. 2007;87(3):456–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.09.004.
Buijsen RA, Visser JA, Kramer P, Severijnen EA, Gearing M, Charlet-Berguerand N, et al. Presence of inclusions positive for polyglycine containing protein, FMRpolyG, indicates that repeat-associated non-AUG translation plays a role in fragile X-associated primary ovarian insufficiency. Hum Reprod. 2016;31(1):158–68. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dev280.
Kong HE, Zhao J, Xu S, ** P, ** Y. Fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome: from molecular pathogenesis to development of therapeutics. Front Cell Neurosci. 2017;11:128. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2017.00128.
Conca Dioguardi C, Uslu B, Haynes M, Kurus M, Gul M, Miao DQ, et al. Granulosa cell and oocyte mitochondrial abnormalities in a mouse model of fragile X primary ovarian insufficiency. Mol Hum Reprod. 2016;22(6):384–96. https://doi.org/10.1093/molehr/gaw023.
Loomis EW, Sanz LA, Chedin F, Hagerman PJ. Transcription-associated R-loop formation across the human FMR1 CGG-repeat region. PLoS Genet. 2014;10(4):e1004294. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1004294.
Linden MG, Bender BG, Robinson A. Genetic counseling for sex chromosome abnormalities. Am J Med Genet. 2002;110(1):3–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.10391.
Franasiak JM, Forman EJ, Hong KH, Werner MD, Upham KM, Treff NR, et al. The nature of aneuploidy with increasing age of the female partner: a review of 15,169 consecutive trophectoderm biopsies evaluated with comprehensive chromosomal screening. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(3):656–63 e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.11.004.
Katz-Jaffe MG, Surrey ES, Minjarez DA, Gustofson RL, Stevens JM, Schoolcraft WB. Association of abnormal ovarian reserve parameters with a higher incidence of aneuploid blastocysts. Obstet Gynecol. 2013;121(1):71–7. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0b013e318278eeda.
Li H, Mao Y, ** J. The correlation between maternal age and fetal sex chromosome aneuploidies: a 8-year single institution experience in China. Mol Cytogenet. 2021;14(1):25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13039-021-00545-2.
Hassold T, Hunt P. To err (meiotically) is human: the genesis of human aneuploidy. Nat Rev Genet. 2001;2(4):280–91. https://doi.org/10.1038/35066065.
Munne S, Lee A, Rosenwaks Z, Grifo J, Cohen J. Diagnosis of major chromosome aneuploidies in human preimplantation embryos. Hum Reprod. 1993;8(12):2185–91. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a138001.
Malcov M, Naiman T, Yosef DB, Carmon A, Mey-Raz N, Amit A, et al. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for fragile X syndrome using multiplex nested PCR. Reprod Biomed Online. 2007;14(4):515–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1472-6483(10)60901-7.
Samara N, Peleg S, Frumkin T, Gold V, Amir H, Haikin Herzberger E, et al. New insights regarding origin of monosomy occurrence in early develo** embryos as demonstrated in preimplantation genetic testing. Mol Cytogenet. 2022;15(1):11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13039-022-00582-5.
Fragouli E, Alfarawati S, Spath K, Jaroudi S, Sarasa J, Enciso M, et al. The origin and impact of embryonic aneuploidy. Hum Genet. 2013;132(9):1001–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-013-1309-0.
Mikwar M, MacFarlane AJ, Marchetti F. Mechanisms of oocyte aneuploidy associated with advanced maternal age. Mutat Res Rev Mutat Res. 2020;785:108320. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mrrev.2020.108320.
Morin SJ, Patounakis G, Juneau CR, Neal SA, Scott RT, Seli E. Diminished ovarian reserve and poor response to stimulation in patients <38 years old: a quantitative but not qualitative reduction in performance. Hum Reprod. 2018;33(8):1489–98. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dey238.
Fragouli E, Lenzi M, Ross R, Katz-Jaffe M, Schoolcraft WB, Wells D. Comprehensive molecular cytogenetic analysis of the human blastocyst stage. Hum Reprod. 2008;23(11):2596–608. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/den287.
Funding
No funding was received for conducting this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The institution review board (IRB) of Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center approved the study (Approval number: 0149-20-TLV).
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
Supplemental Table 1
Indication for PGT-M in the control group (DOCX 30.2 kb)
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Malcov, M., Blickstein, O., Brabbing-Goldstein, D. et al. The association between a carrier state of FMR1 premutation and numeric sex chromosome variations. J Assist Reprod Genet 40, 683–688 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-023-02730-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-023-02730-1