Log in

Concentration of soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) in the pre-ovulatory follicular fluid is associated with development of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome during ovarian stimulation

  • Assisted Reproduction Technologies
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Investigating whether pre-ovulatory follicular fluid (FF) levels of selected proteins differ between women who do or do not develop severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and evaluate whether they potentially could guide a “freeze-all” strategy.

Methods

FF was collected during a randomized controlled trial comparing OHSS in antagonist versus agonist protocol including 1050 women in their first assisted reproductive technology (ART) cycle during year 2009–2013. The present sub-study is a matched case-control study comparing FF levels of soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR), C-reactive protein, placental growth factor, vascular endothelial growth factor, and angiopoietins 1 and 2 in OHSS cases (n = 25, severe OHSS, and ≥ 15 oocytes), high-risk controls (n = 25, no OHSS, and ≥ 15 oocytes), and low-risk controls (n = 25, no OHSS, and 5–8 oocytes).

Results

FF level of suPAR differed significantly between the three groups (p = 0.018) with mean (SD) levels of 2.3 (0.4) μg/L, 2.6 (0.8) μg/L, and 2.8 (0.6) μg/L in OHSS cases, high-risk controls, and low-risk controls, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated that suPAR levels could predict severe OHSS (AUC 0.678; 95% CI 0.553–0.803) with a sensitivity of 64% and a specificity of 66%. None of the other investigated proteins differed between the three groups or between OHSS cases and combined controls.

Conclusion

The pre-ovulatory FF level of suPAR was significantly lower in women develo** severe OHSS, indicating that the plasminogen activator system could be involved in the pathophysiology of OHSS. However, suPAR did not provide a satisfying predictive value for the prediction of OHSS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kumar P, Sait SF, Sharma A, Kumar M. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. J Hum Reprod Sci. 2011;4:70–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Golan A, Ron-el R, Herman A, Soffer Y, Weinraub Z, Caspi E. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: an update review. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1989;44:430–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Practice Committee of American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Fertil Steril. 2008;90:S188–93.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Korhonen KVM, Savolainen-Peltonen HM, Mikkola TS, Tiitinen AE, Unkila-Kallio LS. C-reactive protein response is higher in early than in late ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;207:162–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Orvieto R. Controlled ovarian hyperstimulation--an inflammatory state. J Soc Gynecol Investig. 2004;11:424–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhai J, Liu J, Zhao S, Zhao H, Chen Z-J, Du Y, et al. Kisspeptin-10 inhibits OHSS by suppressing VEGF secretion. Reproduction. 2017;154:355–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Miller I, Chuderland D, Grossman H, Ron-El R, Ben-Ami I, Shalgi R. The dual role of PEDF in the pathogenesis of OHSS: negating both angiogenic and inflammatory pathways. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2016;101:4699–709.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Papanikolaou EG, Humaidan P, Polyzos N, Kalantaridou S, Kol S, Benadiva C, et al. New algorithm for OHSS prevention. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2011;9:147.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tarlatzi TB, Venetis CA, Devreker F, Englert Y, Delbaere A. What is the best predictor of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in IVF? A cohort study. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017;34:1341–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Griesinger G, Verweij PJM, Gates D, Devroey P, Gordon K, Stegmann BJ, et al. Prediction of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in patients treated with corifollitropin alfa or rFSH in a GnRH antagonist protocol. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0149615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Papanikolaou EG, Pozzobon C, Kolibianakis EM, Camus M, Tournaye H, Fatemi HM, et al. Incidence and prediction of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in women undergoing gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril. 2006;85:112–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Steward RG, Lan L, Shah AA, Yeh JS, Price TM, Goldfarb JM, et al. Oocyte number as a predictor for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and live birth: an analysis of 256,381 in vitro fertilization cycles. Fertil Steril Elsevier Inc. 2014;101:967–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Toftager M, Bogstad J, Bryndorf T, Løssl K, Roskær J, Holland T, et al. Risk of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in GnRH antagonist versus GnRH agonist protocol: RCT including 1050 first IVF/ICSI cycles. Hum Reprod. 2016;31:1253–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Vassalli JD, Baccino D, Belin D. A cellular binding site for the Mr 55,000 form of the human plasminogen activator, urokinase. J Cell Biol. 1985;100:86–92.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu Y-X. Plasminogen activator/plasminogen activator inhibitors in ovarian physiology. Front Biosci. 2004;9:3356–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Thunø M, Macho B, Eugen-Olsen J. suPAR: the molecular crystal ball. Dis Markers. 2009;27:157–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Levin I, Gamzu R, Pauzner D, Rogowski O, Shapira I, Maslovitz S, et al. Elevated levels of CRP in ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome: an unrecognised potential hazard? BJOG. 2005;112:952–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lamaita RM, Pontes A, Belo AV, Caetano JPJ, Andrade SP, Cãndido EB, et al. Inflammatory response patterns in ICSI patients: a comparative study between chronic anovulating and normally ovulating women. Reprod Sci. 2012;19:704–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rizk B, Aboulghar M, Smitz J, Ron-El R. The role of vascular endothelial growth factor and interleukins in the pathogenesis of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Hum Reprod Update. 1997;3:255–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ferrara N, Davis-Smyth T. The biology of vascular endothelial growth factor. Endocr Rev. 1997;18:4–25.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Bates DO, Harper SJ. Regulation of vascular permeability by vascular endothelial growth factors. Vasc Pharmacol. 2002;39:225–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Gao M-Z, Zhao X-M, Sun Z-G, Hong Y, Zhao L-W, Zhang H-Q. Endocrine gland-derived vascular endothelial growth factor concentrations in follicular fluid and serum may predict ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. Fertil Steril. 2011;95:673–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Jakimiuk AJ, Nowicka MA, Zagozda M, Koziol K, Lewandowski P, Issat T. High levels of soluble vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1/sFlt1 and low levels of vascular endothelial growth factor in follicular fluid on the day of oocyte retrieval correlate with ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome regardless of the stimulation. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2017;68:477–84.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mathur R, Hayman G, Bansal A, Jenkins J. Serum vascular endothelial growth factor levels are poorly predictive of subsequent ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in highly responsive women undergoing assisted conception. Fertil Steril. 2002;78:1154–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Geva E, Amit A, Lessing JB, Lerner-Geva L, Daniel Y, Yovel I, et al. Follicular fluid levels of vascular endothelial growth factor. Are they predictive markers for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome? J Reprod Med. 1999;44:91–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. De Falco S. The discovery of placenta growth factor and its biological activity. Exp Mol Med. 2012;44:1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Gutman G, Barak V, Maslovitz S, Amit A, Lessing JB, Geva E. Regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor-A and its soluble receptor sFlt-1 by luteinizing hormone in vivo: implication for ovarian follicle angiogenesis. Fertil Steril. 2008;89:922–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Tal R, Seifer DB, Grazi RV, Malter HE. Follicular fluid placental growth factor is increased in polycystic ovarian syndrome: correlation with ovarian stimulation. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2014;12:82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Magnusson Å, Källen K, Thurin-Kjellberg A, Bergh C. The number of oocytes retrieved during IVF: a balance between efficacy and safety. Hum Reprod. 2018;33:58–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Chen CD, Wu MY, Chao KH, Chen SU, Ho HN, Yang YS. Serum estradiol level and oocyte number in predicting severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. J Formos Med Assoc. 1997;96:829–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Asch RH, Li HP, Balmaceda JP, Weckstein LN, Stone SC. Severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome in assisted reproductive technology: definition of high risk groups. Hum Reprod. 1991;6:1395–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Mendoza C, Cremades N, Ruiz-Requena E, Martinez F, Ortega E, Bernabeu S, et al. Relationship between fertilization results after intracytoplasmic sperm injection, and intrafollicular steroid, pituitary hormone and cytokine concentrations. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:628–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

For the primary RCT, an unrestricted research grant was funded by Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA (MSD). The funders had no influence on the idea, data collection, analyses, or conclusions of the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. G. Grynnerup.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grynnerup, A.G., Toftager, M., Zedeler, A. et al. Concentration of soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) in the pre-ovulatory follicular fluid is associated with development of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome during ovarian stimulation. J Assist Reprod Genet 35, 2187–2193 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-018-1314-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-018-1314-2

Keywords

Navigation