Log in

A Taxonomy of Reported Harms in Pediatric Autism Spectrum Disorder Screening: Provider and Parent Perspectives

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) report on screening for Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) highlighted the need for research that examines the harms potentially associated with screening so as to assess the overall net benefit of universal screening. In response, this study engages qualitative, semi-structured interviews to generate a taxonomy outlining potential harms reported by parents and providers (pediatricians and Early Intervention providers) with experience in screening young children for ASD. Potential harms emerged including: physical, psychological, social, logistical/financial, opportunity cost, attrition, and exacerbation of non-targeted disparities. Respondents reported harms being experienced by the toddlers, parents, and providers. The harms reported highlight opportunities for providers to offer resources that mitigate the potential for these unintended consequences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank our Early Intervention collaborators for their enduring partnership and the pediatricians and parents who participated in this study for so generously sharing both their time and their experiences with us.

Funding

This research was supported by a Health Resources Services Administration grant to Drs. Eisenhower and Carter as Multiple Principal Investigators (MPI; R40MC26195) and a National Institute of Mental Health grant (R01MH104400) to Drs. Sheldrick and Carter as MPIs and an associated supplement to examine the harms associated with ASD screening awarded to Drs. Mackie and Carter. This study design, data collection, data analysis and interpretation of this data are those of the authors and do not represent the official position or policy of, nor should any endorsements be inferred by HRSA, HHS, NIMH, or the U.S. Government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MP, LR and TIM participated in the conceptualization of the manuscript, directed and performed data analysis and interpretation, drafted sections of the manuscript, and edited the final manuscript. TIM provided ongoing guidance in the collection, analysis, and publication of this article as senior author. AJS performed data management, data collection and analysis, assisted with data analysis and interpretation and edited the final manuscript. RCS participated in the original design of the study, assisted with data analysis and interpretation, drafted sections of the manuscript, and contributed to revising the final manuscript. ASC and AE conceptualized the original study design, contributed to data analysis and interpretation, and contributed to revising the final manuscript. SB-F assisted with data analysis and interpretation and contributed to revising the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marisa Petruccelli.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr. Sheldrick is the co-creator of the POSI, which is one of the two first-stage screeners used in this study. He conducts research related to this instrument but receives no royalties. Dr. Carter is the cocreator of the POSI but receives no royalties. She is also co-creator of the BITSEA, which is one of the two first-stage screeners used in this study. Dr. Carter receives royalties on the sale of the BITSEA, which is distributed by MAPI Research Trust. The remaining co-authors report no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 18 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Petruccelli, M., Ramella, L., Schaefer, A.J. et al. A Taxonomy of Reported Harms in Pediatric Autism Spectrum Disorder Screening: Provider and Parent Perspectives. J Autism Dev Disord 52, 647–673 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-04964-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-04964-3

Keywords

Navigation