Log in

How does social media influence car sales: the effects of firm-, user-, and professional-generated content

  • Published:
Information Technology and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the unprecedented influence of social media, firms are increasingly relying on social media as a channel for marketing interaction. While firm-generated content (FGC) has become a common tool, allowing brands to show consumers informative, exchangeable messages, online word-of-mouth, such as user-generated content (UGC) and professional-generated content (PGC), has also become a prevalent strategy with the popularity of social media platforms to provide trustworthy information and promote product sales. However, our understanding on how those three online marketing strategies interactively influence firm performance as well as the conditions under which these effects vary remains limited. Drawing on signaling theory, this study examines how FGC, UGC, and PGC interactively influence car sales in the automobile industry and how such effects are influenced by product quality cues, such as price and popularity. Based on the monthly data in 56 major car makers, we find the varying relationships among FGC, UGC, and PGC on car sales. Moreover, for low-priced cars, UGC has a stronger effect on car sales. In contrast, at a higher level of popularity, UGC has a greater positive impact on car sales, while PGC has a less negative impact on car sales. These findings have important implications for automotive brand marketers striving to increase car sales through multiple social media marketing channels. Marketers should evaluate cross-media strategy by including its interplay with different types of social media and monitoring word-of-mouth of cars across different price ranges and popularity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Sources: http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2022-08/12/content_5705101.htm [last accessed: 19 February 2023].

References

  1. de Vries L, Gensler S, Leeflang PSH (2017) Effects of traditional advertising and social messages on brand-building metrics and customer acquisition. J Mark 81:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Liang T-P, Turban E (2014) Introduction to the special issue social commerce: a research framework for social commerce. Int J Electron Commer 16:5–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Goldsmith RE, Horowitz D (2006) Measuring motivations for online opinion seeking. J Interact Advert 6:2–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Reinstein DA, Snyder CM (2005) The influence of expert reviews on consumer demand for experience goods: A case study of movie critics. J Ind Econ 53:27–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Amblee N, Bui T (2007) Freeware downloads: an empirical investigation into the impact of expert and user reviews on demand for digital goods. In: AMCIS 2007 Proceedings, vol 21

  6. Tirunillai S, Tellis GJ (2012) Does chatter really matter? Dynamics of user-generated content and stock performance. Mark Sci 31:198–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Duan W, Gu B, Whinston AB (2008) Do online reviews matter?—An empirical investigation of panel data. Decis Support Syst 45:1007–1016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Liu YS (2006) Word of mouth for movies: its dynamics and impact on box office revenue. J Mark 70:74–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Srinivasan S, Rutz OJ, Pauwels K (2016) Paths to and off purchase: quantifying the impact of traditional marketing and online consumer activity. J Acad Mark Sci 44:440–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Batra R, Keller KL (2016) Integrating marketing communications: new findings, new lessons, and new ideas. J Mark 80:122–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. King RA, Racherla P, Bush VD (2014) What we know and don’t know about online word-of-mouth: A review and synthesis of the literature. J Interact Mark 28:167–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Thorson KS, Rodgers S (2006) Relationships between blogs as eWOM and interactivity, perceived interactivity, and parasocial interaction. J Interact Advert 6:5–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Colicev A, Malshe A, Pauwels K (2018) Improving consumer mindset metrics and shareholder value through social media: The different roles of owned and earned media. J Mark 82:37–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dewan S, Ramaprasad J (2014) Social media, traditional media, and music sales. MIS Q 38:101–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kumar V, Choi JB, Greene M (2017) Synergistic effects of social media and traditional marketing on brand sales: capturing the time-varying effects. J Acad Mark Sci 45:268–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Pilotta JJ, Schultz DE, Drenik G, Rist P (2004) Simultaneous media usage: a critical consumer orientation to media planning. J Consum Behav Int Res Rev 3:285–292

    Google Scholar 

  17. Naik PA, Raman K (2003) Understanding the impact of synergy in multimedia communications. J Mark Res 40:375–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang Y-Y, Wang T, Calantone R (2021) The effect of competitive actions and social media perceptions on offline car sales after automobile recalls. Int J Inf Manag 56:102257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kirmani A, Rao AR (2000) No pain, no gain: a critical review of the literature on signaling unobservable product quality. J Mark 64:66–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Connelly BL, Certo ST, Ireland RD, Reutzel CR (2011) Signaling theory: a review and assessment. J Manag 37:39–67

    Google Scholar 

  21. Appel G, Grewal L, Hadi R, Stephen AT (2020) The future of social media in marketing. J Acad Mark Sci 48:79–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. **g B (2011) Exogenous learning, seller-induced learning, and marketing of durable goods. Manag Sci 57:1788–1801

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Gouldner AW (1960) The norm of reciprocity A preliminary statement. Am Sociol Rev 25:161–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Olson JC (1978) Inferential belief formation in the cue utilization process, ACR North American Advances

  25. Gu B, Tang Q, Whinston AB (2013) The influence of online word-of-mouth on long tail formation. Decis Support Syst 56:474–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhu F, Zhang XM (2010) Impact of online consumer reviews on sales: the moderating role of product and consumer characteristics. J Mark 74:133–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lin Z, Zhang Y, Tan Y (2019) An empirical study of free product sampling and rating bias. Inf Syst Res 30:260–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang J-N, Du J, Chiu Y-L, Li J (2018) Dynamic effects of customer experience levels on durable product satisfaction: price and popularity moderation. Electron Commer Res Appl 28:16–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Song T, Huang J, Tan Y, Yu Y (2019) Using user-and marketer-generated content for box office revenue prediction: differences between microblogging and third-party platforms. Inf Syst Res 30:191–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Akcura T, Altinkemer K, Chen H (2018) Noninfluentials and information dissemination in the microblogging community. Inf Technol Manag 19:89–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Chen Y, **e J (2005) Third-party product review and firm marketing strategy. Mark Sci 24:218–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sayogo DS, Zhang J, Luna-Reyes L, Jarman H, Tayi G, Andersen DL, Pardo TA, Andersen DF (2015) Challenges and requirements for develo** data architecture supporting integration of sustainable supply chains. Inf Technol Manag 16:5–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Homburg C, Vomberg A, Muehlhaeuser S (2020) Design and governance of multichannel sales systems: financial performance consequences in business-to-business markets. J Mark Res 57:1113–1134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Grewal D, Gotlieb J, Marmorstein H (1994) The moderating effects of message framing and source credibility on the price-perceived risk relationship. J Consum Res 21:145–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang X-W, Cao Y-M, Park C (2019) The relationships among community experience, community commitment, brand attitude, and purchase intention in social media. Int J Inf Manag 49:475–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Lee S-H (2016) Factors influencing the social networking service user’s value perception and word of mouth decision of corporate post with special reference to the emotional attachment. Inf Technol Manag 17:15–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Slaughter JE, Zickar MJ, Highhouse S, Mohr DC (2004) Personality trait inferences about organizations: development of a measure and assessment of construct validity. J Appl Psychol 89:85–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Lee LF, Hutton AP, Shu S (2015) The role of social media in the capital market: evidence from consumer product recalls. J Account Res 53:367–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kumar A, Bezawada R, Rishika R, Janakiraman R (2016) From social to sale: the effects of firm-generated content in social media on customer behavior. J Mark 80:7–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Miller AR, Tucker C (2013) Active social media management: the case of health care. Inf Syst Res 24:52–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Stephen AT, Galak J (2012) The effects of traditional and social earned media on sales: a study of a microlending marketplace. J Mark Res 49:624–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Goh K-Y, Heng C-S, Lin Z (2013) Social media brand community and consumer behavior: quantifying the relative impact of user-and marketer-generated content. Inf Syst Res 24:88–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. You Y, Vadakkepatt GG, Joshi AM (2015) A meta-analysis of electronic word-of-mouth elasticity. J Mark 79:19–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Santiago J, Borges-Tiago MT, Tiago F (2022) Is firm-generated content a lost cause. J Bus Res 139:945–953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhang P, Lee H-M, Zhao K, Shah V (2019) An empirical investigation of eWOM and used video game trading: the moderation effects of product features. Decis Support Syst 123

  46. Chen H, Chen H-T (2021) The role of social network sites on the relationship between game users and developers: an evolutionary game analysis of virtual goods. Inf Technol Manag 22:67–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Huang L, Tan CH, Ke W, Wei KK (2018) Helpfulness of online review content: the moderating effects of temporal and social cues. J Assoc Inf Syst 19:503–522

    Google Scholar 

  48. Forman C, Ghose A, Wiesenfeld B (2008) Examining the relationship between reviews and sales: the role of reviewer identity disclosure in electronic markets. Inf Syst Res 19:291–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Dennis AR, Minas RK, Lockwood NS (2016) Map** the corporate blogosphere: linking audience, content, and management to blog visibility. J Assoc Inf Syst 17

  50. Adomavicius G, Bockstedt JC, Curley SP, Zhang J (2021) Effects of personalized recommendations versus aggregate ratings on post-consumption preference responses. MIS Q

  51. Ye Q, Law R, Gu B, Chen W (2011) The influence of user-generated content on traveler behavior: an empirical investigation on the effects of e-word-of-mouth to hotel online bookings. Comput Hum Behav 27:634–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Boatwright P, Basuroy S, Kamakura W (2007) Reviewing the reviewers: the impact of individual film critics on box office performance. Quant Mark Econ 5:401–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Lee Y-J, Tan Y (2013) Effects of different types of free trials and ratings in sampling of consumer software: an empirical study. J Manag Inf Syst 30:213–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Benlian A, Titah R, Hess T (2012) Differential effects of provider recommendations and consumer reviews in e-commerce transactions: an experimental study. J Manag Inf Syst 29:237–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Moon S, Bergey PK, Iacobucci D (2010) Dynamic effects among movie ratings, movie revenues, and viewer satisfaction. J Mark 74:108–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Li M, Huang L, Tan C-H, Wei K-K (2013) Helpfulness of online product reviews as seen by consumers: source and content features. Int J Electron Commer 17:101–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Smith TM, Gopalakrishna S, Chatterjee R (2006) A three-stage model of integrated marketing communications at the marketing-sales interface. J Mark Res 43:564–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. de Vries L, Gensler S, Leeflang PSH (2012) Popularity of brand posts on brand fan pages: an investigation of the effects of social media marketing. J Interact Mark 26:83–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Zhou W, Duan W (2016) Do professional reviews affect online user choices through user reviews? An empirical study. J Manag Inf Syst 33:202–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Assael H (2011) From silos to synergy: A fifty-year review of cross-media research shows synergy has yet to achieve its full potential. J Advert Res 51:42–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Wang Y-Y, Guo C, Susarla A, Sambamurthy V (2021) Online to offline: the impact of social media on offline sales in the automobile industry. Inf Syst Res 32:582–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Hewett K, Rand W, Rust RT, van Heerde HJ (2016) Brand buzz in the echoverse. J Mark 80:1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Sivadas E, Dwyer FR (2000) An examination of organizational factors influencing new product success in internal and alliance-based processes. J Mark 64:31–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Ho-Dac NN, Carson SJ, Moore WL (2013) The effects of positive and negative online customer reviews: do brand strength and category maturity matter? J Mark 77:37–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Clemons EK, Gao GG, Hitt LM (2006) When online reviews meet hyperdifferentiation: a study of the craft beer industry. J Manag Inf Syst 23:149–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Trueman B, Wong MHF, Zhang X-J (2000) The eyeballs have it: Searching for the value in Internet stocks. J Account Res 38:137–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Demers E, Lev B (2001) A rude awakening: Internet shakeout in 2000. Rev Acc Stud 6:331–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Haan MA, Dijkstra SG, Dijkstra PT (2005) Expert judgment versus public opinion–evidence from the Eurovision song contest. J Cult Econ 29:59–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Lim JS, Ri SY, Egan BD, Biocca FA (2015) The cross-platform synergies of digital video advertising: implications for cross-media campaigns in television, Internet and mobile TV. Comput Hum Behav 48:463–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Baum D, Spann M (2014) The interplay between online consumer reviews and recommender systems: an experimental analysis. Int J Electron Commer 19:129–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Hogarth RM (1989) On combining diagnostic ‘forecasts’: thoughts and some evidence. Int J Forecast 5:593–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Mudambi SM, Schuff D (2010) Research note: What makes a helpful online review? A study of customer reviews on Amazon.com. MIS Q 34:185–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Simon HA (1955) A behavioral model of rational choice. Q J Econ 69:99–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Häubl G, Trifts V (2000) Consumer decision making in online shop** environments the effects of interactive decision aids. Mark Sci 19:4–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Kumar N, Benbasat I (2006) Research note: the influence of recommendations and consumer reviews on evaluations of websites. Inf Syst Res 17:425–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Ackerberg DA (2001) Empirically distinguishing informative and prestige effects of advertising. Rand J Econ 32:316–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Bagwell K (2007) The economic analysis of advertising. Handb Ind Organiz 3:1701–1844

    Google Scholar 

  78. Erdem T, Keane MP (1996) Decision-making under uncertainty: capturing dynamic brand choice processes in turbulent consumer goods markets. Mark Sci 15:1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Tellis GJ, Gaeth GJ (1990) Best value, price-seeking, and price aversion: the impact of information and learning on consumer choices. J Mark 54:34–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Moon J, Chadee D, Tikoo S (2008) Culture, product type, and price influences on consumer purchase intention to buy personalized products online. J Bus Res 61:31–39

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Monroe KB (1973) Buyers’ subjective perceptions of price. J Mark Res 10:70–80

    Google Scholar 

  82. Duan W, Gu B, Whinston AB (2008) The dynamics of online word-of-mouth and product sales—an empirical investigation of the movie industry. J Retail 84:233–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. DeSarbo WS, Kim J, Choi SC, Spaulding M (2002) A gravity-based multidimensional scaling model for deriving spatial structures underlying consumer preference/choice judgments. J Consum Res 29:91–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Park D-H, Lee J, Han I (2007) The effect of on-line consumer reviews on consumer purchasing intention: The moderating role of involvement. Int J Electron Commer 11:125–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Chen P-Y, Wu S-yYJ (2004) The impact of online recommendations and consumer feedback on sales. Association for Information Systems

  86. Kirby C (2000) Everyone’s a critic: web sites hope online reviews of products lead to online buying. In: San Francisco Chronicle

  87. Godes D, Mayzlin D (2004) Using online conversations to study word-of-mouth communication. Mark Sci 23:545–560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  88. Burtch G, Ghose A, Wattal S (2013) An empirical examination of the antecedents and consequences of contribution patterns in crowd-funded markets. Inf Syst Res 24:499–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. Lee L-f (2007) GMM and 2SLS estimation of mixed regressive, spatial autoregressive models. J Econom

  90. Aggarwal R, Gopal R, Gupta A, Singh H (2012) Putting money where the mouths are: the relation between venture financing and electronic word-of-mouth. Inf Syst Res 23:976–992

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Stock JH, Yogo M (2002) Testing for weak instruments in linear IV regression. National Bureau of Economic Research

  92. Aiken LS, West SG (1991) Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. Sage Publications, New York

    Google Scholar 

  93. Zeileis A, Kleiber C, Jackman S (2008) Regression models for count data in R. J Stat Softw 27:1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  94. Mollick E, Nanda R (2016) Wisdom or madness? Comparing crowds with expert evaluation in funding the arts. Manag Sci 62:1533–1553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. Speier C, Valacich JS, Vessey I (1999) The influence of task interruption on individual decision making: an information overload perspective. Decis Sci 30:337–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  96. Li X, Wu C, Mai F (2019) The effect of online reviews on product sales: a joint sentiment-topic analysis. Inf Manag 56:172–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (72071190, 72271072, and 71801069) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (JZ2023HGPA0294).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shaobo Wei.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, X., Wang, Y. & Wei, S. How does social media influence car sales: the effects of firm-, user-, and professional-generated content. Inf Technol Manag (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-023-00414-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10799-023-00414-x

Keywords

Navigation