Log in

Policy and Information Systems Implementation: the Greek Property Tax Information System Case

  • Published:
Information Systems Frontiers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study contributes to the literature on Information Systems (IS) implementation and provides insights into how IS implementation emerges as an assemblage constituted by diverse sociomaterial practices –that is, the intertwining of humans and technology in practice– during the implementation of Greece’s Yearly Property Tax policy and information system over the period 1997–2015. Drawing on the work of Deleuze, Guattari, and Delanda on ‘assemblage theory’ and Burke’s on motive (expressed as ‘intentionality’ and ‘motivation’) we discuss IS implementation as a performative process that is shaped by assemblage agents’ intentionality and motivation and conclude that explicitly attending to these dynamics during the emergence of policy and technology as a sociomaterial assemblage contributes to a better understanding of IS implementation and its success. We propose that higher levels of motivation and intentionality are related to higher chances of successful implementation. Finally, limitations and future research directions are proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. One of the authors is full-time academic in the United Kingdom.

References

  • Avgerou, C., & McGrath, K. (2007). Power, rationality, and the art of living through socio-technical change. MIS Quarterly, 31(2), 293–315.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avgerou, C., Ciborra, C., & Land, F. (Eds.). (2004). The social study of ICT: Innovation, actors and contexts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barad, K. (2003). Posthumanist performativity: toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28(3), 801–831.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloomfield, B. P., & Hayes, N. (2009). Power and organizational transformation through technology: hybrids of electronic government. Organization Studies, 30(5), 461–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2011). Business research methods. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, K. (1969a). A grammar of motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, K. (1969b). A rhetoric of motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke, K. (2003). (Nonsymbolic) motion/(symbolic) action. In: Rueckert W. H. and Bonadonna A. (eds.), On human nature: A gathering while everything flows 1967-1984. Berkeley: University of California Press.

  • Butler, T., & McGovern, D. (2012). A conceptual model and IS framework for the design and adoption of environmental compliance management systems. Information Systems Frontiers, 14(2), 221–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlile, P. (2002). A pragmatic view of knowledge and boundaries: boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science, 13, 442–455.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlile, P. R. (2004). Transferring, translating, and transforming: an integrative framework for managing knowledge across boundaries. Organization Science, 15(5), 555–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cecez-Kecmanovic, D., Kautz, K., & Abrahall, R. (2014). Reframing success and failure of information systems: a performative perspective. MIS Quarterly, 38(2), 561–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciborra, C. (2002). The labyrinths of information. Challenging the wisdom of systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciborra. (2005). Interpreting e-government and development. Efficiency, transparency or governance at a distance? Information Technology & People, 18(3), 260–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciborra, C., & Lanzara, G. F. (1994). Formative contexts and information technology: understanding the dynamics of innovation in organizations. Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, 4(2), 61–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordella, A., & Iannacci, F. (2010). Information systems in the public sector: the e-government enactment framework. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 19(1), 52–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dang, Y. M., Zhang, Y. G., & Morgan, J. (2017). Integrating switching costs to information systems adoption: An empirical study on learning management systems. Information Systems Frontiers, 19(3), 625–644.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLanda, M. (2006). A new philosophy of society. London and New York: Continuum.

  • DeLanda, M. (2011). Philosophy and simulation: The emergence of synthetic reason. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (trans: Massumi, B.). Continuum: London.

  • Doolin, B., & McLeod, L. (2012). Sociomateriality and boundary objects in information systems development. European Journal of Information Systems, 21, 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dwivendi, Y., Rana, N., Jeyaraj, A., Clement, M., & Williams, M. (2017). Re-examining the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): towards a revised theoretical model. Information Systems Frontiers. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-017-9774-y.

  • Fosso Wamba, S., Edwards, A., & Akter, S. (2017). Social media adoption and use for improved emergency services operations: the case of the NSW SES. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2545-9.

  • Hirschheim, R., & Klein, H. K. (1989). Four paradigms of information systems development. Communications of the ACM, 32(10), 1199–1216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Introna, L. (1997). Management, information and power: A narrative of the involved manager. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irani, Z., Elliman, T., & Jackson, P. (2007). Electronic transformation of government in the U.K.: a research agenda. European Journal of Information Systems, 16, 327–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Irani, Z., Love, P. E. D., & Jones, S. (2008). Learning lessons from evaluating eGovernment: reflective case experiences that support transformational government. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 17(2), 155–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. (2014). A matter of life and death: exploring conceptualizations of sociomateriality in the context of critical care. MIS Quarterly, 38(3), 895–925.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonardi, P. (2011). When flexible routines meet flexible technologies: affordance, constraint, and the imbrication of human and material agencies. MIS Quarterly, 35(1), 147–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonardi, P. (2012). Materiality, Sociomateriality, and socio-technical systems: What do these terms mean? How are they different? In P. M. Leonardi, B. A. Nardi, & J. Kallinikos (Eds.), Materiality and organizing: Social interaction in a technological world (pp. 25–48). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonardi, P. (2013). Theoretical foundations for the study of Sociomateriality. Information and Organization, 23, 59–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leonardi, P., & Barley, S. (2008). Materiality and change: challenges to building better theory about technology and organizing. Information and Organization, 18(3), 159–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Njihia, J. M., & Merali, Y. (2013). The broader context for ICT4D projects: a morphogenetic analysis. MIS Quarterly, 37(3), 881–905.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2009). OECD economic surveys: Greece 2009. Available at: http://docs.glotta.ntua.gr/International/OECD/1009151etemp.pdf. Accessed on 20 Aug 2018

  • Orlikowski, W. J. (2007). Sociomaterial practices: exploring technology at work. Organization Studies, 28(9), 1435–1448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W., & Scott, S. (2008). Sociomateriality: challenging the separation of technology, work and organization. Academy of Management Annals, 2(1), 433–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papadopoulos, T., Stamati, T., Nikolaidou, M., & Anagnostopoulos, D. (2013). From open source to open innovation practices: a case in the Greek context in light of the debt crisis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(6), 1232–1246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papazafeiropoulou, A., & Spanaki, K. (2016). Understanding governance, risk and compliance information systems (GRC IS): the experts view. Information Systems Frontiers, 18(6), 1251–1263, ISSN: 1387-3326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-015-9572-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rana, N., Dwivedi, Y., Lal, B., Williams, M., & Clement, M. (2017). Citizens’ adoption of an electronic government system: towards a unified view. Information Systems Frontiers, 19(3), 549–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robey, D., & Markus, M. L. (1984). Rituals in information system design. MIS Quarterly, 8(1), 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadiq, S., Muehlen, M., & Indulska, M. (2012). Governance, risk and compliance: applications in information systems (editorial). Information Systems Frontiers, 14, 123–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schandorf, M., & Karatzogianni, A. (2016). Agency in Posthuman IR: Solving the problem of Technosocially mediated agency. In E. Cudworth, S. Hobden, & E. Kavalski (Eds.), Posthuman dialogues in international relations. Farnham: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, S. V., & Orlikowski, W. (2014). Entanglements in practice: performing anonymity through social media. MIS Quarterly, 38(3), 873–893.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silverman, D. (2001). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analysing talk, text and interaction (2nd ed.). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stamati, T., Papadopoulos, T., & Anagnostopoulos, D. (2015). Social media for openness and accountability in the public sector: cases in the Greek context. Government Information Quarterly, 32(1), 12–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G., & Davis, F. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27, 425–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Venters, W., Oborn, E., & Barrett, M. (2014). A Trichordal temporal approach to digital coordination: the sociomaterial mangling of the CERN grid. MIS Quarterly, 38(3), 927–949.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsham, G. (2001). Making a world of difference: It in a global context. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeow, A., & Faraj, S. (2014). Technology and Sociomaterial Performation. Information systems and global assemblages. (Re)configuring actors, artefacts, organizations. Volume 446 of the series IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, pp 48–65.

  • Yin, R. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thanos Papadopoulos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Anagnostopoulos, D., Papadopoulos, T., Stamati, T. et al. Policy and Information Systems Implementation: the Greek Property Tax Information System Case. Inf Syst Front 22, 791–802 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-018-9887-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-018-9887-y

Keywords

Navigation