Log in

Narratives of Positionality in Primatology: Foreign/Range–Country Collaborator Perspectives from Africa and South America

  • Published:
International Journal of Primatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Primate research and conservation may inadvertently reproduce neocolonial dynamics when primatologists from affluent, imperialist nations conduct studies in primate habitat countries. Here, we consider how interrogating the positionality of both foreign researchers and range-country collaborators can strengthen primatology. Such consideration may help us to better understand where each member of the collaboration is coming from, both figuratively and literally, and how those situated perceptions shape the research process. Centering the perspectives of the range-country collaborators, whose perspectives are infrequently voiced within the primatology literature, may illuminate challenges in cross-cultural communication and imbalances of knowledge and power. Here, we explore how positionality shapes collaborative research through the narratives of two foreign/range-country collaborator teams doing primate research and conservation in Africa and South America. Our goal is to provide examples that consider the positionalities of range-country collaborators relative to both foreign researchers and local community members, and that serve as models for primate researchers as they consider their own research teams’ positionalities. These narratives highlight how prioritizing the perspectives of range-country and local collaborators when they differ from those of foreign collaborators can strengthen future research and conservation efforts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, G., Dobles, I., Gómez, L. H., Kurtiş, T., & Molina, L. E. (2015). Decolonizing psychological science: Introduction to the special thematic section. Journal of Social and Political Psychology, 3(1), 213–238. https://doi.org/10.5964/jspp.v3i1.564.

  • Ahuja, N. (2013). Macaques and biomedicine: Notes on decolonization, polio, and changing representation of Indian rhesus in the United States, 1930–1960. In S. Radhakrishna, M. A. Huffman, & A. Sinha (Eds.), The macaque connection: Cooperation and conflict between humans and macaques (pp. 71–91). Springer Science & Business Media LLC.. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3967-7.

  • Anderson-Levitt, K. M. (2014). Significance: Recognizing the value of research across national and linguistic boundaries. Asia Pacific Education Review, 15(3), 347–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-014-9322-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antunes, A. P., Massarani, L. M., & de Castro Moreira, I. (2019). Practical botanists and zoologists: Contributions of Amazonian natives to natural history expeditions (1846–1865). Historia Critica, 73, 137–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antunes, A. P., Massarani, L. M., & de Castro Moreira, I. (2018). Local collaborators in Henry Walter Bates’s Amazonian expedition (1848-1859). In F. D’Angelo (Ed.), the scientific dialogue linking America, Asia, and Europe between the 12th and the 20th century. Theories and techniques travelling in space and time (pp. 382–400). Associazione culturale Viaggiatori: Nápoles.

  • Ashegbofe Ikemeh, R. (2017). Home advantage: How Africans are taking on the reins of leadership in primatology on the continent. In biodiversity (Vol. 18, issue 4, pp. 210–211). Taylor and Francis ltd. https://doi.org/10.1080/14888386.2017.1407672.

  • Asquith, P. J. (2000). Negotiating science: Internationalization and Japanese primatology. In S. C. Strum & L. M. Fedigan (Eds.), Primate encounters: Models of gender, science, and society (pp. 165–183). University of Chicago Press.

  • Baker, K., Eichhorn, M. P., & Griffiths, M. (2019). Decolonizing field ecology. Biotropica, 51(3), 288–292. https://doi.org/10.1111/btp.12663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barber, P. H., Ablan-Lagman, M. C. A., Ambariyanto, A., Berlinck, R. G. S., Cahyani, D., Crandall, E. D., Ravago-Gotanco, R., Juinio-Meñez, M. A., Mahardika, I. G. N., Shanker, K., Starger, C. J., Toha, A. H. A., Anggoro, A. W., & Willette, D. A. (2014). Advancing biodiversity research in develo** countries: The need for changing paradigms. Bulletin of Marine Science, 90(1), 187–210. https://doi.org/10.5343/bms.2012.1108.

  • Berger, R. (2015). Now I see it, now I don’t: researcher’s position and reflexivity in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 15(2), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794112468475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bezanson, M., & McNamara, A. (2019). The what and where of primate field research may be failing primate conservation. Evolutionary anthropology: Issues, news, and reviews, November 2018, Evan.21790. https://doi.org/10.1002/evan.21790.

  • Bicca-Marques, J. C. (2003). How do howler monkeys cope with habitat fragmentation? In L. K. Marsh (Ed.), Primates in fragments (pp. 282–303). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bicca-Marques, J. C. (2016). Development of primatology in habitat countries: A view from Brazil. American Anthropology, 118, 140–141. https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.12503.This.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhambra, G. K. (2014). Postcolonial and decolonial dialogues. Postcolonial Studies, 17(2), 115–121. https://doi.org/10.1080/13688790.2014.966414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, J. S., Waylen, K. A., & Mulder, M. B. (2012). How national context, project design, and local community characteristics influence success in community-based conservation projects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(52), 21265–21270. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1207141110.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Caretta, M. A. (2015). Situated knowledge in cross-cultural, cross-language research: A collaborative reflexive analysis of researcher, assistant and participant subjectivities. Qualitative Research, 15(4), 489–505. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794114543404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhury, A., & Colla, S. (2020). Next steps in dismantling discrimination: Lessons from ecology and conservation science. Conservation Letters, 14(2), e12774. https://doi.org/10.1111/conl.12774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chua, L., Harrison, M. E., Fair, H., Milne, S., Palmer, A., Rubis, J., Thung, P., Wich, S., Büscher, B., Cheyne, S. M., Puri, R. K., Schreer, V., Stępień, A., & Meijaard, E. (2020). Conservation and the social sciences: Beyond critique and co-optation. A case study from orangutan conservation. People and Nature, 2(1), 42–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10072.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, M. R., Alonzo, S. H., Adamczak, S. K., Baker, D. N., Beltran, R. S., Borker, A. L., Favilla, A. B., Gatins, R., Goetz, L. C., Hack, N., Harenčár, J. G., Howard, E. A., Kustra, M. C., Maguiña, R., Martinez-Estevez, L., Mehta, R. S., Parker, I. M., Reid, K., Roberts, M. B., & Zavaleta, E. S. (2021). Anti-racist interventions to transform ecology, evolution and conservation biology departments. Nature Ecology and Evolution, 5(9), 1213–1223. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-021-01522-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Vos, A. (2020). The Problem of “Colonial Science.” Scientific American, , 1–10.

  • De Waal, F. B. M. (2003). Silent invasion: Imanishi’s primatology and cultural bias in science. Animal Cognition, 6(4), 293–299. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10071-003-0197-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deliovsky, K. (2017). Whiteness in the qualitative research setting: Critical skepticism, radical reflexivity and anti-racist feminism. Journal of Critical Race Inquiry, 4(1), 1–24.

  • Dunsworth, H. (2021). This view of wife. In J. DaSilva (Ed.), A Most interesting problem: What Darwin’s descent of man got right and wrong about human evolution (pp. 144–161). Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Estrada, A., Garber, P. A., Pavelka, M. S. M., & Luecke, L. (2006). Overview of the Mesoamerican primate fauna, primate studies, and conservation concerns. In A. Estrada, P. A. Garber, M. S. M. Pavelka, & L. Luecke (Eds.), New perspectives in the study of Mesoamerican primates: Distribution, ecology, behavior, and conservation (pp. 1–22). Springer Science & Business Media LLC.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fagan, M. B. (2007). Wallace, Darwin, and the practice of natural history. Journal of the History of Biology, 40(4), 601–635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-007-9126-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, P. F., & Ma, C. (2018). Extant primates and development of primatology in China: Publications, student training, and funding. Zoological Research, 39(4), 249–254. https://doi.org/10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2018.033

  • Fedigan, L. M., & Strum, S. C. (1999). A brief history of primate studies: National traditions, disciplinary origins, and stages in north American field research. In P. Dolhinhow & A. Fuentes (Eds.), The nonhuman primates (pp. 258–269). Mayfield Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuentes, A. (2011). Being human and doing primatology: National, socioeconomic, and ethnic influences on primatological practice. American Journal of Primatology, 73(3), 233–237. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.20849.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fuentes, A. (2021a). “On the races of man”: Race, racism, science, and hope. In J. DaSilva (Ed.), A most interesting problem: what Darwin’s descent of man got right and wrong about human evolution (pp. 144-161). Princeton University Press

  • Fuentes, A. (2021b). “The Descent of Man,” 150 years on. Science, 372(6544), 769–769. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abj4606

  • Garland, E. (2008). The elephant in the room: Confronting the colonial character of wildlife conservation in Africa. African Studies Review, 51(3), 51–74. https://doi.org/10.1353/arw.0.0095.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gokken, B. (2018). Recovering conservationist: Q & A with orangutan ecologist June Mary Rubis. Mongabayhttp://news.mongabay.com/2018/08/recovering-conservationist-qa-with-orangutan-ecologist-june-mary-rubis/

  • Haelewaters, D., Hofmann, T. A., & Romero-Olivares, A. L. (2021). Ten simple rules for global north researchers to stop perpetuating helicopter research in the global south. PLoS Computational Biology, 17(8), e1009277. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009277.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. J. (1989). Primate visions: Gender, race, and nature in the world of modern science. Routledge, Chapman & Hall, Inc.

  • Hart, A. G., Leather, S. R., & Sharma, M. V. (2020). Overseas conservation education and research: The new colonialism? Journal of Biological Education, 55(5), 569–574. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2020.1739117

  • Hill, C. M., & McLennan, M. R. (2016). The primatologist as social actor. Etnografica, 20(3), 668–671. https://doi.org/10.4000/etnografica.4771Etnográfica

  • Hoàng, T. M. (2016). Development of primatology and primate conservation in Vietnam: Challenges and prospects. American Anthropologist, 118, 130–137. https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.12515.This.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobaiter, C., Akankwasa, J. W., Muhumuza, G., Uwimbabazi, M., & Koné, I. (2021). The importance of local specialists in science: Where are the local researchers in primatology? Current Biology, 31(20), R1367–R1369. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2021.09.034

  • Horwich, R. H., & Lyon, J. (2007). Community conservation: Practitioners’ answer to critics. Oryx, 41(3), 376–385. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0030605307001010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, D., & Mustafa, N. (2019). Social identity map: A reflexivity tool for practicing explicit positionality in critical qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919870075.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jost Robinson, C. A., & Remis, M. J. (2018). Engaging holism: Exploring multispecies approaches in ethnoprimatology. International Journal of Primatology, 39(5), 776–796. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-018-0036-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamenya, S. (2002). Human baby killed by Gombe chimpanzee. Pan Africa News, 9(2), 26–26. https://doi.org/10.5134/143412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leighton, M. (2020). Myths of meritocracy, friendship, and fun work: Class and gender in north American academic communities. American Anthropologist, 122(3), 444–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/aman.13455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mabele, M. B., Sandroni, L. T., Collis, Y. A., & Rubis, J. (2021). What do we mean by decolonizing conservation? A response to Lanjouw (2021). Conviva. https://conviva-research.com/what-do-we-mean-by-decolonizing-conservation-a-response-to-lanjouw-2021/.

  • Malone, N. M., Fuentes, A., & White, F. J. (2010). Ethics commentary: Subjects of knowledge and control in field primatology. American Journal of Primatology, 72(9), 779–784. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.20840.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuzawa, T., & McGrew, W. C. (2008). Kinji Imanishi and 60 years of Japanese primatology. Current Biology, 18(14), R587–R4591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2008.05.040.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McLennan, M. R., & Hill, C. M. (2013). Ethical issues in the study and conservation of an African great ape in an unprotected, human-dominated landscape in western Uganda. In J. MacClancy & A. Fuentes (Eds.), Ethics in the field: Contemporary challenges (pp. 42–66). Berghahn.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLennan, M. R., & Hill, C. M. (2010). Chimpanzee responses to researchers in a disturbed forest–farm mosaic at Bulindi, western Uganda. American Journal of Primatology, 72(10), 907–918. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.20839

  • McLennan, M. R., & Hill, C. M. (2012). Troublesome neighbours: Changing attitudes towards chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) in a human-dominated landscape in Uganda. Journal for Nature Conservation, 20(4), 219–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnc.2012.03.002

  • McLennan, M. R., Hintz, B., Kiiza, V., Rohen, J., Lorenti, G. A., & Hockings, K. J. (2021). Surviving at the extreme: Chimpanzee ranging is not restricted in a deforested human-dominated landscape in Uganda. African Journal of Ecology, 59(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/aje.12803.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLennan, M. R., & Hockings, K. J. (2016). The aggressive apes? Causes and contexts of great ape attacks on local persons. In F. M. Angelici (Ed.), Problematic wildlife: A cross-disciplinary approach (pp. 373–394). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • McLennan, M. R., Lorenti, G. A., Sabiiti, T., & Bardi, M. (2020). Forest fragments become farmland: Dietary response of wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) to fast-changing anthropogenic landscapes. American Journal of Primatology, 82(4), e23090. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.23090

  • Mecca, B. (2020). When your country is a case study: Being an Indonesian environmentalist at Yale. Correspondents of the World, (August 24).

  • Mendes, S. L., da Silva, M. P., & Strier, K. B. (2010). O Muriqui. IPEMA—Instituto de Pesquisas da Mata Atlantica, Publicação do Programa Difusão da Biodiversidade, Vitória, Espirito Santo, Brasil.

  • Mendes, S. L., Silva, M. P., Oliveira, M. Z. T., & Strier, K. B. (2014). O Muriqui: Símbolo da Mata Atlântica, 2o edição. IPEMA—Instituto de Pesquisas da Mata Atlantica, Publicação do Programa Difusão da Biodiversidade, Projeto Muriqui, Espirito Santo, Brasil.

  • Mignolo, W. D. (2007). Introduction: Coloniality of power and de-colonial thinking. Cultural Studies, 21(2–3), 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601162498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mittermeier, R., Fonseca, G., Rylands, A., & Brandon, K. (2005). A brief history of biodiversity conservation in Brazil. Conservation Biology, 19(3), 601–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, G. M. (2005). Place, practice and primatology: Clarence Ray Carpenter, primate communication and the development of field methodology, 1931–1945. Journal of the History of Biology, 38(3), 495-533. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-005-0553-0

  • Moon, D. (1999). White enculturation and bourgeois ideology. In T. K. Nakayama & J. N. Martin (Eds.), Whiteness: The communication of social identity (pp. 177–197). SAGE Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, K., Adams, V. M., & Cooke, B. (2019). Shared personal reflections on the need to broaden the scope of conservation social science. People and Nature, 1(4), 426–434. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreira, I. C. (2002). O escravo do naturalista — O papel do conhecimento nativo nas viagens científicas do século. Ciência Hoje, 31(184), 40–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nkomo, M. N. (2020). The Achilles heel of conservation. iLizwe, 1–11.

  • Pasquini, M. W., & Olaniyan, O. (2004). The researcher and the field assistant: Across-disciplinary, cross-cultural viewing of positionality. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 29(1), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.1179/030801804225012446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickren, W. E. (2009). Liberating history: The context of the challenge of psychologists of color to American psychology. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 15(4), 425–433. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017561.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Quijano, A. (2000). Coloniality of power and eurocentrism in Latin America. International Sociology, 15(2), 215–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quijano, A. (2007). Coloniality and modernity/rationality. Cultural Studies, 21(2–3), 168–178. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502380601164353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radhakrishna, S., & Jamieson, D. (2018). Liberating primatology. Journal of Biosciences, 43(1), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12038-017-9724-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rodrigues, M. A. (2019). It’s time to stop lionizing Dian Fossey as a conservation hero. LadyScience. https://www.ladyscience.com/ideas/time-to-stop-lionizing-dian-fossey-conservation.

  • Rodrigues, M. A. (2020). Neocolonial narratives of primate conservation. IUCN Primate Specialist Group for Primate Interactions Webblog. https://human-primate-interactions.org/blog/.

  • Rodrigues, M. A., Yoon, S. O., Clancy, K. B. H., & Stine-Morrow, E. A. L. (2021). What are friends for? The impact of friendship on communicative efficiency and cortisol response during collaborative problem solving among younger and older women. Journal of Women & Aging, 33(4), 411–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/08952841.2021.1915686

  • Rubis, J. M. (2020). The orang utan is not an indigenous name: Knowing and naming the maias as a decolonizing epistemology. Cultural Studies, 34(5), 811–830. https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2020.1780281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubis, J. M., & Theriault, N. (2020). Concealing protocols: Conservation, indigenous survivance, and the dilemmas of visibility. Social and Cultural Geography, 21(7), 962–984. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2019.1574882.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachs, A. (2003). The ultimate “other”: Post-colonialism and Alexander Von Humboldt’s ecological relationship with nature. History and Theory, 42(42), 111–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sandelowski, M. (1991). Telling stories: Narrative approaches in qualitative research. The Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 23(3), 161–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1547-5069.1991.tb00662.x.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seidler, R., Primack, R. B., Goswami, V. R., Khaling, S., Devy, M. S., Corlett, R. T., Knott, C. D., Kane, E. E., Susanto, T. W., Otali, E., Roth, R. J., Phillips, O. L., Baker, T. R., Ewango, C., Coronado, E. H., Levesley, A., Lewis, S. L., Marimon, B. S., Qie, L., & Wrangham, R. (2021). Confronting ethical challenges in long-term research programs in the tropics. Biological Conservation, 255, 108933. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2020.108933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Setchell, J. M., & Gordon, A. D. (2018). Editorial practice at the International Journal of Primatology: The roles of gender and country of affiliation in participation in scientific publication. International Journal of Primatology, 39(6), 969–986. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-018-0067-1

  • Singh, M., Singh, M., Kumara, H. N., Chetry, D., & Mahato, S. (2020). A history of primatology in India (in memory of professor Sheo Dan Singh). Journal of Threatened Taxa, 12(13), 16715–16735. https://doi.org/10.11609/jott.6524.12.13.16715-16735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P., Ríos, S. D., & Smith, R. L. (2021). Paraguayan primatology: Past, present and future. Primate Conservation, 35, 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solórzano, D. G., & Yosso, T. J. (2002). Critical race methodology: Counter-storytelling as an analytical framework for education research. Qualitative Inquiry, 8(1), 23–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780040200800103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strier, K. B. (2000). An American primatologist in Brazil. In S. C. Strum & L. M. Fedigan (Eds.), Primate Encounters: Models of Gender, Science, and Society (pp. 194–207). University of Chicago Press.

  • Strier, K. B. (2017). Long-term field studies—Americas. In The international encyclopedia of primatology (pp. 1–5). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119179313.wbprim0430.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Strier, K. B. (2019). Everything for the muriquis: Reflections from a long-term field study on a critically endangered primate. Boletim de Sociedade Brasileira de Mastozoologia, 85, 117–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strier, K.B., Mendes, S. L., Santos, R. R. (2001). Timing of births in sympatric brown howler monkeys (Alouatta fusca clamitans) and northern muriquis (Brachyteles arachnoides hypoxanthus). American Journal of Primatology, 55(2), 87–100.

  • Strier, K. B. & Mendes, S. L. (2009). Long-term field studies of South American primates. In P. A. Garber, A. Estrada, J. C. Bicca-Marques, E. W. Heymann, & K. B. Strier (Eds): South American Primates: Comparative Perspectives in the Study of Behavior, Ecology, and Conservation (pp. 129-155).. Springer, NY

  • Strier, K. B., & Mendes, S. L. (2012). The northern muriqui (Brachyteles hypoxanthus): Lessons on behavioral plasticity and population dynamics from a critically endangered species. In P. Kappeler & D. P. Watts (Eds.), Long-term Field Studies of Primates. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-64

  • Strum, S. C., & Fedigan, L. M. (2000). Introduction and history. In S. C. Strum & L. M. Fedigan (Eds.), Primate Encounters: Models of Gender, Science, and Society (pp. 1–49). University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundberg, J. (2014). Decolonizing posthumanist geographies. Cultural Geographies, 21(1), 33–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474474013486067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, J. E. G. (2012). Denying history in colonial Kenya: The anthropology and archeology of G.W.B. Huntington and L.S.B. Leakey. History in Africa, 33(2006), 287–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takasaki, H. (2000). Traditions of the Kyoto school of field primatology in Japan. In S. C. Strum & L. M. Fedigan (Eds.), Primate Ecounters: Models of Gender, Science, and Society (pp. 151–164). University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiago de Melo, M. (1995). Treinamento em primatologia no Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Veterinárias, 2(3), 69–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trisos, C. H., Auerbach, J., & Katti, M. (2021). Decoloniality and anti-oppressive practices for a more ethical ecology. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 5(9), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-021-01460-w.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuck, E., & Yang, K. W. (2012). Decolonization is not a metaphor. In Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1(1), 1–40.

  • Urbani, B. (2017). History of primatology—South America. In A. Fuentes (Ed.), The International Encyclopedia of Primatology. John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119179313.wbprim0312

  • van Wyhe, J., & Drawhorn, G. M. (2015). “I am Ali Wallace”: The Malay assistant of Alfred Russel Wallace. Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society, 88(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1353/ras.2015.0012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weller, S. C. (2014). Structured interviewing and questionnaire construction. In H. R. Bernard & C. C. Gravelee (Eds.), American Anthropologist (pp. 349–390). Rowman & Littlefield. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.2000.102.1.183

  • Yakushko, O. (2019). Eugenics and its evolution in the history of western psychology: A critical archival review. Psychotherapy and Politics International, 17(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppi.1495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamamota, M. E., & Alencar, A. I. (2000). Some characteristics of scientific literature in Brazilian primatology. In S. C. Strum & L. M. Fedigan (Eds.), Primate Encounters: Models of Gender, Science, and Society (pp. 184–193). University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This manuscript was inspired from conversations originating in a roundtable on “What works and what doesn’t work? The challenges of creating effective applied research in human-modified habitats,” organized by Aimee Oxley, Kate Hill, and Giuseppe Donati for the joint European Federation for Primatology/Primate Society of Great Britain 2019 meeting, and particularly influenced by conversations brought up by Sian Waters and Aimee Oxley on positionality. The concept of this manuscript was further developed by the IUCN Primate Specialist Group Section for Human–Primate Interactions webinar on Decolonising Primatology, co-organized by Sian Waters and Susan Cheyne, which included talks by Seheno Andriantsaralazo, June Mary Rubis, and Jo Setchell. The initial manuscript concept was to include perspectives from Susan Cheyne and her Indonesian colleagues with the Borneo Nature Foundation, Adul, Jito Sugarjito, amd Darmae Nasir. Although time constraints prevented them from contributing to this manuscript, we appreciate Susan’s work on advancing this topic and look forward to seeing how they apply these discussions to further work within the Indonesian Primate Society.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MAR developed the manuscript based on a concept originating from the special issue editors, and wrote the introduction and methods. VK/MRM and SLM/KBS each wrote their respective narratives. MAR, MRM, and KBS wrote the discussion, and MRM, SLM and KBS provided editorial advice throughout.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michelle A. Rodrigues.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Joanna M. Setchell

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rodrigues, M.A., Kiiza, V., McLennan, M.R. et al. Narratives of Positionality in Primatology: Foreign/Range–Country Collaborator Perspectives from Africa and South America. Int J Primatol 43, 1133–1158 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-022-00311-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10764-022-00311-0

Key Words

Navigation