Log in

The therapeutic effects of upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy in pacing-induced cardiomyopathy or chronic right ventricular pacing patients: a meta-analysis

  • Published:
Heart Failure Reviews Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) or heart failure accompanied with chronic right ventricular pacing (CRVP-HF) has no established treatments. We aimed to carry out a meta-analysis of published studies about the therapeutic effects of the upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients of PICM/CRVP-HF. The PUBMED, EMBASE, MEDLINE, OVID databases, and Cochrane Library were systemically searched for relevant publications. Data about the improvements of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), NYHA functional class (NYHA-FC), and the CRT response rate was extracted and synthesized. Mean difference (MD), odds ratio, and standard mean difference (SMD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated as the effect size by both fixed and random effect models. We included sixteen studies (four about PICM and twelve about CRVP-HF). The total sample size of PICM/CRVP-HF patients was 924. Upgrade to CRT improved the LVEF by 10.87% (95%CI, 8.90 to 12.84%) and reduce the NYHA-FC by around one class (MD, −1.25; 95%CI, −1.43 to −1.06) in PICM/CRVP-HF patients overall. Upgrade to CRT seemed to improve LVEF no less than de-novo CRT (SMD 0.24; 95%CI 0.05 to 0.43; P < 0.05). This meta-analysis suggested that upgrade CRT could improve the cardiac function in PICM/CRVP-HF patients. This strategy may be considered in these patients but require more evidence about the efficacy and procedure-related complications from prospective studies or randomized controlled trials.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Code availability

All used software applications and codes are available.

References

  1. Askenazi J, Alexander JH, Koenigsberg DI et al (1984) Alteration of left ventricular performance by left bundle branch block simulated with atrioventricular sequential pacing. Am J Cardiol 53:99–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(84)90691-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Tantengco MV, Thomas RL, Karpawich PP (2001) Left ventricular dysfunction after long-term right ventricular apical pacing in the young. J Am Coll Cardiol 37:2093–2100. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(01)01302-x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Merchant FM, Hoskins MH, Musat DL et al (2017) Incidence and time course for develo** heart failure with high-burden right ventricular pacing. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes 10:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.003564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dreger H, Maethner K, Bondke H et al (2012) Pacing-induced cardiomyopathy in patients with right ventricular stimulation for >15 years. Europace 14:238–242. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eur258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Merchant FM, Mittal S (2020) Pacing induced cardiomyopathy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 31:286–292. https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.14277

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sweeney MO, Hellkamp AS, Ellenbogen KA et al (2003) Adverse effect of ventricular pacing on heart failure and atrial fibrillation among patients with normal baseline QRS duration in a clinical trial of pacemaker therapy for sinus node dysfunction. Circulation 107:2932–2937. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000072769.17295.B1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sharma AD, Rizo-Patron C, Hallstrom AP et al (2005) Percent right ventricular pacing predicts outcomes in the DAVID trial. Heart Rhythm 2:830–834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2005.05.015

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Khurshid S, Epstein AE, Verdino RJ et al (2014) Incidence and predictors of right ventricular pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. Heart Rhythm 11:1619–1625. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2014.05.040

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kiehl EL, Makki T, Kumar R et al (2016) Incidence and predictors of right ventricular pacing-induced cardiomyopathy in patients with complete atrioventricular block and preserved left ventricular systolic function. Heart Rhythm 13:2272–2278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.09.027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Khurshid S, Obeng-Gyimah E, Supple GE et al (2018) Reversal of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy following cardiac resynchronization therapy. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 4:168–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2017.10.002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Vijayaraman P, Herweg B, Dandamudi G et al (2019) Outcomes of His-bundle pacing upgrade after long-term right ventricular pacing and/or pacing-induced cardiomyopathy: Insights into disease progression. Heart Rhythm 16:1554–1561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.03.026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Tops LF, Schalij MJ, Bax JJ (2009) The effects of right ventricular apical pacing on ventricular function and dyssynchrony implications for therapy. J Am Coll Cardiol 54:764–776. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.06.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Poçi D, Backman L, Karlsson T, Edvardsson N (2009) New or aggravated heart failure during long-term right ventricular pacing after AV junctional catheter ablation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 32:209–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.02204.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Eldadah ZA, Rosen B, Hay I et al (2006) The benefit of upgrading chronically right ventricle-paced heart failure patients to resynchronization therapy demonstrated by strain rate imaging. Heart Rhythm 3:435–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2005.12.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Witte KKA, Pipes RR, Nanthakumar K, Parker JD (2006) Biventricular pacemaker upgrade in previously paced heart failure patients–improvements in ventricular dyssynchrony. J Card Fail 12:199–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2005.12.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Delnoy PPHM, Ottervanger JP, Luttikhuis HO et al (2009) Long-term clinical response of cardiac resynchronization after chronic right ventricular pacing. Am J Cardiol 104:116–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2009.02.055

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Foley PWX, Muhyaldeen SA, Chalil S et al (2009) Long-term effects of upgrading from right ventricular pacing to cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with heart failure. Europace 11:495–501. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eup037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Nazeri A, Massumi A, Rasekh A et al (2010) Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with right ventricular pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 33:37–40. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2009.02594.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Paparella G, Sciarra L, Capulzini L et al (2010) Long-term effects of upgrading to biventricular pacing: differences with cardiac resynchronization therapy as primary indication. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 33:841–849. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2010.02701.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Morales MA, Startari U, Rossi G et al (2011) Reverse left ventricular remodeling is more likely in non ischemic cardiomyopathy patients upgraded to biventricular stimulation after chronic right ventricular pacing. Cardiovasc Ultrasound 9:41. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-7120-9-41

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Rickard J, Cheng A, Spragg D et al (2013) QRS narrowing is associated with reverse remodeling in patients with chronic right ventricular pacing upgraded to cardiac resynchronization therapy. Heart Rhythm 10:55–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2012.09.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Chang PC, Wo HT, Chen TH et al (2014) Remote past left ventricular function before chronic right ventricular pacing predicts responses to cardiac resynchronization therapy upgrade. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 37:454–463. https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.12291

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Schwerg M, Dreger H, Poller WC et al (2015) Efficacy of optimal medical therapy and cardiac resynchronization therapy upgrade in patients with pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 44:289–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-015-0059-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Gwag HB, Chun KJ, Hwang JK et al (2017) Comparison of de novo versus upgrade cardiac resynchronization therapy: focused on the upgrade for pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. Yonsei Med J 58:703–709. https://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2017.58.4.703

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Rickard J, Gorodeski EZ, Patel D et al (2019) Long term outcomes in patients with chronic right ventricular pacing upgraded to cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 30:1979–1983. https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.14038

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Brignole M, Auricchio A, Baron-Esquivias G, et al (2013) 2013 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy: the Task Force on cardiac pacing and resynchronization therapy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA). Eur Heart J 34:2281–2329. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/eht150

  27. Moran PS, Teljeur C, Harrington P, Ryan M (2015) A systematic review of intermittent pneumatic compression for critical limb ischaemia. Vasc Med 20:41–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/1358863X14552096

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Li H, Chen C, Hu F et al (2020) Impact of corticosteroid therapy on outcomes of persons with SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV, or MERS-CoV infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Leukemia 34:1503–1511. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41375-020-0848-3

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Barbosa RSD, Vieira-Coelho MA (2020) Probiotics and prebiotics: focus on psychiatric disorders - a systematic review. Nutr Rev 78:437–450. https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuz080

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. van Geldorp IE, Vernooy K, Delhaas T et al (2010) Beneficial effects of biventricular pacing in chronically right ventricular paced patients with mild cardiomyopathy. Europace 12:223–229. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eup378

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Delnoy PPHM, Ottervanger JP, Vos DHS et al (2011) Upgrading to biventricular pacing guided by pressure-volume loop analysis during implantation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 22:677–683. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8167.2010.01968.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Prinzen FW, Hunter WC, Wyman BT, McVeigh ER (1999) Map** of regional myocardial strain and work during ventricular pacing: experimental study using magnetic resonance imaging tagging. J Am Coll Cardiol 33:1735–1742. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(99)00068-6

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Cleland JGF, Daubert JC, Erdmann E et al (2005) The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure. N Engl J Med 352:1539–1549. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa050496

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. St John Sutton M, Plappert T, Adamson PB et al (2015) Left ventricular reverse remodeling with biventricular versus right ventricular pacing in patients with atrioventricular block and heart failure in the BLOCK HF trial. Circ Heart Fail 8:510–518. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.114.001626

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Moss AJ, Hall WJ, Cannom DS et al (2009) Cardiac-resynchronization therapy for the prevention of heart-failure events. N Engl J Med 361:1329–1338. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa0906431

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Solomon SD, Foster E, Bourgoun M et al (2010) Effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy on reverse remodeling and relation to outcome: multicenter automatic defibrillator implantation trial: cardiac resynchronization therapy. Circulation 122:985–992. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.955039

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Çelebi Ö, Knaus T, Blaschke F et al (2012) Extraordinarily favorable left ventricular reverse remodeling through long-term cardiac resynchronization: super-response to cardiac resynchronization. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 35:870–876. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2012.03417.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Verhaert D, Grimm RA, Puntawangkoon C et al (2010) Long-term reverse remodeling with cardiac resynchronization therapy: results of extended echocardiographic follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol 55:1788–1795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2010.01.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Killu AM, Grupper A, Friedman PA et al (2014) Predictors and outcomes of “super-response” to cardiac resynchronization therapy. J Card Fail 20:379–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2014.03.001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Fröhlich G, Steffel J, Hürlimann D et al (2010) Upgrading to resynchronization therapy after chronic right ventricular pacing improves left ventricular remodelling. Eur Heart J 31:1477–1485. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehq065

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Lee SA, Cha MJ, Cho Y et al (2016) Paced QRS duration and myocardial scar amount: predictors of long-term outcome of right ventricular apical pacing. Heart Vessels 31:1131–1139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00380-015-0707-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ng ACT, Allman C, Vidaic J et al (2009) Long-term impact of right ventricular septal versus apical pacing on left ventricular synchrony and function in patients with second- or third-degree heart block. Am J Cardiol 103:1096–1101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.12.029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Ter Horst IAH, Kuijpers Y, van ’t Sant J et al (2016) “Are CRT upgrade procedures more complex and associated with more complications than de novo CRT implantations?” A single centre experience. Neth Heart J 24:75–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-015-0771-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Nemer DM, Patel DR, Madden RA et al (2021) Comparative analysis of procedural outcomes and complications between de novo and upgraded cardiac resynchronization therapy. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 7:62–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacep.2020.07.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Cheung JW, Ip JE, Markowitz SM et al (2017) Trends and outcomes of cardiac resynchronization therapy upgrade procedures: a comparative analysis using a United States National Database 2003–2013. Heart Rhythm 14:1043–1050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.02.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Poole JE, Gleva MJ, Mela T et al (2010) Complication rates associated with pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator generator replacements and upgrade procedures: results from the REPLACE registry. Circulation 122:1553–1561. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.976076

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Klug D, Balde M, Pavin D et al (2007) Risk factors related to infections of implanted pacemakers and cardioverter-defibrillators: results of a large prospective study. Circulation 116:1349–1355. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.678664

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Shan P, Su L, Zhou X et al (2018) Beneficial effects of upgrading to His bundle pacing in chronically paced patients with left ventricular ejection fraction <50. Heart Rhythm 15:405–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.10.031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Wu S, Su L, Wang S et al (2019) Peri-left bundle branch pacing in a patient with right ventricular pacing-induced cardiomyopathy and atrioventricular infra-Hisian block. Europace 21:1038. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euz031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Qian Z, Wang Y, Hou X et al (2020) Efficacy of upgrading to left bundle branch pacing in patients with heart failure after right ventricular pacing. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.14147

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Author Wenzhao Lu and Ke** Chen came up with the conception and design of the study. Data collection was completed by Wenzhao Lu and **xuan Lin. Data analysis was performed by Wenzhao Lu, and the result interpretation was done by Wenzhao Lu and **xuan Lin. All the authors participated in drafting and revising the article. The final approval of the version to be submitted was performed by Yan Dai, Ke** Chen, and Shu Zhang.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ke** Chen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 1073 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lu, W., Lin, J., Dai, Y. et al. The therapeutic effects of upgrade to cardiac resynchronization therapy in pacing-induced cardiomyopathy or chronic right ventricular pacing patients: a meta-analysis. Heart Fail Rev 27, 507–516 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741-021-10091-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10741-021-10091-z

Keywords

Navigation