Abstract
The powerful method of multipole expansion has found wide utility in classical electromagnetics and quantum-mechanics. In contrast, the gravitational mechanics traditionally have only seen peripheral mentions of the corresponding (mass-density) multipoles in specific applications. In this paper, we develop the general theory of the multipole formalism for the classical two-body gravitational dynamics, a most prevalent subject in planetary (and global Earth) dynamics. We treat two general, well-encountered configurations: (i) the interior “mantle-inner core gravitational (MICG)” type of configuration consisting of concentric bodies; and (ii) the exterior type of configuration of “planet + satellite” separate bodies in the general form of tidal interactions. We derive concise and exact formulas in terms of multipole expansions; by retaining the leading term(s) of relevance, typically up to the quadrupolar terms that include the planetary triaxiality, one can evaluate to the precision desired while bearing in mind that higher subtleties are readily available in the higher multipole terms. The two-body problems that are so formulated range from potential energy, satellite orbit, to tides, librations of sorts and precession/nutation, to planetary rotational normal modes and wobbles. We demonstrate that, via its various symmetry properties, the multipole formalism provides a theoretical unification framework for these gravitational phenomena that are conventionally treated topic-by-topic in textbook literature.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10712-021-09650-8/MediaObjects/10712_2021_9650_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10712-021-09650-8/MediaObjects/10712_2021_9650_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10712-021-09650-8/MediaObjects/10712_2021_9650_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10712-021-09650-8/MediaObjects/10712_2021_9650_Fig4_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The work is theoretical in nature and involves no observational data.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Arfken GB, Weber HJ, Harris FE (2012) Mathematical methods for physicists. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2009-0-30629-7
Ashenberg J (2007) Mutual gravitational potential and torque of solid bodies via inertia integrals. Celest Mech Dyn Astron 99(2):149–159
Backus G, Parker R, Constable C (1996) Foundations of geomagnetism. Cambridge University Press, New York
Bills BG (1995) Discrepant estimates of moments of inertia of the Moon. J Geophys Res 100:26297–26303
Boué G (2017) The two rigid body interaction using angular momentum theory formulae. Celest Mech Dyn Astron 128(2–3):261–273
Buffett B (1996) Gravitational oscillations in the length of day. Geophys Res Lett 23:2279–2282
Bullen KE (1975) The Earth’s density. Chapman and Hall, London
Busse FH (1974) On the free oscillation of the Earth’s inner core. J Geophys Res 79:753
Busse FH (2002) Is low Rayleigh number convection possible in the Earth’s core? Geophys Res Lett. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001GL014597
Carlson BC, Morley GL (1963) Multipole expansion of Coulomb energy. Am J Phys 31:209. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1969367
Chao BF (1981) Symmetry and terrestrial spectroscopy. Geophys J R Astron Soc 66:285–312
Chao BF (1983) Normal mode study of the Earth’s rigid-body motions. J Geophys Res 88:9437–9442
Chao BF (1985) As the world turns. EOS Trans Am Geophys Union 46:766–770
Chao BF (2005) On inversion for mass distribution from global (time-variable) gravity field. J Geodyn 39:223–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jog.2004.11.001
Chao BF (2014) On gravitational energy associated with the Earth’s changing oblateness. Geophys J Int 199:800–804. https://doi.org/10.1093/gji/ggu301
Chao BF (2016) Caveats on the equivalent-water-thickness and surface mascon solutions derived from the GRACE satellite-observed time-variable gravity. J Geod 90(9):807–813. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00190-016-0912-y
Chao BF (2017a) Dynamics of axial torsional libration under the mantle-inner core gravitational interaction. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 122(1):560–571
Chao BF (2017b) Dynamics of the inner core wobble under mantle-inner core gravitational interactions. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 122(9):7437–7448
Chao BF (2017c) On rotational normal modes of the Earth: resonance, excitation, convolution, deconvolution and all that. Geod Geodyn. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geog.2017.03.014
Chao BF, Gross RS (1987) Changes in the Earth’s rotation and low-degree gravitational field induced by earthquakes. Geophys J Int 91(3):569–596
Chao BF, Rubincam DP (1989) The gravitational field of Phobos. Geophys Res Lett 16:859–862
Chao BF, Yu Y (2020) Variation of the equatorial moments of inertia associated with a 6-year westward rotary motion in the Earth. Earth Plant Sci Lett. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2020.116316
Chao BF, O’Connor WP, Chang ATC, Hall DK, Foster JL (1987) Snow-load effect on the Earth’s rotation and gravitational field 1979–1985. J Geophys Res 92:9415–9422
Chao BF, Dong DN, Liu HS, Herring TA (1991) Libration in the Earth’s rotation. Geophys Res Lett 18:2007–2010
Crossley D, Rochester MG, Peng ZR (1992) Slichter modes and Love numbers. Geophys Res Lett 91:755–794
D’Urso C, Adelberger EG (1997) Translation of multipoles for a 1/r potential. Phys Rev D 55(12):7970
Dahlen FA, Tromp J (1998) Theoretical global seismology. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Dehant V, Mathews PM (2015) Precession, nutation, and wobble of the Earth. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781316136133.014
Dickey JO, Bender PL, Faller JE, Newhall XX, Ricklefs RL, Ries JG, Shelus PJ, Veillet C, Whipple AL, Wiant JR, Williams JG, Yoder CF (1994) Lunar laser ranging: a continuing legacy of the Apollo program. Science 22:482–490
Ding H, Chao BF (2015) The Slichter mode of the Earth: Revisit with optimal stacking and autoregressive methods on full superconducting gravimeter dataset. J Geophys Res. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015JB012203
Dziewonski AM, Anderson DL (1981) Preliminary reference Earth model. Phys Earth Planet Int 25:297–356
Eckhardt D (1981) Theory of the libration of the Moon. Moon Planets 25:3–49
Edmonds AR (1957) Angular momentum in quantum mechanics. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Efroimsky M, Williams JG (2009) Tidal torques: a critical review of some techniques. Celest Mech Dyn Astron 104(3):257–289
Feynman RP, Leighton RB, Sands M (1964) Feynman lectures on physics. Addison-Wesley, Boston
Gray C (1979) Magnetic multipole expansions using the scalar potential. Am J Phys 47:457–459
Guo ZL, Shen WB (2020) Formulation of a triaxial three-layered earth rotation: theory and rotational normal mode solutions. J Geophys Res Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JB018571
Hirschfelder JO, Curtiss CF, Bird RB, Mayer MG (1954) Molecular theory of gases and liquids. Wiley, New York
Hofmann-Wellenhof B, Moritz H (2006) Physical geodesy. Springer Science & Business Media
Hou X, Scheeres DJ, **n X (2017) Mutual potential between two rigid bodies with arbitrary shapes and mass distributions. Celest Mech Dyn Astron 127(3):369–395
Jackson JD (1999) Classical electrodynamics. Wiley, New York
Kaula WM (1966) Theory of satellite geodesy. Blaisdell, Waltham
Kinoshita H (1977) Theory of the rotation of the rigid Earth. Cel Mech 15:277–326
Landau LD, Lifshitz EM (1965) Quantum mechanics, volume 3 of a course of theoretical physics. Pergamon Press
Landau LD, Lifshitz EM (1969) Mechanics, volume 1 of a course of theoretical physics. Pergamon Press
Landau LD, Lifshitz EM (1971) The classical theory of fields, volume 2 of a course of theoretical physics. Pergamon Press
Liu HS, Chao BF (1991) The Earth’s equatorial principal axes and moments of inertia. Geophys J Int 106(3):699–702
Lowes F, Duka B (2011) Magnetic multipole moments (Gauss coefficients) and vector potential given by an arbitrary current density distribution. Earth Planets Space 63:1–6. https://doi.org/10.5047/eps.2011.08.005
Maciejewski AJ (1995) Reduction, relative equilibria and potential in the two rigid bodies problem. Celest Mech Dyn Astron 63(1):1–28
Marchenko AN, Zayats AS (2011) Estimation of the gravitational potential energy of the earth based on different density models. Stud Geophys Geod 55:35–54
Mathews PM, Buffett BA, Herring TA, Shapiro II (1991) Forced nutations of the Earth: influence of inner core dynamics: 1. Theory. J Geophys Res 96:8219–8242. https://doi.org/10.1029/90JB01955
Mathews PM, Herring TA, Buffett BA (2002) Modeling of nutation and precession: new nutation series for non-rigid Earth, and insights into the Earth’s interior. J Geophys Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JB000390
Melchior P (1983) The tides of the planet Earth, 2nd edn. Pergamon Press, New York
Menke W (1989) Geophysical data analysis, discrete inverse theory. Academic Press, San Diego
Moons M (1982) Analytical theory of the libration of the Moon. Moon Planets 27:257–284
Morse PM, Feshbach H (1953) Methods of theoretical physics. McGraw-Hill, New York
Mound JE, Buffett BA (2003) Interannual oscillations in length of day: implications for the structure of the mantle and core. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 108(B7)
Mound JE, Buffett BA (2006) Detection of a gravitational oscillation in LOD. Earth Planet Sci Lett 243(3–4):383–389
Munk WE, MacDonald GJF (1960) The rotation of the Earth: a geophysical discussion. Cambridge University Press, New York
Murray CD, Dermott SF (1999) Solar system dynamics. Cambridge University Press, New York
Naidu SP, Margot JL (2015) Near-Earth asteroid satellite spins under spin-orbit coupling. Astron J 149(2):80
Newman R, Bantel M, Berg E, Cross W (2014) A measurement of G with a cryogenic torsion pendulum. Phil Trans R Soc A 372:20140025
Papoulis A (1965) Probability, random variables, and stochastic processes. McGraw-Hill, New York
Parker RL (1994) Geophysical inverse theory. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Phinney RA, Burridge R (1973) (1973) Representation of the elastic—gravitational excitation of a spherical Earth model by generalized spherical harmonics. Geophys J R Astr Soc 34:451–487. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365246X.1973.tb02407.x
Rambaux N, Williams J (2011) The Moon’s physical librations and determination of their free modes. Celest Mech Dyn Astron. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10569-010-9314-2
Rekier J, Triana SA, Trinh A, Dehant V (2020) Inertial modes of a freely rotating ellipsoidal planet and their relation to nutations. Planet Sci J 1(1):20
Rochester MG, Crossley D, Chao BF (2018) On the physics of the inner core wobble: corrections to “Dynamics of the inner-core wobble under mantle-inner core gravitational interactions” by B. F. Chao. J Geophys Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JB016506
Rosat S (2011) A review of the Slichter modes: an observational challenge. In: Phillips JM (ed) The Earth’s Core: structure, properties and dynamics. Nova Science Publishers Inc, Hauppauge, pp 63–77
Rotenberg M, Bivins R, Metropolis N, Wooten JK Jr (1959) The 3-j and 6-j Symbols. MIT Press, Cambridge
Rubincam DR (1979) Gravitational potential energy of the Earth: a spherical harmonic approach. J Geophys Res 84:6219–6225
Rubincam DP, Chao BF, Thomas PC (1995) The gravitational field of Deimos. Icarus 114:63–67
Shih SA, Chao BF (2020) Inner core and its libration under gravitational equilibrium: implications to lower-mantle density anomaly. J Geophys Res. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JB020541
Slichter LB (1961) The fundamental free mode of the Earth’s inner core. Proc Natl Acad Sci 47:186–190
Smith ML (1977) Wobble and nutation of the Earth. Geophys J R Astron Soc 50:103–140
Smylie DE, Szeto AMK, Rochester MG (1984) The dynamics of the Earth’s inner and outer cores. Rep Prog Phys 47:855–906
Snieder R (2001) A guided tour of mathematical methods for the physical sciences. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Stacey FD, Davis PM (2008) Physics of the Earth. Cambridge University Press, New York
Steinborn EO, Ruedenberg K (1973) Rotation and translation of regular and irregular solid spherical harmonics. Adv Quantum Chem 7:1–81
Stirling J (2017) Multipole calculation of gravitational forces. Phys Rev D. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.95.124059
Stirling J, Schlamminger S (2019) Closed form expressions for gravitational multipole moments of elementary solids. Phys Rev D 100(12):124053. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.100.124053
Szeto AMK, Xu S (1997) Gravitational coupling in a triaxial ellipsoidal Earth. J Geophys Res 102:27651–27657
Tapley BD, Bettadpur S, Ries J, Thompson PF, Watkins MM (2004) GRACE measurements of mass variability in the Earth system. Science 305:503–505
Thorne KS (1980) Multipole expansions of gravitational radiation. Rev Mod Phys 52(2):299–339. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.52.299
Thornton ST, Marion JB (2004) Classical dynamics of particles and systems. Cengage Learning, Boston
Torge W (1989) Gravimetry. Walter de Gruyter and Co, Berlin
Tough RJA, Stone AJ (1977) Properties of the regular and irregular solid harmonics. J Phys A Math Gen 10(8):1261–1269. https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/10/8/004
Trenkel C, Speake CC (1999) Interaction potential between extended bodies. Phys Rev D 60(10):107501
Van Hoolst T, Rambaux N, Karatekin Ö, Dehant V, Rivoldini A (2008) The librations, shape, and icy shell of Europa. Icarus 195(1):386–399
Wahr JM, Molenaar M, Bryan F (1998) Time variability of the Earth’s gravity field: hydrological and oceanic effects and their possible detection using GRACE. J Geophys Res 103:30205–30229
Acknowledgements
We thank the two anonymous reviewers for substantial improvements of the paper. This work is supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan via Grant #109-2116-M-001-028. The content is theoretical in nature and involves no observational data. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
SAS is instrumental in the verification and interpretations of all the equations, and initiated the enlargement to planetary dynamic problems.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Chao, B.F., Shih, SA. Multipole Expansion: Unifying Formalism for Earth and Planetary Gravitational Dynamics. Surv Geophys 42, 803–838 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-021-09650-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10712-021-09650-8