Log in

The Effect of Lightweight Expanded Clay Aggregate on the Mitigation of Liquefaction in Shaking Table

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Geotechnical and Geological Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Non-conventional materials are often applied to dissipate the energy of dynamic loads and mitigate liquefaction. In this study, the effect of Lightweight Expanded Clay Aggregate (LECA) on the mitigation of liquefaction was examined using shaking table tests. LECA, a common lightweight material, was added to saturated sand in a range of 0–20% to study the variation of excess pore water pressure (EPWP) generation, as well as the acceleration response of the soil. Based on the obtained results, the addition of 5% and 10% LECA to saturated sand resulted in a significant decrease in the generation of EPWP, while higher LECA content led to an increase in the generation of EPWP. The mechanisms behind such behaviors contradict the effects of increasing the dam** of the soil mixture and reducing the effective initial stress as a function of overall mixture density. Adding 5 and 10% LECA reduces EPWP because aggregates accelerate the dissipation of EPWP during and after vibration. As the percentage of LECA increases by 15% and 20%, excess pore pressure ratio increases. The cause of this may be the reduction of effective initial stress leading to reduced soil density in higher-LECA contents. 10% LECA is presented as the threshold for changing the liquefaction behavior of sand-LECA mixtures. This study concludes that adding LECA to sand samples increases the rate of dissipation of EPWP, but also leads to a significant decrease in initial effective stress.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdoun T, Dobry R, O’Rourke TD, Goh SH (2003) Pile response to lateral spreads: centrifuge modeling. J Geotech Geoenvironmental Eng 129:869–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arulanandan K, Scott RF (1993) Verification of numerical procedures for the analysis of soil liquefaction problems. Proceedings of the international conference on the verification of numerical procedures for the analysis of soil liquefaction problems, Davis, California, USA

  • ASTM D422 (2007) Standard test method for particle-size analysis of soils. ASTM international

  • Bouckovalas GD, Papadimitriou AG, Niarchos D (2009) Gravel drains for the remediation of liquefiable sites: the Seed and Booker (1977) approach revisited, Int Conf Performance-Based Design in Earthquake

  • Brandenberg SJ, Boulanger RW, Kutter BL, Chang D (2005) Behaviour of pile foundations in laterally spreading ground during centrifuge tests. J Geotech Geoenvironmental Eng 131:1378–1391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aj B, Madabhushi SPG (2006) Liquefaction remediation by vertical drains with varying penetration depths. J Soil DynEarthqEng 26:469–475

    Google Scholar 

  • Berrill JB, Davis RO (1985) Energy dissipation and seismic liquefaction of sands: revised model. Soils Found. 25(2):106–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng L, Shahin M, Cord-Ruwisch R (2014) Bio-cementation of sandy soil using microbial-induced carbonate precipitation (MICP) for marine environments. Geotechnique 64(2):1010–1013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dash HK, Sitharam TG (2016) Effect of frequency of cyclic loading on liquefaction and dynamic properties of saturated sand. Int J Geotech Eng 10(5):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devecioğlu AG, Biçer Y (2016) The effects of tragacanth addition on the thermal and mechanical properties of lightweight concretes mixed with expanded clay. Period Polytech Civ Eng 60(1):45–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobry R, Taboada V, Liu L (1995) Centrifuge modelling of liquefaction effects during earthquakes. Proceedings of the First international conference on Earthq. Geotech. Eng. (ISTokyo), Keynote Lecture, Tokyo, Japan, AA Balkema, Rotterdam/Brookfield, 1291–1324

  • Dordio A (2013) Carvalho AJ (2013) Constructed wetlands with light expanded clay aggregates for agricultural wastewater treatment. Sci Total Environ 1(463–464):454–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drnevich VP, Richart FE (1970) Dynamic prestraining of dry sand. J Soil Mech Found Div 96(2):435–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ecemis N (2013) Simulation of seismic liquefaction: 1-g model testing system and shaking table tests. Eur J Environ Civ Eng 17(10):899–919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebrahimi M, Ghorbani A, Jafarian Y (2014) Effect of plastic fines on undrained resistance of Anzali sand. Amirkabir J Sci & Res (Civ & Env Eng) 46(2):45–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Elgamal A, Zeghal M, Taboada V, Dobry R (1996) Analysis of site liquefaction and lateral spreading using centrifuge testing records. Soils Found 36:111–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El Mohtar C.S (2008) Pore fluid engineering: an auto-adaptive design for liquefaction mitigation. Ph.D. dissertation, Purdue Univ, West Lafayette, IN

  • El Mohtar CS, Bobet A, Santagata MC, Drnevich VP, Johnston CT (2013) Liquefaction mitigation using bentonite suspensions. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 139:1369–1380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El Mohtar CS, Bobet A, Drnevich VP, Johnston CT, Santagata MC (2014) Pore pressure generation in sand with bentonite: from small strains to liquefaction. Ge′otechnique 64(2):108–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figueroa JL, Saada AS, Liang L, Dahisaria NM (1994) Evaluation of soil liquefaction by energy principles. J Geotech Eng 120:1554–1569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher PM, Conlee CT, Rollins KM (2007a) Full-scale field testing of colloidal silica grouting for mitigation of liquefaction risk. J Geotech Geo Environ Eng 133(2):186–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher PM, Pamuk A, Abdoun T (2007b) Stabilization of liquefiable soils using colloidal silica grout. J Mater Civ Eng 19(1):33–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Georgiannou V, Tsomokos A, Stavrou K (2008) Monotonic and cyclic behaviour of sand under torsional loading. Géotechnique 58(2):113–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haigh SK, Madabhushi SPG (2005) The effect of pile flexibility on pile-loading in lateral spreading slopes. In: R. W. Boulanger & K. Tokimatsu (Eds.). Geotechnical Special Publications, 145. 24–37

  • Hall MR (2010) Materials for Energy efficiency and thermal comfort in buildings. Woodhead Publishing Series in Energy, Elsevier

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hamouz V, Lohne J, Wood JR, Muthanna TM (2018) Hydrological performance of LECA-based roofs in cold climates. Water 10(3):263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hazarika H, Yasuhara K, Hyodo M, Karmokar AK, Mitarai Y (2008) Mitigation of earthquake induced geotechnical disasters using a smart and novel geomaterial. The 14th World conference on earthquake engineering October 12–17 Bei**g, China

  • He J, Ivanov V, Chu J (2013) Mitigation of liquefaction of saturated sand using biogas. Geo tech 63(4):267–275

    Google Scholar 

  • He L, Elgamal A, Abdoun T, Abe A, Dobry R, Meneses J, Tokimatsu K (2006) Lateral load on piles due to liquefaction-induced lateral spreading during 1g shake table experiments. Proceedings of the eighth US national conference on earthquake eng, no 881, San Francisco, EERI, Oakland, CA

  • Huang C, Sui Z, Wang L, Liu K (2015) Mitigation of soil liquefaction using stone columns-an experimental investigation. Mar Geo resour Geotechnol 34(3):244–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiri Z, Michala H, Jitka H (2009) Possibilities of determination of thermal conductivity of lightweight concrete with utilization of non-stationary hot-wire method. The 10PthP international conference of the slovenian society for non-destructive testing, application of contemporary non-destructive testing in engineering, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 207–213

  • Kawata S, Hyodo M, Orense RP, Yamada S, Hazarika H (2008) Undrained and drained shear behavior of sand and tire chips composite material. In: Proceedings of the international workshop on scrap tire derived geomaterials-opportunities and challenges, IW-TDGM 2007 277–283

  • Kayen RE, Mitchell J (1997) Assessment of liquefaction potential during earthquakes by Arias intensity. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 12:1162–1174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumari S, Sawant VA, Sahoo PP (2016) Assessment of Effect of Cyclic Frequency and Soil Modulus on Liquefaction Using Coupled FEA. Indian Geotech J 46:124–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee KL, Albaisa A (1974) Earthquake induced settlements in saturated sands. J Geo tech Geoenviron Eng 100:387–406

    Google Scholar 

  • Machado AI, Dordio A, Fragoso R, Leitao AE, Duarte E (2017) Furosemide removal in constructed wetlands: comparative efficiency of LECA and Cork granulates as support matrix. J Environ Manag 203:422–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maduro IJ, Molina CR, Castillo LV, Renoud-Lias B, Salvi GJ (2004) The use of stone columns on settlement and liquefaction susceptible soils. 5th int Conf Case Hist Geotech Eng

  • Movahedi N, Linul E (2018) Mechanical properties of light expanded clay aggregated (LECA) filled tubes. Mater Lett. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2018.01.078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nkansah MA, Christy AA, Barth T, Francis GW (2012) The use of lightweight expanded clay aggregate (LECA) as sorbent for PAHs removal from water. J Hazard Mater 360(5):217–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Ochoa-Cornejo F (2017) Dynamic behavior of sand with nanoparticles. Proceedings of the 19th Int Conf Soil Mech Geotech Eng

  • Ochoa-Cornejo F, Bobet A, El Howayek A, Johnston CT, Santagata M, Sinfield JV (2017) Discussion on: laboratory investigation of liquefaction mitigation in silty sand using nanoparticles Eng. Geol. 204: 23–32]. Eng Geol 216:161–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ochoa-Cornejo F, Bobet A, Johnston CT, Santagata M, Sinfield JV (2016) Cyclic behavior and pore pressure generation in sands with laponite, a super-plastic nanoparticle. Soil Dyn 88:265–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ochoa-Cornejo F, Bobet A, Johnston C, Santagata M, Sinfield JV (2020) Dynamic properties of a sand-nanoclay composite. Géotechnique 70:210-225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otsubo M, Towhatab I, Hayashidac T, Liub B, Goto S (2016) Shaking table tests on liquefaction mitigation of embedded lifelines by backfilling with recycled materials foundations. Soil Found 65(3):365–378

  • Papadimitriou A, Moutsopoulou M, Bouckovalas G, Brennan A (2007) Numerical investigation of liquefaction mitigation using gravel drains. 4th Int Conf Earthq Geotech Eng, Paper number 1548

  • Paul S, Babu G (2014) Mechanical properties of light weight aggregate geopolymer concrete using light weight expanded clay aggregate. Trans EngSci 2(10):33–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Polito CP (1999) The effects of non-plastic and plastic fines on the liquefaction of sandy soils. Dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

  • Rugg DA, Yoon J, Hwang H, El Mohtar CS (2011) Undrained shearing properties of sand permeated with a bentonite suspension for static liquefaction mitigation. In Geo-Frontiers 2011: advances in geotechnical engineering-proceedings of the geo-frontiers 2011 conference 677–686

  • Sajedi F, Shafigh P (2012) High-strength lightweight concrete using Leca, silica fume, and limestone. Arab J SciEng 37:1885–1893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santagata M, Bobet A, El-Howayek A, Ochoa-Cornejo F, Sinfield JV, Johnston CT (2014) Building a nanostructure in the pore fluid of granular soils. In: Soga et al. (Eds.), Geomechanics from Micro to Macro. Taylor & Francis Group, London, UK 1377–1383

  • Sousa H, Carvalho A, Melo A (2004) A new sound insulation lightweight concrete masonry block. Design and experimental characterization. 13th International brick and block masonry conference

  • Suzuki H, Tokimatsu K, Sato M, Abe A (2005) Factor affecting horizontal subgrade reaction of piles during soil liquefaction and lateral spreading. In R. Boulanger & K. Tokimatsu (Eds.) Seismic performance and simulation of pile foundations in liquefied and laterally spreading ground (pp. 1–10). Geotechnical Special Publications No 145

  • Tamura S, Tokimatsu K (2005) Seismic earth pressure acting on embedded footing based on large-scale shaking table tests. In R. W. Boulanger & K. Tokimatsu, (Eds.) Geotechnical Special Publications 145 83–96

  • Tang L, Cong S, Ling X, Lu J, Elgamal A (2015) Numerical study on ground improvement for liquefaction mitigation using stone columns encased with geosynthetics. J Geotext Geomembr 43:190–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thevanayagam S, Kanagalingam T, Reinhorn A, Tharmendhira R, Dobry R, Pitman M, El Shamy U (2009) Laminar box system for 1-g physical modelling of liquefaction and lateral spreading. J ASTM Geotech Test 32:438–449

    Google Scholar 

  • Thevanayagam S, Liang J, Shenthan T (2000) A contact index for liquefaction potential analysis of silty/gravely soils. EM2000, Proc. 14th ASCE EMD Spec Conf, Tassoulas, ed., Austin, Texas

  • Towhata I, Sesov V, Motamed R, Gonzalez M (2006) Model tests on lateral earth pressure on large group pile exerted by horizontal displacement of liquefied sandy ground. Proceedings of the eighth US National conference on earthq. eng, no.1227, San Francisco, CA, EERI, Oakland, CA

  • Troncoso JH (1990) Failure risks of abandoned tailing dams. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on safety and rehabilitation of tailing dams, International commission on large dams

  • Uchimura T, Nguyen AC, Nirmalan S, Sato T, Meidani M, Towhata I (2008) Shaking table tests on effects of tire chips and sand mixture in increasing liquefaction resistance and mitigating uplift of pipe. In: Hazarika, Yasuhara (Eds.), Proceedings of the international workshop on scrap tire derived geomaterials–opportunities and challenges, London:179–186

  • Xenaki VC, Athanasopoulos GA (2003) Liquefaction resistance of sand–silt mixtures: an experimental investigation of the effect of fines. Soil DynEarthqEng 23:183–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeybek A, Madabhushi SPG (2017) Influence of air injection on the liquefaction-induced deformation mechanisms beneath shallow foundations. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 97:266–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Ghorbani.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ghorbani, A., Rabanifar, H. The Effect of Lightweight Expanded Clay Aggregate on the Mitigation of Liquefaction in Shaking Table. Geotech Geol Eng 39, 1861–1875 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-020-01592-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-020-01592-z

Keywords

Navigation