Log in

Investigating the Application of a Hybrid Space Discretisation for Urban Scale Evacuation Simulation

  • Published:
Fire Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The devastating effects of wildfires cannot be overlooked; these include massive resettlement of people, destruction of property and loss of lives. The considerable distances over which wild fires spread and the rates at which these fires can spread is a major concern as this places considerable challenges on the evacuation mechanisms that need to be put in place. It is therefore crucial for personnel, involved in evacuation planning, to obtain reliable estimates of evacuation times faster than real time, to assist their decision making in response to actual unfolding of events. In this work, we present a hybrid approach, which we refer to as the Hybrid Spatial Discretisation (HSD) for large scale evacuation simulation. The HSD integrates the three spatial representation techniques typically used for representing space usage in evacuation models; namely Coarse regions, Fine nodes and Continuous regions. In this work, we describe the core models constituting the HSD coupled with the approaches used for representing the transition of agents across the different spatial types. Using a large scale case, we demonstrate how the HSD can be used to obtain higher resolution of results where it is most required while optimising the use of available computational resources for the overall simulation. The HSD is seen to provide improvements in run times of more than 40% when compared to modelling the whole area using just the Fine node method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. WorldAtlas (2018) Largest fires in the world. https://www.worldatlas.com/articles/the-blaze-of-oblivion-the-top-deadliest-wildfires-in-the-world.html. Accessed Feb 2018.

  2. Cohen, J. (2008). The wildland–urban interface fire problem, A Consequence of the Fire Exclusion Paradigm. https://foresthistory.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Cohen.pdf. Accessed 25 Feb 2018.

  3. Westhaver A (2016) Why some homes survived: learning from the fort McMurray wildfire disaster. Institute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction, Ontario.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lindell MK (2008) EMBLEM2: an empirically based large scale evacuation time estimate model. Transp Res A 42(2008):140–154.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen X, Meaker JW, Zhan FB (2006) Agent-based modeling and analysis of hurricane evacuation procedures for the Florida Keys. Nat Hazards 38(2006):321–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kuligowski ED , Peacock RD , Hoskins BL (2010) A review of building evacuation models, Technical Note 1680, 2nd edn. Fire Research Division Engineering Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Washington.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lammel G, Grether D, Nagel K (2010) The representation and implementation of time-dependent inundation in large-scale microscopic evacuation simulations. Transp Res C 18:84–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lovreglio R, Ronchi E, Maragkos G, Beji T, Merci B (2016) A dynamic approach for the impact of a toxic gas dispersion hazard considering human behaviour and dispersion modelling. J Hazard Mater 318(2016):758–771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ronchi E, Uriz FN, Criel X, Reilly P (2016) Modelling large-scale evacuation of music festivals. Case Stud Fire Saf 5(2016):11–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chooramun N, Lawrence PJ, Galea ER (2012) An agent based evacuation model utilising hybrid space discretisation. Saf Sci 50(8):1685–1694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Vassalos D, Guarin L, Vassalos GC, Bole M, Kim H, Majumder J (2003) Advanced evacuation analysis—testing the ground on ships. In: Proceedings of conference on pedestrian and evacuation dynamics, Greenwich 2003.

  12. Gloor C, Stucki P, Nagel K (2004) Hybrid techniques for pedestrian simulations. In: Proceedings of 4th Swiss transport research conference, Ascona 2004.

  13. **ong M, Tang S, Zhao D (2013) A hybrid model for simulating crowd evacuation. New Gener Comput 31(3):211–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. **ong M, Lees M, Cai W, Zhou S, Low MYH (2012) Hybrid modelling of crowd simulation. Procedia Comput Sci 1(1):57–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Tissera PC, Printista M, Luque E (2012) A hybrid simulation model to test behaviour designs in an emergency evacuation. Procedia Comput Sci 9(2012):266–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Galea ER, Galparsoro JMP (1994) A computer based simulation model for the prediction of evacuation from mass transport vehicles. Fire Saf J 22:341–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gwynne S, Galea ER, Lawrence PJ, Filippidis L (2001) Modelling occupant interaction with fire conditions using the building EXODUS evacuation model. Fire Saf J 36:327–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Galea ER, Wang Z, Veeraswamy A, Jia F, Lawrence PJ, Ewer J (2008) Coupled fire/evacuation analysis of the station nightclub fire. In: Proceedings of 9th IAFSS symposium Karlsruhe 2008, pp 465–476.

  19. Galea ER, Sharp G, Lawrence PJ (2008) Investigating the representation of merging behavior at the floor stair interface in computer simulations of multi-floor building evacuations. J Fire Prot Eng 18:291–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chooramun N (2011) Implementing a hybrid spatial discretisation within an agent based evacuation model. Thesis, University of Greenwich.

  21. Hui X, Filippidis L, Gwynne S, Galea ER, Blackshields D, Lawrence PJ (2007) Signage legibility distances as a function of observation angle. J Fire Prot Eng 17(1):41–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pretorius M, Gwynne S, Galea ER (2015) Large crowd modelling: an analysis of the Duisburg love parade disaster. Fire Mater 39(4):301–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Oberhagemann D (2012) Static and dynamic crowd densities at major public events, Technical Report VFDB TB 13-01, German Fire Protection Association.

  24. Anderson J , Shiers D, Steele K (2009) The green guide to specification, 4th edn. IHS BRE Press, Watford.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Fruin J (1971) Pedestrian and planning design. Educational Services Division, Elevator World Inc., Alabama.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kholshevnikov V, Samoshin D (2008) Laws of motion of pedestrian flow-basics for evacuation modeling and management. In: Environmental security, NATO science for peace and security series C, pp 417–442.

  27. Nelson H, Mowrer F (2002) The SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering, 3rd edn. Society of Fire Protection Engineers, Bethesda.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Reynolds CW (1999) Steering behaviors for autonomous characters. in: the proceedings of game developers conference 1999, San Jose. Miller Freeman Game Group, San Francisco, pp 763–782.

  29. Buckmann LT, Leather J (1994) Modelling station congestion the PEDROUTE way. Traffic Eng Control 35:373–377.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Transport Watch UK (2010) Facts sheet 3: Widths and headroom. http://www.transport-watch.co.uk/transport-fact-sheet-3.htm. Accessed 29 Nov 2010.

  31. Department for Transport (2010) Inclusive Mobility. http://www.dft.gov.uk/transportforyou/access/peti/inclusivemobility?page=3. Accessed 29 Nov 2010.

  32. Ronchi E, Rein G, Gwynne SMV, Intini P, Wadhwani R (2017) Framework for an integrated simulation system for wildland–urban interface fire evacuation. Proc Int Conf Res Adv Technol Fire Saf 2017:119–134.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Wood N, Jones J, Peters J, Richards K (2018) Pedestrian evacuation modeling to reduce vehicle use for distant tsunami evacuations in Hawai'i. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct (in press).

  34. Di Mauro M, Megawati K, Cedillos V, Tucker B (2013) Tsunami risk reduction for densely populated Southeast Asian cities: analysis of vehicular and pedestrian evacuation for the city of Padang, Indonesia, and assessment of interventions. Nat Hazards 68(2):373–404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nitish Chooramun.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chooramun, N., Lawrence, P.J. & Galea, E.R. Investigating the Application of a Hybrid Space Discretisation for Urban Scale Evacuation Simulation. Fire Technol 55, 391–413 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-018-0742-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-018-0742-y

Keywords

Navigation