Abstract
The growing need for sustainable and low-carbon energy sources has led to significant research in alternative fuels. The majority of energy produced today comes from fossil fuels, which has led to enormous emissions of greenhouse gases. The direct combustion of fossil fuels produces syngas and hydrogen, which contribute to global warming. In contrast, the gasification process of biomass produces clean energy in the form of syngas and hydrogen. The biomass and plastic co-gasification has gained a lot of attention recently due to the challenges associated with gasifying biomass and plastic wastes separately. The broader objectives of this study are to alleviate these waste management problems and optimize the syngas LHV and H2 content using co-gasification process. The synthesis gas is a crucial intermediary used to create chemicals and fuels for transportation. The hydrogen component of synthesis gas can also be utilized directly as fuel for hydrogen fuel cells, which produce electricity. This work employs Aspen simulator to analyze an optimum processing condition where the synthesis gas has the maximum feasible hydrogen content and calorific value which has not been investigated in the available literature so far. Aspen software is used in this study since it can be useful in figuring out reaction yield and performing parametric studies to optimize process conditions. It is found that the carbon dioxide emission sharply decreases as the proportion of plastic increases in co-gasification. The mole fractions of CO, H2 and CO2 that the current model predicts using experimental data on rice husk have average modeling errors of less than 8%, indicating a satisfactory fit with the experimental findings. Under 1 bar of pressure and a combined feed rate of 100 kg/h for both plastic and biomass, the simulation was run at temperatures between 550 °C and 1300 °C. When steam was added, the fraction of hydrogen increased by approximately a factor of two for a steam-to-biomass ratio (SBR) of 2. Following the addition of plastic to the feed, the amount of hydrogen in the produced gas rose for all temperatures. When 15% plastic is combined with the feed at 850 °C, carbon dioxide is reduced by roughly 60%. The results indicate significant increase in calorific value of the product as well as the hydrogen proportion—suggesting plastic addition as an excellent method to improve the LHV of biomass gasification.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author.
References
Abbasi, T., Premalatha, M., & Abbasi, S. A. (2011). The return to renewables: Will it help in global warming control? Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15(1), 891–894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.09.048
Abdel-Shafy, H. I., & Mansour, M. S. M. (2018). Solid waste issue: Sources, composition, disposal, recycling, and valorization. Egyptian Journal of Petroleum, 27(4), 1275–1290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpe.2018.07.003
Ahmed, I. I., Nipattummakul, N., & Gupta, A. K. (2011). Characteristics of syngas from co-gasification of polyethylene and woodchips. Applied Energy, 88, 165–174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2010.07.007
Alhashimi, H. A., & Aktas, C. B. (2017). Life cycle environmental and economic performance of biochar compared with activated carbon: A meta-analysis. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 118, 13–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2016.11.016
Balasubramanian, R., Abishek, A., Gobinath, S., & Jaivignesh, K. (2022). Alternative fuel: Hydrogen and its thermodynamic behavior. Journal of Human, Earth, and Future, 3(2), 195–203. https://doi.org/10.28991/HEF-2022-03-02-05
Baloch, H. A., Yang, T., Li, R., Nizamuddin, S., Kai, X., & Bhutto, A. W. (2016). Parametric study of co-gasification of ternary blends of rice straw, polyethylene and polyvinylchloride. Clean Technology and Environmental Policy, 18, 1031–1042. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-016-1092-4
Block, C., Ephraim, A., Weiss-Hortala, E., Minh, D. P., Nzihou, A., & Vandecasteele, C. (2019). Co-Pyrogasification of plastics and biomass, a review. Waste and Biomass Valorization, 10, 483–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-018-0219-8
Brachi, P., Chirone, R., Miccio, F., Miccio, M., Picarelli, A., & Ruoppolo, G. (2014). Fluidized bed co-gasification of biomass and polymeric wastes for a flexible end-use of the syngas: Focus on bio-methanol. Fuel, 128, 88–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2014.02.070
Cao, C., Bian, C., Wang, G., Bai, B., **e, Y., & **, H. (2020). Co-gasification of plastic wastes and soda lignin in supercritical water. Chemical Engineering Journal, 388, 124277. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEJ.2020.124277
Couto, N., Monteiro, E., Silva, V., & Rouboa, A. (2016). Hydrogen-rich gas from gasification of Portuguese municipal solid wastes. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 41(25), 10619–10630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.04.091
Demirbas, A. (2004). Combustion characteristics of different biomass fuels. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 30(2), 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2003.10.004
Devi, L., Ptasinski, K. J., & Janssen, F. J. J. G. (2003). A review of the primary measures for tar elimination in biomass gasification processes. Biomass and Bioenergy, 24, 125–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(02)00102-2
Diblasi, C. (2008). Modeling chemical and physical processes of wood and biomass pyrolysis. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 34(1), 47–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2006.12.001
Edenhofer, O., Madruga, R. P., & Sokona, Y. (2011). Renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139151153
Fan, H., Gu, J., Hu, S., Yuan, H., & Chen, Y. (2019). Co-pyrolysis and co-gasification of biomass and polyethylene: Thermal behaviors, volatile products and characteristics of their residues. Journal of the Energy Institute, 92, 1926–1935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joei.2018.11.002
Faraji, M., & Saidi, M. (2021). Hydrogen-rich syngas production via integrated configuration of pyrolysis and air gasification processes of various algal biomass: Process simulation and evaluation using Aspen Plus software. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 46(36), 18844–18856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.03.047
Geyer, R., Jambeck, J. R., & Law, K. L. (2017). Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. Science Advances. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1700782
Ghorbannezhad, P., Park, S., & Onwudili, J. A. (2020). Co-pyrolysis of biomass and plastic waste over zeolite- and sodium-based catalysts for enhanced yields of hydrocarbon products. Waste Management, 102, 909–918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.12.006
Han, J., Liang, Y., Hu, J., Qin, L., Street, J., Lu, Y., & Yu, F. (2017). Modeling downdraft biomass gasification process by restricting chemical reaction equilibrium with Aspen Plus. Energy Conversion and Management, 153(1), 641–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.10.030
He, J., Yang, Z., **ong, S., Guo, M., Yan, Y., Ran, J., & Zhang, L. (2020). Experimental and thermodynamic study of banana peel non-catalytic gasification characteristics. Waste Management, 113, 369–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.06.006
Huber, G. W., Iborra, S., & Corma, A. (2006). Synthesis of transportation fuels from biomass: Chemistry, catalysts, and engineering. Chemical Reviews, 106(9), 4044–4098. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr068360d
Inayat, M., Sulaiman, S. A., Kurnia, J. C., & Shahbaz, M. (2019). Effect of various blended fuels on syngas quality and performance in catalytic co-gasification: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 105, 252–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.01.059
International energy agency (IEA), Bioenergy annual report (2017). Retrieved August 28, 2023, from https://www.ieabioenergy.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/05/IEA-BioenergyAnnual-Report-2019-Rev-26-May-2020.pdf
Kasataka, K., Kumagai, S., Kameda, T., Saito, Y., & Yoshioka, T. (2020). Enhancement of gasification and liquefaction during fast co-pyrolysis of cedar wood and polyethylene through control of synergistic interactions. Bioresource Technology Reports., 11, 100431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2020.100431
Kaygusuz, K. (2011). Energy for sustainable development: A case of develo** countries. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(2), 1116–1126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.11.013
Keche, A. J., Gaddale, A. P. R., & Tated, R. G. (2015). Simulation of biomass gasification in downdraft gasifier for different biomass fuels using Aspen Plus. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 17(2), 465–473. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-014-0804-x
Khonde, R., & Chaurasia, A. (2016). Rice husk gasification in a two-stage fixed-bed gasifier: Production of hydrogen rich syngas and kinetics. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 41(21), 8793–8802. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.03.138
Khonde, R., Nanda, J., & Chaurasia, A. (2018). Experimental investigation of catalytic cracking of rice husk tar for hydrogen production. Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management, 20(2), 1310–1319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-017-0695-0
Lopez, G., Erkiaga, A., Amutio, M., Bilbao, J., & Olazar, M. (2015). Effect of polyethylene co-feeding in the steam gasification of biomass in a conical spouted bed reactor. Fuel, 153, 393–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2015.03.006
Mastellone, M. L., Zaccariello, L., & Arena, U. (2010). Co-gasification of coal, plastic waste and wood in a bubbling fluidized bed reactor. Fuel, 89(10), 2991–3000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2010.05.019
Miandad, R., Nizami, A. S., Rehan, M., Barakat, M. A., Khan, M. I., Mustafa, A., Ismail, I. M. I., & Murphy, J. D. (2016). Influence of temperature and reaction time on the conversion of polystyrene waste to pyrolysis liquid oil. Waste Management, 58, 250–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2016.09.023
Mishra, S., & Upadhyay, R. K. (2021). Review on biomass gasification: Gasifiers, gasifying mediums, and operational parameters. Materials Science for Energy Technologies, 4, 329–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mset.2021.08.009
Moghadam, R. A., Yusup, S., Uemura, Y., Chin, B. L. F., Lam, H. L., & Shoaibi, A. A. (2014). Syngas production from palm kernel shell and polyethylene waste blend in fluidized bed catalytic steam co-gasification process. Energy, 75, 40–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2014.04.062
Moretti, L., Arpino, F., Cortellessa, G., Di Fraia, S., Di Palma, M., & Vanoli, L. (2021). Reliability of equilibrium gasification models for selected biomass types and compositions: An overview. Energies, 15(1), 61. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15010061
Mukherjee, C., Denney, J., Mbonimpa, E. G., Slagley, J., & Bhowmik, R. (2020). A review on municipal solid waste-to-energy trends in the USA. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 119, 10951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109512
Mutlu, Ö. Ç., & Zeng, T. (2020). Challenges and opportunities of modeling biomass gasification in Aspen Plus: A review. Chemical Engineering and Technology, 43(9), 1674–1689. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.202000068
Neves, D., Thunman, H., Matos, A., Tarelho, L., & Gómez-Barea, A. (2011). Characterization and prediction of biomass pyrolysis products. Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, 37(5), 611–630. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2011.01.001
Nikoo, M. B., & Mahinpey, N. (2008). Simulation of biomass gasification in fluidized bed reactor using Aspen Plus. Biomass and Bioenergy, 32(12), 1245–1254. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOMBIOE.2008.02.020
Nipattummakul, N., Ahmed, I. I., Kerdsuwan, S., & Gupta, A. K. (2010). Hydrogen and syngas production from sewage sludge via steam gasification. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 35(21), 11738–11745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2010.08.032
Nistratov, A. V., Klimenko, N. N., Pustynnikov, I. V., & Vu, L. K. (2022). Thermal regeneration and reuse of carbon and glass fibers from waste composites. Emerging Science Journal, 6(5), 967–984. https://doi.org/10.28991/ESJ-2022-06-05-04
Nunes, S. M., Paterson, N., Herod, A. A., Dugwell, D. R., & Kandiyoti, R. (2008). Tar formation and destruction in a fixed bed reactor simulating downdraft gasification: Optimization of conditions. Energy & Fuels, 22(3), 1955–1964. https://doi.org/10.1021/ef700662g
Pauls, J. H., Mahinpey, N., & Mostafavi, E. (2016). Simulation of air-steam gasification of woody biomass in a bubbling fluidized bed using Aspen Plus: A comprehensive model including pyrolysis, hydrodynamics and tar production. Biomass and Bioenergy, 95, 157–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BIOMBIOE.2016.10.002
Pinto, F., Franco, C., André, R. N., Miranda, M., Gulyurtlu, I., & Cabrita, I. (2002). Co-gasification study of biomass mixed with plastic wastes. Fuel, 81(3), 291–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-2361(01)00164-8
Ratnawati, R., Wulandari, R., Kumoro, A. C., & Hadiyanto, H. (2022). Response surface methodology for formulating PVA/starch/ lignin biodegradable plastic. Emerging Science Journal, 6(2), 238–255. https://doi.org/10.28991/ESJ-2022-06-02-03
Robinson, T., Bronson, B., Gogolek, P., & Mehrani, P. (2016). Comparison of the air-blown bubbling fluidized bed gasification of wood and wood–PET pellets. Fuel, 178, 263–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2016.03.038
Rosha, P., Kumar, S., Vikram, S., Ibrahim, H., & Al-Muhtaseb, A. H. (2022). H2-enriched gaseous fuel production via co-gasification of an algae-plastic waste mixture using Aspen Plus. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 47(62), 26294–26302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.11.092
Rosha, P., Rosha, A. K., Ibrahim, H., & Kumar, S. (2021). Recent advances in biogas upgrading to value added products: A review. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 46(41), 21318–21337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.03.246
Rosha, P., Singh, R., Mohapatra, S. K., Mahla, S. K., & Dhir, A. (2018). Optimization of hydrogen-enriched biogas by dry oxidative reforming with nickel nanopowder using response surface methodology. Energy and Fuels, 32(6), 6995–7001. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b00819
Ruiz, J. A., Juárez, M. C., Morales, M. P., Muñoz, P., & Mendívil, M. A. (2013). Biomass gasification for electricity generation: Review of current technology barriers. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 18, 174–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.10.021
Ruoppolo, G., Ammendola, P., Chirone, R., & Miccio, F. (2012). H2- rich syngas production by fluidized bed gasification of biomass and plastic fuel. Waste Management, 32(4), 724–732. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2011.12.004
Salaudeen, S. A., Arku, P., & Dutta, A. (2019). Gasification of plastic solid waste and competitive technologies. Plastics to Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813140-4.00010-8
Son, Y. I., Sang, J. Y., Yong, K. K., & Lee, J. G. (2011). Gasification and power generation characteristics of woody biomass utilizing a downdraft gasifier. Biomass and Bioenergy, 35, 4215–4220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.07.008
Tavares, R., Monteiro, E., Tabet, F., & Rouboa, A. (2020). Numerical investigation of optimum operating conditions for syngas and hydrogen production from biomass gasification using Aspen Plus. Renewable Energy, 146, 1309–1314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.07.051
Tremel, A., Gaderer, M., & Spliethoff, H. (2013). Small-scale production of synthetic natural gas by allothermal biomass gasification. International Journal of Energy Research, 37(11), 1318–1330. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.2933
Tsui, T. H., & Wong, J. W. C. (2019). A critical review: Emerging bioeconomy and waste-to-energy technologies for sustainable municipal solid waste management. Waste Disposal and Sustainable Energy, 1, 151–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42768-019-00013-z
Turns, S. R. (2001). An introduction to combustion: Concepts and application. McGraw Hill Publishers.
United Nations Report (2023). ‘Progress towards the sustainable development goals: Towards a rescue plan for people and planet’ Available at https://hlpf.un.org/sites/default/files/2023-04/SDG%20Progress%20Report%20Special%20Edition.pdf
Uzoe**wa, B. B., He, X., Wang, S., El-Fatah Abomohra, A., Hu, Y., & Wang, Q. (2018). Co-pyrolysis of biomass and waste plastics as a thermochemical conversion technology for high-grade biofuel production: Recent progress and future directions elsewhere worldwide. Energy Conversion and Management, 163, 468–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2018.02.004
Vargas-Mira, A., Zuluaga-García, C., & González-Delgado, Á. D. (2019). A technical and environmental evaluation of six routes for industrial hydrogen production from empty palm fruit bunches. ACS Omega, 4(13), 15457–15470. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.9b01683
Vikram, S., Rosha, P., & Kumar, S. (2021a). Recent modeling approaches to biomass pyrolysis: A review. Energy & Fuels, 35(9), 7406–7433. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c00251
Vikram, S., Rosha, P., & Kumar, S. (2021b). Recent modeling approaches to biomass pyrolysis: A review. Energy and Fuels, 35(9), 7406–7433. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.1c00251
Yana, S., Nizar, M., Irhamni, & Mulyati, D. (2022). Biomass waste as a renewable energy in develo** bio-based economies in Indonesia: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 160, 112268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112268
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the Khadi and Village Industries Commission under Ministry of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises, Government of India (Sanction Order No. S and T/18/9/2021/S and T/HQ/17532/2021-22/303).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Bhurse, R.R., Gope, P.P., Yadav, H. et al. Syngas and hydrogen production from co-gasification of rice husk biomass and plastic waste mixture using Aspen Plus. Environ Dev Sustain (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04571-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04571-z