Log in

Energy efficiency suppression and spatial spillover effect: a quasi-natural experiment based on China’s environmental protection tax law

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The environmental protection tax law (EPTL) is China’s inaugural formally legislated market-based environmental tax regime. Whether the EPTL can improve green total factor energy efficiency (GTFEE) is of great importance for China’s sustainable development. Utilizing a sample of China’s 284 prefecture-level cities from 2015 to 2019 and the difference-in-differences method, this study explores the impact of China’s environmental protection tax law (EPTL) on green total factor energy efficiency (GTFEE). Results show that: (1) The EPTL exerts a significant negative impact on GTFEE, a conclusion reinforced by a series of robustness checks; (2) two potential mechanisms are reduced green technology innovation and shifted industrial structure; (3) heterogeneity analysis underscores that the negative effects are more significant in eastern regions, old industrial cities, and cities under high fiscal pressure; and (4) based on the spatial difference-in-differences method, the subsequent analysis reveals a negative spatial spillover effect of the EPTL on GTFEE of neighboring cities. Derived from the above conclusions, this study provides policy recommendations for the long-term formulation of the EPTL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Notes

  1. The “Green Paradox” refers the notion that an increase in taxes could exacerbate existing environmental and climate issues, as such a tax might incentivize producers to shift their production to the present moment, thereby undermining the intended purpose of the environmental tax.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shiqin Su.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Su, S., Li, S. Energy efficiency suppression and spatial spillover effect: a quasi-natural experiment based on China’s environmental protection tax law. Environ Dev Sustain (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-04146-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-04146-4

Keywords

Navigation