Abstract
The recovery of energy potential through anaerobic digestion is a widely used method for treating biodegradable waste. However, challenges related to operational issues, waste characterization, and process instability hinder its widespread application and result in low methane yields. This review aims to organize and analyze the static and dynamic parameters that influence biogas yield in order to optimize its production. Biogas typically consists of 50–70% methane (CH4) and 30–50% carbon dioxide (CO2) along with traces of other gases. The paper highlights various solutions to enhance CH4 production, including substrate pre-treatment, co-digestion, Fe0 powder addition, anaerobic fungi, multi-stage biodigester design, and controlling factors influencing anaerobic digestion. These factors primarily include methanogenic potential, C/N ratio, digestion temperature, pH, reactor tightness, and Pressure. However, the use of bioreactors faces technical, socio-economic, and environmental constraints that vary between developed and less developed countries, as discussed in the paper. Through an analysis of over 30 substrate types, the optimum ratios for certain substrates to achieve higher biogas yields were identified. For cow manure mixed with other materials, the yield increases within a C/N ratio of 20–30 and decreases at a ratio of 35. In the case of poultry drop**s mixed with other substrates, the yield increases within a C/N ratio of 18–22. Food waste yield, on the other hand, varies significantly due to the differing characteristics of food waste sources. In summary, this study emphasizes the importance of optimizing biogas production through understanding and controlling the influencing factors. It provides insights into potential solutions and optimum substrate ratios for improved biogas yield.
Graphical abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abraham, A., Mathew, A. K., Park, H., Choi, O., Sindhu, R., Parameswaran, B., Pandey, A., Park, J. H., & Sang, B. I. (2020). Pretreatment strategies for enhanced biogas production from lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresources Technology, 301, 122725. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122725
Adou, K. E., Alle, O. A., Kouakou, A. R., Adouby, K., Drogui, P., & Tyagi, R. D. (2020). Anaerobic mono-digestion of wastewater from the main slaughterhouse in Yamoussoukro (Côte d’Ivoire): Evaluation of biogas potential and removal of organic pollution. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 8(3), 103770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2020.103770
Axelle, D. (2016). La méthanisation par voie sèche agricole appliquée aux fumiers de bovins: Optimisation de la recirculation des lixiviats, https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01379423, Université de Rennes 1.
Bautista Angeli J.-R. (2019). Etude de faisabilité de la micro méthanisation par co-digestion à l’échelle des quartiers. https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-02118401/
Benizri, D. (2016). Epuration du biogaz à la ferme: EPUROGAS, une solution énergétique et économique d’avenir. Etude expérimentale et modélisation d’un procédé d’absorption de dioxyde de carbone avec de l’eau sous pression à une échelle industrielle, https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01538100
Biogas World. (2018). Systèmes de méthanisation par voie sèche et par voie humide pour le traitement des déchets organiques. BiogasWorld 6.
Blasco, L., Kahala, M., Ervasti, S., & Tampio, E. (2022). Dynamics of microbial community in response to co-feedstock composition in anaerobic digestion. Bioresources Technology, 364, 128039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2022.128039
Blasius, J. P., Contrera, R. C., Maintinguer, S. I., & Alves de Castro, M. C. A. (2020). Effects of temperature, proportion and organic loading rate on the performance of anaerobic digestion of food waste. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.btre.2020.e00503.
Bolzonella, D., Battista, F., Mattioli, A., Nicolato, C., Frison, N., & Lampis, S. (2020). Biological thermophilic post hydrolysis of digestate enhances the biogas production in the anaerobic digestion of agro-waste. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 134, 110174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110174
Browne, J. D., Allen, E., & Murphy, J. D. (2014). Assessing the variability in biomethane production from the organic fraction of municipal solid waste in batch and continuous operation. Applied Energy, 128, 307–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.04.097
Carlini, M., Castellucci, S., & Moneti, M. (2015). Biogas production from poultry manure and cheese whey wastewater under mesophilic conditions in batch reactor. Energy Procedia, 82, 811–818. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.11.817
Carotenuto, C., Guarino, G., D’Amelia, L. I., Morrone, B., & Minale, M. (2020). The peculiar role of C/N and initial pH in anaerobic digestion of lactating and non-lactating water buffalo manure. Waste Management, 103, 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2019.12.008
Chatterjee, B., & Mazumder, D. (2019). Role of stage-separation in the ubiquitous development of anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste: A critical review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 104, 439–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.01.026
Chen, X., Yan, W., Sheng, K., & Sanati, M. (2014). Comparison of high-solids to liquid anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and green waste. Bioresource Technology, 154, 215–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.12.054
Cyril, K. M., Rodrigue, K. A., Essi, K., Albert, T., & Agboué, A. (2018). Anaerobic bioconversion of food waste into energy: Case study of the food waste from Akouedo landfill, Côte d’Ivoire. Journal of Ultra Chemistry, 14, 142–145. https://doi.org/10.22147/juc/140403
Czatzkowska, M., Harnisz, M., Korzeniewska, E., & Koniuszewska, I. (2020). Inhibitors of the methane fermentation process with particular emphasis on the microbiological aspect: A review. Energy Science & Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.609
Deepanraj, B., Sivasubramanian, V., & Jayaraj, S. (2017). Effect of substrate pretreatment on biogas production through anaerobic digestion of food waste. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 42(42), 26522–26528. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.06.178
EBSCOhost | 150484130 | Use of biogas plants on a national and international scale. https://web.s.ebscohost.com/abstract?direct=true&profile=ehost&scope=site&authtype=crawler&jrnl=13351788&AN=150484130&h=LEhzE%2bqfs85OKREDuNWuLj8ZbeOMsiSkksb5nEcA0MWoVC1roGR4n621x%2bzm3CiCpUg8khTweEg%2bThfJh1K3pA%3d%3d&crl=c&resultNs=AdminWebAuth&resultLocal=ErrCrlNotAuth&crlhashurl=login.aspx%3fdirect%3dtrue%26profile%3dehost%26scope%3dsite%26authtype%3dcrawler%26jrnl%3d13351788%26AN%3d150484130 (consulté le 22 mai 2023).
Elalami, D., Carrere, H., Monlau, F., Abdelouahdi, K., Oukarroum, A., & Barakat, A. (2019). Pretreatment and co-digestion of wastewater sludge for biogas production: Recent research advances and trends. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 114, 109287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2019.109287
Emmanuel Pax, M., Muzenda, E., & Lekgoba, T. (2020). Effect of co-digestion of food waste and cow dung on biogas yield. E3S Web of Conferences, 181, 01005. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202018101005
Gelegenis, J., Georgakakis, D., Angelidaki, I., & Mavris, V. (2007). Optimization of biogas production by co-digesting whey with diluted poultry manure. Renewable Energy, 32(13), 2147–2160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2006.11.015
Ghosh, P., Shah, G., Sahota, S., Singh, L., & Vijay, V. K. (2020). Biogas production from waste: Technical overview, progress, and challenges. In L. Singh, A. Yousuf, & D. M. Mahapatra (Eds.), Bioreactors (pp. 89–104). Elsevier.
Gong, H., Liu, M., Li, K., Li, C., Xu, G., & Wang, K. (2020). Optimizing dry anaerobic digestion at pilot scale for start-up strategy and long-term operation: Organic loading rate, temperature and co-digestion. Bioresource Technology, 316, 123828. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.123828
Hess, J. (2010). Modélisation de la qualité du biogaz produit par un fermenteur méthanogène et stratégie de régulation en vue de sa valorisation, https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00257347
Homeky, B. O. (2015). Digestion anaérobie sur une ferme: Évaluation du pouvoir méthanogène de substrats et étude de micropolluants, p. 212. https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01665490
Hu, F., et al. (2022). Investigating the role of different materials supplementation in anaerobic digestion of kitchen waste: Performance and microbial community dynamics. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 184, 108490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bej.2022.108490
Jabeen, M., Yousaf, S., Haider, M. R., & Malik, R. N. (2015). High-solids anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and rice husk at different organic loading rates. International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, 102, 149–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2015.03.023
Jaglin, S., Debout, L., & Salenson, I. (2019). Du rebut à la ressource: Valorisation des déchets dans les villes du Sud. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01856401
Jain, S., Jain, S., Wolf, I. T., Lee, J., & Tong, Y. W. (2015). A comprehensive review on operating parameters and different pretreatment methodologies for anaerobic digestion of municipal solid waste. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 52, 142–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.091
Jiang, Y., McAdam, E., Zhang, Y., Heaven, S., Banks, C., & Longhurst, P. (2019). Ammonia inhibition and toxicity in anaerobic digestion: A critical review. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 32, 100899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2019.100899
**gura, R. M., & Matengaifa, R. (2009). Optimization of biogas production by anaerobic digestion for sustainable energy development in Zimbabwe. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13(5), 1116–1120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2007.06.015
Kainthola, J., Kalamdhad, A. S., & Goud, V. V. (2019). Optimization of methane production during anaerobic co-digestion of rice straw and hydrilla verticillata using response surface methodology. Fuel, 235, 92–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.07.094
Kainthola, J., Kalamdhad, A. S., & Goud, V. V. (2020). Optimization of process parameters for accelerated methane yield from anaerobic co-digestion of rice straw and food waste. Renewable Energy, 149, 1352–1359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.10.124
Kalaiselvan, N., Glivin, G., Bakthavatsalam, A. K., Mariappan, V., Premalatha, M., Raveendran, P. S., Jayaraj, S., & Sekhar, S. J. (2022). A waste to energy technology for Enrichment of biomethane generation: A review on operating parameters, types of biodigesters, solar assisted heating systems, socio economic benefits and challenges. Chemosphere, 293, 133486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133486
Kapoor, R., Ghosh, P., Tyagi, B., Vijay, V. K., Vijay, V., Thakur, I. S., Kamyab, H., Nguyen, D. D., & Kumar, A. (2020). Advances in biogas valorization and utilization systems: A comprehensive review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 273, 123052. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123052
Karidio Daouda Idrissa, O.-K., Tsuanyo, D., Kouakou, A. R., & Yao-Kouassi, B. (2022). The effect of pH variation in biogas production: Impact of cocoa pods and empty palmyra palm bunches. Waste Biomass Valorization. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-022-01997-2
Karidio Daouda Idrissa, O.-K., Tsuanyo, D., Kouakou, A., & Yao Kouassi, B. (2022). Impact of hydrogen potential on anaerobic digestion of organic waste. E3S Web of Conferences, 354, 03005. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202235403005
Karne, H., Mahajan, U., Ketkar, U., Kohade, A., Khadilkar, P., & Mishra, A. (2023). A review on biogas upgradation systems. Materials Today: Proceedings, 72, 775–786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2022.09.015
Kim, H., Choi, H., & Lee, C. (2020). The potential use of human urine as a solvent for biogas upgrading. Journal of Water Process Engineering, 36, 101343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwpe.2020.101343
Kouakou, A. R., Donatien, E. A., & Cyril, K. M. (2021). Comparison of the energy recovery potential using life cycle assessment of municipal solid waste of Abidjan (Côte d’Ivoire). Journal of Energy and Power Engineering. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijepe.20211001.13
Kumar, A., & Samadder, S. R. (2020). Performance evaluation of anaerobic digestion technology for energy recovery from organic fraction of municipal solid waste: A review. Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117253
Kwietniewska, E., & Tys, J. (2014). Process characteristics, inhibition factors and methane yields of anaerobic digestion process, with particular focus on microalgal biomass fermentation. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 34, 491–500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.03.041
Laura, A. (2016). Étude de verrous scientifiques et technologiques pour la compréhension et l’optimisation du procédé de méthanisation voie sèche discontinu de sous- produits d’origine agricole. http://www.theses.fr/2016com2279
Li, H., Zhang, C., & Sun, B. (2023). Optimal design and operation method of integrated energy system based on stochastic scenario iteration and energy storage attribute evaluation. Sustainable Cities and Society, 95, 104585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2023.104585
Li, P., Liu, Z., Zhao, M., Dai, X., & Ruan, W. (2020b). Evaluation of biogas performance and process stability from food, kitchen, and fruit/vegetable waste by mono-, co-, and tridigestion. Energy & Fuels, 34(10), 12734–12742. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c02598
Li, W., Huusom, J. K., Zhou, Z., Nie, Y., Xu, Y., & Zhang, X. (2018). Multi-objective optimization of methane production system from biomass through anaerobic digestion. Chinese Journal of Chemical Engineering, 26(10), 2084–2092. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2018.01.001
Li, Y., & **, Y. (2015). Effects of thermal pretreatment on acidification phase during two-phase batch anaerobic digestion of kitchen waste. Renewable Energy, 77, 550–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.12.056
Li, Z., Wachemo, A. C., Yuan, H., Korai, R. M., & Li, X. (2020a). High levels of ammonia nitrogen for biological biogas upgrading. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 45(53), 28488–28498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.07.247
Liu, Y., et al. (2012). Optimization of anaerobic acidogenesis by adding Fe0 powder to enhance anaerobic wastewater treatment. Chemical Engineering Journal, 192, 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2012.03.044
Mahmudul, H. M., Rasul, M. G., Akbar, D., & Mofijur, M. (2019). Opportunities for solar assisted biogas plant in subtropical climate in Australia: A review. Energy Procedia, 160, 683–690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2019.02.192
Marañón, E., Castrillón, L., Quiroga, G., Fernández-Nava, Y., Gómez, L., & García, M. M. (2012). Co-digestion of cattle manure with food waste and sludge to increase biogas production. Waste Management, 32(10), 1821–1825. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2012.05.033
Maroušek, J. (2022). Review: Nanoparticles can change (bio)hydrogen competitiveness. Fuel, 328, 125318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.125318
Maroušek, J., & Gavurová, B. (2022). Recovering phosphorous from biogas fermentation residues indicates promising economic results. Chemosphere, 291, 133008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133008
Maroušek, J., Hašková, S., Zeman, R., Váchal, J., & Vaníčková, R. (2014). Nutrient management in processing of steam-exploded lignocellulose phytomass. Chemical Engineering & Technology, 37(11), 1945–1948. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceat.201400341
Maroušek, J., & Maroušková, A. (2021). Economic considerations on nutrient utilization in wastewater management. Energies, 14(12), 3468. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14123468
Maroušek, J., Strunecký, O., Kolář, L., Vochozka, M., Kopecký, M., Maroušková, A., Batt, J., Poliak, M., Šoch, M., Bartoš, P., & Klieštik, T. (2020). Advances in nutrient management make it possible to accelerate biogas production and thus improve the economy of food waste processing. Energy Sources, Part a: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2020.1776796
Maroušek, J., Strunecký, O., Bartoš, V., & Vochozka, M. (2022). Revisiting competitiveness of hydrogen and algae biodiesel. Fuel, 328, 125317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2022.125317
Maroušek, J. (2013). Two-fraction anaerobic fermentation of grass waste: Anaerobic fermentation of grass waste. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 93(10), 2410–2414. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6046
Maroušek, J., Strunecký, O., & Stehel, V. (2019). Biochar farming: Defining economically perspective applications. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 21(7), 1389–1395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10098-019-01728-7
Mehrpooya, M., Ghorbani, B., & Manizadeh, A. (2020). Cryogenic biogas upgrading process using solar energy (process integration, development, and energy analysis). Energy, 203, 117834. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2020.117834
Mockaitis, G., Bruant, G., Guiot, S. R., Foresti, E., & Zaiat, M. (2019). Dataset of anaerobic acidogenic digestion for hydrogen production using xylose as substrate: Biogas production and metagenomic data. Data in Brief, 26, 104466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2019.104466
Mukeshimana, M. C., Zhao, Z.-Y., Ahmad, M., & Irfan, M. (2021). Analysis on barriers to biogas dissemination in Rwanda: AHP approach. Renewable Energy, 163, 1127–1137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.09.051
Nevzorova, T., & Kutcherov, V. (2019). Barriers to the wider implementation of biogas as a source of energy: A state-of-the-art review. Energy Strategy Reviews, 26, 100414. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esr.2019.100414
Ndobeni, A., Oyekola, O., & Welz, P. J. (2019). Organic removal rates and biogas production of an upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor treating sugarcane molasses, Elsevier Enhanced Reader. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sajce.2019.01.002
Ning, J., et al. (2019). Simultaneous biogas and biogas slurry production from co-digestion of pig manure and corn straw: Performance optimization and microbial community shift. Bioresource Technology, 282, 37–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.02.122
Nkuna, R., Roopnarain, A., Rashama, C., & Adeleke, R. (2022). Insights into organic loading rates of anaerobic digestion for biogas production: A review. Critical Reviews in Biotechnology, 42(4), 487–507. https://doi.org/10.1080/07388551.2021.1942778
Nsair, A., Önen Cinar, S., Abu Qdais, H., & Kuchta, K. (2019). Optimizing the performance of a large scale biogas plant by controlling stirring process: A case study. Energy Conversion and Management, 198, 111931. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.111931
Ntakiyiruta, P., et al. (2021). Energetic valorization of Eichhornia crassipes and pistia stratiotes by methane production in an anaerobic co-digestion process. Science Journal of Energy Engineering, 9, 59–69. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sjee.20210904.13
Nwokolo, N., Mukumba, P., Obileke, K., & Enebe, M. (2020). Waste to energy: A focus on the impact of substrate type in biogas production. Processes. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr8101224
O’Connor, J., Mickan, B. S., Rinklebe, J., Song, H., Siddique, K. H., Wang, H., Kirkham, M. B., & Bolan, N. S. (2022). Environmental implications, potential value, and future of food-waste anaerobic digestate management: A review. Journal of Environmental Management, 318, 115519. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115519
Okonkwo, U. C., Onokpite, E., & Onokwai, A. O. (2018). Comparative study of the optimal ratio of biogas production from various organic wastes and weeds for digester/restarted digester. Journal of King Saud University-Engineering Sciences, 30(2), 123–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksues.2016.02.002
Paladino, O. (2022). Data driven modelling and control strategies to improve biogas quality and production from high solids anaerobic digestion: A mini review. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416467
Patinvoh, R. J., & Taherzadeh, M. J. (2019). Challenges of biogas implementation in develo** countries. Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health, 12, 30–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coesh.2019.09.006
Panuccio, M. R., Romeo, F., Mallamaci, C., & Muscolo, A. (2021). Digestate application on two different soils: Agricultural benefit and risk. Waste Biomass Valorization, 12(8), 4341–4353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12649-020-01318-5
Pramanik, S. K., Suja, F. B., Zain, S. M., & Pramanik, B. K. (2019). The anaerobic digestion process of biogas production from food waste: Prospects and constraints. Bioresource Technology Reports, 8, 100310. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biteb.2019.100310
Rahman, Md. A., Møller, H. B., Saha, C. K., Alam, Md. M., Wahid, R., & Feng, L. (2018). Anaerobic co-digestion of poultry drop**s and briquetted wheat straw at mesophilic and thermophilic conditions: Influence of alkali pretreatment. Renewable Energy, 128, 241–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.05.076
Ravard, B. (2014). Evaluation du potentiel méthanogène de différentes rations et des effets des digestats (fraction sèche et fraction liquide) sur des indicateurs de fonctionnement biologique du sol en lien avec le service de fertilité. https://hal.univ-lorraine.fr/hal-01838109. [En ligne].
Şenol, H., Erşan, M., & Görgün, E. (2020). Optimization of temperature and pretreatments for methane yield of hazelnut shells using the response surface methodology. Fuel, 271, 117585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.117585
Sheng, K., Chen, X., Pan, J., Kloss, R., Wei, Y., & Ying, Y. (2013). Effect of ammonia and nitrate on biogas production from food waste via anaerobic digestion. Biosystems Engineering, 116(2), 205–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2013.08.005
Sreekrishnan, T. R., Kohli, S., & Rana, V. (2004). Enhancement of biogas production from solid substrates using different techniques––A review. Bioresource Technology, 95(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2004.02.010
Stehel, V., Maroušková, A., & Kolář, L. (2018). Intracellular disintegration by shockwave pretreatment accelerates “dry fermentation.” Energy Sources, Part a: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 40(6), 716–720. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2018.1454553
Stehel, V., Maroušková, A., Kolář, L., Strunecký, O., & Shreedhar, S. (2020). Advances in dry fermentation extends biowaste management possibilities. Energy Sources, Part a: Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 42(2), 212–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2019.1587066
Stürmer, B., Leiers, D., Anspach, V., Brügging, E., Scharfy, D., & Wissel, T. (2021). Agricultural biogas production: A regional comparison of technical parameters. Renewable Energy, 164, 171–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2020.09.074
Thiruselvi, D., et al. (2020). A critical review on global trends in biogas scenario with its up-gradation techniques for fuel cell and future perspectives. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.10.023
Vilardi, G., Bassano, C., Deiana, P., & Verdone, N. (2020). Exergy and energy analysis of three biogas upgrading processes. Energy Conversion and Management, 224, 113323. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113323
Vinzelj, J., Joshi, A., Insam, H., & Podmirseg, S. M. (2020). Employing anaerobic fungi in biogas production: Challenges & opportunities. Bioresource Technology, 300, 122687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.122687
Vochozka, M., Horák, J., Krulický, T., & Pardal, P. (2020). Predicting future Brent oil price on global markets. Acta Montanistica Slovaca, 25, 375–392. https://doi.org/10.46544/AMS.v25i3.10
Vochozka, M., Rowland, Z., Suler, P., & Marousek, J. (2020). The influence of the international price of oil on the value of the EUR/USD exchange rate. Journal of Competitiveness, 12(2), 167–190. https://doi.org/10.7441/joc.2020.02.10
Wadchasit, P., Rakmak, N., Sompong, O., Rattanasak, U., Imai, T., Jitpinit, S., & Nuithitikul, K. (2023). Improvement of biogas production and quality by addition of struvite precipitates derived from liquid anaerobic digestion effluents of palm oil wastes. Journal of Environmental Chemical Engineering, 11(1), 109081. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2022.109081
Wang, H., Ma, C., Yang, Z., Lu, X., & Ji, X. (2020). Improving high-pressure water scrubbing through process integration and solvent selection for biogas upgrading. Applied Energy, 276, 115462. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115462
Wang, H., Zhang, Y., & Angelidaki, I. (2016). Ammonia inhibition on hydrogen enriched anaerobic digestion of manure under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions. Water Research, 105, 314–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.09.006
Wang, X., Yang, G., Feng, Y., Ren, G., & Han, X. (2012). Optimizing feeding composition and carbon–nitrogen ratios for improved methane yield during anaerobic co-digestion of dairy, chicken manure and wheat straw. Bioresource Technology, 120, 78–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.06.058
Weiland, P. (2009). Biogas production: Current state and perspectives. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 85(4), 849–860. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-009-2246-7
Winquist, E., Rikkonen, P., Pyysiäinen, J., & Varho, V. (2019). Is biogas an energy or a sustainability product?—Business opportunities in the Finnish biogas branch. Journal of Cleaner Production, 233, 1344–1354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.181
World Bank Group, Silpa, K., Lisa, Y., Perinaz, B.-T., & Frank Van, W. (2018). A global snapshot of solid waste management to 2050. [En ligne]. Disponible sur: http://hdl.handle.net/10986/30317
Yang, S., Liu, Y., Wu, N., Zhang, Y., Svoronos, S., & Pullammanappallil, P. (2019). Low-cost, Arduino-based, portable device for measurement of methane composition in biogas. Renewable Energy, 138, 224–229. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.01.083
Yen, H. W., & Brune, D. E. (2007). Anaerobic co-digestion of algal sludge and waste paper to produce methane. Bioresource Technology, 98(1), 130–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2005.11.010
Yong, Z., Dong, Y., Zhang, X., & Tan, T. (2015). Anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and straw for biogas production. Renewable Energy, 78, 527–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2015.01.033
Zhai, N., et al. (2015). Effect of initial pH on anaerobic co-digestion of kitchen waste and cow manure. Waste Management, 38, 126–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2014.12.027
Zhang, C., **ao, G., Peng, L., Su, H., & Tan, T. (2013). The anaerobic co-digestion of food waste and cattle manure. Bioresource Technology, 129, 170–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.10.138
Funding
The funding was provied by Agence Française de Développement.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
List of parameters and variables
C/N | Carbon/ Nitrogen |
pH | hydrogen potential |
°C | Degree celcius |
HRT | hydraulic retention time |
VFAs | Volatile fatty acid |
TS | Total solid |
VS | Volatile solid |
List of acronyms and abbreviations
CH4 | Methane |
UN | United Nations |
UE | European Union |
CO2 | Carbon dioxide |
H2S | Hydrogen sulfide |
NH3 | Ammonia |
H2 | Hydrogen |
AF | Anaerobic fungi |
AD | Anaerobic digestion |
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Karidio Daouda Idrissa, OK., Tsuanyo, D., Kouakou, R.A. et al. Analysis of the criteria for improving biogas production: focus on anaerobic digestion. Environ Dev Sustain (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03788-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03788-8