Abstract
Due to escalating climate variation and excessive resource utilization, organizations are under enormous pressure from governing agencies to diminish the adverse environmental influence of their products. In addition, Industry 4.0 has lately instigated substantial changes in the supply chain (SC) operations of enterprises. Therefore, to stay competitive, organizations are eager to purchase from those suppliers who can assist them in making their SC efficient and environment-friendly. In this concern, for the first time, this research amalgamates the notions of sustainability, circular economy, and Industry 4.0 for selecting the beverage sector’s suppliers using a novel hybrid approach. With the help of a thorough literature examination and experts’ feedback, fourteen sub-criteria were initially identified, which were later categorized into the three main aspects (economic, social, and circular) for suppliers’ evaluation. Subsequently, the fuzzy full consistency method (FUCOM) was utilized to compute the selected criteria and sub-criteria relative weights. Later, the fuzzy multi-objective optimization based on ratio analysis with the full multiplicative form (MULTIMOORA) method was employed to assess and rate the efficacy of suppliers based on three ranking subordinates. Finally, the obtained rankings were aggregated using the ordinal dominance theory (ODT) to identify the ultimate rank of the suppliers. To effectively manage the inherent uncertainty associated with the decision-makers (DMs) judgment, fuzzy set theory (FST) has been combined with the proposed methodology. A Pakistani beverage sector case study was offered to show the viability and usefulness of the suggested technique. Based on the obtained results, cost (C11), GIS/GPS assisted logistics (C15), training and awareness of employees on Industry 4.0 (C21), cyber-physical production and smart manufacturing (C13), and eco-friendly packaging (C33) sub-criteria were found to be the most significant criteria. In contrast, supplier S2 achieved the highest rank among selected suppliers based on its performance. Finally, the sensitivity and comparative analysis results reveal that the proposed hybrid technique delivers reliable and robust outcomes. The proposed research will offer a crucial guide for the managers of manufacturing organizations if they want to optimize their resource consumption and SC efficiency.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
All the authors affirm that the data assisting the outcomes of this research are accessible inside the manuscript.
References
Acerbi, F., Rocca, R., Fumagalli, L., & Taisch, M. (2023). Enhancing the cosmetics industry sustainability through a renewed sustainable supplier selection model. Production & Manufacturing Research,11(1), 2161021. https://doi.org/10.1080/21693277.2022.2161021
Adiguzel, F., Cetin, M., Dogan, M., Gungor, S., Kose, M., Sert, E. B., & Kaya, E. (2022). The assessment of the thermal behavior of an urban park surface in a dense urban area for planning decisions. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,194, 519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10172-y
Afrasiabi, A., Tavana, M., & Caprio, D. D. (2022). An extended hybrid fuzzy multi-criteria decision model for sustainable and resilient supplier selection. Environmental Science and Pollution Research,29, 37291–37314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17851-2
Aksoy, H., Kaptan, S., Varol, T., Cetin, M., & Ozel, H. B. (2022). Exploring land use/land cover change by using density analysis method in yenice. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology,19, 10257–10274. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-021-03847-5
Alavi, B., Tavana, M., & Mina, H. (2021). A dynamic decision support system for sustainable supplier selection in circular economy. Sustainable Production and Consumption,27, 905–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.02.015
Ali, H., & Zhang, J. (2023). A fuzzy multi-objective decision-making model for global green supplier selection and order allocation under quantity discounts. Expert Systems with Applications,225, 120119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120119
Ali, H., Zhang, J., Liu, S., & Shoaib, M. (2022). An integrated decision-making approach for global supplier selection and order allocation to create an environment-friendly supply chain. Kybernetes. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-10-2021-1046
Bai, C., Zhu, Q., & Sarkis, J. (2022). Circular economy and circularity supplier selection: A fuzzy group decision approach. International Journal of Production Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2022.2037779
Başaran, B., & Çakir, S. (2021). Evaluation of food safety and halal criteria in supplier selection: An application in food sector with fuzzy COPRAS method. International Food Research Journal,28(3), 576–585. https://doi.org/10.47836/ifrj.28.3.17
Böyükaslan, A., & Ecer, F. (2021). Determination of drivers for investing in cryptocurrencies through a fuzzy full consistency method-Bonferroni (FUCOM-F’B) framework. Technology in Society,67, 101745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101745
Boz, E., Çizmecioğlu, S., & Çalık, A. (2022). A novel MDCM approach for sustainable supplier selection in healthcare system in the era of logistics 4.0. Sustainability,14(21), 13839. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142113839
Brauers, W. K. M., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2010). Project management by multimoora as an instrument for transition economies. Technological and Economic Development of Economy,16(1), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2010.01
Brauers, W. K. M., & Zavadskas, E. K. (2012). Robustness of MULTIMOORA: A method for multi-objective optimization. Informatica,23(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.15388/Informatica.2012.346
Çalık, A. (2021). A novel pythagorean fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methodology for green supplier selection in the industry 4.0 era. Soft Computing,25, 2253–2265. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-020-05294-9
Cetin, I. Z., Varol, T., Ozel, H. B., & Sevik, H. (2023). The effects of climate on land use/cover: A case study in Turkey by using remote sensing data. Environmental Science and Pollution Research,30, 5688–5699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22566-z
Cetin, M. (2013). Landscape engineering, protecting soil, and runoff storm water. InTech. https://doi.org/10.5772/55812
Cetin, M. (2015). Determining the bioclimatic comfort in Kastamonu City. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,187, 640. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-015-4861-3
Cetin, M. (2015). Evaluation of the sustainable tourism potential of a protected area for landscape planning: A case study of the ancient city of Pompeipolis in Kastamonu. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology,22(6), 490–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2015.1081651
Cetin, M. (2015). Using GIS analysis to assess urban green space in terms of accessibility: Case study in Kutahya. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology,22(5), 420–424. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2015.1061066
Cetin, M. (2016). Determination of bioclimatic comfort areas in landscape planning: A case study of Cide Coastline. Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology,4(9), 800–804. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v4i9.800-804.872
Cetin, M. (2016). A change in the amount of CO2 at the center of the examination halls: Case study of Turkey. Studies on Ethno-Medicine,10(2), 146–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/09735070.2016.11905483
Cetin, M. (2019). The effect of urban planning on urban formations determining bioclimatic comfort area’s effect using satellitia imagines on air quality: A case study of Bursa city. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 12, 1237–1249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-019-00742-4
Cetin, M. (2020). Climate comfort depending on different altitudes and land use in the urban areas in Kahramanmaras City. Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, 13, 991–999. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-020-00858-y
Degerli, B., & Çetin, M. (2022). Using the remote sensing method to simulate the land change in the year 2030. Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology,10(12), 2453–2466. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v10i12.2453-2466.5555
Degerli, B., & Çetin, M. (2022). Evaluation from rural to urban scale for the effect of NDVI-NDBI indices on land surface temperature, in Samsun, Türkiye. Turkish Journal of Agriculture - Food Science and Technology,10(12), 2446–2452. https://doi.org/10.24925/turjaf.v10i12.2446-2452.5535
Dolatabad, A. H., Dahooie, J. H., Antucheviciene, J., Azari, M., & Hajiagha, S. H. R. (2023). Supplier selection in the industry 4.0 era by using a fuzzy cognitive map and hesitant fuzzy linguistic VIKOR methodology. Environmental Science and Pollution Research,30, 52923–52942. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26004-6
Ecer, F., & Pamucar, D. (2020). Sustainable supplier selection: A novel integrated fuzzy best worst method (F-BWM) and fuzzy CoCoSo with Bonferroni (CoCoSo’B) multi-criteria model. Journal of Cleaner Production,266, 121981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121981
Ecer, F., & Torkayesh, A. E. (2022). A stratified fuzzy decision-making approach for sustainable circular supplier selection. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2022.3151491
Fallahpour, A., Wong, K. Y., Rajoo, S., Fathollahi-Fard, A. M., Antucheviciene, J., & Nayeri, S. (2021). An integrated approach for a sustainable supplier selection based on industry 4.0 concept. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17445-y
Fallahpour, A., Yazdani, M., Mohammed, A., & Wong, K. Y. (2021). Green sourcing in the era of industry 4.0: Towards green and digitalized competitive advantages. Industrial Management & Data Systems,121(9), 1997–2025. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-06-2020-0343
Firouzi, F., & Jadidi, O. (2021). Multi-objective model for supplier selection and order allocation problem with fuzzy parameters. Expert Systems with Applications,180, 115129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115129
ForouzeshNejad, A. A. (2023). Leagile and sustainable supplier selection problem in the industry 4.0 era: A case study of the medical devices using hybrid multi-criteria decision making tool. Environmental Science and Pollution Research,30, 13418–13437. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22916-x
Ghamari, R., Mahdavi-Mazdeh, M., & Ghannadpour, S. F. (2022). Resilient and sustainable supplier selection via a new framework: A case study from the steel industry. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24, 10403–10441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01872-5
Govindan, K., Mina, H., Esmaeili, A., & Gholami-Zanjani, S. M. (2020). An integrated hybrid approach for circular supplier selection and closed loop supply chain network design under uncertainty. Journal of Cleaner Production, 242, 118317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118317.
Hafezalkotob, A., Hafezalkotob, A., Liao, H., & Herrera, F. (2019). An overview of MULTIMOORA for multi-criteria decision-making: Theory, developments, applications, and challenges. Information Fusion,51, 145–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2018.12.002
Haleem, A., Khan, S., Luthra, S., Varshney, H., Alam, M., & Khan, M. I. (2021). Supplier evaluation in the context of circular economy: A forward step for resilient business and environment concern. Business Strategy and the Environment,30(4), 2119–2146. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2736
Hasan, M. M., Jiang, D., Ullah, A. M. M. S., & Noor-E-Alam, M. (2020). Resilient supplier selection in logistics 4.0 with heterogeneous information. Expert Systems with Applications,139, 112799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.07.016
He, Q. R., & Chen, P. K. (2023). Develo** a green supplier evaluation system for the chinese semiconductor manufacturing industry based on supplier willingness. Operations Management Research,16, 227–244. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-022-00299-z
Hoseini, S. A., Fallahpour, A., Wong, K. Y., Mahdiyar, A., Saberi, M., & Durdyev, S. (2021). Sustainable supplier selection in construction industry through hybrid fuzzy-based approaches. Sustainability,13(3), 1413. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031413
Hosseini, Z. S., Flapper, S. D., & Pirayesh, M. (2022). Sustainable supplier selection and order allocation under demand, supplier availability and supplier grading uncertainties. Computers & Industrial Engineering,165, 107811. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107811
Ishizaka, A., Khan, S. A., Kheybari, S., & Zaman, S. I. (2023). Supplier selection in closed loop pharma supply chain: A novel BWM–GAIA framework. Annals of Operations Research,324, 13–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-04710-7
Kannan, D., Mina, H., Nosrati-Abarghooee, S., & Khosrojerdi, G. (2020). Sustainable circular supplier selection: A novel hybrid approach. Science of The Total Environment,722, 137936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137936
Kaya, S. K. (2023). A novel two-phase group decision-making model for circular supplier selection under picture fuzzy environment. Environmental Science and Pollution Research,30, 34135–34157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24486-4
Kaya, S. K., & Aycin, E. (2021). An integrated interval type 2 fuzzy AHP and COPRAS-G methodologies for supplier selection in the era of industry 4.0. Neural Computing and Applications,33, 10515–10535. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-021-05809-x
Kazancoglu, I., Kazancoglu, Y., Yarimoglu, E., & Kahraman, A. (2020). A conceptual framework for barriers of circular supply chains for sustainability in the textile industry. Sustainable Development,28(5), 1477–1492. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2100
Koppiahraj, K., Bathrinath, S., Venkatesh, V. G., Mani, V., & Shi, Y. (2023). Optimal sustainability assessment method selection: A practitioner perspective. Annals of Operations Research,324, 629–662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-021-03946-z
Kusi-Sarpong, S., Gupta, H., Khan, S. A., Jabbour, C. J. C., Rehman, S. T., & Kusi-Sarpong, H. (2021). Sustainable supplier selection based on industry 4.0 initiatives within the context of circular economy implementation in supply chain operations. Production Planning & Control. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2021.1980906
Liu, C., Rani, P., & Pachori, K. (2022). Sustainable circular supplier selection and evaluation in the manufacturing sector using pythagorean fuzzy EDAS approach. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 35(4/5), 1040–1066. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-04-2021-0187.
Mabrouk, N. B. (2021). Green supplier selection using fuzzy Delphi method for develo** sustainable supply chain. Decision Science Letters,10(1), 63–70. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.dsl.2020.10.003
Mina, H., Kannan, D., Gholami-Zanjani, S. M., & Biuki, M. (2021). Transition towards circular supplier selection in petrochemical industry: A hybrid approach to achieve sustainable development goals. Journal of Cleaner Production,286, 125273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125273
Moktadir, M. A., Ali, S. M., Kusi-Sarpong, S., & Shaikh, M. A. A. (2018). Assessing challenges for implementing industry 4.0: Implications for process safety and environmental protection. Process Safety and Environmental Protection,117, 730–741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2018.04.020
Münch, C., Benz, L. A., & Hartmann, E. (2022). Exploring the circular economy paradigm: A natural resource-based view on supplier selection criteria. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management,28(4), 100793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pursup.2022.100793
Nasri, S. A., Ehsani, B., Hosseininezhad, S. J., & Safaie, N. (2022). A sustainable supplier selection method using integrated fuzzy DEMATEL–ANP–DEA approach (case study: Petroleum Industry). Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02590-2
Nemati, M., Saen, R. F., & Matin, R. K. (2021). A data envelopment analysis approach by partial impacts between inputs and desirable-undesirable outputs for sustainable supplier selection problem. Industrial Management & Data Systems,121(4), 809–838. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-12-2019-0653
Orji, I. J., & Ojadi, F. (2021). Investigating the COVID-19 pandemic’s impact on sustainable supplier selection in the Nigerian manufacturing sector. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 160, 107588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.107588
Ososanmi, A. O., Ojo, L. D., Ogundimu, O. E., & Oke, A. E. (2022). Drivers of green supply chain management: A closeup study. Environmental Science and Pollution Research,29, 14705–14718. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-16638-9
Pamucar, D., Ecer, F., & Deveci, M. (2021). Assessment of alternative fuel vehicles for sustainable road transportation of United States using integrated fuzzy FUCOM and neutrosophic fuzzy MARCOS methodology. Science of The Total Environment,788, 147763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147763
Pamucar, D., Stević, Ž, & Sremac, S. (2018). A new model for determining weight coefficients of criteria in MCDM models: Full consistency method (FUCOM). Symmetry,10(9), 393. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym10090393
Perçin, S. (2022). Circular supplier selection using interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 24, 5551–5581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-01671-y
Puška, A., Beganović, A., Stojanović, I., & Murtič, S. (2022). Green supplier’s selection using economic and environmental criteria in medical industry. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02544-8
Rahardjo, B., Wang, F. K., Lo, S. C., & Chou, J. H. (2023). A hybrid multi-criteria decision-making model combining DANP with VIKOR for sustainable supplier selection in electronics industry. Sustainability,15(5), 4588. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054588
Sachdeva, N., Shrivastava, A. K., & Chauhan, A. (2021). Modeling supplier selection in the era of industry 4.0. Benchmarking: An International Journal,28(5), 1809–1836. https://doi.org/10.1108/BIJ-12-2018-0441
Sajadiyan, S. M., Hosnavi, R., Karbasian, M., & Abbasi, M. (2022). An approach for reliable circular supplier selection and circular closed-loop supply chain network design focusing on the collaborative costs, shortage, and circular criteria. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-022-02668-x
Sert, E. B., Kaya, E., Adiguzel, F., Cetin, M., Gungor, S., Cetin, I. Z., & Dinc, Y. (2021). Effect of the surface temperature of surface materials on thermal comfort: A case study of Iskenderun (Hatay, Turkey). Theoretical and Applied Climatology, 144, 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-021-03524-0.
Shang, Z., Yang, X., Barnes, D., & Wu, C. (2022). Supplier selection in sustainable supply chains: Using the integrated BWM, fuzzy Shannon entropy, and fuzzy MULTIMOORA methods. Expert Systems with Applications,195, 116567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.116567
Sharafi, H., Soltanifar, M., & Lotfi, F. H. (2022). Selecting a green supplier utilizing the new fuzzy voting model and the fuzzy combinative distance-based assessment method. EURO Journal on Decision Processes,10, 100010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejdp.2021.100010
Shoaib, M., Lim, M. K., & Wang, C. (2020). An integrated framework to prioritize blockchain-based supply chain success factors. Industrial Management & Data Systems,120(11), 2103–2131. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMDS-04-2020-0194
Shoaib, M., Zhang, S., & Ali, H. (2022). Assessment of sustainable green logistics enablers: A robust framework using fuzzy DEMATEL and ISM approach. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-022-04709-4
Shoaib, M., Zhang, S., & Ali, H. (2023). A bibliometric study on blockchain-based supply chain: A theme analysis, adopted methodologies, and future research agenda. Environmental Science and Pollution Research,30, 14029–14049. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24844-2
Singh, R. K., & Modgil, S. (2020). Supplier selection using SWARA and WASPAS – a case study of Indian cement industry. Measuring Business Excellence, 24(2), 243–265. https://doi.org/10.1108/MBE-07-2018-0041
Şişman, T., Kiriş, S. B., & Yilmaz, D. (2022). Sustainable supplier evaluation in an automotive company using fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making methods. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622022500833
Stević, Ž, Vasiljević, M., Puška, A., Tanackov, I., Junevičius, R., & Vesković, S. (2019). Evaluation of suppliers under uncertainty: A multiphase approach based on fuzzy AHP and fuzzy EDAS. Transport,34(1), 52–66. https://doi.org/10.3846/transport.2019.7275
Tronnebati, I., Yadari, M. E., & Jawab, F. (2022). A review of green supplier evaluation and selection issues using MCDM, MP and AI models. Sustainability,14(24), 16714. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416714
Tseng, M. L., Islam, M. S., Karia, N., Fauzi, F. A., & Afrin, S. (2019). A literature review on green supply chain management: Trends and future challenges. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 141, 145–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2018.10.009
Unal, Y., & Temur, G. T. (2022). Sustainable supplier selection by using spherical fuzzy AHP. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems,42(1), 593–603. https://doi.org/10.3233/JIFS-219214
Vukasović, D., Gligović, D., Terzić, S., Stević, Ž, & Macura, P. (2021). A novel fuzzy MCDM model for inventory management in order to increase business efficiency. Technological and Economic Development of Economy,27(2), 386–401. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2021.14427
Wang, C. N., Nguyen, T. T. T., Dang, T. T., & Nguyen, N. A. T. (2022). A hybrid OPA and fuzzy MARCOS methodology for sustainable supplier selection with technology 4.0 evaluation. Processes,10(11), 2351. https://doi.org/10.3390/pr10112351
Yan, K., Hua, G., & Cheng, T. C. E. (2021). Green supply chain management with cooperative promotion. Sustainability,13(6), 3204. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063204
Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control,8(3), 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
Zhan, Y., Chung, L., Lim, M. K., Ye, F., Kumar, A., & Tan, K. H. (2021). The impact of sustainability on supplier selection: A behavioural study. International Journal of Production Economics,236, 108118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2021.108118
Zhang, J., Yang, D., Li, Q., Lev, B., & Ma, Y. (2021). Research on sustainable supplier selection based on the rough DEMATEL and FVIKOR methods. Sustainability,13(1), 88. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010088
Funding
This work was partly supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) under Grant No. 71971173; Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China under Grant No. 2020JM-150; Cross disciplinary cultivation project of Northwestern Polytechnical University under Grant No. D5000220376.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
HA and JZ contributed to the conceptualization. HA and MS collected the data. HS contributed to the methodology and writing—original draft. Finally, reviewing and editing were performed by JZ and MS.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethical approval
Not applicable
Consent to participation
Not applicable
Consent for publication
All the authors’ consent to publish this research paper in the Environment, Development and Sustainability journal.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ali, H., Zhang, J. & Shoaib, M. A hybrid approach for sustainable-circular supplier selection based on industry 4.0 framework to make the supply chain smart and eco-friendly . Environ Dev Sustain (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03567-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03567-5