Log in

Water quality simulation under river restoration measures for the Delhi stretch of river Yamuna, India

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is currently unclear how river restoration based on hydro-geometrical modifications, dredging, and creating a barrier instead of its removal on a river would affect the water quality in urban rivers. This work attempts to fill this gap in our understanding by simulating the water quality of a highly critical 22-km-long Delhi stretch of river Yamuna in terms of DO, BOD, and total coliform after the implementation of these river restoration measures. Four scenarios were conceptualized based on these restoration measures and water quality simulated. These are: scenario I: simulate the impact of varying the width uniformly for all reaches of the study stretch on the water quality, scenario II: simulate the impact of increased depth by controlled dredging. Scenario III (a) closing the ITO barrage gate and then simulating river water quality from Wazirabad barrage to ITO barrage and (b) closing the ITO barrage and simulation of water quality from ITO barrage to Okhla barrage. Results reveal that the water quality improved significantly in scenario I and scenario II. Scenario III did not yield desirable results in terms of water quality improvement. To the best of the author’s knowledge, this is the first attempt involving river morphometry changes using the QUAL2k model for the Delhi stretch of river Yamuna.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Source: Delhi Jal Board (2016)

Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Amin, D. O., & Banahene, P. (2021). Urbanization and stream ecosystems: The role of flow hydraulics towards an improved understanding in addressing urban stream degradation. Environmental Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1139/er-2020-0063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anim, D. O., Fletcher, T. D., Vietz, G. J., Burns, M. J., & Pasternack, G. B. (2019). How alternative urban stream channel designs influence eco-hydraulic conditions. Journal of Environmental Management, 247, 242–252.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bednarek, A. T. (2001). Undamming rivers: A review of the ecological impacts of dam removal. Environmental Management, 27, 803–814. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002670010189

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bednarska, A. J., Wyzga, B., Mikus, P., & Kedzior, R. (2018). Ground beetle communities in a mountain river subjected to restoration: The Raba River, Polish Carpathians. Science of the Total Environment, 610–611, 1180–1192.

    Article  PubMed  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Bernhardt, E. S., Palmer, M. A., Allan, J. D., Alexander, G., Barnas, K., Brooks, S., Carr, J., Clayton, S., Dahm, C., Follstad-shah, J., Galat, D., Gloss, S., Goodwin, P., Hart, D., Hassett, B., Jenkinson, R., Katz, S., Kondolf, G.M., Lake, P. S., Lave, R., Meyer, J. L., O'donnell, T. K., Pagano, L., Powell, B. & Sudduth, E. (2005). Forum on “Synthesizing U.S. River Restoration Efforts.”. Science, 308(5722), 636–637. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.110976

  • Bernhardt, E. S., & Palmer, M. A. (2007). Restoring streams in an urbanizing world. Freshwater Biology, 52(4), 738–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernhardt, E. S., & Palmer, M. A. (2011). River restoration: The fuzzy logic of repairing reaches to reverse catchment scale degradation. Ecological Applications, 21(6), 1926–1931. https://doi.org/10.1890/10-1574.1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Birnie-Gauvin, K., et al. (2018). Moving beyond fitting fish into equations: Progressing the fish passage debate in the Anthropocene. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 29, 1095–1105.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Chapra, S. C., Pelletier, G. J., & Tao, H. (2008). QUAL2K: A modeling framework for simulating river and stream water quality, version 2.11: Documentation and user’s manual. Medford: Civil and Environmental Engineering Department, Tufts University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhary, S., Dhanya, C. T., & Kumar, A. (2018). Sequential calibration of a water quality model using reach-specific parameter estimates. Hydrology Research, 49(4), 1042–1055.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • CPCB. (2006–07). Water quality status of River Yamuna (1999–2005), assessment and development study of river basin series (ADSORBS). ADSORBS/41. Delhi: Central Pollution Control Board.

  • CPCB. (2011). Water quality status of Yamuna River. Assessment and development study of river basin series (ADSORBS) ADSORBS/32. New Delhi: Central Pollution Control Board.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding, L., Chen, L., & Ding, C. (2019). Global trends in dam removal and related research: A systematic review based on associated datasets and bibliometric analysis. Chinese Geographical Science, 29, 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ding, L., Liqiang, C., Ding, C., & Tao, J. (2018). Global trends in dam removal and related research: A systematic review based on associated datasets and bibliometric analysis. Chinese Geographical Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-018-1009-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DPCC. (2020). Report on water quality of Delhi stretch of river Yamuna-2019–2020. Delhi: Delhi Pollution Control Committee.

  • Duda, J. J., & Bellmore, J. R. (2022). Dam removal and river restoration. In T. Mehner & K. Tockner (Eds.), Encyclopedia of inland waters (2nd ed., pp. 576–585). Amsterdam: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819166-8.00101-8 ISBN 9780128220412.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kannel, P. R., Lee, S., Lee, Y. S., Kanel, S. R., & Khan, S. P. (2007). Application of water quality indices and dissolved oxygen as indicators for river water classification and urban impact assessment. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 132, 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-006-9505-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kazmi, A. A., & Hansen, I. S. (1997). Numerical models in water quality management: a case study for the Yamuna River (India). Water Science and Technology, 36(5), 193–200.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keshari, A. K., & Parmar, D. (2006). Discussion on “Pollution management in the twentieth century.” Journal of Environmental Engineering, 132(11), 1543–1546. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9372(2006)132:11(1543)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Paliwal, R., Sharma, P., & Kansal, A. (2007). Water quality modelling of the river Yamuna (India) using QUAL2E-UNCAS. Journal of Environmental Management, 83(2), 131–144.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, M. A., Filoso, S., & Fanelli, R. M. (2014). From ecosystems to ecosystem services: Stream restoration as ecological engineering. Ecological Engineering, 65, 62–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parmar, D., & Keshari, A. K. (2012). Sensitivity analysis of water quality for Delhi stretch of the River Yamuna, India. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 184(3), 1487–1508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-011-2055-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parmar, D., & Keshari, A. K. (2014). Wasteload allocation using wastewater treatment and flow augmentation. Environmental Modeling and Assessment, 19(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-013-9378-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parmar, D., & Keshari, A. K. (2018). Simulating strategic measures for managing water quality in the Delhi stretch of the River Yamuna, India. Sustainable Water Resources Management, 4(4), 1123–1133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-018-0289-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parmar, D., & Keshari, A. K. (2020a). Discussion of water quality-based environmental flow under plausible temperature and pollution scenarios. By Shushobhit Chaudhary, C. T. Dhanya, Arun Kumar, and Rehana Shaik. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parmar, D., & Keshari, A. K. (2020b). Monitoring and processing of data for effective wasteload allocation modeling in India. In T. Gupta, S. Singh, P. Rajput, & A. Agarwal (Eds.), Measurement, analysis and remediation of environmental pollutants. Energy, environment, and sustainability (pp. 357–373). Singapore: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0540-9_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Parmar, D., & Keshari, A. K. (forthcoming). Multi-objective wasteload allocation: Application to Delhi stretch of the river Yamuna, India. International Journal of Environmental and Waste Management. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJEWM.2023.10045111 (in press).

  • Rehana, S., & Mujumdar, P. P. (2011). River water quality response under hypothetical climate change scenarios in Tunga-Bhadra River, India. Hydrological Processes, 25(22), 3373–3386. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8057

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, D., Gupta, R., Kansal, A., & Singh, R. K. (2011). Characteristics of the event mean concentration (EMCs) from rainfall runoff on mixed agricultural land use in the shoreline zone of the Yamuna River in Delhi India. Applied Water Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-011-0022-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, D., Kansal, A., & Pelletier, G. (2017). Water quality modeling for urban reach of Yamuna river, India (1999–2009), using QUAL2Kw. Applied Water Science, 7, 1535–1559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-015-0311-1

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, D., & Singh, R. K. (2009). DO-BOD modeling of River Yamuna for national capital territory India using stream II a 2D water quality model. Environmental Monitoring Assessment, 159(1–4), 231–240.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A. P., Ghosh, S. K., & Sharma, P. (2007). Water quality management of a stretch of river Yamuna: An interactive fuzzy multi-objective approach. Water Resources Management, 21(2), 515–553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sippi, S., & Parmar, D. (2022). Water quality based ranking and benchmarking of rivers in India using multicriteria decision making technique. Journal of Hazardous, Toxic and Radioactive Waste, ASCE. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HZ.2153-5515.0000669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomann, R. V. (1972). Systems analysis and water quality management. McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, M., & Stewardson, M. (2014). Hydrologic indicators of hydraulic conditions that drive flow–biota relationships. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 59(3–4), 659–672. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2014.896997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vietz, G. J., Rutherfurd, I. D., Fletcher, T. D., & Walsh, C. J. (2016). Thinking outside the channel: Challenges and opportunities for protection and restoration of stream morphology in urbanizing catchments. Landscape and Urban Planning, 145, 34–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walling, B., Chaudhary, S., Dhanya, C. T., & Kumar, A. (2019). Estimation of environmental flow incorporating water quality and hypothetical climate change scenarios. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 189(5), 225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-017-5942-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wei, G., Yang, Z., & Cui, B. (2009). Impact of dam construction on water quality and water self-purification capacity of the Lancang River, China. Water Resources Management, 23, 1763–1780. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-008-9351-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheaton, J. M., Brasington, J., Darby, S. E., Merz, J., Pasternack, G. B., Sear, D., & Vericat, D. (2010). Linking geomorphic changes to salmonid habitat at a scale relevant to fish. River Research Applications, 26, 469–486.

  • Wohl, E., Angermeier, P., Bledsoe, B., Kondolf, G. M., MacDonnell, L., Merritt, D., Palmer, M., Poff, N., & Tarboton, D. (2005). River restoration. Water Resources Research. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR003985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wohl, E., Lane, S. N., & Wilcox, A. C. (2015). The science and practice of river restoration. Water Resources Research, 51(8), 5974–5997.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Yadav, D. V., Parmar, D., Ganguly, R., & Shukla, S. (2022). Efficiency evaluation of sewage treatment plants in Delhi, India, using tolerance-based data envelope analysis. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 194, 867. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10528-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zainudin, Z., Rahman, N. A., Abdullah, N., & Mazlan, N. F. (2010). Development of water quality model for Sungai Tebrau using QUAL2K. Journal of Applied Sciences, 10, 2748–2750.

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, R., Qian, X., Yuan, X., Ye, R., **a, B., & Wang, Y. (2012). Simulation of water environmental capacity and pollution load reduction using QUAL2K for water environmental management. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 9, 4504–4521.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was carried out as a doctoral thesis of the first author under the second author. The TEQIP-II fellowship received by the first author from HBTU Kanpur is acknowledged.

Funding

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to this study as per the details below: First author was involved in data collection, processing, analysis, and the first draft of the manuscript. Second author helped in conceptualization of the research problem, supervision, revision of the manuscript—especially the introduction, results and discussion, conclusions. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.”

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dipteek Parmar.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper. The authors declare that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent to publish

The authors hereby give their consent for the submission of this manuscript to this journal. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sippi, S., Parmar, D. Water quality simulation under river restoration measures for the Delhi stretch of river Yamuna, India. Environ Dev Sustain 26, 5891–5914 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-02943-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-02943-5

Keywords

Navigation