Log in

Toxic potential evaluation of liquid effluents discharged into nature by the university hospital centers (UHC) and mixed wastewater treatment station (WWTS) at Ouagadougou-Burkina Faso

  • Research
  • Published:
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In Burkina Faso, several investigations have raised suspicions that hospital liquid effluents are the source of contaminants in porbeagle-culture products and surface water in urban and peri-urban areas. This study aimed to evaluate the hygienic quality of hospital liquid effluents discharged into nature by the UHC Bogodogo (UHC-BOG), Yalgado Ouédraogo (UHC-YO), and the WWTS of Kossodo (WWTS-KOS). Thus, 15 samples of liquid effluents (five per site) discharged into nature were collected. Within the physicochemical parameters, the pH, chemical oxygen demand (COD), biochemical oxygen demand (BOD5), suspended solids (TSS), conductivity, copper, iron, hafnium, silver, mercury, lead, and cadmium of these samples were determined using standard methods. The mean values of pH were 8.84 ± 0.42,8.06 ± 0.54, and 8.55 ± 0.53 for WWTS-KOS, UHC-BOG, and UHC-YO, respectively. Conductivity values were 1956.80 ± 81.30, 812.80 ± 45.22, and 956.00 ± 39.96 µS/cm, respectively. TSS were 338.20 ± 38.80, 45.00 ± 5.79, and 187.80 ± 27.58 mg/L, respectively. COD were 274.80 ± 20.46, 35.00 ± 5.52, and 139.80 ± 25.53 mg/L, respectively. BOD5 were 186.40 ± 68.68, 26.20 ± 4.82, and 81.80 ± 15.63 mg/L, respectively. Mercury values were 1.93 ± 0.38, 4.04 ± 0.38, and 14.37 ± 1.65 µg/L, respectively. Lead values were 434.70 ± 202.42, 310.50 ± 4.09, and 367.43 ± 94.01 µg/L, respectively. Cadmium values were 79.59 ± 19.48, 109.94 ± 8.43, and 80.26 ± 7.85 µg/L, respectively. Copper values were 27.66 ± 3.33, 30.84 ± 1.65, and 28.32 ± 2.36 mg/L, respectively. Iron was detected only on the STEP-KOS with an average of 71.01 ± 37.83 mg/L. Hafnium values were 50.27 ± 4.49 and 51.58 ± 4.61 mg/L for WWTS-KOS and UHC-BOG, respectively. Silver values were 34.26 ± 3.06 for WWTS-KOS. On the three sites, the differences found were significant (p < 0.05). Liquid hospital effluents from Ouagadougou discharged into nature on the whole do not compile with the Burkinabè normative values for the discharge of wastewater into the environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Data availability

All the detailed data of this manuscript are available from the authors Ouédraogo Ganamé Abasse and Savadogo Aly. For the needs, these data can be provided with the agreement of all the actors of the manuscit to the following Emails: ganamabasse@gmail.com or alysavadogo@gmail.com.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank ONEA (Burkina Faso) for supporting us in taking samples and offering the technical platform for COD, conductivity, BOD5, and TSS analysis. To LANAVET (Cameroon), for offering us the technical platform for the search of certain MET antibiotic residues in samples. We thank the AFRIDI structure for offering us mobility in Douala, Cameroon.

Funding

This research was funded by the AFRIDI structure. The AFRIDI structure financed our stay in Douala (Cameroon) and the payment of a large part of the reagents for the analysis of MET.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization, Ouédraogo Gamamé Abasse, Savadogo Aly and Tchoumbougnang François; methodology, Ouédraogo Gamamé Abasse, Zongo Omarou and Djopnang Djimbie Justin; software, Ouédraogo Gamamé Abasse, Badé Farid Toyigbenan and Kaboré Boukaré; validation, Tchoumbougnang François, Ouédraogo Arouna, Cissé Hama and  Traoré Yves; formal analysis, Ouédraogo Gamamé Abasse and Djopnang Djimbie Justin; investigation; resources, Ouédraogo Gamamé Abasse, Tchoumbougnang François and Savadogo Aly; writing—review and editing, Ouédraogo Gamamé Abasse, Cissé Hama and Zongo Omarou; visualization, Badé Farid Toyigbenan, Djopnang Djimbie Justin, and Ismael Henri Nestor Bassolé; supervision, Traoré Yves, Ismael Henri Nestor Bassolé, Tchoumbougnang François, and Savadogo Aly; project administration, University Joseph KI-ZERBO and University of Douala; funding acquisition, AFRIDI.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ganamé Abasse Ouédraogo.

Ethics declarations

Ethical responsibilities of authors

All authors have read, understood, and have complied as applicable with the statement on “Ethical responsibilities of Authors.”

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ouédraogo, G.A., Djopnang, D.J., Zongo, O. et al. Toxic potential evaluation of liquid effluents discharged into nature by the university hospital centers (UHC) and mixed wastewater treatment station (WWTS) at Ouagadougou-Burkina Faso. Environ Monit Assess 196, 718 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-024-12852-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-024-12852-3

Keywords

Navigation