Abstract
Urbanization inevitably interfered with the supply and demand of ecosystem services (ESs), which has a crucial impact on the ESs balance. Scientific exploration and clarification of the coupling and decoupling relationship between them can effectively reveal the disturbance of urbanization to the ecosystem, which can help to reasonably manage and protect the ecosystem. Previous studies have paid more attention to the coupling relationship but less attention to the decoupling relationship. This study comprehensively reflected urbanization from the three aspects of construction land, population, and economy and used the evaluation matrix to measure ESs. On this basis, coupling and decoupling analyses were taken to fully clarify the complex relationship between urbanization and ESs balance in China, so as to provide a reference for the formulation of relevant policies. Coupling aspect, the coupling degrees between the proportion of construction land (CLP) and ESs balance index (ESBI) were higher only in the central and eastern plains. The coupling degrees between population density (PD) and ESBI, economic density (ED) and ESBI, and land development index (LDI) and ESBI were only lower in the central and eastern plains than in other regions. Decoupling aspect, strong, weak negative, weak, and strong negative decoupling were the main decoupling types between urbanization and ESs balance in China. Among them, the proportion of the strong decoupling type is much higher than other types, which proves the opposite relationship between the two. Weak decoupling can not only promote economic growth and social development but also protect the ecological environment and biodiversity, which is a type of sustainable development and an ideal state that urbanization should pursue. The results can provide scientific guidance for the formulation of differentiated ecosystem management policies.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10661-024-12782-0/MediaObjects/10661_2024_12782_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10661-024-12782-0/MediaObjects/10661_2024_12782_Fig2_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10661-024-12782-0/MediaObjects/10661_2024_12782_Fig3_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10661-024-12782-0/MediaObjects/10661_2024_12782_Fig4_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10661-024-12782-0/MediaObjects/10661_2024_12782_Fig5_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10661-024-12782-0/MediaObjects/10661_2024_12782_Fig6_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10661-024-12782-0/MediaObjects/10661_2024_12782_Fig7_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10661-024-12782-0/MediaObjects/10661_2024_12782_Fig8_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10661-024-12782-0/MediaObjects/10661_2024_12782_Fig9_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10661-024-12782-0/MediaObjects/10661_2024_12782_Fig10_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10661-024-12782-0/MediaObjects/10661_2024_12782_Fig11_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10661-024-12782-0/MediaObjects/10661_2024_12782_Fig12a_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs10661-024-12782-0/MediaObjects/10661_2024_12782_Fig12b_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Not applicable.
References
Anselin, L. (1995). Local indicators of spatial association—LISA. Geographical Analysis, 27(2), 93–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00338.x
Bai, L., **u, C., Feng, X., & Liu, D. (2019). Influence of urbanization on regional habitat quality: A case study of Changchun city. Habitat International, 93, 102042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2019.102042
Bai, Y., Jiang, B., Wang, M., Li, H., Alatalo, J. M., & Huang, S. (2016). New ecological redline policy (ERP) to secure ecosystem services in China. Land Use Policy, 55, 348–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.09.002
Burkhard, B., Kroll, F., Nedkov, S., & Müller, F. (2012). Map** ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecological Indicators, 21, 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019
Chen, W., & Chi, G. (2022). Spatial mismatch of ecosystem service demands and supplies in China, 2000–2020. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 194(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-09981-y
Chen, W., & Zeng, J. (2021). Decoupling analysis of land use intensity and ecosystem services intensity in China. Journal of Natural Resources, 36(11), 2853–2864.
Chen, W., Bian, J., Liang, J., Pan, S., & Zeng, Y. (2022a). Traffic accessibility and the coupling degree of ecosystem services supply and demand in the middle reaches of the Yangtze River urban agglomeration China. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 32(8), 1471–1492. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-022-2006-5
Chen, W., Chi, G., & Li, J. (2019a). The spatial association of ecosystem services with land use and land cover change at the county level in China, 1995–2015. Science of the Total Environment, 669, 459–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.03.139
Chen, W., Chi, G., & Li, J. (2020). The spatial aspect of ecosystem services balance and its determinants. Land Use Policy, 90, 104263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104263
Chen, W., Li, J., Zeng, J., Ran, D., & Yang, B. (2019). Spatial heterogeneity and formation mechanism of eco-environmental effect of land use change in China. Geographical research, 38(9), 2173–2187. https://doi.org/10.11821/dlyj020180659
Chen, W., Liang, J., Bian, J., Zeng, J., & Pan, S. (2022). Impact of landscape fragmentation on soil conservation services in the Yellow River basin. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 42(4), 589–601.
Chen, W., Zeng, Y., & Zeng, J. (2021a). Impacts of traffic accessibility on ecosystem services: An integrated spatial approach. Journal of Geographical Sciences, 31, 1816–1836. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-021-1924-y
Chen, W., Zhou, T., & Liang, J. (2022). Urbanization, ecosystem services, and their interactive coercive relationship in Hunan Province China. Environmental science and pollution research, 30(2), 3416–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22370-9
Chen, Y., Li, Z., Li, P., Zhang, Z., & Zhang, Y. (2021b). Identification of coupling and influencing factors between urbanization and ecosystem services in Guanzhong China. Sustainability, 13(19), 10637.
Chi, G., & Ho, H. C. (2018). Population stress: A spatiotemporal analysis of population change and land development at the county level in the contiguous United States, 2001–2011. Land Use Policy, 70, 128–137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.10.008
Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., De Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O’Neill, R. V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R. G., Sutton, P., & Van Den Belt, M. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387(6630), 253–260. https://doi.org/10.1038/387253a0
Fan, J. (2015). Draft of major function oriented zoning of China. Acta Geographica Sinica, 70(2), 186–201. https://doi.org/10.11821/dlxb201502002
Feng, Y., He, S., & Li, G. (2021). Interaction between urbanization and the eco-environment in the Pan-Third pole region. Science of the Total Environment, 789, 148011.
Guan, Q., Hao, J., Xu, Y., Ren, G., & Kang, L. (2019). Zoning of agroecological management based on the relationship between supply and demand of ecosystem services. Resources science, 41(7), 1359–1373. https://doi.org/10.18402/resci.2019.07.16
Hu, Y., Liu, Y., & Yan, Z. (2022). Research regarding the coupling and coordination relationship between new urbanization and ecosystem services in nanchang. Sustainability, 14(22), 15041.
Li, B., Chen, D., Wu, S., Zhou, S., Wang, T., & Chen, H. (2016a). Spatiotemporal assessment of urbanization impacts on ecosystem services: Case study of Nan**g City, China. Ecological Indicators, 71, 416–427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.07.017
Li, G., Fang, C., & Wang, S. (2016b). Exploring spatiotemporal changes in ecosystem-service values and hotspots in China. Science of the Total Environment, 545, 609–620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.067
Li, S., Wang, J., Zhu, W., Zhang, J., Liu, Y., Gao, Y., Wang, Y., & Li, Y. (2014). Research framework of ecosystem services geography from spatial and regional perspectives. Acta Geographica Sinica, 69(11), 1628–1639. https://doi.org/10.11821/dlxb201411004
Li, W., Chen, W., Bian, J., **an, J., & Zhan, L. (2022). Impact of urbanization on ecosystem services balance in the Han River ecological economic belt, China: A multi-scale perspective. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(21), 14304. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192114304
Liu, C., Yang, M., Hou, Y., & Xue, X. (2021a). Ecosystem service multifunctionality assessment and coupling coordination analysis with land use and land cover change in China’s coastal zones. Science of the Total Environment, 797, 149033.
Liu, R., Dong, X., Wang, X. C., Zhang, P., Liu, M., & Zhang, Y. (2021b). Study on the relationship among the urbanization process, ecosystem services and human well-being in an arid region in the context of carbon flow: Taking the Manas River basin as an example. Ecological Indicators, 132, 108248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.108248
Lyu, R., Zhang, J., Xu, M., & Li, J. (2018). Impacts of urbanization on ecosystem services and their temporal relations: A case study in Northern Ningxia, China. Land Use Policy, 77, 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.05.022
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Island Press.
Müller, F., Bicking, S., Ahrendt, K., Bac, D. K., Blindow, I., Fürst, C., Haase, P., Kruse, M., Kruse, T., Ma, L., Perennes, M., Ruljevic, I., Schernewski, G., Schimming, C., Schneiders, A., Schubert, H., Schumacher, J., Tappeiner, U., Wangai, P., … Zeleny, J. (2020). Assessing ecosystem service potentials to evaluate terrestrial, coastal and marine ecosystem types in Northern Germany–An expert-based matrix approach. Ecological Indicators, 112, 106116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106116
Na, L., Zhao, Y., & Guo, L. (2022). Coupling coordination analysis of ecosystem services and urbanization in Inner Mongolia China. Land, 11(10), 1870.
Ouyang, X., Tang, L., Wei, X., & Li, Y. (2021). Spatial interaction between urbanization and ecosystem services in Chinese urban agglomerations. Land Use Policy, 109, 105587. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105587
Pan, Z., & Wang, J. (2021). Spatially heterogeneity response of ecosystem services supply and demand to urbanization in China. Ecological Engineering, 169, 106303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2021.106303
Peng, J., Tian, L., Liu, Y., Zhao, M., & Wu, J. (2017). Ecosystem services response to urbanization in metropolitan areas: Thresholds identification. Science of the Total Environment, 607, 706–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.06.218
Peng, J., Wang, X., Liu, Y., Zhao, Y., Xu, Z., Zhao, M., Qiu, S., & Wu, J. (2020). Urbanization impact on the supply-demand budget of ecosystem services: Decoupling analysis. Ecosystem Services, 44, 101139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101139
Qiu, B., Li, H., Zhou, M., & Zhang, L. (2015). Vulnerability of ecosystem services provisioning to urbanization: A case of China. Ecological Indicators, 57, 505–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.04.025
Richards, D. R., Law, A., Tan, C. S. Y., Shaikh, S. F., Carrasco, L. R., Jaung, W., & Oh, R. R. (2020). Rapid urbanisation in Singapore causes a shift from local provisioning and regulating to cultural ecosystem services use. Ecosystem Services, 46, 101193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2020.101193
Shi, L., Halik, Ü., Mamat, Z., Aishan, T., Abliz, A., & Welp, M. (2021a). Spatiotemporal investigation of the interactive coercing relationship between urbanization and ecosystem services in arid northwestern China. Land Degradation & Development, 32(14), 4105–4120. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3946
Shi, Y., Feng, C. C., Yu, Q., & Guo, L. (2021b). Integrating supply and demand factors for estimating ecosystem services scarcity value and its response to urbanization in typical mountainous and hilly regions of south China. Science of the Total Environment, 796, 149032. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149032
Sun, Y., Liu, S., Dong, Y., An, Y., Shi, F., Dong, S., & Liu, G. (2019). Spatio-temporal evolution scenarios and the coupling analysis of ecosystem services with land use change in China. Science of the Total Environment, 681, 211–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.136
Tapio, P. (2005). Towards a theory of decoupling: Degrees of decoupling in the EU and the case of road traffic in Finland between 1970 and 2001. Transport Policy, 12(2), 137–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.01.001
Tian, Y., Zhou, D., & Jiang, G. (2020). Conflict or coordination? Multiscale assessment of the spatio-temporal coupling relationship between urbanization and ecosystem services: The case of the **g**ji Region China. Ecological Indicators, 117, 106543.
Wang, J., Wu, S., Wang, Y., Yan, D., Cheng, M., Zhou, W., & Liu, Z. (2024). Spatiotemporal decoupling between impervious surface areas and ecosystem services. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 31(3), 3707–3721.
Wang, J., Zhai, T., Lin, Y., Kong, X., & He, T. (2019a). Spatial imbalance and changes in supply and demand of ecosystem services in China. Science of the Total Environment, 657, 781–791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.080
Wang, J., Zhou, W., Pickett, S. T., Yu, W., & Li, W. (2019b). A multiscale analysis of urbanization effects on ecosystem services supply in an urban megaregion. Science of the Total Environment, 662, 824–833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.260
Wang, L., Zheng, H., Wen, Z., Liu, L., Robinson, B. E., Li, R., Li, C., & Kong, L. (2019c). Ecosystem service synergies/trade-offs informing the supply-demand match of ecosystem services: Framework and application. Ecosystem Services, 37, 100939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100939
Wang, S., Hu, M., Wang, Y., & **a, B. (2022). Dynamics of ecosystem services in response to urbanization across temporal and spatial scales in a mega metropolitan area. Sustainable Cities and Society, 77, 103561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103561
Wei, H., Fan, W., Wang, X., Lu, N., Dong, X., Zhao, Y., Ya, X., & Zhao, Y. (2017). Integrating supply and social demand in ecosystem services assessment: A review. Ecosystem Services, 25, 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.03.017
Wu, X., Liu, S., Zhao, S., Hou, X., Xu, J., Dong, S., & Liu, G. (2019). Quantification and driving force analysis of ecosystem services supply, demand and balance in China. Science of the Total Environment, 652, 1375–1386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.329
**e, G., Zhang, C., Zhen, L., & Zhang, L. (2017). Dynamic changes in the value of China’s ecosystem services. Ecosystem Services, 26, 146–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.06.010
Yao, J., Xu, P., & Huang, Z. (2021). Impact of urbanization on ecological efficiency in China: An empirical analysis based on provincial panel data. Ecological Indicators, 129, 107827.
Yu, Q., Feng, C. C., Shi, Y., & Guo, L. (2021). Spatiotemporal interaction between ecosystem services and urbanization in China: Incorporating the scarcity effects. Journal of Cleaner Production, 317, 128392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128392
Yuan, Y., Wu, S., Yu, Y., Tong, G., Mo, L., Yan, D., & Li, F. (2018). Spatiotemporal interaction between ecosystem services and urbanization: Case study of Nan**g City China. Ecological Indicators, 95, 917–929. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.07.056
Zeng, J., Cui, X., Chen, W., & Yao, X. (2023a). Ecological management zoning based on the supply-demand relationship of ecosystem services in China. Applied Geography, 155, 102959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2023.102959
Zeng, J., Cui, X., Chen, W., & Yao, X. (2023b). Impact of urban expansion on the supply-demand balance of ecosystem services: An analysis of prefecture-level cities in China. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 99, 107003. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2022.107003
Zhang, W., Yang, D., & Huo, J. (2016). Studies of the relationship between city size and urban benefits in China based on a panel data model. Sustainability, 8(6), 554. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8060554
Zhang, Z., Peng, J., Xu, Z., Wang, X., & Meersmans, J. (2021). Ecosystem services supply and demand response to urbanization: A case study of the Pearl River Delta China. Ecosystem Services, 49, 101274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2021.101274
Zhao, Y., Wang, Y., & Wang, Y. (2021). Comprehensive evaluation and influencing factors of urban agglomeration water resources carrying capacity. Journal of Cleaner Production, 288, 125097. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125097
Zhou, Z. X., Li, J., & Zhang, W. (2016). Coupled urbanization and agricultural ecosystem services in Guanzhong-Tianshui economic zone. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23, 15407–15417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6726-x
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their constructive comments on improving this paper.
Funding
This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant nos. 42001231, 42001187, and 41701629], this research was also supported in part by the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [Grant No. 2023M733466].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
**nyu Cui, Jie Zeng, and Wanxu Chen: methodology and resources. Jie Zeng and Wanxu Chen: conceptualization and supervision. **nyu Cui, Jie Zeng, and Wanxu Chen: writing—review and editing. **nyu Cui and Jianhua Wu: software, data curation, and writing—original draft.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
All our research complies with ethical guidelines, including compliance with the legal requirements of the research country.
Consent to participate
The authors of this paper have participated in the entire process of this article, including conceptualization, paper ideas, methods, writing, and review.
Consent for publication
The participant has consented to the submission of the case report to the journal.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Highlights
• China’s ecosystem services can still afford the urbanization process, but they were gradually degraded.
• The strong decoupling type was the main decoupling type in China, revealing the negative impact of urbanization on ESs balance.
• The weak decoupling type represented the coordination of urbanization and ESs balance, which is the ideal state that China should pursue.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Cui, X., Zeng, J., Wu, J. et al. The nexus between urbanization and ecosystem services balance in China: A coupling perspective. Environ Monit Assess 196, 638 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-024-12782-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-024-12782-0